logo

AUD/USD Breaks Below Key Support as Israel's Attack Elevates Risk-Off Mood

0143 GMT—AUD/USD breaks below key support at 0.6480 as Israel's attack on Iran elevates risk-off mood, Westpac Strategy Group's Kaitlyn Buhariwalla says in commentary. 'This flare up in risk opens up further downside risks for AUD/USD moving into next week,' the strategist says. Key levels on the downside are the 0.6390-0.6410 and the 0.6350-0.6360 areas, the strategist adds. AUD/USD slips 1.0% to 0.6467.
0152 GMT — Risky assets could pull back amid rising geopolitical risks in the Middle East, DBS Group Research's Chang Wei Liang says in commentary. The forex and credit strategist notes news that Israel launched a wide-ranging attack on Iran's nuclear program. 'This is in the wake of limited progress in talks between U.S. and Iran on curtailing the latter's nuclear program,' he says. 'Markets will carefully assess risks of an escalation,' the strategist says. 'Safe havens such as CHF and JPY have rallied,' the strategist adds. USD/JPY falls 0.3% to 143.08; USD/CHF drops 0.4% to 0.8069. (ronnie.harui@wsj.com)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A look at colleges with federal money targeted by the Trump administration
A look at colleges with federal money targeted by the Trump administration

Hamilton Spectator

time36 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

A look at colleges with federal money targeted by the Trump administration

Several elite U.S. colleges have made deals with President Donald Trump's administration, offering concessions to his political agenda and financial payments to restore federal money that had been withheld. Ivy League schools Columbia, Brown and the University of Pennsylvania reached agreements to resolve federal investigations. The Republican administration is pressing for more, citing the deal it negotiated with Columbia as a 'road map' for other colleges . There is a freeze on billions of dollars of research money for other colleges including Harvard, which has been negotiating with the White House even as it fights in court over the lost grants. Like no other president, Trump has used the government's control over federal research funding to push for changes in higher education, decrying elite colleges as places of extreme liberal ideology and antisemitism. Here's a look at universities pressured by the administration's funding cuts. COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY Columbia said July 23 it had a $200 million fine to restore federal funding. The school was threatened with the potential loss of billions of dollars in government support, including more than $400 million in grants canceled earlier this year. The administration pulled the money because of what it described as Columbia's failure to address antisemitism on campus during the Israel-Hamas war . Columbia has agreed to administration demands such as overhauling its student disciplinary process and applying a federally backed definition of antisemitism to teaching and a disciplinary committee investigating students critical of Israel. Federal officials said the fine will go to the Treasury Department and cannot be spent until Congress appropriates it. Columbia also agreed to pay $21 million into a compensation fund for employees who may have faced antisemitism. The deal includes a clause that Columbia says preserves its independence, putting in writing that the government does not have the authority to dictate 'hiring, admission decisions, or the content of academic speech.' BROWN UNIVERSITY An agreement Wednesday calls for Brown to pay $50 million to Rhode Island workforce development organizations. That would restore dozens of lost federal research grants and end investigations into allegations of antisemitism and racial bias in Brown admissions. Among other concessions, Brown agreed to adopt the government's definition of 'male' and 'female' and remove any consideration of race from the admissions process. Like the settlement with Columbia, Brown's does not include a finding of wrongdoing. It includes a provision saying the government does not have authority to dictate Brown's curriculum or 'the content of academic speech.' UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA Under a July agreement resolving a federal civil rights case, Penn modified a trio of school records set by transgender swimmer Lia Thomas and said it would apologize to female athletes 'disadvantaged' by Thomas' participation on the women's swimming team. The Education Department investigated Penn as part of the administration's broader attempt to remove transgender athletes from girls and women's sports. As part of the case, the administration had suspended $175 million in funding to Penn. HARVARD UNIVERSITY The administration has frozen more than $2.6 billion in research grants to Harvard, accusing the nation's oldest and wealthiest university of allowing antisemitism to flourish. Harvard has pushed back with several lawsuits. In negotiations for a possible settlement, the administration is seeking for Harvard to pay an amount far higher than Columbia. CORNELL UNIVERSITY The White House announced in April that it froze more than $1 billion of Cornell's federal funding as it investigated allegations of civil rights violations. The Ivy League school was among a group of more than 60 universities that received a letter from the Education Department on March 10 urging them to take steps to protect Jewish students or else face 'potential enforcement actions.' NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY Like Cornell, Northwestern saw a halt in some of its federal funding in April. The amount was about $790 million, according to the administration. DUKE UNIVERSITY The administration this week froze $108 million in federal money for Duke. The hold on funding from the National Institutes of Health came days after the departments of Health and Human Services and Education sent a joint letter alleging racial preferences in Duke's hiring and admissions. PRINCETON UNIVERSITY Dozens of research grants were suspended at Princeton without a clear rationale, according to an April 1 campus message from the university's president, Christopher Eisgruber. The grants came from federal agencies such as the Department of Energy, NASA and the Pentagon. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at . Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Turbulence ahead: How conflict zones affect the airline industry
Turbulence ahead: How conflict zones affect the airline industry

The Hill

time2 hours ago

  • The Hill

Turbulence ahead: How conflict zones affect the airline industry

The recent Iran-Israel conflict has not only escalated regional tensions but also disrupted global aviation dynamics. As drones and missiles dominated the skies, the resulting airspace closures and rerouting exposed the vulnerability of commercial airlines to modern conflict zones. With a cease-fire now in place, it is timely to examine how such military escalations ripple into civilian sectors, particularly the airline industry, which now faces heightened operational and financial uncertainty. The abrupt closure of airspace in conflict-affected regions is undertaken to avoid overlapping trajectories of commercial and military aircraft, which may lead to accidents. Commercial airlines are notably vulnerable in conflict-prone regions, as evidenced by past incidents like the downing of Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 in 2024 and Ukraine International Airlines flight PS752 in 2020. Following Israel's air strikes, Iran closed its airspace on June 13. Likewise, Jordan and Iraq temporarily closed their airspace, anticipating retaliatory strikes. As a result, air operations were curtailed in the Middle East, which hosts pivotal transit hubs of the world, including the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, amongst others. Nearly 400,000 passengers transit through Dubai and Doha, with an additional 80,000 passing through the United Arab Emirates' other air corridors. As the Israel-Iran-U.S. escalation grew, some American and European Airlines also canceled flights to the Middle East during volatile periods. Qatar, UAE and Bahrain temporarily closed their airspace for several hours, given an imminent Iranian attack on American military bases. In fact, airspace across the region experienced widespread disruptions both before and during the attack on Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. While airspace reopened following the cease-fire between Iran and Israel, nearly 3,000 inbound and outbound flights have been affected since the start of the conflict. Airspace closures trigger high-stakes chain reactions across the aviation ecosystem, creating complex challenges for air traffic control in managing incoming and outgoing aircraft. Flights routed to their destinations are forced to divert to safer locations, with subsequent aircraft using alternative routes, which can be much longer and costlier. If such closures are prolonged, it can have a heavy financial impact. For instance, according to Al-Jazeera, Air India could face losses of nearly $600 million if Pakistan's airspace ban remains in effect for a year. Likewise, diverting routes through narrower, congested corridors increases the burden on both pilots and air traffic controllers. Furthermore, GPS jamming and spoofing in volatile areas can affect aircraft navigation, adding another layer of security risk. On the ground, rerouting also comes with underlying operational challenges for airlines and airports, respectively. Scheduled flights have to face cancellations and delays. Existing flight schedules have to be revised and updated. Airlines also have to enhance their customer service care services to address queries related to flight resumption, ticketing, rescheduling and refunds among others. In parallel, the maintenance crew has to remain vigilant in light of any potential contingency. Changes in flight operations can lead to surging prices, impacting consumer behaviour. In a similar context, repeated warnings and advisories can erode customer confidence in affected regions. These implications apply to both passenger and cargo planes, significantly declining airline revenues. Earlier, similar trends were witnessed during the Russia-Ukraine war. During the conflict, leading airlines terminated their operations in the region, an aspect that continues today. Three years on, the region continues to witness intense drone and missile strikes. A recent incident in this regard is the Russian strike on Dnipro that killed 17 people. According to FlightRadar24, as of now there is limited airline activity in Russia, Ukraine, Iran, Israel, Lebanon and Syria. In May, the India-Pakistan standoff also led both countries to impose airspace closures. The growing reliance on air power through aircraft, missiles and drones in recent conflicts has further intensified these challenges. Moreover, during critical periods of conflict escalation, the cyber domain can be exploited by hostile entities to amplify disruptions and deepen instability. In an era marked by ideological conflicts, technological disruptions and economic interdependence, the impact of conflict zones extends beyond geography. The aviation sector is an indispensable pillar of global connectivity. Current developments suggest that any global crisis is likely to have a profound operational impact on the airline industry. Looking ahead, airspace closure may become more frequent, and airlines would have to come up with innovative measures to deal with this impending challenge. From ground operations to in-flight safety, every layer of the aviation ecosystem will require reinforcement augmented via effective regulations.

ImmunityBio, Inc. (IBRX) Gains UK Approval for ANKTIVA in Bladder Cancer
ImmunityBio, Inc. (IBRX) Gains UK Approval for ANKTIVA in Bladder Cancer

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

ImmunityBio, Inc. (IBRX) Gains UK Approval for ANKTIVA in Bladder Cancer

We recently compiled a list of ImmunityBio, Inc. stands eleventh on our list. ImmunityBio, Inc. (NASDAQ:IBRX) is one of the best future stocks to buy now. It is transforming cancer care through immunotherapies that activate the body's natural defenses. Its lead therapy, ANKTIVA (nogapendekin alfa inbakicept), has already been approved by the FDA for treating certain types of bladder cancer. The company is now expanding its approach with a focus on reversing lymphopenia, an immune deficiency often caused by chemotherapy, radiation, or immunotherapy. In June 2025, the FDA authorized an Expanded Access Program for ANKTIVA under the Cancer BioShield platform, making it the first approved therapy to target treatment-induced lymphopenia in patients with solid tumors who failed standard therapies. At ASCO 2025, data showed that restoring immune health with ANKTIVA, especially when paired with CAR-NK therapy, can significantly improve survival in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients. Internationally, ImmunityBio, Inc. (NASDAQ:IBRX) is gaining momentum. In July 2025, the UK approved ANKTIVA with BCG for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), marking its first approval outside the U.S. Additionally, a partnership with Saudi Arabia's health system will bring the Cancer BioShield platform to the Middle East. The company is also expanding clinical trials, including a U.S.-based study testing ANKTIVA with PD-1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with plans to expand globally. Meanwhile, the business is seeking broader FDA approval for ANKTIVA + BCG in bladder cancer after addressing regulatory hurdles. A laboratory technician using high tech equipment to sequence cancer genomics. By targeting immune collapse caused by cancer treatments, ImmunityBio, Inc. (NASDAQ:IBRX) is introducing a paradigm shift, fighting both cancer and immune dysfunction simultaneously. With FDA designations, strategic global alliances, and promising clinical data, the company is advancing a potentially life-extending new standard in oncology. While we acknowledge the potential of GOOGL as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store