Judge orders Trump administration to release billions in EV charging funds
In a ruling Tuesday, US District Judge Tana Lin granted a preliminary injunction to require distribution of funds for National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) development, which allotted US$5 billion for use from 2022 to 2026.
Signed into law by former president Joe Biden in 2021, the Trump administration's Department of Transportation defunded NEVI in February, axing expected funding for 16 states and the District of Columbia.
President Donald Trump has repeatedly called climate change a "hoax," abandoned electric vehicle booster programmes and campaigned to drill for oil extensively.
Trump has also blocked California's plan to ban internal combustion engine vehicles by 2035.
Seventeen attorneys general sued the Trump administration to unfreeze funds in May, led by California, the state with the largest number of electric vehicles.
"It is no secret that the Trump Administration is beholden to the fossil fuel agenda," said California Attorney General Rob Bonta, adding legal programmes can't be dismantled "just so that the President's Big Oil friends can continue basking in record-breaking profits."
"We are pleased with today's order blocking the Administration's unconstitutional attempt to do so, and California looks forward to continuing to vigorously defend itself from this executive branch overreach," the Democrat added.
The Trump administration has until July 2 to appeal or release funds under Lin's order, which applies to Washington, Colorado, California, Arizona, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wisconsin and the District of Columbia.
Federal transportation and justice officials did not immediately indicate whether they intend to appeal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
US trade deficit widens in May as Trump tariffs fuel uncertainty
WASHINGTON: The US trade deficit widened more than expected in May, government data showed Thursday, with both imports and exports declining as US President Donald Trump's tariffs sent shock waves through the economy and snagged supply chains. The world's biggest economy logged an overall trade gap of $71.5 billion, in the month after Trump imposed a 10 percent duty on most trading partners before pausing steeper rates for dozens of these economies. This was an expansion from the $60.3 billion deficit in April, according to Commerce Department data. The figures, however, came as both imports and exports shrank in May. US imports were down 0.1 percent to $350.5 billion, as incoming shipments of goods ticked down. Imports of consumer goods dropped by $4.0 billion, with those of apparel and toys both sliding, although imports of autos and parts climbed. US exports, meanwhile, dropped by 4.0 percent to $279.0 billion, with declines largely seen in industrial supplies and materials, the report showed. While Trump pulled back on some of his harshest tariff measures in April, he doubled down on levies impacting goods from China. Tit-for-tat tariffs between Washington and Beijing surged to triple-digits around the time, a level described as a trade embargo as businesses halted shipments to wait for both governments to ease tensions. This could have dented imports of certain consumer goods before United States and Chinese officials eventually came to a pact in mid-May to temporarily lower these tariffs. – AFP
New Straits Times
5 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Trump's tariff deadline to have only 3 outcomes
A few days before United States President Donald Trump reimposes steep tariffs on dozens of economies, including the European Union and Japan, many are still scrambling to reach a deal that would protect them from the worst. The tariffs taking effect on July 9 are part of a package Trump imposed in April citing a lack of "reciprocity " in trading ties. He slapped a 10 per cent levy on most partners, with higher customised rates to kick in later in countries the US has major trade deficits with. But these were halted until this month to allow room for negotiations. Analysts expect countries will encounter one of three outcomes: they could reach a framework for an agreement; receive an extended pause on higher tariffs; or see levies surge. "There will be a group of deals that we will land before July 9," said Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent last Friday on CNBC. Policymakers have not named countries in this group, although Bessent maintains that Washington has been focused on striking deals with about 18 key partners. "Vietnam, India and Taiwan remain promising candidates for a deal," said Asia Society Policy Institute vice-president Wendy Cutler. Without a deal, Vietnam's "reciprocal tariff" rises from the baseline of 10 per cent to 46 per cent, India's to 26 per cent and Taiwan's to 32 per cent. Josh Lipsky, international economics chair at the Atlantic Council, cited Indian negotiators' extension of their US trip recently in noting that it "seems like a frontrunner ". "Japan was in that category, but things have set back a little," said Lipsky, referring to Trump's criticism on Monday over what the president called Japan's reluctance to accept US rice exports. The deals, however, would unlikely be full-fledged trade pacts, said analysts, citing complexities in negotiating such agreements. Since April, Washington has only announced a pact with Britain and a deal to temporarily lower tit-for-tat duties with China. Bessent has also said countries "negotiating in good faith" can have their tariffs remain at the 10 per cent baseline. But extensions of the pause on higher rates would depend on Trump, he added. "With a new government, (South) Korea looks well positioned to secure an extension," said Cutler of ASPI. Lipsky expects many countries to fall into this bucket, receiving an extended halt on higher tariffs that could last until Labour Day, which falls on Sept 1. Bessent earlier said Washington could wrap up its agenda for trade deals by Labour Day, a signal that more agreements could be concluded but with talks likely to extend past July. For countries that the US finds "recalcitrant", however, tariffs could spring back to the higher levels Trump previously announced, Bessent has warned. These range from 11 per cent to 50 per cent. Cutler warned that "Japan's refusal to open its rice market, coupled with the US resistance to lowering automotive tariffs, may lead to the reimposition of Japan's 24 per cent reciprocal tariff ". Trump himself said on Tuesday a trade deal was unlikely with Japan and the country could pay a tariff of "30 per cent, 35 per cent, or whatever the number is that we determine". Lipsky believes that the EU is at risk of having tariffs snap back to steeper levels, too —to the 20 per cent unveiled in April or the 50 per cent Trump more recently threatened. An area of tension could be Europe's approach to digital regulation. Trump recently said he would terminate trade talks with Canada — which is not impacted by the July 9 deadline — in retaliation for the country's digital services tax, which Ottawa eventually said it would rescind. This week, EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic is in Washington in a push to seal a trade deal, with the EU commission having received early drafts of proposals that officials are working on.
Malaysia Sun
6 hours ago
- Malaysia Sun
Ukraine looking to EU to bypass US weapons freeze Politico
Several bloc members are reportedly weighing options to buy American weapons to be handed over to Kiev Ukraine wants its EU backers to purchase American-made weapons on its behalf in order to offset the suspension of key US arms deliveries to Kiev, Politico reported on Wednesday. US media outlets reported earlier this week that supplies of Patriot missile interceptors - touted as important in repelling Russian strikes - as well as GMLRS rockets, Hellfire missiles, and thousands of 155mm artillery shells have been put on hold. NBC noted that some US cargo had already reached Europe but was being withheld from transfer to Ukrainian forces. US officials later confirmed the development, portraying it as part of the "America first" policy and stating that the country must maintain its weapons stockpiles to ensure "our own success on the battlefield." The freeze "blindsided top Ukrainian officials" and has prompted Kiev to ask Washington "to let Europe purchase US weapons for Ukraine," several Politico sources claimed. "We don't have a choice," an unnamed Ukrainian official added. Several European countries are reportedly reviewing potential purchases. However, the weapons transfers would still require US approval, one person told Politico, indicating that Ukraine's attempts to keep weapons flowing could become mired in additional negotiations. Part of the push involves overcoming export restrictions that Washington typically imposes on foreign use of its arms. Under the administration of former US President Joe Biden, even British deliveries of Storm Shadow missiles to Ukraine were initially delayed because the systems contained American components, Politico noted. A Ukrainian official told the outlet that similar hurdles could be addressed during the talks, although it remains unclear whether the US would sign off on deliveries. The administration of US President Donald Trump appears to be warming up to the idea of direct military sales to Kiev, according to the magazine. Politico in particular cited a recent meeting between Trump and Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky on the sidelines of the NATO summit in the Netherlands, with one person briefed on the talks claiming that Trump seemed "compassionate" and "understanding," although no specific commitments were detailed. The US weapons freeze has caused frustration in Kiev, with Ukrainian MP Mariana Bezuglaya proclaiming that the country "is no longer our ally." The Ukrainian Foreign Ministry also summoned US charge d'affaires John Ginkel to underscore "the critical importance" of deliveries and warn against any "delay or procrastination." Russia has consistently denounced Western arms deliveries to Ukraine, insisting they will only drag out the conflict without changing its eventual outcome. (
