logo
Trump plans to impose a Russia ‘penalty' on India in addition to a 25 percent tariff as trade talks stall

Trump plans to impose a Russia ‘penalty' on India in addition to a 25 percent tariff as trade talks stall

RNZ News4 days ago
By
Phil Mattingly
and
Kit Maher
, CNN
US President Donald Trump doubled down on a threat to impose 25 percent tariffs on all Indian imports.
Photo:
AFP / Pool / Christopher Furlong
US President Donald Trump is ratcheting up the pressure on India, calling into question the prospects of a deal with a key US trading partner just days before his tariff deadline.
Trump, in a pair of social media posts Wednesday, sharply attacked India's trade barriers and directly targeted India's sustained reliance on Russian oil purchases and military equipment. He doubled down on his threat to impose 25 percent tariffs on all Indian imports and threatened an additional "penalty" in response to India's energy purchases.
"Remember, while India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the World, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country," Trump wrote on Truth Social.
"Also, they have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE - ALL THINGS NOT GOOD!"
Trump's tariff escalation comes on the heels of a series of deals with major US trading partners that have set a rough baseline of between 15 percent and 20 percent and included a series of pledges to expand market access for US products and foreign investment commitments.
For India, it marks a major setback in a months-long effort to secure a deal that officials believed on several occasions was nearing the finish line.
Top trade officials have been transiting back and forth between the Washington and New Delhi for months in pursuit of a final agreement. But the recent trade agreements with Japan and the European Union have emboldened Trump in the final days before the August 1 deadline for the administration's paused "reciprocal" tariffs to snap back into place, officials say.
Trump's ability to secure commitments on market access for US producers has become a particularly salient fixation as Trump has reviewed draft offers in recent days, the officials said. That has created a significant obstacle to the prospects of an agreement with India, one official told CNN.
"They're willing to go part of the way," the official said. "But the president isn't in a 'part of the way' mood - he wants barriers removed completely or as close to completely as possible."
Trump's approach is tied in part to a strategy that has become increasingly apparent to foreign trade officials involved in late-stage talks: Trump has no qualms about letting those higher tariffs go into place - a message he's delivered repeatedly in public over the last several weeks.
But it's also created an environment in which Trump has embraced a clear sense of leverage over trading partners - even close allies - who are desperate to maintain access to the world's largest consumer market.
"I think President Trump is frustrated with the progress we've made with India but feels that a 25 percetn rariff will address and remedy the situation in a way that's good for the American people," Director of the National Economic Council Kevin Hassett said at the White House on Wednesday.
The tariffs on India, Hassett said, might cause them to "reconsider their practices."
"Over time, I would guess that Indian firms will be onshoring production in the US, and Indians might even open their markets more to us so that we reconsider our future trades," Hassett added.
At the same time, Trump has escalated in parallel his threat to impose secondary sanctions on Russian energy exports in response to Russian President Vladimir Putin's refusal to de-escalate attacks on Ukraine.
That dynamic, which has long been weighed across successive administrations, would directly impact India and China most as nations who purchase the bulk of Russian energy products.
India's oil imports from Russia have ticked up this year as Russia continued to be the top supplier to the world's most populous nation. Russia for roughly 35 percent of India's overall supplies, followed by Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and United Arab Emirates.
CNN has reached out to the White House for more information on what the penalty will be and if India will be receiving an official letter from the United States marking the tariff, as other nations have received.
On Tuesday, Trump told reporters that India would pay 25 percent tariffs if they don't reach a deal by August 1.
When imposing a 50-day deadline on Russia to reach a ceasefire earlier this month, Trump announced that countries that purchase Russian oil would face secondary sanctions. That ceasefire deadline has since moved to August 8.
Trump officials have been privately making clear to counterparts that Trump's threat to significantly escalate an already sweeping US sanctions regime on Russia should be taken seriously and is not a negotiating ploy, the officials said.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Tuesday he shared that message directly with his Chinese counterparts during trade talks in Stockholm.
"I think anyone who buys sanctioned Russian oil should be ready for this," Bessent told reporters at a news conference at the conclusion of the talks.
According to an analysis of Russian fossil fuel exports and sanctions conducted by the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air in June, India continued to be the second-largest buyer of Russian fossil fuels behind China.
- CNN
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Pakistan shot down India's cutting-edge fighter using Chinese gear
How Pakistan shot down India's cutting-edge fighter using Chinese gear

RNZ News

time6 hours ago

  • RNZ News

How Pakistan shot down India's cutting-edge fighter using Chinese gear

By Saeed Shah and Shivam Patel , Reuters An Indian Air Force (IAF) Rafale fighter jet takes off, November 2022. Photo: Emmanuel Dunard / AFP Just after midnight on 7 May, the screen in the Pakistan Air Force's operations room lit up in red with the positions of dozens of active enemy planes across the border in India. Air Chief Marshal Zaheer Sidhu had been sleeping on a mattress just off that room for days in anticipation of an Indian assault. New Delhi had blamed Islamabad for backing militants who carried out an attack the previous month in Indian Kashmir, which killed 26 civilians. Despite Islamabad denying any involvement, India had vowed a response, which came in the early hours of 7 May, with air strikes on Pakistan. Sidhu ordered Pakistan's prized Chinese-made J-10C jets to scramble. A senior Pakistani Air Force (PAF) official, who was present in the operations room, said Sidhu instructed his staff to target Rafales, a French-made fighter that is the jewel of India's fleet and had never been downed in battle. "He wanted Rafales," said the official. The hour-long fight, which took place in darkness, involved some 110 aircraft, experts estimate, making it the world's largest air battle in decades. The J-10s shot down at least one Rafale , Reuters reported in May, citing US officials. It's downing surprised many in the military community and raised questions about the effectiveness of Western military hardware against untested Chinese alternatives. Pakistan Air Force J-10C fighter jets perform at a rehearsal ahead of Pakistan's national day parade in Islamabad in March, 2024. Photo: Aamir Qureshi / AFP Shares of Dassault, which makes the Rafale, dipped after reports that the fighter had been shot down. Indonesia, which has outstanding Rafale orders, has said it is now considering purchasing J-10s - a major boost to China's efforts to sell the aircraft overseas. Reuters interviews with two Indian officials and three of their Pakistani counterparts found that the performance of the Rafale wasn't the key problem. Central to its downing was an Indian intelligence failure concerning the range of the China-made PL-15 missile fired by the J-10 fighter. China and Pakistan are the only countries to operate both J-10s - known as Vigorous Dragons - and PL-15s. The faulty intelligence gave the Rafale pilots a false sense of confidence that they were out of Pakistani firing distance, which they believed was only about 150km, the Indian officials said, referring to the widely cited range of PL-15's export variant. "We ambushed them," the PAF official said, adding that Islamabad conducted an electronic warfare assault on Delhi's systems in an attempt to confuse Indian pilots. Indian officials dispute the effectiveness of those efforts. "The Indians were not expecting to be shot at," said Justin Bronk, air warfare expert at London's Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) think-tank. "The PL-15 is clearly very capable at long range." The PL-15 that hit the Rafale was fired from about 200km away, according to Pakistani officials, and even farther, according to Indian officials. That would make it among the longest-range air-to-air strikes recorded. India's defence and foreign ministries did not return requests for comment about the intelligence mistakes. Delhi hasn't acknowledged a Rafale being shot down, but France's air chief told reporters in June that he had seen evidence of the loss of that fighter and two other aircraft flown by India, including a Russian-made Sukhoi. A top Dassault executive also told French lawmakers that month that India had lost a Rafale in operations, although he didn't have specific details. Pakistan's military referred to past comments by a spokesperson, who said that its professional preparedness and resolve was more important than the weaponry it had deployed. China's defence ministry did not respond to Reuters' questions. Dassault and UAC, the manufacturer of the Sukhoi, also did not return requests for comment. Reuters spoke to eight Pakistani and two Indian officials to piece together an account of the aerial battle, which marked the start of four days of fighting between the two nuclear-armed neighbours that caused alarm in Washington. The officials all spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss national security matters. Not only did Islamabad have the element of surprise with its missiles' range, the Pakistani and Indian officials said, but it managed to more efficiently connect its military hardware to surveillance on the ground and in the air, providing it with a clearer picture of the battlefield. Such networks, known as "kill chains," have become a crucial element of modern warfare. Four Pakistani officials said they created a "kill chain" or a multi-domain operation, by linking air, land and space sensors. The network included a Pakistani-developed system, Data Link 17, which connected Chinese military hardware with other equipment, including a Swedish-made surveillance plane, two Pakistani officials said. The system allowed the J-10s flying closer to India to obtain radar feeds from the surveillance plane cruising further away, meaning the Chinese-made fighters could turn their radars off and fly undetected, according to experts. Pakistan's military did not respond to requests for comment on this point. Delhi is trying to set up a similar network, the Indian officials said, adding that their process was more complicated because the country sourced aircraft from a wide range of exporters. Retired UK Air Marshal Greg Bagwell, now a fellow at RUSI, said the episode didn't conclusively prove the superiority of either Chinese or Western air assets, but it showed the importance of having the right information and using it. "The winner in this was the side that had the best situational awareness," said Bagwell. After India, in the early hours of 7 May, struck targets in Pakistan that it called terrorist infrastructure, Sidhu ordered his squadrons to switch from defence to attack. Five PAF officials said India had deployed some 70 planes, which was more than they had expected and provided Islamabad's PL-15s with a target-rich environment. India has not said how many planes were used. The 7 May battle marked the first big air contest of the modern era in which weaponry is used to strike targets beyond visual range, said Bagwell, noting both India and Pakistan's planes remained well within their airspaces across the duration of the fight. Five Pakistani officials said an electronic assault on Indian sensors and communications systems reduced the situational awareness of the Rafale's pilots. The two Indian officials said the Rafales were not blinded during the skirmishes and that Indian satellites were not jammed. But they acknowledged that Pakistan appeared to have disrupted the Sukhoi, whose systems Delhi is now upgrading. Other Indian security officials have deflected questions away from the Rafale, a centrepiece of India's military modernisation, to the orders given to the air force. India's defence attaché in Jakarta told a university seminar that Delhi had lost some aircraft "only because of the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack (Pakistan's) military establishments and their air defences." India's chief of defence staff, General Anil Chauhan, previously told Reuters that Delhi quickly "rectified tactics" after the initial losses. After the 7 May air battle, India began targeting Pakistani military infrastructure and asserting its strength in the skies. It's Indian-made BrahMos supersonic cruise missile repeatedly sliced through Pakistan's air defences, according to officials on both sides. On 10 May, India said it struck at least nine air bases and radar sites in Pakistan. It also hit a surveillance plane parked in a hangar in southern Pakistan, according to Indian and Pakistani officials. A ceasefire was agreed later that day, after US officials held talks with both sides. In the aftermath of the episode, India's deputy army chief Lieutenant General Rahul Singh accused Pakistan of receiving "live inputs" from China during the battles, implying radar and satellite feeds. Military personnel stand in front of a Chengdu Aircraft Corporation J-10C, September, 2021. Photo: Noel Celis / AFP He did not provide evidence and Islamabad denied the allegation. When asked at a July briefing about Beijing's military partnership with Pakistan, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning told reporters the work was "part of the normal co-operation between the two countries and does not target any third party". Beijing's air chief, Lieutenant General Wang Gang, visited Pakistan in July to discuss how Islamabad had used Chinese equipment to put together the "kill chain" for the Rafale, two PAF officials said. China did not respond, when asked about that interaction. The Pakistani military said in July that Wang had expressed "keen interest in learning from PAF's battle-proven experience in Multi Domain Operations". -Reuters

Need some 'motherly warmth'? In Japan, you can hire a grandma for as little as $60
Need some 'motherly warmth'? In Japan, you can hire a grandma for as little as $60

RNZ News

time8 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Need some 'motherly warmth'? In Japan, you can hire a grandma for as little as $60

By Neryssa Azlan and Seena Katayama , ABC Taeko Kaji started working as a grandmother-for-hire after her dog died. Photo: Supplied / Client Partners / ABC As a grandmother-for-hire, 69-year-old Taeko Kaji performs a variety of tasks - from cleaning to cooking to giving life advice. "I never get bored," the Tokyo resident told the ABC . "I get to go out and have these experiences, and that's why taking this job was the right decision for me." Japan is experiencing what some have called a "loneliness epidemic". Grandmother-for-hire services allow people to experience what it is like to have an older woman care for them in a maternal way for as little as $60 a visit. They also provide a work opportunity in a society that usually does not value the skills and experience of older women. Kaji said she wanted to find a job to keep her busy after her dog died. The only option she could find for a woman at her age was to be a cleaner. That was until her daughter came across a company that hired older women to play the role of grandmother for strangers. Kaji is employed by Client Partners, a "women-only handyman" company run by women and employing only women. Besides working as grandmothers-for-hire, Client Partner's older staff also provide care and emotional support to people their own age. Photo: Supplied / Client Partners / ABC Client Partners started the OK!Obaachan (OK!Grandmother) service in 2011, hoping to tackle problems that women were suited for. "There were so many male handymen and we knew that the market was saturated," chief executive Ruri Kanazawa told the ABC . "Just adding the word 'female' [to the business] really opened up the market." Of the company's approximately 300-400 staff, about 80 are over the age of 60. Other services the company offers include interpreters and tourist guides, or even renting a friend or an aunt. They say they get a wide range of customers, from men and women in their 20s to people in their 70s. Kaji said one client, who was about the same age as her, hired her to pack their expensive tableware. Client Partners currently employs approximately 300-400 staff members, with about 80 of them over the age of 60. Photo: Supplied / Client Partners / ABC Kanazawa said the emotional support they provided made their company stand out from other "handyman companies". She said many of their clients sought their services because it could be hard for them to "ask for help even for things that could be solved between relatives or family members". "Some people may be abused and some people may never have had a mother in the first place," she said. Kaori Okano says Client Partners provides opportunities that are valuable for some older women. Photo: Supplied / Kaori Okano / ABC "Our grandmother staff members, who cook for the guests and act like a mother to them, help provide the motherly warmth they need." Kaori Okano, a professor of Asian Studies and Japanese at La Trobe University, studies gender relations in Japan. She said the company provided valuable opportunities for some older women. "These organisations value 'housewife' skills," said Okano. "It gives a sense of self-fulfilment to these women, who were previously unemployed, that they can be useful and valued by other people." In Japan, retirees can receive income from employee pension schemes, similar to superannuation in Australia, and the national basic pension scheme. Ruri Kanazawa says Client Partners founder Maki Abe saw "a gaping hole that no one else was doing which was mental support" . Photo: Supplied / Client Partners / ABC To be eligible for the pension, they need to have contributed to it through work or their husband must have made contributions to their own employee pension scheme. Okano said this meant some women might get less pension, if they were not married or if they did not have regular income. "The dominant trend two decades ago was that women would quit their jobs and stay at home, after they got married and had kids," she said. "Once their kids start school, they re-enter the workforce in casual or contract roles, also known as non-regular work." Photo: Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications Japan / ABC While Japanese mothers have been able to participate more fully in the workforce, thanks to improved maternity leave and childcare, there is still a gender gap. Japan's 2024 Labour Force Survey found that the number of women with regular employment still peaked at 25-34 years old. Eriko Teramura, who is the professor of human resource management and labour economics at Japan's Meikai University, said she expected the number of older women in the workforce to increase. "Older women often have long periods of unemployment or part-time work, limiting their accumulation of work skills," Teramura told the ABC . "It's unlikely that many older women can survive on their own pensions alone." According to Teramura, companies like Client Partners demonstrated the growing need for "social innovation that combines caregiving, community, and employment". "Contributing to society through life experience, emotional labour and communication skills can provide purpose and income for older women," she said. OECD economists have warned that the decline in the working-age population in Japan could impact its economic growth. To counter this, they have recommended closing the gender gap in employment and increasing immigration. The Japanese government has made some efforts to address these labour gender disparities. A recent amendment to the Promotion of Women's Active Engagement in Professional Life Act will force companies to be transparent about their gender pay gap, as well as their share of women in managerial positions, from April 2026. Kanazawa said working with her older colleagues had made her optimistic about Japan's future. "Older people have a lot of different experiences and a tough soul, and I've learned a lot from Ms Kaji and my colleagues," she said. -ABC

Watchdog agency launches probe into former Trump prosecutor Jack Smith
Watchdog agency launches probe into former Trump prosecutor Jack Smith

RNZ News

time18 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Watchdog agency launches probe into former Trump prosecutor Jack Smith

By Kaanita Iyer , CNN Special Counsel Jack Smith delivers remarks in Washington, DC, on 1 August, 2023. Photo: Getty via CNN Newsource The Office of Special Counsel has launched an investigation into former special counsel Jack Smith, who led criminal probes into President Donald Trump's handling of classified documents and alleged efforts to subvert the 2020 election. The investigation into potential Hatch Act violations comes as Trump and his allies have sought retribution against his political enemies and those who brought investigations against him. The Hatch Act limits certain political activities of government workers. It is supposed to stop the federal government from affecting elections or going about its activities in a partisan manner. According to the OSC's explanation of the rule, it applies to federal employees as well as state and local employees who work with federally funded programmes. While the Office of Special Counsel - which is distinct from the special counsels, like Smith, who are appointed to oversee politically sensitive Justice Department investigations - is an independent agency created by Congress. It is currently helmed by a Trump appointee in an acting capacity after the president fired the previous head of the office, who was appointed by President Joe Biden for a five year term. The office handles allegations of whistleblower retaliation and Hatch Act investigations, according to its website. CNN has reached out to a representative for Smith and to the White House for comment. The New York Post first reported the news. In 2021, a report found that 13 administration officials from Trump's first term violated the Hatch Act, including former adviser Kellyanne Conway, whom the Office of Special Counsel had previously recommended be removed from her job. Biden's press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre received a warning letter in 2023 for violating the Hatch Act by using the term "mega MAGA" from the briefing room podium. The rule is a workplace guideline, and violating it is not a crime. Responses can vary significantly after employees violate the rule, from a slap on the wrist to loss of a job. Smith no longer works for the federal government after he resigned from the Justice Department earlier this year - months after he formally dropped the classified documents and election subversion cases following Trump's victory in the 2024 election. Smith's two-year investigation into Trump was historic, marking the first time a former occupant of the White House faced federal criminal charges. Trump and his allies rallied against Smith, attacking his probes as a weaponization of the federal government. Trump had vowed to fire Smith once he retook the office, shattering previous norms around special counsel investigations. The Office of Special Counsel investigation comes after Trump ally Sen. Tom Cotton claimed earlier this week that "Smith used his DOJ role to influence the election" in favour of Biden's and Vice President Kamala Harris' campaigns, pointing to Smith filing a brief within 60 days of Election Day - which could violate a separate Justice Department rule that goes beyond the Hatch Act. Richard Painter, the top ethics lawyer in the George W Bush administration, told CNN he has "never seen a prosecutor found to violate the Hatch Act for pleading with a court". "If Jack Smith was making public announcements close to the election and putting up press releases, that is something he'd have to be extremely careful about," said Painter, now a law professor at the University of Minnesota. "But this was a case that'd been pending ever since the summer of 2023, and for him to continue the case with the filings with the courts that he filed, I don't think that is a violation of the Hatch Act." It is unclear what exactly the Office of Special Counsel is investigating as a possible violation of the Hatch Act. Painter also cast doubt on the independence of the agency under the Trump administration. Earlier this year, Trump fired Hampton Dellinger, a Biden appointee, and picked US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer to serve as interim head of the office. Trump's nominee for the position, Paul Ingrassia, awaits Senate confirmation. "A political appointee is going to do what the president wants. So, you know, it's not really functioning as an independent agency," Painter told CNN. CNN has reported that insiders and independent watchdogs are raising alarms over the historically a non-partisan agency, saying it has been "captured" by loyalists from the very administration it's supposed to police. "The office is a shell of its former self," a former federal ethics official previously told CNN in an interview. - CNN

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store