&w=3840&q=100)
Thailand closes border with Cambodia, recalls ambassador amid tensions
AP Bangkok
Thailand said Wednesday it is closing northeastern border crossings with Cambodia, withdrawing its ambassador to the neighboring country and expelling the Cambodian ambassador to protest a landmine blast in which a Thai soldier lost a leg.
A Thai Army statement said four other soldiers also were wounded Wednesday when one of them stepped on a land mine that Thailand blamed on Cambodia and said took place in Thailand's Ubon Ratchathani province.
Cambodia disputed that account, saying the blast happened in its Preah Vihear province. It occurred in one of several small patches of land along the border that both lay claim to and which is treated as a no-man's land.
The explosion drew a swift response from the Thai government. Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai said the Foreign Ministry would make an official protest to Cambodia, and further measures would be considered.
The injuries Wednesday came a week after three other Thai soldiers were wounded when one of them stepped on a land mine and lost a foot in a different contested area along the border.
Thai authorities say that the mines were newly laid along paths that by mutual agreement were supposed to be safe. They said the mines were Russian-made and not of a type employed by Thailand's military. The army statement called on Cambodia to take responsibility for this incident, which constitutes a serious threat to peace and stability in the border region between the two countries. After last week's blast, Thailand accused Cambodia of violating the Ottawa Treaty, an international pact that bans the production and use of anti-personnel landmines.
Cambodia rejected the Thai version of the events as baseless accusations.
Defense Ministry spokespesrson Lt. Gen. Maly Socheata said the landmine explosion took place on Cambodian territory and charged that Thailand had violated a 2000 agreement regarding the use of agreed paths for patrols.
Many border checkpoints had already been closed by one side or the other or operated with restrictions after relations between the neighbors deteriorated following an armed confrontation on May 28 in which one Cambodian soldier was killed in one of the contested areas.
Efforts to defuse the situation have been hindered by the nationalist passions that flared in both countries. There is historical enmity between the two nations.
There have been major political consequences in Thailand, with former Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra suspended from office last month after making what critics saw as a disparaging comment about her country's military in a phone call to Cambodia's former Prime Minister Hun Sen, who leaked a recording of it.
Cambodia has denied that it laid new mines along the border, pointing out that many unexploded mines and other ordnance remain all over the country, a legacy of civil war and unrest that began in 1970 and ended only in 1998.
Since the end of that fighting, nearly 20,000 Cambodians have been killed and about 45,000 injured by leftover war explosives. The number of casualties has sharply declined over time; and last year there were only. 49 deaths.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
18 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Short-term hiccups, long-term rewards
That this is not a good week for India-US relations is an understatement. With 25% tariffs, threat of a 'penalty' for purchasing oil and military equipment from Russia, criticism for being a part of the Brics grouping, and sermons over an apparently 'dead economy' and 'obnoxious non-monetary trade barriers,' US President Donald Trump has made clear that India, who he still calls a 'friend', is high on his imagination. His irritation might even be personal. It's difficult to say. The conclusion of what appears to be a last-minute trade agreement with Pakistan, still with 19% tariffs, and a plan — the details of which are best known to the President — to develop untapped and 'massive oil reserves' within Pakistan is striking, if not mystifying to global oil experts. Understandably, within India, anger has dimmed the vision for promise in a relationship that has transformed in the past two decades. Well known television anchors have selflessly advised the government to 'draw a line' because, apparently, 'Trump always chickens-out'. Given that the Indian Parliament is in session, news channels have one sound bite after another on this crucial relationship, the state of the Indian economy, and much else. Friends in Washington D.C. who have spent a lifetime building trust between the two countries are appalled. 'What is lost,' argues Evan Feigenbaum, a former US official who played a key role in getting the US-India civil nuclear agreement across the line, 'is trust that took 25 years of painstaking, hard, bipartisan work and a huge lift by advocates in both countries'. Trust, the former official argues, is 'hard to build, easy to lose'. To be sure, within India, those who have remained sceptical, to put it mildly, of deepening US-India ties find themselves back in the limelight. Russian social media handles are electrified. 'We stand with India' are lines being circulated on WhatsApp groups and through unattributable handles. There is little doubt that in some office corner in China, a disinformation campaign is on the loose. Yet, whilst fully acknowledging the complexities woven into these difficult days for Indian and American interlocutors who have battled hard for a better future, this is neither the time for India to engage in grammar wars — this can be left to anchors and pundits alike — or, in fact, give-up on the functional aspects of the relationship. Understandably, there will be an impulse to pause ties across the board. Politically, it might be prudent too. But this is the time to demonstrate a version of altruism keeping the future in mind. For US experts, the term altruism refers to some strange conceptualisation of benevolence. Supporting India without asking for something in return, they would argue, was the spirit that drove American officials to go out of their way to accommodate India's civil nuclear ambitions. Currently, the verve is to turn altruism on its head, and for India to give more than it gets — to get past Trump 2.0. Many in India will disagree with this conceptualisation. I do. But that's another matter altogether. What is needed is an altruism not to react to a President who may well be negotiating for a better day or determinately pushing India where it hurts. He may hit India with 30% tariffs next week. His negotiators and their counterparts within India, who in all likelihood had agreed on terms for the first tranche of the trade deal, may still prevail. It is impossible to tell. What is clear is that no one in the US, including those within the White House can second guess Trump's next move or tweet. What is required is for India to be lingually altruistic to a President, who only in part controls the temperature and shapes the trajectory of a relationship that has proliferated well beyond government ties. This is the real success of the US-India relationship: The creation of a wide and spirited ecosystem that is fusing ties that go well beyond the government and foreign military sales. This is not to say that the drum that beats within the White House is not important. It is not necessarily all-important. The trust that has been built may not, in fact, be that easy to lose. Neither can it be taken for granted any longer. But this will require persistent engagement at the functional level and within this broader ecosystem. There are some 1,500 American Global Capabilities Centres peppered across India. Cutting-edge American defence platforms are being assembled in Hyderabad. Every major American technology firm has deep investments in India. This number is only growing. India's space companies service contracts for the US Space Force. The lists of these intersections are almost countless. For India's own economic and technological growth, a good part of the future lies with the US beyond Trump. This, of course, does not mean taking the bait for geopolitical realignments, which the government seems firm on. And rightly so. In fact, in a couple of months, the US may even strike an agreement with Russia, turning the tide on the current pressure on oil sales. If the Quad summit takes place in October or November, there is still an opportunity to functionally streamline and add substance to the myriad of working groups from cyber and infrastructure to space and critical and emerging technologies. AI infrastructure deals are unlikely, as of this moment, to stop in their tracks. India will host the Global AI Impact Summit in February 2026. Every technology company in the world wants to be involved, and all American firms want to send their top brass to Delhi. This is an opportunity to further deepen an already invested ecosystem. In sum, there is no doubt that India is in a tight spot. But not an impossible one. As of this moment, there is nothing to suggest that all is lost. It is not. Yet, at the functional level from government to industry and from technology to investment portfolios, there is a need to engage — for the sake of a relationship that has the space and dexterity, at least for a little time, to bridge ties beyond normalcy. Notwithstanding all the noise on the television channels and in Parliament, it is in India's interest to be linguistically altruistic for the sake of a relationship that has the space and dexterity, at least for some time, to bridge ties beyond immediacy. Rudra Chaudhuri is director, Carnegie India. The views expressed are personal.
First Post
18 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump Imposes 25% Tariffs on India, Including "Penalty" Over Russia Ties Firstpost America
Trump Imposes 25% Tariffs on India, Including "Penalty" Over Russia Ties | Firstpost America | N18G US President Donald Trump has announced a 25% tariff on all Indian imports, effective August 1, along with an unspecified penalty targeting India's defence and energy ties with Russia. Calling India's tariffs "among the highest in the world," Trump accused New Delhi of creating unfair trade barriers and maintaining a massive trade deficit with the US. He also criticised India's purchase of Russian oil and weapons amid the Ukraine war. Shortly after the announcement, Trump revealed a new oil development deal with Pakistan. India responded by saying it is reviewing the decision and remains committed to a fair and balanced trade agreement with the US. See More
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's tariff reset: From Canada to Laos, even dealmakers face higher costs as legal fight brews; US allies & rivals hit with steep import taxes
US President Donald Trump's sweeping new tariff regime, set to take effect August 7, has triggered a wave of economic disruption across the globe, from low-income nations like Laos and Algeria to wealthy trade partners such as Canada and Switzerland. Under the new policy, countries face steep new import duties unless they agree to revised trade terms with the US. Trump has framed the plan as a campaign for "fairness" under the slogan of "Liberation Day," invoking a 1977 law to declare the trade deficit a national emergency and bypass Congress. But legal and economic blowback is mounting, with US courts weighing challenges and allies questioning Washington's reliability, AP reported. 'Everybody's a loser': Experts flag fallout "In many respects, everybody's a loser here," said Barry Appleton, co-director of the Center for International Law at New York Law School. "The U.S. consumer's a big loser," added Alan Wolff, a former WTO deputy director-general and trade official. Even countries that struck deals to reduce their tariff exposure are still facing steeper import duties than before. The UK agreed to raise tariffs on its exports to the US from 1.3% to 10%, despite the US running a trade surplus with it for nearly two decades. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your Finger Shape Says a Lot About Your Personality, Read Now Tips and Tricks Undo The EU and Japan accepted 15% tariffs, lower than the threatened rates but still significantly higher than last year's levels. Steep tariffs for those resisting Trump's demands Nations that refused to negotiate fared far worse. Laos and Algeria, despite low per capita incomes, now face tariffs of 40% and 30% respectively. Brazil was slapped with a 50% levy, reportedly over its treatment of former president Jair Bolsonaro. Canada drew a 35% tariff, tied in part to its position on Palestinian statehood. Even Switzerland, which did not reach an agreement, was hit with a 39% import tax, exceeding the originally announced 31%. "The Swiss probably wish that they had camped in Washington to make a deal," said Wolff, now a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. Legal battle escalates as costs rise for US consumers Five US businesses and 12 states have filed lawsuits against the new tariffs, arguing that Trump overstepped his authority. In May, the US Court of International Trade sided with plaintiffs, blocking the tariffs, though collections continue during the appeal process. Economists at Goldman Sachs estimate that US businesses and consumers are absorbing most of the cost. Companies including Walmart, Nike, Best Buy and Procter & Gamble have all raised prices in response. "This is a consumption tax, so it disproportionately affects those with lower incomes," said Appleton. "Your appliances are going to go up. Your TV and electronics are going to go up. Your video game devices, consoles are going to go up." According to Yale University's Budget Lab, the average US tariff has jumped from 2.5% at the start of 2025 to 18.3%, the highest since 1934. The lab estimates this will cost the average US household $2,400 annually. Winners still end up paying more Even countries that reached deals to avoid Trump's harshest penalties are still absorbing high tariffs. Taiwan saw its rate lowered from 32% to 20%, and Angola's from 32% to 15% — but both were paying less than 2% before the new policy. Lesotho, one of the poorest nations affected, saw its tariff reduced from 50% to 15%, though economists say the damage may already be done. "He [Trump] wants to do it because he found an undervalued franchise -- not because the market says you need to do a deal," said Wolff, referring to Trump's transactional approach to global trade. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025
