
Picture abhi baaki hai…! Karnataka's ticket price cap is multiplexes' latest plot twist
In Karnataka's movie theatres, popcorn might soon cost more than the film itself.The Siddaramaiah-ruled state wants to cap movie ticket prices at Rs 200 (taxes included) across all formats, languages and theatre types. The proposal which was announced in the CM's budget speech earlier this year, is now out as a draft notification. It's open for public feedback, but the industry's reaction is already loud and: this is a big deal!There are two sides to this story. While this move is being sold as a pro-public, pro-cinema step, it flips the economics of multiplexes on its head. Lower ticket prices might get more people through the door, yes. But for theatre chains that rely heavily on flexible pricing and premium formats, this is a real threat to their bottom line.For example, take a Director's Cut hall. Imagine getting a recliner at just Rs 200. Bizarre, isn't it? Not just for you, but for brands offering these services as well.PVR-Inox, India's biggest multiplex operator, might face a tough time if this move comes into action. Karnataka alone accounts for more than 12% of its screens and about 10% of its box office earnings. Average ticket prices in the state hover around Rs 260. A flat Rs 200 cap means a straight 30% cut in ticket-level revenue.
Now stretch that across the chain's pan-India books. According to Elara Securities, the cap could shave off 3.7% from PVR-Inox's overall average ticket price, reduce revenue by 2.2%, and drag down EBITDA by 1.8% over FY26–28. That's not small change. And the concern isn't just about numbers, it is also about the message this sends. This might just be the start of a broader reset in how India prices its cinema.What does the cap really mean for theatres?If you're a regular moviegoer, this sounds great. Tickets prices have been climbing up for years. A family of four catching a weekend movie in a mall may have to spend Rs 2,000 after tickets, snacks, and parking. Bring the ticket down to Rs 200, and suddenly that trip becomes more budget-friendly or as GenZs would say - Affordable pro max!But from the business side, this is a very different story. Multiplexes operate on a fragile formula based on ticket revenue, food sales, ad revenue and rent. Now, take away the ability to charge more when demand is high, and that formula starts to break.This is especially true for premium formats like IMAX, 4DX, or recliner seats. These don't come cheap. Building and operating them require major investments. In Bengaluru, these screens currently charge Rs 600 or more. A blanket cap of Rs 200 makes them instantly unviable.Karan Taurani of Elara Securities said that the cap hurts the very model multiplexes used for securing high growth. Lower returns will cool investor and franchise interest. Expansion plans, especially in second-tier cities or in premium screens, will slow down (or maybe stop).That will have ripple effects, too. Fewer screens means fewer options for producers and distributors. Local employment in theatre operations will take a hit. And viewers, ironically, might end up with fewer places to watch the kinds of films this policy claims to support.Theatre chains might also be forced to shrink, pulling out of low-performing properties or cutting down on the number of screens in some locations. In the short term, that's a loss for audiences. In the long run, it's a risk to the entire movie theatre ecosystem.
PVR-Inox already struggling The numbers don't lie. The revenue from operations in the quarter ended March 2025 stood at Rs 1,250 crore, down from Rs 1,256 crore in the corresponding quarter of the last financial year.On a sequential basis, the company reported a loss against profit after tax (PAT) of Rs 36 crore in Q3FY25. The top line, though, witnessed a 27% fall versus Rs 1,717 crore in the October-December quarter of FY25.
The box office in FY '25 was impacted by an uneven release calendar, marked by inconsistent content availability across quarters, a company filing said. Both Bollywood and Hollywood underperformed, contributing to a 9% decline in the company's overall gross box office revenue. That's a sign of real pressure. Content is uneven, audience behaviour is shifting, and the costs of operating multiplexes keep climbing. The Rs 200 cap only adds to the troubles.So what's the fallback plan? Food.Over the past few years, theatres have leaned heavily into their snack counters not just as a side hustle, but as a core profit driver.With tickets squeezed, expect that push to intensify. More combo deals, bundled experiences, loyalty perks or anything that gets people spending more once they're inside. Lobbies may be redesigned. Premium snack options might grow. Because the reality is that the real money now has to come from the counter, not the seat.
Komal Nahta, Indian film trade analyst, sums it up well. 'Business of multiplexes will reduce. That's the minus side,' he says. 'The plus is that the public won't have to pay exorbitantly high ticket prices. Hopefully, lower rates mean more people come in and that boosts overall business,' he added. That's the bet theatres are now being forced to make. But it's a risky one. Especially when most weeks don't have a blockbuster to fill those cheaper seats.
OTT threats looming already There's yet another side to this story: streaming.
Over the past few years, platforms like Netflix, Amazon and JioCinema have changed how people watch films. Big-screen exclusivity has shrunk. Many films, especially regional or mid-budget ones, land online just weeks after release. Some skip theatres entirely. That shift has weakened the power of the theatre window. Sure, a big-screen release still brings buzz and status. But for many producers, OTT deals offer faster, safer and more certain returns.In Karnataka, this has created friction. Kannada filmmakers have spoken out about poor visibility on national platforms. Some are now building their own OTT ecosystems. The state government, on its part, has announced plans for a dedicated Kannada streaming platform and a film archive, a bid to strengthen local content.But even if that works, it doesn't entirely solve the problem multiplexes face. Without strong theatrical performance, films lose momentum. Without momentum, their digital and satellite rights may lose value too. It's all linked. And price caps disrupt that entire chain.Add to that the shrinking screen count, the slowdown in premium formats, and the pressure on profits - and it's clear that the multiplex model is entering a period of stress.
Not the first time! This isn't Karnataka's first attempt at price control. In 2017, the state tried to impose a similar Rs 200 cap. That move went to court. Eventually, the High Court allowed theatres to charge more for premium formats, carving out some breathing space.That legal history may be PVR-Inox's best hope now. It gives them a precedent. A possible negotiation point.But the politics this time is different. Cinema is emotional. And ticket price, like onion price or petrol price, is now becoming a talking point. Rs 200 tickets sound good. It's hard to oppose that publicly, even if the economics don't work.And here's the larger worry. If Karnataka gets away with this and earns goodwill for it, other states might follow suit. A wider adoption of flat caps could force the entire industry to rewrite its business model.That's the real risk. A blow in one state can be absorbed. But a national trend? That's a crisis.Because here's what multiplexes really are - retail businesses with fixed costs, variable revenue and high stakes. You can't squeeze them endlessly without something giving way. Theatres will survive. But they may look very different from the ones we know today - with fewer screens, fewer formats, more food counters, and far more caution on what gets released!This may still get challenged in court. It may still get tweaked. However, the direction is clear -- ticket margins are under review, and for multiplex chains, that's a tough seat to be in.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Who Is Vikram Chatwal, Priya Sachdev's First Husband Before She Married The Late Sunjay Kapur?
In 2006, Vikram married actress and investment banker Priya Sachdev in a high-profile wedding. The couple welcomed a daughter, Safira, the same year. As Sunjay Kapur's sudden demise ignites a Rs 30,000 crore inheritance battle, one name that keeps resurfacing is Vikram Chatwal, the ex-husband of Sunjay's third wife, Priya Sachdev. While the family tussle over Kapur's vast business empire has captivated headlines, Chatwal's past relationship with Priya and his own controversial life make him an intriguing figure. Here's everything to know about the flamboyant businessman once called the 'playboy hotelier." Early Life and Education Born on November 1, 1971, in Ethiopia, Vikram Chatwal is the son of Indian-American hotel magnate Sant Singh Chatwal. He grew up in New York and graduated from the prestigious Wharton School of Business in 1993. He began his career as an investment banker at Morgan Stanley but soon ventured into more glamorous industries including modelling, acting, and eventually hospitality. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Vikram Chatwal (@vikramdoc) Modelling, Acting and Hollywood Cameos Vikram briefly worked as a model and became the first Sikh man to be featured in Vogue magazine. His dapper looks also landed him minor roles in films like Zoolander and Honeymoon Travels Pvt Ltd. Though he didn't pursue acting full-time, he remained a staple in social circles across New York, London and Mumbai. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Vikram Chatwal (@vikramdoc) Marriage to Priya Sachdev and Divorce In 2006, Vikram married actress and investment banker Priya Sachdev in a high-profile wedding. The couple welcomed a daughter, Safira, the same year. However, Vikram's substance abuse issues and wild lifestyle led to two stints in rehab. By 2011, Priya divorced him. She later married Sunjay Kapur in 2017. Sunjay adopted Safira, and she now goes by the surname Kapur. Scandals and Legal Troubles Vikram Chatwal's lifestyle caught up with him. In 2013, he was arrested at Fort Lauderdale airport for drug possession. A year later, his father Sant Chatwal pleaded guilty to illegal campaign contributions. In 2016, Vikram faced public outrage after being charged with setting two dogs on fire. He later pleaded guilty and was sentenced to community service. Hotel Empire and Comeback Despite his turbulent past, Vikram has managed a remarkable comeback in hospitality. He founded Vikram Chatwal Hotels and owns several luxury properties, including the iconic Dream New York hotel, which underwent a Rs 166 crore ($20 million) renovation in 2015. His brand has since expanded to Miami, Bangkok and India, known for stylish décor and celebrity clientele. Ties To The Kapur Succession Battle In the current Kapur family dispute, Vikram's name has resurfaced due to the legal status of his daughter Safira. If Sunjay Kapur legally adopted her, she loses any right to inherit from Vikram's estate. Meanwhile, Priya Sachdev and Safira have both dropped 'Chatwal" from their names. First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
MP Waje seeks immigration checkpoint at Nashik airport
Nashik: Nashik MP Rajabhau Waje recently met with Union aviation minister Ram Mohan Naidu to push for significant developments at Nashik airport ahead of the upcoming Simhastha Kumbh Mela in 2026-2028. Waje submitted a memorandum requesting an immigration checkpoint and a major airport expansion to handle the expected influx of devotees. The proposed expansion includes constructing a new terminal building with seating for 1,000 passengers, developing new taxiways, and increasing the number of aircraft parking bays. Waje also called for the construction of separate helipads at the airport, in Nashik city, and in Trimbakeshwar to manage the massive crowd. Naidu has assured Waje that he would look into these requests. Additionally, Waje proposed that the airport be named after Yashwantrao Chavan, Maharashtra's first chief minister who was instrumental in bringing the Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) unit to Nashik. Currently, the Nashik-Delhi flight has been reduced from daily to four days a week. This service should be made daily again. Waje also requested a slot at Delhi airport for the second Nashik-Delhi flight at night. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Do you have a mouse? Desert Order Undo The MP also called for expanded air connectivity to Nashik airport, specifically requesting new routes to major cities like Kolkata, Varanasi, and Chennai. All these demands come ahead of the upcoming Kumbh Mela, where the airport expects a significant increase in passenger traffic. The airport, a joint venture between the state government and Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), was developed between 2013 and 2014 at a cost of Rs 94 crore. The current terminal can only accommodate 300 passengers at a time. With the footfall expected to reach 1,000 passengers per hour during the Kumbh Mela, HAL has submitted a proposal to state govt for a much-needed upgrade. However, a decision on the development plan is still pending.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
AIS mismatch causes chaos for taxpayers with stock market exposure
Ahmedabad: With the income-tax return (ITR) filing deadline fast approaching, chartered accountants and tax practitioners are raising alarm over widespread mismatches in the Annual Information Statement (AIS), particularly for individuals with stock market investments including mutual funds. Several taxpayers have flagged discrepancies between actual stock market transactions and the data reflected in the AIS. According to sources, a key concern is that in many instances, the AIS shows a purchase value of zero for listed securities. This significantly inflates the capital gains — and consequently the tax liability — for the taxpayer. The inconsistencies are attributed to the use of multiple data sources by the Income Tax Department, such as stock exchanges, mutual funds and depositories. You Can Also Check: Ahmedabad AQI | Weather in Ahmedabad | Bank Holidays in Ahmedabad | Public Holidays in Ahmedabad Further complications arise in cases involving equities and equity-oriented mutual funds acquired prior to 31 Jan 2018 — the cut-off date for the grandfathering clause — which are also appearing in majority cases with a zero purchase value in the AIS as there is no source of auto-capturing the cost in cases where shares were received as gift or inheritance etc. Karim Lakhani, a chartered accountant, said, "AIS has been a useful tool in recent years for retrieving transaction details at the time of filing returns. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas in Dubai | Search Ads Get Info Undo However, this year, the number of mismatches has been exceptionally high, making the process far more complex and time-consuming. Most salaried individuals now have stock market exposure, and this year, the AIS data related to such investments has been riddled with errors. " "For instance, one of my clients' AIS shows dividend income of around Rs 1.5 lakh from a company in which he holds no shares. We've also faced difficulty in calculating short-term or long-term capital gains because the data provided by the client's broker often does not align with the AIS or the Taxpayer Information Summary (TIS). In many stock market-related cases, the purchase value is recorded as zero, resulting in inflated tax liabilities. We are forced to raise feedback within the return to get it corrected," Lakhani explained. CA Jainik Vakil, chairman of the direct tax committee of the Gujarat Chamber of Commerce and Industry (GCCI) said, "Mutual funds entry is sometimes reflected twice in AIS because same transactions are reported twice-- one by registrar and one by depository." Mukesh Patel, international tax expert said, "There are multiple data mismatch in AIS but fortunately, vigilante tax payers can compare their own data with AIS and correct it with feedback. It will help them in case of scrutiny." A senior chartered accountant added, "Return filing has become far more complicated this year due to the existence of two slabs for short-term and long-term capital gains — one applicable before 23 July 2024, and another post that date. We've also observed that in cases where shares were received as gifts, via succession, or acquired before 31 January 2018, the AIS lists the purchase cost as zero. The same issue applies in cases related to the grandfathering clause. " Tax experts advise taxpayers with stock market exposure to cross-check AIS and TIS data carefully against their demat statements and broker reports before filing. Where discrepancies exist, raising timely feedback within the ITR portal is key to rectification.