Union urges for ministers to help with Scottish Water pay dispute
Scottish ministers have been urged to get involved in the dispute, which began in June 2024.
Workers at GMB Scotland backed industrial action after the water company reduced the terms of a pay offer that had already been rejected, according to the union, which claimed that executives received record bonuses last year.
Unionised staff voted against an offer of 3.4% or £1,400 covering the last nine months as the company changed the date for annual rises from July to April.
The company branded industrial action 'unnecessary' and said seven offers have been made since June 2024.
Scottish Water's latest offer would see an average pay increase of around 7% over two years (2024/25 and 2025/26), in addition to a 3.5% yearly salary increase. It called for 'sensible' negotiations from the unions, rejecting suggestions that emergency works would be impacted.
In a marginal majority, 51% of Unison workers employed by the water supplier voted to reject the pay offer, and 49% voted to accept. The turnout was 86%.
GMB said 60% of its members voted against the offer, and 40% chose to accept, on a turnout of 78%, while statistics were not provided by Unison.
The strikes will conclude on June 8, and follow two days of industrial action in April.
GMB Scotland organiser Claire Greer wrote to secretary for net zero Gillian Martin, raising concerns about the failure to resolve the dispute.
Ms Greer said: 'It is impossible to know whether Scottish Water is playing games or simply inept, but the relentless progress of this dispute towards industrial action could have been halted at any time with open and straightforward negotiations.
'Instead, we have been given a series of needlessly complicated offers, one worse than the last, as managers spend more time attempting to undermine staff unions than delivering a fair offer.
'It needs to stop and if Scottish Water do not know how, ministers must explain public money is being risked by a dispute that should have been settled months ago.
'The public deserves better and workers deserve a fair pay offer.'
Peter Farrer, chief operating officer at Scottish Water, said: 'This week's industrial action is unnecessary. It will mean union members losing valuable wages and add extra costs to the business which are ultimately paid for by customers.
'We invited the joint trade unions to talk over the weekend but unfortunately they refused to meet without preconditions.
'Given how close the vote against our latest pay offer was, we felt a resolution was possible and would be welcomed by all our colleagues.
'It is now time for the joint trade union leadership to return to the table with a sensible solution that ends this dispute.
'In the meantime, we have robust plans in place to maintain essential services should the trade unions press ahead with their strike action.'
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Ministers have set out their policy in relation to public sector pay.
'It is a matter for Scottish Water and its unions to agree a settlement within the constraints of that policy and affordability.
'The Scottish Government urges both parties to resume negotiations to find an agreement.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Heritage groups try to save decaying modernist studio in Scottish Borders
A coalition of heritage and design groups has launched a last-minute bid to save one of the UK's most threatened modernist buildings after its owners put it up for auction. The late modernist studio was built in the Scottish Borders in 1972 for the textile designer Bernat Klein, whose fabrics were worn by Coco Chanel and Jean Shrimpton, and is widely regarded as a jewel of late 20th-century architecture. But the category A-listed studio, which won architectural awards for its designer, Peter Womersley, has been vacant for decades and is in severe disrepair, featuring on the Scottish buildings at risk register since 2002. To the surprise of heritage groups who had hoped to buy the property from them privately, its owners have put the building up for auction through the auctioneers Savills with an indicative price of £18,000. The listing has forced those groups to launch a fundraising appeal backed by the National Heritage Lottery Fund to try to buy it at auction on 28 July, potentially competing with other bidders who could push the price up. The coalition, which includes the National Trust for Scotland, the Scottish Historic Buildings Trust and the Bernat Klein Foundation, which promotes the textile designer's work and life, said it would then need to raise about £2.5-£3m to fully restore the studio. It is now vandalised, with smashed glass, rotting timber, crumbling concrete posts and barbed wire rolled along the balustrades of the elevated walkway that takes visitors into the building. Prof Alison Harley, chair of trustees for the Bernat Klein Foundation, said they had been in talks for months with the owners about buying the studio privately and were disappointed by the sudden decision to auction it. The coalition, which is supported by the Architectural Heritage Fund and the Twentieth Century Society, plans to return the building to its original purpose as a design studio and public education centre run by the foundation. She said the studio told 'quite a hidden story' about the two talents of Klein the designer and textiles visionary, who reinvented tweed design, and Womersley the architectural genius, who both made the Borders their home. The men were close friends and collaborators. 'They tell a 20th-century story of design and architecture together,' she said. The two-storey brick, concrete and glass studio sits close to Klein's home at High Sunderland north of Selkirk, which Womersley designed in the late 1950s, setting both in a carefully designed parkland. Womersley, already an established and sought-after designer, was partly inspired by Frank Lloyd Wright's famous modernist house Fallingwater in Pennsylvania, which is cantilevered over mountain streams. A winner of a Royal Institute for British Architects award and often listed among Scotland's finest modernist buildings, the studio was used by Klein to design his fabrics, make his textiles and receive clients. The buildings at risk register notes it is a 'very fine sculptural late modernist building' which, with its bold horizontal cantilevered concrete and 'finely framed vertical glazing', showed 'a monumental sensibility executed with sophistication and with great attention to detail'. Serbian-born Klein was one of the few members of his Orthodox Jewish family to survive the Holocaust having studied in Jerusalem during the war. He arrived in the UK in 1945 to study woven textiles at Leeds University, before setting up his firm Colourcraft in 1952 in Galashiels, the Borders town then at the centre of the region's thriving textiles industry. His abstract, colourful and often tactile designs won him clients including the fashion houses Balenciaga, Dior and Yves Saint Laurent, as well as commissions from the furniture firms G Plan and Heal's in London. He was also a colour consultant to the then Department of the Environment, an arm of the UK government. Dr Samuel Gallacher, director of the Scottish Historic Buildings Trust, which hopes to lead on the restoration of the building, said that attempting to buy it at auction was 'a real unknown'. But doing so would be a significant achievement. 'Thinking of Scotland's rich heritage of 20th-century architecture, much of which is at risk and is poorly adapted to our changing climate, this project can be an exemplar of how to save our modernist and brutalist buildings,' he said.
North Wales Chronicle
7 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Government-backed scheme to transition oil and gas workers opens
The pilot will help about 200 current or former workers in Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire with support and funding for training courses, in a move energy minister Michael Shanks said would 'help deliver a fair and prosperous transition'. Both Governments have pinpointed the north east as being crucial to the planned transition away from fossil fuels, with £900,000 made available by the UK Government and an additional £40,000 from the Scottish Government for the first raft of applicants. But the Scottish Conservatives criticised the plans as 'frankly embarrassing', claiming the funding was not enough. 'Aberdeen has been the energy capital of Britain for decades and while oil and gas will be with us for decades to come, we are determined to make sure that workers are supported to access the thousands of jobs in industries such as offshore wind and carbon capture,' the energy minister said. 'This funding will help deliver a fair and prosperous transition in the North Sea, unlocking the full potential of renewable energy and reaping the economic benefits from the skills and experiences of Aberdeen's workforce.' Scottish Tory net zero spokesman Douglas Lumsden said: 'It's frankly embarrassing that Labour and the SNP are boasting about this scheme. 'This support for 200 workers amounts to a drop in the ocean when compared to the projected 400 jobs a fortnight being lost thanks to their decimation of the oil and gas sector. 'Both parties shamefully opposed Rosebank and Cambo (oil fields) and have said they're against North Sea drilling altogether. 'This sector drives £14 billion into our economy and supports 83,000 jobs, but John Swinney and Keir Starmer have sold it down the river.' But Scottish Secretary Ian Murray described the announcement as 'good news' for the area and the industry, claiming it will 'ensure there is a key role for our offshore workers in delivering our net zero future'. And Scottish Energy Secretary Gillian Martin said: 'The north east of Scotland has long been a titan in the oil and gas industry and the expertise within our workforce must be at the heart of driving a just transition to new fuels and sustainable energy. 'This new oil and gas transition training fund will support offshore workers to take on roles in the sustainable energy sector and has been designed and developed by the Scottish Government, supported by funding from UK Government's regional skills pilot for Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire, and will be delivered by Skills Development Scotland. 'Through initiatives such as the just transition fund and the energy transition fund, the Scottish Government has already invested £120 million in the north east's transition to net zero to help create green jobs, support innovation, and secure the highly skilled workforce of the future.' The programme will be run by Skills Development Scotland.
The National
13 minutes ago
- The National
Anas Sarwar urged to break silence on Labour's 'nuclear tax' for Scots
Energy Security Secretary Ed Miliband has confirmed the Sizewell-C plant will cost £38 billion, nearly double the previous estimate of £20bn. Miliband snuck out a statement hours before Parliament was due to go into a six-week summer recess, admitting energy bill payers would face a decade-long levy as a result of the price hike. This is despite Labour promising ahead of the General Election that their flagship GB Energy policy would save people £300 a year on their energy bills. In actual fact, bills are on average 10% higher than they were this time last year. READ MORE: Renewables transition fund for Aberdeen oil workers launched It also comes after Chancellor Rachel Reeves cut £2.5 billion from GB Energy to fund English nuclear reactors at the Spending Review. An average of £1 will be added to each household's energy bills per month from autumn, over the duration of the nuclear site's construction phase. (Image: NQ) SNP MP Graham Leadbitter (above) has now written to Scottish Labour leader Sarwar to seek clarity on whether he still backs the plant given its spiralling cost and the fact Scots it will "punish Scottish bill payers". The letter says: "These English nuclear power plants are extortionate, but the bombshell announcement that your Labour Government slipped out was that they are to be funded by a decade-long levy on Scottish energy bills. "To be absolutely clear: in energy rich Scotland, Scots will pay more money on their energy bills to pay for English nuclear power plants. "If Ed Miliband's stated figures are correct, it could see Scots foot a £300m bill for a nuclear power plant south of the border – a 'nuclear tax' on every Scottish energy bill. A grave injustice and a far cry for your party's pledge to cut energy bills which have soared by £150 on your watch. READ MORE: Scottish Water hits back at UK minister Steve Reed's pollution claim 'Any politician from Scotland worth their salt will call this out for what it is - completely absurd. Yet far from that being the case, it seems Scottish Labour is happy to cheer on investment in England at the expense of Scottish industry and Scottish bill payers. "You and your party stand squarely behind these extortionate white elephants despite Scotland's energy future being bound in the success of renewable energy projects, carbon capture and closer links with Europe. 'Your continued silence on this matter begs the question whether you support these plans that will punish Scottish bill payers - if not, when will you speak out?" Sarwar has previously urged John Swinney to end the Scottish Government's "ideological block" on nuclear power. The UK Government announced on Tuesday that it had signed a deal with a group of investors on Sizewell-C. The Government will become the biggest equity shareholder in the project with a 44.9% stake. New investors include Canadian investment fund La Caisse with 20%, British Gas owner Centrica with 15%, and Amber Infrastructure with an initial 7.6%. Scottish Labour have been approached for comment.
