
SC allows Adani Cementation to cut 158 mangrove trees for captive jetty project along Amba river
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
The Supreme Court on Monday upheld the Bombay High Court 's order that allowed Adani Cementation to cut 158 mangrove trees for construction of a captive jetty project along the Amba river in Maharashtra's Raigad district.The jetty construction project , which allegedly fell within 1.26 hectares of Coastal Regulation Zone regulations-IA area (being mangrove forest and mangrove buffer zone area), will help Adani transport cement, clinker and other raw material through waterways along with a conveyor corridor and an approach road to the proposed cement grinding and fly ash processing unit, a back up storage unit in Shahapur and Shahabaz in Raigad district to meet the increasing demand for cement in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR).A bench led by Chief Justice B.R. Gavai dismissed a petition by the Bombay Environmental Action Group, an NGO, alleging that the HC failed to appreciate that mangroves and mangrove buffer zones were ecologically sensitive and geomorphological features which play a role in maintaining the integrity of the coast and their destruction would threaten Maharashtra's fragile coastal environment.The HC judgment 'fundamentally erred in prioritizing the commercial interests of a private entity over the paramount ecological importance of mangroves,' the NGO said.Considering the large demand of cement in the coastal areas and seeing the current congestion of roads in MMR, Adani said that it had conceptualised setting up of cement manufacturing unit along Amba River, with an intention to reduce the carbon footprint and to help reduce the overall pollution and also accelerate the infrastructure development in Mumbai, and hence it was in larger public interest.The HC had on March 5 allowed the project "keeping in mind the goal of sustainable development of striking a balance between the necessity of the project, which aims at meeting the every increasing need of cement.' The HC found no difficulty in granting the requisite permission to Adani as the requisite statutory permissions were granted in favour of the project, subject to strict compliance of the conditions imposed upon it by various statutory authorities for ensuring protection of ecology and environment.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
GST notices based on UPI transaction: Traders on warpath, official calls action proper
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Amid rising concerns among traders in Karnataka over the issuance of nearly 6,000 GST demand notices based on UPI transaction data, traders' bodies gave a strike call, while a top tax official termed the action to be within the framework of to the PTI, Meera Suresh Pandit, Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, has also clarified that notices are not final tax demands and the recipients have the right to respond with supporting documentation. If the reply is convincing or the goods and services are exempted under the GST Act, notices will be dropped, she to the issue of notices sent to traders based on UPI transactions, a number of Traders Associations in Karnataka have given a call to the traders to boycott UPI transactions. They have also called for a strike on July to the reports of a proposed traders' strike on July 25 and calls to revert to cash-only transactions, Pandit explained in detail the rationale behind the notices."When a person reaches the threshold limit of Rs 20 lakh for services or Rs 40 lakh for goods, it is mandatory for the person to get registered under the GST Act to take registration and declare his turnover," the officer told PTI."The registration empowers the trader to collect taxes from the consumers and pay it to the government. These taxes are meant for the government, but when the dealers collect them and fail to remit them, they are treated as unregistered persons, and we issue notices accordingly."The department, she said, cannot individually identify every trader evading registration. Instead, the Services Analysis Wing at the department's head office used reliable sources such as UPI transaction data to flag potential defaulters."If a person has transacted over Rs 20 lakh for services or Rs 40 lakh for goods in a year through UPI, it indicates that they may be liable to register under GST," Pandit said, adding that notices were based only on preliminary data, not final officer said the department is not aware whether the turnover is entirely exempted, partially taxable, or fully taxable. That is why the notice includes a proposal to register and pay applicable taxes, interest, and penalties."If the turnover is completely from exempted goods or services like tuition fees, the registration is not required. If the reply is convincing, the notice will be dropped and proceedings will close with a nil demand," Pandit also addressed doubts prevailing among the trading circles."Some innocent traders are being carried away, hoping every notice will be withdrawn. Some are being misled. But if they want relief within legal provisions, I request them to come to the department. We will guide them as per the law," the Joint Commissioner said."Calling for a ' Bandh ' will not serve the purpose. They may represent their concerns peacefully," she concerns that UPI alone doesn't reveal the full turnover, Pandit said, "The UPI transaction is only one indicator. There could be other modes of payment like cash, card, or net banking. So, if they are not liable for registration, they must explain and support their claim through written replies or personal hearings."The department, the officer said, is open to engagement and has made extensive efforts to educate traders."Prior to the rollout of GST in July 2017, we conducted door-to-door awareness programmes, workshops, and released educational videos," she said."We also have helplines now across offices, and traders are coming forward to seek guidance.""Even if traders fail to respond to the first notice, we send three reminders and conduct a field visit if necessary. Final assessment happens only after considering their response and facts," she told PTI."We strictly adhere to the principles of natural justice and ensure every opportunity is given," she added."When you buy a plot, you go to the sub-registrar's office without being told. Likewise, traders should know applicable tax laws. Ignorance cannot be an excuse. The department is always there to guide," she trade activist Sajjanraj Mehta raised concerns over the fairness of recent GST notices He stated that while the Commercial Taxes Department is legally within its powers to use such data, the lack of prior warning, context, and education has confused."Many small traders were unaware that their UPI inflows, often a mix of business and personal transactions, would be treated as undeclared turnover," Mehta told PTI."The fairness issue lies not in enforcement itself, but in the suddenness and lack of clarity," he stressed that the department should differentiate between exempt and taxable goods before sending notices."Issuing notices without accounting for exempt goods like fruits, vegetables, or unbranded food items shows a lack of nuance," he said."A more tailored, data-informed approach could have avoided unnecessary panic".Mehta acknowledged a growing trend among vendors in Bengaluru and Mysuru to shift away from UPI."There's visible hesitation, especially in markets and grocery stores. Some vendors are reverting to cash or asking customers to avoid UPI. However, urban areas with tech-savvy customers still show strong digital payment usage," he to him, traders are currently seeking clear guidelines on how UPI transactions are treated under GST, a mechanism to contest mismatches or clarify exemptions without immediate penalties and awareness programmes in local languages.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
ADB lowers India's FY26 growth forecast on trade, tariff concerns
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The Asian Development Bank ( ADB ) on Wednesday lowered India's growth forecast for FY26 to 6.5 per cent from 6.7 per cent on account of trade uncertainty and higher US tariffs that are expected to impact exports and the downward revision from the April 2025 Asian Development Outlook (ADO), India remains one of the fastest-growing major economies in the world."This revision is primarily due to the impact of US baseline tariffs and associated policy uncertainty. In addition to the effects of lower global growth and the direct impact of additional US tariffs on Indian exports, heightened policy uncertainty may affect investment flows," the July ADO this, economic activity remains robust, with domestic consumption set to grow strongly on the back of revival of rural demand, it and agriculture sectors are expected to be key drivers of growth, the latter supported by a forecast of above-normal monsoon rains, it Economic Survey has projected the GDP growth for FY26 between 6.3 per cent and 6.8 per cent, while RBI lowered its growth forecast from an earlier level of 6.7 per cent to 6.5 per cent for the ongoing financial economy grew by 6.5 per cent in the FY25, marking its slowest pace in four years. This growth was the slowest in four years and compared to a 9.2 per cent expansion in the previous 2023-24 to the report, the central government's fiscal position remains strong, with higher-than-expected dividends from the Reserve Bank of India, and it is on track to meet the targeted reduction in its fiscal FY27, growth is projected to improve to 6.7 per cent on account of rising investments, under the assumption of reduced policy uncertainty and favourable financial conditions, backed by recent reductions in the repo rate and the cash reserve ratio by the monetary authorities, the report inflation on a downward trend, the RBI's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) has been reducing the benchmark repo rate and has adopted a neutral stance, which also gives the flexibility to either cut or hike the rate going forward. The central bank has cumulatively reduced the repo rate by 100 basis points since February this month, The RBI cut interest rates by more than expected 50 basis points, a third consecutive reduction, and unexpectedly reduced the cash reserve ratio for banks to provide a major liquidity fillip to support the economy amid geopolitical and tariff also cut the cash reserve ratio by 100 basis points to 3 per cent, adding Rs 2.5 lakh crore to already surplus liquidity in the banking baseline expectations of lower crude oil prices will also support economic activity in FY26 and FY27, it added. PTI


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
SC stays Bombay HC order asking MMRDA to deposit full ₹1,169 crore arbitral award to Ambani's metro JV
Advt Advt By , ET Bureau The Supreme Court has stayed a Bombay High Court order directing the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority ( MMRDA ) to deposit the entire arbitral award of ₹1,169 crore won by Mumbai Metro One Private Ltd (MMOPL), a subsidiary of Anil Ambani 's Reliance Infrastructure, in the apex court said the HC's direction to deposit the full award amount in favour of MMOPL will remain stayed, subject to MMRDA depositing 50 per cent of the awarded amount in the High Court.A bench led by Justice Manoj Mishra sought a response from MMOPL on MMRDA's appeal against the HC's July 10 order, which refused the latter's request for an unconditional stay on the arbitral top court further clarified that the pendency of the proceedings will not preclude the HC from continuing with the hearing of the application filed by MMRDA under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act , 1996. If the HC finally decides the application in the meantime, this interim order will abide by the HC's General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the state entity, argued that the HC's condition to deposit the entire awarded amount at this stage would be unduly harsh. Therefore, it was a fit case to modify the condition imposed by the High Court while granting interim relief to the Ambani in its appeal, submitted that the HC had erred in not granting interim relief, given that the arbitral award was patently illegal and perverse, beyond the scope of the arbitration agreement, in breach of principles of natural justice, and passed without application of mind or any evidentiary basis.A majority decision of the three-member arbitral tribunal in 2023 awarded ₹992 crore plus interest to MMOPL, a special purpose vehicle (SPV) between Reliance Infrastructure (74 per cent stake) and MMRDA (26 per cent stake). The award was passed in 2023 and corrected in 2024. The JV operates Mumbai's first metro line on the Versova-Andheri-Ghatkopar Maharashtra government had in June 2006 awarded the Metro One Project to the consortium of Reliance Infrastructure and Veolia Transport SA (now Transdev Ile-de-France).Multiple disputes arose between the parties over development, design, engineering, financing, procurement, construction, operation, and maintenance of the mass rapid transit system, as well as delays in project completion. The metro rail project was delayed by over two years. MMOPL claimed project costs increased from ₹2,356 crore to ₹4,321 crore, which MMRDA the Ambani firm invoked the arbitration clause under the Concession Agreement.