logo
/C O R R E C T I O N -- Color Health/

/C O R R E C T I O N -- Color Health/

Yahoo02-06-2025
In the news release, Color Health Presents Findings on National Telehealth-Based Cancer Screening Programs at ASCO 2025, issued June 2, 2025 by Color Health over PR Newswire, we are advised by a representative of the company that the first bullet should read "Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Program: Launched in June 2024..." rather than "...Launched in June 2025..." as originally issued inadvertently. The complete, corrected release follows:
Programs were designed in collaboration with the American Cancer Society
CHICAGO, June 2, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Yesterday at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2025 Annual Meeting, Color Health presented new findings on the effectiveness of two nation-wide, virtual-first screening programs for colorectal and lung cancer. These programs were designed to expand access to cancer screening and were developed in collaboration with the American Cancer Society.
Aligned with the conference theme of "Driving Knowledge to Action: Building a Better Future," Color's Virtual Cancer Clinic is dedicated to delivering center of excellence cancer care to all patients, from screening to survivorship care. The research presented today at ASCO reflects a commitment to access and rigorous evaluation. Titled "Improving Access to Cancer Screening Through National Telehealth-Based Lung and Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs," the research highlights preliminary results from two initiatives aimed at reducing inequities in early cancer detection using a virtual-first model.
"Despite strong evidence supporting the efficacy of cancer screening, many patients - particularly those in healthcare deserts - face logistical, financial, and systemic barriers," said senior author William L. Dahut, MD, Chief Scientific Officer for the American Cancer Society. "The programs demonstrate that telehealth can be a powerful tool to deliver equitable, scalable cancer screening."
Program Highlights
The Color free cancer screening programs based on ACS screening guidelines and analyzed by Color utilize a centralized digital interface for cancer risk assessments, patient education, home-based testing, and appointment scheduling. Color, through its physician-led team implementing the program, personalized recommendations and managed follow-up on results.1
Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Program: Launched in June 2024, Color drives CRC testing through a closed-loop virtual clinical program. At-home fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) are distributed to eligible adults (ages 45–75) via community partners such as federally qualified health centers and libraries.
Lung Cancer Screening Program: Initiated in November 2023, Color evaluates eligibility of individuals seeking lung cancer screening, enables low-dose CT scan scheduling, and ensures appropriate clinical follow-up of results through its virtual platform.
Research Focus
Determine patient-initiated interest and final eligibility for cancer screening
Evaluate success of community partnerships and virtual care navigation to enable rapid, accessible cancer screening
Determine outcomes of closed-loop, physician-led virtual cancer screening clinical management
"This work demonstrates how we can reimagine cancer care as a service that meets people where they are - at home and in their communities," said co-author Rebecca Miksad, MD, MPH, Chief Medical Officer at Color Health. "By integrating virtual care with personalized support, we can bridge persistent gaps in access and bring evidence-based preventive care to those who need it most."
"We believe we've shown what's possible when technology, public health, and community infrastructure come together to remove long-standing barriers to cancer prevention," said Miksad. "We are proud to work with the ACS to support innovative models that help ensure equitable access to life-saving cancer care delivery."
The data demonstrate that telehealth-driven, community-based models can meaningfully deliver access to cancer screening. By reducing logistical barriers and offering personalized, virtual support and medical care, these programs represent a scalable strategy to close screening gaps nationwide.
Poster Details
Title: Improving access to cancer screening through national telehealth-based lung and colorectal cancer screening programs
Abstract: 1549
Poster Board Number: 315
About Color Health
Color Health is changing the way patients access cancer care through a first-of-its-kind, vertically integrated, and fully owned Virtual Cancer Clinic. Powered by a 50-state oncologist-led team of clinical experts, Color provides proactive, evidence-based care that is accessible to anyone, anytime, and at every step of the cancer journey. We partner with employers, health plans, unions, and government agencies to improve accessibility of early interventions, timely diagnosis, oncology care management, and survivorship care. Connect with Color on Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook and www.color.com.
1 ACS does not provide clinical care. ACS does not endorse any product, service, or providers.
Media ContactAndy Killandy.kill@color.com
Lily Peskincolor@12080group.com
View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/color-health-presents-findings-on-national-telehealth-based-cancer-screening-programs-at-asco-2025-302470671.html
SOURCE Color Health
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. firm to build $1.5B power line linking Angola, DRC
U.S. firm to build $1.5B power line linking Angola, DRC

Business Insider

time2 hours ago

  • Business Insider

U.S. firm to build $1.5B power line linking Angola, DRC

U.S.-based energy company HYDRO-LINK has announced plans to construct a 1,150-kilometre electricity transmission line connecting Angola and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), in a step toward regional energy integration. HYDRO-LINK announced plans to construct a 1,150 km electricity transmission line between Angola and the DRC. The $1.5 billion project aims to alleviate power shortages in the DRC's Copperbelt mining region. The project is expected to be completed by 2029, also creating regional industrial and employment opportunities. The project, valued at $1.5 billion, addresses persistent power shortages in the DRC's southeastern Copperbelt region, which hosts critical mineral mines. With Angola enjoying a surplus of energy at its hydropower sites, the line will connect those sites to the DRC's energy-hungry mining areas. According to HYDRO-LINK, the transmission line is scheduled for completion by 2029. While it is primarily designed to power mining operations, the line will also connect to load centres in both Angola and the DRC, supplying much-needed electricity for public use. 'The transmission line will promote regional energy integration, provide energy security to the DRC, support the development of industrial hubs for local manufacturing and mineral processing, and create thousands of local construction jobs,' said Paul Hinks, CEO and Chairman of HYDRO-LINK. The project has taken a major step forward with the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Government of Angola. HYDRO-LINK also signed an MoU with the Swiss-based Mitrelli Group, which joins as a major investor and partner, and another with U.S.-based Sargent & Lundy, which will provide engineering services for the project. All three agreements were signed in Luanda during the U.S.-Africa Business Summit. According to HYDRO-LINK, the project will serve African and American strategic interests. Other strategic project partners HYDRO-LINK signed a memorandum of understanding with the Swiss-based Mitrelli Group, which has decades of operational experience in Angola and joins the project as a major investor and partner. Additionally, the company formalized an agreement with Sargent & Lundy, a U.S.-based architecture, engineering, and design firm, which will provide engineering services for the transmission line.

Best & Worst Hot Dogs Ranked By Nutritionists
Best & Worst Hot Dogs Ranked By Nutritionists

Buzz Feed

time7 hours ago

  • Buzz Feed

Best & Worst Hot Dogs Ranked By Nutritionists

OK, so hot dogs aren't the world's healthiest food, but admit it: If they weren't on the menu at summer barbecues, it'd feel like losing a friend. Fortunately, with a growing number of healthier hot dogs hitting supermarket shelves, it's become possible to indulge and still go easy on your body. You just need to know what to look out for. First things first: 'Avoid traditional or ballpark-labeled hot dogs,' Nicole Avena, a New York-based nutrition consultant, told HuffPost. 'These are usually the highest in sodium and contain the most additives and preservatives.' All processed meats are a health risk ― they've been linked to certain types of cancer, like colorectal cancer, because of the way they're preserved. But there are a few types of meat that offer less risk than the standard beef hot dog, Avena said. Look for a label that indicates whole beef, turkey or chicken, as opposed to mechanically processed and separated meats. Another important factor is sodium content. 'Choose hot dogs that have less than 400 mg (or less than 20% of the daily value) of sodium per serving,' said Gretchen Zimmermann, senior director of cardiometabolic care for Vida Health. (The Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommend that adults limit sodium intake to less than 2,300 mg per day.) Other indications of a higher-quality hot dog are if they're uncured and nitrate- and nitrite-free, and have minimal ingredients. 'Overall, uncured chicken or turkey hot dogs would be a better option, because they're usually lower in saturated fat and less processed than beef,' Avena even if the label says 'uncured,' 'no nitrates added' or 'all natural,' it doesn't mean these options are necessarily healthier. Natural preservatives, such as celery powder and celery salt, may sound better, but there's no evidence they're safer, so it's still best to minimize your intake. The same goes for veggie dogs: Choose dogs with minimally processed ingredients, such as tofu, instead of heavily processed soy protein concentrate or isolate. 'An occasional processed veggie dog isn't likely to be harmful, but these soy ingredients haven't been well-studied, so there are still some concerns about their safety,' said Samantha Cassetty, nutrition expert and co-author of Sugar Shock. To save you time scanning nutrition labels, here are the healthiest and the least healthy store-bought hot dogs, according to nutritionists. A healthy beef option: Organic Valley Uncured 100% Beef Hot Dogs 'The Organic Valley hot dogs boast healthy ingredients like organic grass-fed beef, organic spices, garlic and onion powder (although celery powder is used as a preservative),' Zimmermann they're uncured, this makes them your best bet for avoiding high amounts of carcinogens -- and compared to traditional dogs, they're lower in calories, sodium and saturated fat. A healthy beef option: Applegate Naturals Do Good Dog Uncured Beef Hot Dogs Applegate Naturals Do Good Dogs are made with regeneratively sourced beef that's 100% grass-fed. They use just four simple ingredients: beef, water, salt and spices.'You are what you eat, and a healthier diet for the animal you're consuming means a healthier diet for you too,' said Marissa Meshulam, a registered dietitian based in New York City. An unhealthy beef option to avoid: Ball Park Brand Prime Uncured Beef Franks Even though the packaging says 'uncured,' it only takes one glance at the nutrition facts to know these hot dogs aren't the best Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommend limiting calories from saturated fat to less than 10% of one's total calories per day to promote heart health. 'A 2,000-calorie diet would equate to less than 20g of saturated fat per day,' Zimmermann said. 'The Ball Park Prime Uncured Beef Franks provides nearly half that amount in one serving.' Even before the bun, ketchup and other salty condiments and accessories are added, these hot dogs pack a whopping 710mg of sodium in one serving, as well as 230 calories, 20g of fat, 9g of saturated fat, 2g of carbohydrates and 9g of protein. Bottom line: Yikes. A healthy pork blend: Applegate Naturals Natural Stadium Beef and Pork Hot Dogs 'Applegate Naturals uses antibiotic-free beef and pork to make these without any preservatives — just natural spices and herbs,' said Amy Shapiro, a New York-based registered dietitian. The franks contain no fillers and no added nitrates or nitrites (except for those naturally occurring in sea salt and celery powder). A healthy pork blend: Seemore La Dolce Beet-a Pork Sausages The pork used to make these sausages is animal welfare-certified, and the dogs themselves are minimally processed. 'Plus, the brand adds fresh beets, garlic and fennel, which further boosts the nutrient content,' Meshulam are no preservatives or phosphates, and the only nitrates or nitrites are those that naturally occur in cultured celery powder and sea salt. An unhealthy pork blend to avoid: Kayem Beef & Pork Hot Dogs These dogs contain a boatload of fat and sodium, as well as corn syrup and dextrose (two types of added sugar), mystery flavorings and preservatives. 'This can indicate the company uses pork byproducts to produce their product, not lean pork or beef,' Avena said. A healthy turkey option: Organic Valley Uncured Pasture-Raised Turkey Hot Dogs These turkey hot dogs are made using meat from animals that have been humanely raised, and the hot dogs are free from fillers and potentially harmful salt sources like sodium nitrates and nitrites, Zimmermann said. They also contain 20% less sodium than the leading organic brand. A healthy turkey option: Applegate Natural Uncured Turkey Hot Dog The turkey dogs from Applegate Farms are as clean as it gets — the turkey is organic and humanely raised with no antibiotics, and the hot dogs themselves contain no fillers or preservatives. 'They simply contain organic turkey and organic spices and herbs,' Shapiro said. 'They're a lean and light option, coming in at 70 calories each with under 4g of fat.' An unhealthy turkey option to avoid: Ball Park Brand White Meat Smoked Turkey Franks Ball Park's turkey franks contain mechanically separated turkey, which, 'to keep it simple, means the meat isn't coming from a good part of the turkey,' Meshulam said. 'It's more likely ground-up bone paste.' They're also loaded with sodium, at almost 600mg per dog. ('That's more than I recommend in a full frozen meal,' Shapiro said.) A healthy chicken option: Applegate Organics Great Organic Uncured Chicken Hot Dog 'This is an excellent choice for a hot dog with just a handful of ingredients, including organic chicken, water, sea salt and spices,' Zimmermann said. 'There are no artificial or naturally occurring nitrate or nitrite sources either, like celery powder, making it one of the best summer grilling hot dog options.' A healthy chicken option: Bilinski's Mild Italian Chicken Sausage with Bell Peppers The line of chicken sausages by Bilinski's are another excellent summer grilling option. 'Not only are they made with only organic chicken breast, water and spices, they're pretty lean,' Meshulam said. The brand's mild Italian option has only 2.5g of fat per dog (0.5g of that being saturated fat) and 13g of protein. An unhealthy chicken option to avoid: Gwaltney Original Chicken Hot Dogs While Gwaltney's chicken dogs are lower in fat, they contain mechanically separated chicken, which means 'you're not just eating chicken meat, but also tendons, veins and skin,' Shapiro said. On top of multiple sodium sources in the ingredients, this hot dog uses 'natural' flavors, which may contain unknown chemicals added during the manufacturing process. 'The word 'natural' isn't regulated by the FDA and can mislead consumers,' Zimmermann said. 'Overall, the high sodium content and long list of ultra-processed ingredients make this chicken dog a no-go.' A healthy vegetarian option: Upton Naturals Updog Vegan Hot Dog This vegan hot dog alternative has a texture similar to meat. 'It contains 19 grams of protein from vital wheat gluten or seitan (the main protein of wheat),' Avena said. 'The limited ingredients and preservatives make it a great meat-free hot dog option.' A healthy vegetarian option: Jack & Annie's Jackfruit Sausages Many 'not dogs' out there contain iffy ingredients (like soy protein isolate), inflammatory oils (canola) and lots of stabilizers and additives to make them taste good. 'While they're 100% better for the environment, they're still very processed products and may not be that much better for your health,' Meshulam said. Instead, go for a real plant-based protein (like tofu, beans or legumes). Jack & Annie's Jackfruit Sausages, for instance, are made with a base of jackfruit — a plant that eats like your favorite meat — and prepared with natural seasonings. An unhealthy vegetarian option to avoid: Lightlife Smart Dogs To make these non-meat dogs taste like meat, Lightlife uses a lot of processed ingredients, including soy protein isolate, 'a very processed and broken-down form [of] soy I tell my clients to avoid,' Shapiro said. 'They also use three different sweeteners, soy and canola oil, guar gum and xanthum gums, too — so many ingredients that cause inflammation in the body.' What if your favorite hot dog is one of the 'unhealthy' options listed above? If any of your go-to dogs made the 'steer clear' list, it doesn't mean you have to ghost them. 'Going to barbecues and eating less healthy foods are part of living a joy-filled life,' Cassetty advice? If you feel that no family barbecue is complete without a Ball Park frank in your hand, then have one and enjoy. Just don't make hot dogs a way of life.'The occasional hot dog at a barbecue when you're otherwise eating a mostly healthy diet isn't going to wreck your health,' Cassetty said. 'So pick the one you'll enjoy and be mindful of your diet as a whole.'

Fight continues to save Main Street Station in Hobart from wrecking ball
Fight continues to save Main Street Station in Hobart from wrecking ball

Chicago Tribune

time10 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Fight continues to save Main Street Station in Hobart from wrecking ball

The owner of a long-shuttered, 151-year-old building deemed unsafe by the city of Hobart and scheduled for demolition is making one last-ditch effort to save it so he can reestablish his bar. In an email Jimmie Batalis' Portage-based attorney sent to the Post-Tribune, Patrick McEuen said he and Batalis filed an appeal with Hobart Building Official Steve McDermott asking him to rescind the July 5, 2023, demolition order imposed by the city. The Hobart Board of Public Works and Safety at its February 19 meeting awarded a $40,631 contract to C. Lee Construction Services of Gary to complete the demolition within the next month or two. McEuen, on behalf of Batalis, asked McDermott 'to modify the demolition order dated July 5, 2023, to permit John Cantu an opportunity to present plans to renovate the building.' McEuen also sent a purchase agreement, apparently signed by Cantu, that said, 'John Cantu has agreed to purchase Main Street Station 235 Main Street Hobart IN 46342 for $100,000 on contingency of the building not being demolished by the City of Hobart.' 'Jimmie Batalis understands that Mr. Cantu will pursue a restaurant/bar operation, and my (sic) intend to renovate the single-family apartment dwelling upstairs,' the appeal said. McEuen also attached a 2022 opinion from Porter-based James F. Gianni & Associates engineer Mark Stern that said, 'It is our opinion that the building is structurally sound and capable of sustaining code-compliant structural loads required for a retail/mercantile operation on the first floor and a single-family residential apartment on the second floor.' That letter was submitted to the Lake County Superior Court's Civil Division during hearings on the matter. 'We have based this opinion on our observations made at time of inspection; specifically, that no distress of structural members was observed,' Stern's letter said. 'The frustrating part about it is that the City never heard evidence in July 2023 to confirm the claim of the former Building Commissioner, Mr. McDermott, that the building is unsafe,' McEuen said in an email. 'We have an engineer's report to refute the claims of the former Building Commissioner showing the building is structurally sound. Privately, every politician from the Mayor on down admits the building is not unsafe, but either they have an insider who wants it, or they just don't want Jimmie Batalis to own it. 'The city is so hell-bent on tearing down a perfect historical building, they are acting as if the Petition does not exist. In fact, an asbestos inspector went through the building on Monday, June 30, and made sure to tell Mr. Batalis he did not feel unsafe in the building at all. So, we are left with a city fighting a person, Jimmie Batalis, not a city fighting for the safety of its citizens or the appearance of its downtown. With the eyesore on Main Street known as the former Bright Spot, the city has other problems more important than tearing down an iconic building at taxpayer expense.' Hobart City Attorney Heather McCarthy issued a statement on behalf of the city, reiterating the city has held multiple talks with Batalis about renovating or rebuilding on the property because Batalis – not the city – owns it. 'Beginning in June of 2022, the investigation began regarding complaints that the building was unsafe,' the City's statement said. 'The City provided over a year for the owner to address the ongoing issues with the building prior to issuing the initial demolition order. 'The initial Demolition Order of the Unsafe Building Hearing Authority was issued July 5, 2023. Additionally, the Lake County Superior Court granted two orders for the City to proceed with the demolition. 'The majority of building owners bring their buildings into compliance after being notified of an investigation. In this case, despite the owner being represented by multiple attorneys and the Unsafe Building Hearing Authority granting numerous hearings and opportunities, the building was never brought into compliance.' Batalis, who was paroled in December 2023 after serving 16.5 years of a 57-year sentence for the May 2003 murder of 28-year-old Jason Nosker, said previously he believes the city is against his plans because he is a convicted felon. Nosker was the boyfriend of Batalis' ex-girlfriend, and they were threatened repeatedly by Batalis before he shot into their bedroom window while they were asleep, according to court records. Nosker was paralyzed from the waist down before dying of his injuries. Batalis' sentence was handed down before the state of Indiana required those with high-level felonies and murder convictions to serve at least 75% of their sentence. Batalis said the property went into probate after his father and brother died while he was in prison, and the unsafe building issues started during that time. 'They (city officials) are coming up with every little excuse to tear the building down because they don't want me there,' Batalis said. Lake Superior Court Civil Judge Stephen Scheele on March 8 ruled in favor of the city of Hobart, the Hobart Board of Works and former Hobart Building Official Karen Hansen against Batalis and his business partner, Harold Killian, the Post-Tribune previously reported. In the building case, Scheele found 'no genuine issue as to the fact that Plaintiffs failed to file a timely complaint for judicial review as required by the Indiana Unsafe Building Law,' the city 'is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Count I of Plaintiffs' Complaint for Judicial Review,' the judge wrote. The court also found that the city 'did not violate Plaintiffs' procedural or substantive due process rights,' he wrote in the judgment. Batalis and Killian previously offered to put $60,000 into renovating the building, but Huddlestun said that isn't enough to make the building habitable. The Board of Works originally set 235 Main St. for condemnation at its July 5, 2023, meeting after at least a year of trying to get the owner's representatives to repair it, the Post-Tribune previously reported. During that meeting, a local contractor appeared before the board with attorney Dana Rifai, who said Batalis had given him limited power of attorney to act on his behalf while he was in prison. Since the contractor's company wasn't licensed with the city to do work at the time, he told the board he reached out to Tak Construction, which is licensed to work in Hobart, to do the work with him acting as the project manager — a move the board immediately shot down, the Post-Tribune reported. The contractor then said he had a copy of a report that says the building is structurally sound, a point which Hansen disputed, the Post-Tribune reported. The building's east wall needs to be replaced, plus the owners failed to maintain it, she said at the time. Additionally, the owners did have a Hobart-licensed contractor lined up to do the work at one point, but that contractor claims they never got a deposit from the owner, Hansen said. Former Hobart Fire Chief Randy Smith added that there have been two fires at the building, and as it stands now, he would not allow his firefighters to enter the building if there were a third, the Post-Tribune reported. The Lake Superior Court Civil Division on May 23 denied Batalis' motion for summary judgment, a temporary restraining order and for hearing on preliminary injunction saying, among other things, that the Indiana Unsafe Building Law grants the City 'all requisite authority to enforce and carry out its July 2023 demolition order, according to the ruling.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store