Buildup to a meltdown: How the Trump-Musk alliance collapsed
The long-awaited breakup between President Donald Trump and Mr Elon Musk was as personal and petty as anticipated, and yet it's a sign of something much more than a conflict between two of the world's most powerful and mercurial men. PHOTO: ERIC LEE/NYTIMES
WASHINGTON – US President Donald Trump was peeved.
Just minutes before he walked into the Oval Office for a televised send-off for Mr Elon Musk last week, an aide had handed him a file.
The papers showed that Mr Trump's nominee to run Nasa - a close associate of Mr Musk's - had donated to prominent Democrats in recent years, including some who Mr Trump was learning about for the first time.
The president set his outrage aside and mustered through a cordial public farewell. But as soon as the cameras left the Oval Office, the president confronted Mr Musk. He started to read some of the donations out loud, shaking his head.
This was not good, Mr Trump said.
Mr Musk, who was sporting a black eye that he blamed on a punch from his young son, tried to explain. He said Mr Jared Isaacman, a billionaire entrepreneur who was set to become the next Nasa administrator, cared about getting things done. Yes, he had donated to Democrats, but so had a lot of people.
Maybe it's a good thing, Mr Musk told the president - it shows that you're willing to hire people of all stripes.
But Mr Trump was unmoved. He said that people don't change. These are the types of people who will turn, he said, and it won't end up being good for us.
The moment of pique was a signal of the simmering tensions between the two men that would explode into the open less than a week later, upending what had been one of the most extraordinary alliances in American politics.
This account of the crumbling ties between the president and Mr Musk is based on interviews with 13 people with direct knowledge of the events, all of whom asked for anonymity to describe private discussions.
While the relationship had been losing steam over the past several months as Mr Musk clashed with Trump officials, people close to both men said the disagreement over Mr Isaacman accelerated the breakup.
Mr Musk had been planning to exit the White House relatively quietly - before Mr Isaacman's ouster left him feeling humiliated.
Now the two men, who seemed inseparable at one point, are on opposite sides. Mr Musk suggested Mr Trump should be impeached. Mr Trump has threatened to cancel government contracts with Mr Musk's companies. And in recent days, Mr Trump has been telling people close to him that he believes Mr Musk is acting 'crazy' and must be doing drugs.
A tanked nomination
For Mr Musk, there were few positions across the thousands in the federal government that mattered more to him than the head of Nasa, because of its critical importance to SpaceX, his rocket business. So it was of great personal benefit to Mr Musk when Mr Trump chose Mr Isaacman, who has flown to space twice with SpaceX, to oversee the agency.
Mr Isaacman's donations to Democrats had not always been a problem.
While Mr Trump privately told advisers that he was surprised to learn of them, he and his team had been briefed about them during the presidential transition, before Mr Isaacman's nomination, according to two people with knowledge of the events. But by May 30, when Mr Trump went through the file containing details of the donations, he clearly had changed his mind.
Mr Musk barely mounted a defence of his friend. He was anxious about doing so with other people around, including Mr Sergio Gor, director of the presidential personnel office, who had clashed with Mr Musk over other staffing matters. Mr Musk believed that he would be able to talk to the president at some point after the gathering, privately.
But Mr Musk never got a chance to make his case.
In the hours after the Oval Office farewell, Mr Trump decided he would withdraw Mr Isaacman from consideration. Mr Musk was stunned by how fast it all happened.
Mr Musk's allies have argued privately that Mr Isaacman's recent donations to Democrats were nonideological and made at the encouragement of Senator Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., a former astronaut. A spokesperson for Mr Kelly declined to comment.
As Mr Musk dealt with the fallout from the tanked nomination, he spent part of the weekend outside Missoula, Montana, as a guest at 'Symposium', an event for tech executives, investors and startup founders thrown by Founders Fund, the venture capital firm founded by Peter Thiel.
After spending a day in Montana, he turned his attention in earnest to assailing the top domestic priority of Mr Trump: the Republican Bill making its way through Congress that would slash taxes and steer more money to the military and immigration enforcement.
Privately and publicly, Mr Musk stewed over the Bill, believing that its spending would erase the supposed savings of his Department of Government Efficiency and add to the federal deficit.
Some Republican lawmakers had tried to assuage Mr Musk's fears. On June 2, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., walked the billionaire through the Bill and said that Congress would try to codify the work done by Doge. After the call, Mr Johnson told associates that he felt Mr Musk was uninformed about the legislation and the congressional process, but that he had been able to reason with the world's richest man, according to a person familiar with the conversation.
On June 2 evening, Mr Musk still had concerns. He hinted at them on his social platform X, reposting a chart apparently showing the yearly increase in the national debt.
'Scary,' Mr Musk wrote as a caption.
Mr Trump did not respond to Mr Musk's criticisms of the Bill and maintained a light public schedule.
Meltdown
The Trump-Musk alliance fully ruptured on June 5, six days after the two men put on the collegial display in the Oval Office.
Mr Musk, who had largely focused his attacks on Republicans in Congress, had started directing more ire at the president.
So when Mr Trump was asked about Mr Musk's comments during a meeting with Mr Friedrich Merz, the new German chancellor, the president finally let loose. He said he was 'disappointed' in Mr Musk, downplayed the billionaire's financial support for his presidential campaign and posited that Mr Musk developed 'Trump derangement syndrome' after leaving the White House.
Mr Musk fired back in real time. Using X, he unleashed a torrent of attacks. He claimed there were references to the president in government documents about Jeffrey Epstein, the sex offender, and indicated his support for the president's impeachment. He also said Mr Trump's tariffs would cause a recession by the end of the year.
Later, Mr Trump, using his own social media platform, threatened to cut billions of dollars in federal contracts with Mr Musk's companies.
By June 5 evening, Mr Musk signalled he would be open to de-escalating the fight, while the president seemed to have little interest in an immediate reconciliation. White House officials said Mr Trump had no plans to call Mr Musk.
'President Trump is the unequivocal leader of the Republican Party, and the vast majority of the country approves of his job performance as president,' Ms Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said in a statement. 'Inflation is down, consumer confidence and wages are up, the jobs report beat expectations for the third month in a row, the border is secure and America is hotter than ever before.'
A spokesperson for Mr Musk did not respond to a request for comment.
White House officials said on June 6 that Mr Trump was considering selling the bright red Tesla he got in March as a show of support for Mr Musk. NYTIMES
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
31 minutes ago
- Straits Times
G-7 agrees to exempt US multinationals from global minimum tax
US President Donald Trump was deeply critical of the landmark minimum global tax rate of 15 per cent agreed by 140 countries in 2021. PHOTO: NYTIMES LONDON - The Group of Seven (G-7) nations said on June 28 they have agreed to exempt US multinational companies from a global minimum tax imposed by other countries – a win for President Donald Trump's government, which pushed hard for the compromise. The deal will see US companies benefit from a 'side-by-side' solution under which they will only be taxed at home, on both domestic and foreign profits, the G-7 said, in a statement released by Canada, which holds the group's rotating presidency. The agreement was reached in part due to 'recently proposed changes to the US international tax system' included in Mr Trump's signature domestic policy Bill, which is still being debated in Congress, the statement said. The side-by-side system could 'provide greater stability and certainty in the international tax system moving forward,' it added. Nearly 140 countries struck a landmark deal in 2021 to tax multinational companies, an agreement negotiated under the auspices of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). That agreement, deeply criticised by Mr Trump, includes two 'pillars,' the second of which sets a minimum global tax rate of 15 per cent. The OECD must ultimately decide to exempt the US companies from that tax – or not. The G-7 said it looked forward to 'expeditiously reaching a solution that is acceptable and implementable to all.' On June 26, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent had signalled that a 'joint understanding among G-7 countries that defends American interests' was in the works. He also asked US lawmakers to 'to remove the Section 899 protective measure from consideration in the One, Big, Beautiful Bill' – Mr Trump's policy mega-Bill. Section 899 has been dubbed a 'revenge tax,' allowing the government to impose levies on firms with foreign owners and on investors from countries deemed to impose unfair taxes on US businesses. The clause sparked concern that it would inhibit foreign companies from investing in the United States. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Lyon owner Textor to step back from club management
PHILADELPHIA - American businessman John Textor plans to step back from the day-to-day management of Olympique Lyonnais following the club's relegation to Ligue 2, which was confirmed after a meeting with French football's financial watchdog (DNCG) this week. Textor, who owns the French club through his Eagle Football Group, revealed his decision in an interview with Brazil's TV Globo on Saturday, shortly before his Brazilian side Botafogo lost 1-0 to Palmeiras in the Club World Cup, saying he could have dealt better with French football politics. Lyon's demotion was provisionally announced by the DNCG in November due to financial irregularities and was confirmed on Tuesday. Textor said the club would appeal against the decision and that Lyon's financial position remained strong despite the ruling. "I will tell you that we're very well capitalised in France," Textor told TV Globo. "It's clear that I've been much better on the pitch than managing France. I have not been so good at the politics of France. I think that's well known. So the process is, for me, as an American capitalist, adjusting to that system." Textor said his focus would shift towards broader responsibilities within Eagle Football Group which also includes Botafogo and formerly included a 43% stake in English club Crystal Palace, sold earlier this week. "I am going to spend a lot more time focusing on Eagle Global, coming back frankly a bit more to Botafogo," he said. "I've got very good partners in the Eagle Football Group shareholders who are going to take a lead on dealing with some of the issues that I have frankly not been very good at dealing with." Despite Lyon's relegation, Textor highlighted the club's recent achievements, including back-to-back qualifications for the Europa League, and reassured fans about their financial stability. "We've never been more liquid in cash. But there are things in the process I did that disappointed the governing bodies there that we need to fix," Textor said. "We did pass through the financial sustainability review with UEFA, which is quite a comprehensive process. So the fact that we didn't pass through France has more to do with some of the specific elements that I brought to the table that I should have improved." Textor hinted at a potential acquisition in the United Kingdom to replace the Crystal Palace stake. "We have our U.K. strategy where we need to look at who our new club is. What are we going to buy there? What's the partnership? Because it's that collaboration between the clubs that's been so successful for us," he said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.


International Business Times
4 hours ago
- International Business Times
What is Canada's Digital Services Tax and Why It Sparked a Trade War With US?
Trade tensions between the United States and Canada reached a boiling point this week as President Donald Trump abruptly ended trade negotiations in response to Canada's Digital Services Tax (DST). Trump described the tax as "a direct and blatant attack" on American businesses and warned that new tariffs on Canadian goods would be imposed within a week. Canada confirmed it will enforce the DST starting Monday, following months of tense discussions. The tax was introduced under the Trudeau government in June 2024 and applies a 3% levy on revenue earned by large digital firms—particularly those with over €750 million in global revenue and more than $20 million in Canadian digital sales. This move primarily targets major US tech firms like Amazon, Google, Meta, and Uber, with retroactive application to January 2022, creating a US$2 billion bill due by the end of June. Under Canadian law, companies are required to register with the Canada Revenue Agency by January 31, 2025, and file returns by June 30, 2025. Penalties include fines of $20,000 per year for failure to register, and late filing could result in additional financial penalties of up to 5% plus 1% monthly interest. Trump reacted strongly, ending trade discussions and stating on social media that Canada would regret its decision. He asserted, "We have such power over Canada. They were foolish to do it." Trump insisted Canada would eventually retract the tax but made clear he was indifferent to their decision. The tax has long been a sore point for US policymakers who claim it unfairly singles out American digital companies. Industry leaders welcomed Trump's firm approach. Matt Schruers of the Computer & Communications Industry Association praised the administration's move, saying it protected US digital exports from discriminatory treatment. In response to the DST, tech companies have started passing costs to Canadian customers. Google, for example, introduced a "Canada DST Fee" of 2.5% on ads purchased in the country. Despite US pressure, Canada remains resolute. Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne confirmed the government is moving forward, and Prime Minister Mark Carney stated negotiations will continue but only on Canada's terms. Canada relies heavily on trade with the US, with nearly 80% of its exports heading south. It is also America's top foreign supplier of oil, uranium, steel, and electricity. The highly integrated auto sector could be significantly affected by any new tariffs. This dispute is not isolated. The US had earlier initiated consultations under the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement regarding the DST. Canadian business groups have warned of potential harm to both economies if the situation escalates.