Swinney to press Trump on Scotch whisky tariffs exemption
John Swinney said the 'uniqueness' of whisky made in Scotland justified the exemption from the 10% tariff applied on UK exports into the US.
The First Minister, who is due to hold talks with Mr Trump during his ongoing visit to Scotland, said the tariffs were currently costing the local whisky industry £4 million a week.
'Tariffs are very important for the Scottish economy and obviously scotch whisky is a unique product,' he told BBC Breakfast.
'It can only be produced in Scotland. It's not a product that can be produced in any other part of the world. So there's a uniqueness about that, which I think means there is a case for it to be taken out of the tariffs arrangement that is now in place.
'Obviously the trade deal with the United States provides a degree of stability for economic connections with the United States, but the application of tariffs is increasing the costs for the Scotch whisky industry.
'So one of my objectives will be to make the case to President Trump that Scotch whisky should be exempted from those tariffs.
'It's a product that is uniquely produced in Scotland, and it's a product that is much welcomed and supported within the United States. And I think there's a really good case for exempting Scotch whisky, and this is an opportunity that I have to put that case to President Trump on behalf of the Scotch whisky industry, which is a significant part of the Scottish economy.
'And the tariffs just now are costing the industry about £4 million each week, so it's a very significant burden on the industry. It would help growth and development within the Scottish economy if we could secure that deal. And, obviously, I'll be using every opportunity I have to try to put that across to President Trump.'
Mr Trump's five-day visit to Scotland is largely a private one that has seen the president play golf at his course at Turnberry in Ayrshire ahead of opening a new course at his property in Aberdeenshire on Tuesday.
Mr Swinney said the final cost of the policing the visit has yet to be worked out.
'Obviously, we're working very closely with Police Scotland and the Scottish Police Authority about the arrangements for this visit,' he said.
'The security arrangements have gone well since President Trump arrived on Friday, and that's as it should be, because we've got an obligation to make sure that when we have major international visitors, when they come to Scotland, that they are protected and able to go about their activities.
Pressed to reveal the bill, Mr Swinney added: 'All of that will be worked out and we'll address that with Police Scotland and the Scottish Police Authority, and we're talking to the United Kingdom government about these questions, but it's important that we have a secure policing operation.
'It's also important that members of the public who wish to express their point of view, who want to protest about the visit or about other issues, are able to go about their exercise of their democratic right to protest. That's exactly what they've been able to do since Friday, and that's the way it should be.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
5 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Man at war with neighbours over 'oppressive' private drinking den in his garden 'just 20cm from their fence'
Disgruntled neighbours are at war over claims that a resident has built a private drinking den in his garden without planning permission. Company director Michael Bowe, 40, erected a sprawling summer house in the back garden, claiming in council documents that it was needed for 'modern home working and flexible living'. But neighbours allege the plush five-metre-long annexe in Marton-in-Cleveland, near Middlesbrough, looks more like a private bar than a home office. In objections submitted to Middlesbrough Council, disgruntled neighbour Debby Allan wrote to officials: 'We do not feel like the use of what this building is for is accurate. 'It appears to be a bar and when used there have been unacceptable noise levels, as there is a lot of glass that echoes from the outside which causes disturbance to us.' Council planners have now ordered the 'overbearing' and 'oppressive' summer house to be demolished after refusing a retrospective planning application. The flat-roofed garden building, which measures 3.5m by 5m, was built just 20cm from a neighbour's fence and stands nearly three metres tall. Planning permission is typically required when a building taller than 2.5m is located within two metres of a boundary. In planning documents, Ms Allan accused Mr Bowe, a co-director of Middlesbrough childcare agency Invested Childcare, of causing 'great disruption' and said the annexe was 'not in character with existing properties'. She added: 'The work to this property has already been carried out in 2022 and 2024. It has caused great disruption, which has in turn caused us a lot of stress and impacted our mental health. 'We work shifts including night shifts, the noise and disruption had meant we had to stay with relatives to rest in between. 'We were unable to open our blinds in the living room due to the lack of privacy by the builders.' Another neighbour also submitted complaints which claimed the annexe looms into view from her living room and dominates the garden, with its rear wall pressed up against Mr Bowe's back fence. Louise Finn claimed she had endured a loss of privacy and that a confrontation between the pair had caused 'a huge amount of stress and anxiety'. The concern, raised in the documents, read: 'This property has been developed without planning permission and any consideration to properties involved. 'I respectfully request that you reconsider the approval for this retrospective planning of the development, as it would have a negative impact on my property and health and well-being.' Town hall officials refused retrospective planning consent, despite accepting that the annexe was 'not unattractive or of low quality in design terms'. But it ruled the 'significant overbearing' development affects the 'quality of life and living conditions' of neighbours, and launched enforcement action. Mr Bowe, who bought his four-bed detached home for £390,000 in 2020, is appealing the council's order to raze the summer house, describing the planning permission refusal as 'without merit'. His planning consultants argue the summer house only marginally exceeds height limits due to its proximity to the boundary fence, and causes no actual harm to neighbouring properties. They claim 'careful consideration' was given to its placement behind a neighbour's garage, which they say 'almost entirely screens it from view'. The consultants said: 'In the present case, the proposed summer house has been deliberately positioned behind the adjoining property's garage, ensuring it is substantially screened from view and has no adverse effect on outlook, daylight, or privacy.' It said the summer house 'remains well-screened by boundary fencing, free from overlooking openings, and is positioned to avoid shadowing or overbearing effects. 'The design, while utilising a flat roof, does so in a low-profile and non-intrusive way.' The planning inspectorate will make a decision on whether to uphold or overturn the council's refusal later this year. When approached at his home, Mr Bowe declined to comment, describing himself as a 'private person'. He said: 'I don't feel like I've done anything wrong.'
BBC News
5 minutes ago
- BBC News
Padel could come to Rotherham under new plans
The dedicated padel tennis centre could open in Rotherham under new plans submitted to the application to transform a vacant industrial unit in Hellaby would see several indoor padel courts built alongside a small cafe and Lawn Tennis Association (LTA) has supported the proposal, describing the development as a "fantastic attribute for the Rotherham area".The LTA said there were currently no padel courts in Rotherham and praised the facility's potential to boost participation in what it calls the "fastest-growing sport in the world". Padel is a racket sport that combines elements of tennis and squash, played on a smaller enclosed court, and is designed to be more accessible and sociable than traditional site, Unit 1, Sandbeck Way, is currently a vacant truck park and distribution warehouse which dates back to the 1970s, according to the Local Democracy Reporting to the applicant the building is no longer viable as a warehouse due to modern demands and structural limitations and has stood vacant since applicant said the centre would create up to 12 jobs, including roles for padel coaches, cleaning and maintenance staff, and a full-time site provision would be expanded from the existing 14 spaces to a minimum of 37, with an additional 14 overspill spaces available at the nearby Trinity House unit. Eight parking bays would be equipped with electric vehicle charging would operate from 7am to 10pm on weekdays and 8am to 9pm at application is currently under consideration by Rotherham Council's planning department. Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North
Daily Mail
5 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Record number of over-60s are referred to anti-terrorism scheme amid overall explosion in 'extreme right wing' views
Record numbers of over-60s are being referred to the Government's troubled anti-terrorism scheme, the Daily Mail can reveal today. Home Office figures show 127 adults in their 60s or beyond were put on Prevent's radar in 2023/24 - the most since records began in 2016. Of them, 43 had sparked alarm for expressing 'extreme right wing' views. Extreme right wing ideologies 'can be broadly characterised as cultural nationalism, white nationalism and white supremacism', officials say. Guidance published online states they also use violence to further their aims. Yet free speech campaigners fear that anyone critical of mass immigration might be being wrongly labelled an 'extremist'. Last month, it was revealed how Prevent training documents listed sharing the view that Western culture was 'under threat from mass migration and a lack of integration' was a 'terrorist ideology'. And in 2023, it emerged that popular British sitcoms, including comedies Yes Minister and The Thick Of It, were marked as 'key texts' for white nationalists. Even the 1955 epic war film The Dam Busters and The Complete Works Of William Shakespeare were flagged as possible red flags of extremism by Prevent's Research Information and Communications Unit. Across all age groups, more than 1,300 people were referred to Prevent last year for 'extreme right wing' behaviour, including 27 kids under the age of ten. While 'extreme right wing' referrals have been stable since records began in 2016, the reports for over 60s in all categories has more than doubled - rising from 59 in 2016, to 127 in 2023. Over the same period, the overall number of referrals under the Islamist umbrella has plunged by 75 per cent, from 3,706 to 913 - or 13 per cent of the total. Islamist terrorism relates to 'the threat or use of violence as a means to establish a strict interpretation of an Islamic society'. A damning public report warned in 2023 that Prevent had been experiencing a 'loss of focus' as it had become distracted by far right cases, rather than concentrating on Islamists. In his long-awaited 188-page report, William Shawcross claimed too many resources were being focused on right-wing terrorism rather than its Islamist equivalent, which has been responsible for far more deadly attacks. Since 2015, the law has placed public bodies, such as schools and the police, under a legal duty to identify people in danger of turning to extremism. But the £49million-a-year Prevent scheme has faced huge criticism over its failures in spotting Islamist terror sympathisers, including those with links to notorious hate preacher Anjem Choudary. Southport murderer Axel Rudakubana was also missed, despite being referred to the deradicalisation body three times before he went on to knife three children to death in July 2024. The scheme works by local council-appointed Prevent coordinators taking referrals from public servants like teachers and social workers, with each individual of concern categorised by their ideology. Less serious cases are dealt with by councils, who can offer services like mentoring or parenting support, while the more serious ones go to Channel, where a panel of local officials, including police, will recommend the next steps. If Prevent officers find no risk of radicalisation while conducting initial checks, the case is immediately closed. Potential threats from left wing organisations are also included in the annual Prevent figures, although an exact toll is not provided as counter-terror chiefs view the risk as slim. Expressing sympathy or admiration for the likes of Adolf Hitler or praising extremists would be enough to risk being flagged to Prevent if overheard by a teacher, social worker or even work colleague. However concerns have been raised after Prevent has also been flagging far more mainstream views. Pictures from a Prevent online training course emerged last month which highlighted 'dangerous' beliefs such as 'Cultural nationalism' and the idea 'Western culture is under threat'. Critics warned the definition of 'cultural nationalism' is too broad and could even encompass the likes of Sir Keir Starmer's 'island of strangers' speech - despite polling showing most Brits agreed with him. There are three categories of 'Extreme right-wing' terrorism according to Prevent. They are 'Cultural nationalism', 'white/ethno-nationalism' and 'white supremacism' What is Prevent? Prevent was set up in 2006 to combat the threat of Islamic terrorism in the UK following the 7/7 London bombings which killed 52 commuters. The stated aim of the voluntary programme is to 'divert' people from potential terrorism-related activity before they offend, and it is not a criminal sanction. Since 2015, local authority staff and other professionals such as doctors, teachers and social workers have a duty to flag concerns about an individual being radicalised or drawn into a terrorism. Less serious reports may be sent to council services, which could include parenting support for families whose children have been watching inappropriate videos online. Serious reports are forwarded on to Prevent's Channel stage, at which a panel of local police, healthcare specialists and social workers meeting monthly will consider the case. Hundreds of Prevent officers also work inside police forces and local authorities to identify potential extremists, and intervene with a programme of deradicalisation. Over the years, Prevent has been reformed several times. Each year, thousands staff undergo Prevent training. Prevent faced a barrage of criticism last year when a 12-year-old schoolboy was investigated by counter-extremism officers after he declared there 'are only two genders'. The child made a video, posted online, in which he also stated: 'There's no such thing as non-binary'. But the school told the boy's mother they would refer him to Prevent amid fears he could be at risk of being radicalised by the far-right. The boy's mother was visited by Prevent and Northumbria Police officers, in a meeting she described as 'an interrogation'. Other teenage boys face investigation by anti-terrorism officers if they make sexist remarks in the classroom, it was claimed. One source said previously comments about a 'woman's place being in the kitchen' could be enough to spark a referral to the unit. The personal details of those referred to Prevent are retained on its databases for at least six years and duplicated across police and intelligence systems. It comes as counter terrorism officers urged parents to keep an eye out for signs that their child could be drawn into extremism after Netflix's Adolescence became a topic of mainstream political debate. In April, the Met Police's Prevent co-coordinator told parents to 'take an active interest' in their child's online activities so they can be aware of signs that they could be vulnerable to radicalisation. Adolescence examines so-called incel (involuntary celibate) culture, which is related to violence and hating women. However, the latest data shows incels make up less than one per cent of Prevent referrals. Prevent is the first tier in the Government's anti radicalisation strategy. After an initial discussion with police, a case can be diverted to Channel process - a voluntary programme designed to support people deemed terrorist threats. People who accept help from Channel can get assistance through mentoring, religious guidance, education and even help with housing and hobbies in a bid to lead them away from trouble. If people at risk of radicalisation refuse help or are at continued risk of radicalisation, they will be continually monitored by police. In the past, Prevent has been criticised by groups who claim it discriminates against Muslims and children. Others have claimed it lacks transparency, as people are often unaware why they have been referred or how they can challenge it. However a study by the Counter Extremism Group, a think tank close to the government, previously found many of the attacks on the programme were misguided and relied largely on 'speculation and unproven assumptions' by 'anti-Prevent activists'. A Home Office spokesperson said: 'Since it first came into existence two decades ago, the Prevent programme has dealt with a wide range of individuals where concerns have been raised about their potential radicalisation. 'The make-up of the individuals referred to Prevent may change over time, but the role of the programme in stopping people from becoming terrorists remains the same.' The number of referrals might include individuals who have been reported more than once during the year.
