Don's unfair peace proposal for Ukraine: Letters
I applaud President Trump for making the end of the Ukraine war a priority, and I understand his need to fulfill a campaign promise ('Peace deal's on 'iffy' ground,' April 24).
However, forcing our ally to capitulate to our enemy will not bring the peace the world wants.
The president keeps talking about this 'leverage' he has on Russia — well, now is the time to use it.
Advertisement
Daniel Kuncio
Manhattan
I was surprised at how magnanimous Trump was to Russia when I read his peace proposal.
Advertisement
US recognition of Russia's annexation of Crimea in addition to maintaining occupation of the territories that Russian forces presently occupy, along with the promise that Ukraine will never join NATO, is everything that Russia has demanded. If Moscow refuses, it can only be because it wants to annex all of Ukraine.
Trump must make Vladimir Putin believe America will not, under any circumstances, allow that to happen and, if he persists in that endeavor, the economic consequences for Russia will be severe.
I only hope that this is what Trump meant when he said that if this peace offering is not accepted, we will 'move on' from the negotiation table.
Jack Kaufman
Advertisement
Naples, Fla
When does our responsibility to fall on every other countries' sword finally end?
It needs to, unless we deliberately want to bring about World War III.
Yes, it's a terrible war with incalculable injuries, deaths and destruction, but we didn't start it. There are absolutely no saints in this struggle, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky can't expect to get everything he wants if Russia can't do likewise. The solution is called a compromise specifically because of that fact.
Advertisement
Vincent Ruggiero
Scottsdale, Ariz.
Forcing Ukraine to give up Crimea would be totally unrealistic and ultimately reward Russia for its aggression.
In addition to Ukraine itself, all European countries have an interest in seeing their borders not changed by force.
As a compromise, Ukraine should refrain from joining NATO but receive strong security guarantees from a number of its current allies, including at least one of the two European nuclear powers, the UK and France.
Bruce Couchman
Ottawa, Canada
If this is our president's idea of a fair and equitable deal, we clearly know where his allegiance lies.
Advertisement
Steve Bollander
Montville, NJ
The Issue: President Trump's opposition to the Empire Wind Project and Mayor Adams' pleas to revive it.
I hope Mayor Adams prevails over President Trump's irrational aversion to wind farms and his decision to pull the plug on the one already under construction ('Project on Hizz whoosh list,' April 25.
New York needs the clean, low-cost electricity, jobs and economic development offshore wind farms provide.
Advertisement
Gov. Hochul has taken a firm stance against the moves Trump is making.
She and Mayor Adams can be allies.
Laurie Aron
Manhattan
Advertisement
The Trump administration's recent halt to the Empire Wind Project off Long Island was based on political opposition, not environmental concerns.
Offshore wind offers benefits beyond clean energy; it will revitalize our ports, reduce air pollution and stabilize energy costs.
Hochul noted that Trump's action threatens over 1,000 union jobs. Now Adams is jumping on the bandwagon, opposing Trump.
We can't derail our clean-energy future because of Trump's fearmongering and debunked claims about whales.
Advertisement
Melissa Parrott
Long Island
Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@nypost.com. Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
12 minutes ago
- New York Post
Senate makes progress in averting a gov't shutdown much earlier than usual
The Senate took a significant step towards averting an impending partial government shutdown by passing a tranche of funding bills much earlier than usual. Senators approved three of the 12 appropriations bills Friday needed to forestall a partial shutdown, including ones to fund the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Agriculture, new military facilities, and Congress itself. 'We are on the verge of an accomplishment that we have not done since 2018, and that is, pass appropriations bills across the Senate floor prior to the August recess,' Senate Appropriations Committee Chairwoman Susan Collins (R–Maine) cheered before the upper chamber reached the feat. 'That is exercising our constitutional responsibility for the power of the purse.' The three appropriations bills that clear the Senate are typically viewed as the less controversial ones to get across the finish line. Still, it comes amid significant hurdles toward preventing the looming autumn shutdown. 4 Sen. Susan Collins helped broker the deal to get the three appropriations bills passed through the Senate. REUTERS 4 Senate Majority Leader John Thune has eaten into the August recess to clear up the upper chamber's lengthy to-do list. Democrats widely see the shutdown fight as a rare instance in which they have leverage in Congress and have been vexed by President Trump's use of impoundment and rescissions to make spending cuts without their approval. Moreover, Congress hasn't actually passed the 12 appropriations bills to properly fund the government on time since 1997. Each fiscal year, which starts on Oct. 1, Congress is tasked with funding the government to prevent a partial shutdown. Congress has typically relied on a mechanism known as continuing resolutions, or CRs, to put government spending on autopilot for stretches of time. CRs and appropriations bills are subject to the 60-vote threshold needed to break a filibuster in the Senate and must be bipartisan, which is why Congress typically struggles with the process. 4 Sen. Patty Murray said the deal will help prevent some of the cuts Democrats opposed. The current fiscal year is running on what turned into a yearlong CR, and there have been some murmurs in the House about doing so again for Fiscal Year 2026. Senators voted 87-9 on Friday for a two-bill minibus to fund the VA and Department of Agriculture. They then voted 81–15 on the third appropriations bill to fund Congress. Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the top Democratic appropriator, argued the small-scale deal 'rejects damaging cuts from Trump and House Republicans,' despite progressive complaints. The Senate still has nine more appropriations bills to take up: Commerce, Defense, Energy, Financial Services, Homeland Security, Interior, Labor, State and Transportation. The Senate Appropriations Committee has already approved about half of those, inching them closer to a full chamber vote. 4 Oftentimes, government shutdown fights come down to the wire. REUTERS Those appropriations bills will need to be green-lit by the House of Representatives, which is on August recess, and signed into law by President Trump. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) has eaten into the August recess while seeking to wrangle through key Trump nominations and chip away at the backlog. He is currently negotiating with Democrats on a deal to expedite that process.
The Hill
12 minutes ago
- The Hill
Texas House committee advances GOP-friendly map
A Texas state House panel on Saturday advanced proposed congressional maps that aim to make the Lone Star State's district lines even friendlier to Republicans. The Texas House Select Committee on Congressional Redistricting voted to advance a set of maps that would give Republicans five more pick-up opportunities ahead of 2026 and would impact lawmakers in the Dallas-Forth, Austin, Houston and Rio Grande Valley areas. The move tees up a floor vote in the House, where the map will be considered by all members. With an 88-62 GOP majority in the state House, the maps are expected to pass the lower chamber easily. President Trump is looking to pick up five seats in Texas as Republicans brace for an unfavorable political environment in the midterms next year. Republicans are considering pick-up opportunities in Missouri, Indiana and Florida as well. Texas Democrats have limited options to respond, given Republicans enjoy a decisive majority in the state legislature and in the governor's office, though the map is expected to draw litigation. Democrats could try to break quorum — the number of lawmakers needed in order to conduct business — as they did in 2003 when Texas Republicans engaged in mid-cycle redistricting, yet it would do little to thwart eventually passing a new map. Democrats are also weighing their options for mid-cycle redistricting in blue states as a response. California is seriously considering several options – either through a ballot initiative or through the state legislature – to redraw its maps. Democratic governors in New York, New Jersey and Illinois are leaving the door open to considering redrawing their maps. The redistricting tit-for-tat is paving the way for a tumultuous election year that could upend multiple maps, setting off a scramble over which districts candidates run in and potentially impacting when primaries happen depending on whether those issues can be resolved quickly.
Axios
12 minutes ago
- Axios
"No piecemeal deals": Witkoff tells hostage families Trump wants full Gaza agreement
White House envoy Steve Witkoff told hostage families on Saturday that President Trump wants to "shift" the Gaza policy from trying to get a partial and phased Gaza ceasefire and hostage deal to reaching a comprehensive deal that ends the war and returns all remaining hostages at once, according to a statement by the families and recordings from the meeting. Why it matters: Witkoff's remarks, during a two-hour meeting in Tel Aviv with dozens of families of hostages held by Hamas, were an acknowledgment that the approach Israel and the U.S. have pursued over the last six months to try and reach a partial and incremental ceasefire and hostage deal has failed. Behind the scenes: Two members of the hostage families who were in the room said Witkoff listened for a long time to every family member who wanted to speak. "We never have these meetings with senior Israeli government officials," one family member said. Witkoff told the families he doesn't have "perfect news" for them but stressed he believes "we are going to be successful here ultimately" for reasons he said he can't discuss at the moment. "President Trump now believes that everybody ought to come home at once - no piecemeal deals. That doesn't work," Witkoff said. "Now we have to get all the 20 [live hostages] at the same time... we think that we have to shift this negotiation to all or nothing so that everybody comes home. We think it is going to be successful and we have a plan around it." Catch up quick: Trump and Witkoff had a big role in closing a ceasefire and hostage deal in January, days before the inauguration. That deal led to the release of 33 hostages, but was supposed to open negotiations on a comprehensive deal to end the war and release all remaining hostages. But the Trump administration allowed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to violate that deal by not negotiating seriously on its next phase. Israel resumed the war unilaterally in March. Since then, Netanyahu preferred to try and get a partial and incremental ceasefire and hostage deal. He did that for domestic political reasons, so as not to have to commit to ending the war. Trump preferred a comprehensive deal, but despite his reservations, endorsed Netanyahu's approach during the ensuing rounds of talks, which thus far have all failed. In a meeting with hostage families 10 days ago, Secretary of State Marco Rubio made clear he and Trump still don't think the incremental approach is the right one and hinted that it might be time to explore a more comprehensive approach to end the war and free all the remaining hostages. State of play: Witkoff discussed with Netanyahu on Thursday the stalemate in the negotiations over the Gaza ceasefire and hostage deal, an Israeli official said in a briefing with reporters. The official said Netanyahu and Witkoff discussed the possibility of moving from an incremental and partial Gaza deal to a comprehensive deal. "An understanding is being established between Israel and the U.S. that, in light of Hamas' rejectionist position, there is a need to shift from a framework for the release of some of the hostages to a framework for the release of all the hostages, the disarmament of Hamas and the demilitarization of the Gaza Strip," the Israeli official said. Yes, but: A senior Israeli official and two other sources involved in the negotiations said a final decision to change course hasn't been made yet and stressed that the partial deal for a 60-day ceasefire in return for the release of 10 live hostages and 18 deceased hostages is still on the table. "We are at a crossroads. Hamas is taking its time and not engaging, but this could change in the near future," the official said. The big picture: Witkoff told the families on Saturday that any deal for ending the war in Gaza will have to include Hamas demilitarizing. "Hamas has said it is prepared to demilitarize. But even over and above that, multiple Arab governments are now demanding that Hamas demilitarizes. So we are very very close to a solution around this war," he said. Hamas responded to Witkoff's comment that were published in the Israeli press and stressed it will not disarm before the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital.
