Time to pull the plug on utility-run EV charger program
In 2023, Gov. Wes Moore joined Maryland to California's Advanced Clean Cars II program, pledging to slash greenhouse gas emissions by phasing out gasoline vehicle sales by 2035. Barely two years later, he signed an executive order delaying penalties for these Zero-Emission Vehicle Goals, blaming insufficient charging infrastructure.
The real culprit? A large portion of Maryland's public chargers are utility-owned and routinely broken — mocking the drivers who rely on them and the ratepayers who funded them.
Since 2019, the Maryland Public Service Commission has let utilities like BGE, Pepco, Delmarva Power, Potomac Edison and SMECO operate public EV chargers in a pilot program now nearing its end. BGE alone spent $15 million installing chargers at libraries, parks and government buildings.
The utilities vowed these stations would match the reliability of their electric grid. Instead, they've delivered a charging disaster. Now, they want four more years — and more ratepayer cash — to keep it limping along.
Maryland Matters welcomes guest commentary submissions at editor@marylandmatters.org.
We suggest a 750-word limit and reserve the right to edit or reject submissions. We do not accept columns that are endorsements of candidates, and no longer accept submissions from elected officials or political candidates.
Opinion pieces must be signed by at least one individual using their real name. We do not accept columns signed by an organization. Commentary writers must include a short bio and a photo for their bylines.
Views of writers are their own.
The utilities' pitch in 2018 was simple: Give us millions, and we'll build a dependable electric vehicle network. But drivers know the truth: These chargers are often down. Worse, utilities outsourced most operations to third-party contractors. When a charger fails, EV drivers don't call BGE for a quick fix — they're stuck dialing a 'network provider,' where complaints vanish into a virtual black hole, sometimes taking months to resolve. This isn't service; it's abandonment.
In 2023, the General Assembly demanded accountability, passing House Bill 834, the Electric Vehicle Charging Reliability Act, requiring 97% uptime, backed by quarterly reports and penalties for failure. Two years on, the Public Service Commission has yet to see those reports. Drivers, meanwhile, feel reliability worsening.
Moore's executive order, citing the very infrastructure utilities failed to deliver, only deepens the distrust — easing pressure on automakers instead of fixing the public charging networks.
Fed up, I joined 12 other Maryland EV drivers to survey every fast charger statewide. Our Maryland Fast Charger Survey visited 304 locations, testing over 1,000 ports.
Tesla, running more than half of Maryland's fast chargers, delivered 99.6% availability — 541 of 543 ports worked. BGE? A measly 33% (30 of 90 chargers operational). Delmarva Power's Eastern Shore network was the worst at 31% (4 of 13). These aren't chargers; They're proof utilities can't deliver.
Now, utilities propose bigger budgets for a second phase of the pilot program, funneling more money to contractors for obsolete chargers. Unlike Tesla's stations—built near 24-hour stores with 8 to 16 plugs pumping up to 325 kW—most utility chargers are stuck at 50 kW, often with just one or two ports. They're not at vibrant hubs but in desolate corners of parking lots, like behind state office buildings.
Why pour millions into slow, outdated chargers nobody wants to use?
Moore's order admits the infrastructure isn't ready, but after six years, that's no excuse — it's a failure of leadership. Utilities have had time and money to build a network that works. Instead, they've squandered trust and dollars.
The Public Service Commission must end this failed experiment, redirect funds to proven models like supporting commercial charger programs, and demand Moore recommit to Zero-Emission Vehicle Goals with infrastructure that delivers. Marylanders deserve better than broken chargers and weak promises. It's time to pull the plug.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Sneaky Way General Motors Is Catching Tesla
Key Points Chevrolet has overtaken the No. 2 spot for EV sales in the U.S. Cadillac EVs are bringing in new customers, especially from Tesla. GM has slowly built trust with consumers while Tesla has done the opposite. 10 stocks we like better than General Motors › Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) took over the U.S. electric vehicle (EV) market in impressive fashion. It went from an intriguing Roadster story to a full-fledged automotive company that's generated bottom-line income -- a rarity for pure-play EV companies these days. While many believed Tesla's dominance to be durable and long-lasting, General Motors' (NYSE: GM) Chevrolet brand is already rocking the boat. And keep your eye on the company's luxury line of EVs, it might sneak up on you. Providing a spark Competitors that have been checking the rearview mirror may have seen Chevrolet coming, but most of us probably didn't. Chevrolet is now the second best-selling EV brand in the U.S., overtaking Ford and gaining on the top spot that Tesla has held closely for years. Amid all the doom and gloom surrounding tariffs, potential disruptions in trade and distribution networks, and uncertainty for long-term planning, Chevrolet has done nothing but shine for General Motors. May was Chevrolet's second-best month ever for EV sales. That strong May result came on the heels of the company's astounding 94% year-over-year growth in EV sales during the first quarter when GM's Chevrolet became the fastest-growing domestic EV brand. In fact, General Motors' recent surge helped the company's market double to capture 15.5% of EV market share in the U.S. Chevrolet posted a staggering 134% increase in EV sales during the first half of 2025, compared to the prior year. In fact, the two largest movers in year-over-year EV delivery volume change are GM and Tesla, and they're moving in opposite directions as you can see in the graphic below. "GM is driving the growth of the U.S. industry, and we have put real distance between us and our traditional competitors," said Duncan Aldred, GM's president of North America, according to Automotive News. Sneaky Cadillac While Chevrolet is hauling volume, Cadillac has sneakily been a big boost to GM's EV ambitions. GM is claiming that Cadillac is already the luxury "EV leader" this year with a lineup of luxury electric SUVs hitting the roads, but it should be noted management doesn't include Tesla in the mix due to its pricing structure. Switch Auto Insurance and Save Today! Affordable Auto Insurance, Customized for You The Insurance Savings You Expect Great Rates and Award-Winning Service Cadillac just delivered its best first-half sales since 2008 and sales were up across the board in all 50 U.S. states. Even better, the luxury brand is bringing in new consumers, which is notoriously difficult in the auto industry. In fact, Brad Franz, Cadillac's global marketing director, told CNBC that nearly 80% of Cadillac EV buyers are new to the brand. Franz even went on to note that at the time Cadillac was seeing an influx of consumers fleeing the Tesla brand with almost 25% of current Cadillac Lyriq buyers coming from Tesla. Cadillac's momentum is just beginning to accelerate: GM's luxury brand already launched seven EVs in 2025 as it drives toward completing a full lineup. The strategy is simply that if consumers are turned off by the loss of the federal EV tax credit at the end of September, then GM will offer a wide range of product so consumers can find the right vehicle. Another reason that Cadillac could be a sneaky help to General Motors' EV ambitions is because the administration's tariff policy has a very limited impact on Cadillac. The brand is almost entirely produced in the U.S., with the exception of the Optiq that is produced in Mexico. Catch me if you can Right now the EV business isn't very enticing for automakers, but it's a necessity to tap into the future bloodline of consumers. In fact, the vast majority of EVs are losing money for their manufacturers, but General Motors is doing something right by building out not only full lineups of vehicles, but also bolstering the luxury end with Cadillac -- a brand that carries higher margins. General Motors has slowly built trust with consumers at a time Tesla has undermined itself. While General Motors and its surging Chevrolet and Cadillac EVs have impressively moved up the rank in sales, it still has a long way to catch Tesla -- but for once, the possibility doesn't seem so far-fetched. Should you buy stock in General Motors right now? Before you buy stock in General Motors, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and General Motors wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $652,133!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,056,790!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 15, 2025 Daniel Miller has positions in General Motors. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends General Motors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The Sneaky Way General Motors Is Catching Tesla was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's latest blending of business interests puts his Grok AI chatbot in Teslas—and raises questions around data and privacy
This week, owners of Tesla cars learned that they were getting a freebie: Starting July 12, all new Tesla vehicles have automatically had the Grok AI chatbot installed and available to use. Grok, of course, is the chatbot created by xAI, the privately-held AI company launched two years ago by Tesla CEO Elon Musk. Like a gas station offering a free car wash with a fill-up, Musk appears to be leveraging his various assets and business endeavors to give customers extra value. In this case, however, it's fair to wonder who is getting more value out of this 'gift,' which further intertwines Musk's businesses. Switch Auto Insurance and Save Today! The Insurance Savings You Expect Great Rates and Award-Winning Service Affordable Auto Insurance, Customized for You With the update, Grok is now a button on the Tesla in-car display's homescreen. Users can ask it questions or give it tasks to perform, just like they would with any other LLM, be it OpenAI's ChatGPT or Google's Gemini. For now, Grok cannot control any vehicle functions like windows or AC, but it's not hard to imagine users coming up with plenty of handy uses for an in-car LLM, from responding to an email to summarizing a book. The new arrangement between Tesla and xAI will likely make Tesla a significant customer for xAI, though neither company has disclosed any financial details surrounding the partnership. For reference, Tesla sold nearly 1.8 million vehicles just last year, meaning that this new partnership will open the door for millions of customers to start using Grok. Should even a small percentage of new Tesla owners utilize the feature, it could ramp up computing costs for xAI, which is already reportedly spending some $1 billion a month to build out its data centers and buy up enough computer chips to compete with other AI companies. But it's important to think about what data sharing may occur now that Grok is installed in Tesla vehicles. In disclosures, Tesla says that driver conversations with Grok will be 'securely processed by xAI' in line with xAI's privacy policy, noting that conversations will be anonymized and not linked to individual vehicles. A look at xAI's privacy policy says the company collects personal information, user content, social media information, and other data points for its service and that it will share data with contracted service providers, its 'related companies,' and to third-parties customers choose to share information with. But what exact data will xAI get access to when Grok is used in vehicles? Elon Musk has suggested a 'wake-word' will be added, but will that limit which snippets of conversation it captures, or does it listen to everything said in the car once it's been activated via the homescreen? And conversations are just part of the data that's out there. After all, automobiles have become some of the most powerful data-collecting devices in day-to-day life. Vehicles contain multiple computers and sensors, with some estimates indicating that they generate about 25 gigabytes of data every hour—data that could be particularly valuable to a company with a large language model to train. Tesla discloses in its own privacy policy that it uses vehicle data for its own self-driving AI models, and it allows customers to download copies of the data that it collects for themselves. But Tesla doesn't go into specifics about which data it uses for what purpose, and it hasn't updated its privacy policy since the July 12 addition of Grok so it's unclear how conversations may be used. Tesla and xAI did not respond to requests for comment. 'This is part of a larger trend we see within the automotive industry,' says Albert Cahn, executive director of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project, a public interest, advocacy, and legal services organization focused on how technology can be used to target individuals. 'Cars have been transformed from this emblem of independence on the open road to the most heavily monitored parts of our lives. There is a huge amount of risk that the data that is collected in the privacy of our own cars will be used against us, whether by law enforcement or immigration officials or simply being monetized without our consent.' Tesla vehicles, specifically, have series of cameras and they collect data from video and camera feeds, ultrasonic sensor data, GPS and location information, vehicle telemetry data such as speed, battery use, and odometer readings, event logs like collisions or breaking data, and user interaction data—data that Tesla has provided to government authorities to find criminals or assist law enforcement with investigations. It's unclear whether conversations with Grok may be permissible to use in investigations as well. Particularly as vehicles are installed with more cameras and sensors for self-driving capabilities, more and more data points are being collected from drivers, Cahn says. 'These companies are quick to claim that our data is being anonymized, but it's really hard to actually anonymize this sort of information in a way where it can't be re-identified,' he says. Every new technology comes with privacy trade-offs, of course. The GPS that gives you directions also leaves digital footprints that reveal your wanderings and whereabouts. As the person behind some of today's most popular tech products—from EV, self-driving tech, and LLMs to social media and Starlink internet satellites—Musk appears increasingly intent on fusing and intermingling the various components of his business empire to give consumers something new and unique. It will be up to consumers to decide if the trade-offs are worth it. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's latest blending of business interests puts his Grok AI chatbot in Teslas—and raises questions around data and privacy
This week, owners of Tesla cars learned that they were getting a freebie: Starting July 12, all new Tesla vehicles have automatically had the Grok AI chatbot installed and available to use. Grok, of course, is the chatbot created by xAI, the privately-held AI company launched two years ago by Tesla CEO Elon Musk. Like a gas station offering a free car wash with a fill-up, Musk appears to be leveraging his various assets and business endeavors to give customers extra value. In this case, however, it's fair to wonder who is getting more value out of this 'gift,' which further intertwines Musk's businesses. With the update, Grok is now a button on the Tesla in-car display's homescreen. Users can ask it questions or give it tasks to perform, just like they would with any other LLM, be it OpenAI's ChatGPT or Google's Gemini. For now, Grok cannot control any vehicle functions like windows or AC, but it's not hard to imagine users coming up with plenty of handy uses for an in-car LLM, from responding to an email to summarizing a book. The new arrangement between Tesla and xAI will likely make Tesla a significant customer for xAI, though neither company has disclosed any financial details surrounding the partnership. For reference, Tesla sold nearly 1.8 million vehicles just last year, meaning that this new partnership will open the door for millions of customers to start using Grok. Should even a small percentage of new Tesla owners utilize the feature, it could ramp up computing costs for xAI, which is already reportedly spending some $1 billion a month to build out its data centers and buy up enough computer chips to compete with other AI companies. But it's important to think about what data sharing may occur now that Grok is installed in Tesla vehicles. In disclosures, Tesla says that driver conversations with Grok will be 'securely processed by xAI' in line with xAI's privacy policy, noting that conversations will be anonymized and not linked to individual vehicles. A look at xAI's privacy policy says the company collects personal information, user content, social media information, and other data points for its service and that it will share data with contracted service providers, its 'related companies,' and to third-parties customers choose to share information with. But what exact data will xAI get access to when Grok is used in vehicles? Elon Musk has suggested a 'wake-word' will be added, but will that limit which snippets of conversation it captures, or does it listen to everything said in the car once it's been activated via the homescreen? And conversations are just part of the data that's out there. After all, automobiles have become some of the most powerful data-collecting devices in day-to-day life. Vehicles contain multiple computers and sensors, with some estimates indicating that they generate about 25 gigabytes of data every hour—data that could be particularly valuable to a company with a large language model to train. Tesla discloses in its own privacy policy that it uses vehicle data for its own self-driving AI models, and it allows customers to download copies of the data that it collects for themselves. But Tesla doesn't go into specifics about which data it uses for what purpose, and it hasn't updated its privacy policy since the July 12 addition of Grok so it's unclear how conversations may be used. Tesla and xAI did not respond to requests for comment. 'This is part of a larger trend we see within the automotive industry,' says Albert Cahn, executive director of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project, a public interest, advocacy, and legal services organization focused on how technology can be used to target individuals. 'Cars have been transformed from this emblem of independence on the open road to the most heavily monitored parts of our lives. There is a huge amount of risk that the data that is collected in the privacy of our own cars will be used against us, whether by law enforcement or immigration officials or simply being monetized without our consent.' Tesla vehicles, specifically, have series of cameras and they collect data from video and camera feeds, ultrasonic sensor data, GPS and location information, vehicle telemetry data such as speed, battery use, and odometer readings, event logs like collisions or breaking data, and user interaction data—data that Tesla has provided to government authorities to find criminals or assist law enforcement with investigations. It's unclear whether conversations with Grok may be permissible to use in investigations as well. Particularly as vehicles are installed with more cameras and sensors for self-driving capabilities, more and more data points are being collected from drivers, Cahn says. 'These companies are quick to claim that our data is being anonymized, but it's really hard to actually anonymize this sort of information in a way where it can't be re-identified,' he says. Every new technology comes with privacy trade-offs, of course. The GPS that gives you directions also leaves digital footprints that reveal your wanderings and whereabouts. As the person behind some of today's most popular tech products—from EV, self-driving tech, and LLMs to social media and Starlink internet satellites—Musk appears increasingly intent on fusing and intermingling the various components of his business empire to give consumers something new and unique. It will be up to consumers to decide if the trade-offs are worth it. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data