
Christianity, Islam and communism and the global conquest
Each claims exclusive truth, dismissing predecessors as flawed: Christianity supersedes Judaism via Jesus as the Messiah; Islam negates both, presenting Muhammad as the final prophet; Communism rejects all as 'opiates of the masses,' promoting a materialist utopia with monotheistic zeal. Rooted in apocalyptic visions, these absolutist ideologies fuel conflicts by compelling adherents to impose their truth globally, often at the expense of non-adherent civilisations
Over the past two millennia, universalist ideologies like Christianity, Islam, and communism have driven global conflicts, pursuing territorial, demographic, and cultural dominance, each emerging at different points in history. They targeted each other and pluralistic civilisations such as Roman, Greek, Persian, Mesoamerican, and Hindutva, with only the resilient Hindutva enduring, albeit with significant losses.
Readers may note that in 1892, Chandranath Basu coined the term "Hindutva" for his eponymous book as a synonym for Sanatan Dharma, avoiding the colonial term "Hinduism," and we accordingly use it to refer to Sanatan Dharma. This article examines their aggression, ideology's primacy over economics, impacts on civilisations, intra-ideological conflicts, and exceptions like the Mongol invasions.
Defining lasting conflicts:
Lasting conflicts involve sustained territorial conquest, demographic shifts, and cultural imposition, reshaping civilisations over centuries. Christian colonialism, Islamic conquests and immigration, and Communist expansions (Soviet occupations, China's Tibet annexation) reflect universalist mandates—crusade and evangelisation, jihad, or class war. Non-adherents defend their existence, unlike in short-term disputes.
Shared roots of prophetic monotheism:
Christianity, Islam, and communism share a prophetic monotheistic framework, granting believers a mandate to subjugate non-believers, seen as obstacles to a universal truth. While Judaism also stems from the same prophetic monotheistic tradition, it markedly differs by being non-proselytising, non-expansionist, and refraining from imposing its beliefs on others. Each claims exclusive truth, dismissing predecessors as flawed: Christianity supersedes Judaism via Jesus as the Messiah; Islam negates both, presenting Muhammad as the final prophet; Communism rejects all as 'opiates of the masses,' promoting a materialist utopia with monotheistic zeal. Rooted in apocalyptic visions, these absolutist ideologies fuel conflicts by compelling adherents to impose their truth globally, often at the expense of non-adherent civilisations.
Christianity-The Sword and the Cross:
Christianity expanded aggressively via crusades, colonialism, and missionary work. From the 15th to 20th centuries, Spain, Portugal, Britain, and France conquered territories, eradicating non-Christian civilisations. Spanish conquests destroyed Aztec, Inca, and Maya cultures through genocide and forced Christianisation, justified by the 1513 Requerimiento.
British colonisation devastated Aboriginal Australia, while missionary work disrupted African and Asian cultures, creating Christian populations. Though trade was a motive, Christianity's divine mission to 'civilise' non-believers was primary. Intra-Christian conflicts, like Catholic-Protestant wars and British exploitation of India show the ideology's unifying force against non-Christians.
Islam-Conquest and demographic expansion:
Islam's rapid expansion started in the seventh century, transforming the Middle East, North Africa, and beyond, through jihad-driven conquests, with economic incentives like jizya taxes contributing. The Islamic conquests (632–750 CE) largely wiped out pre-Islamic Arab, Persian-Zoroastrian, and Egyptian-Coptic cultures. The Umayyad conquest of Spain (711 CE) and Ottoman advances, including the 1453 fall of Constantinople, subdued Christian territories.
In the Hindu civilisational region, Islamic invasions (8th–18th centuries) devastated Hindu and Buddhist heritage, turning Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Maldives, Indonesia, and Malaysia into Islamic nations, while leaving significant Muslim populations in other formerly Hindu and Buddhist lands. Contemporary Islamic immigration to non-Muslim regions like India, Europe, and the Americas is seen as demographic aggression, reinforcing cultural enclaves despite economic motives.
Intra-Islamic conflicts, like the Sunni-Shia Iran-Iraq War (1980–1988), reflect disputes over governance highlighting religion's role. The Israel-Iran conflict, intensified by the U.S. bombardment of Iranian nuclear facilities on June 21, 2025, stems from historical Islam-Judaism-Christianity tensions, like the 627 CE Banu Qurayza execution, with doctrinal clashes driving persistence despite geopolitical framing.
Communism-Ideology as empire:
Emerging in the 19th century, communism became an aggressor through territorial and ideological expansion.The Soviet Union's annexation of Eastern Europe, the Baltic states, and Central Asia imposed Marxist-Leninist ideology, suppressing local cultures. The Ukrainian Holodomor (1932–1933) killed four million, targeting non-Communist identities. China's annexation of Tibet devastated Buddhist culture, and Mao's cultural revolution eradicated Confucian and Taoist heritage.
Intra-Communist conflicts, like the Sino-Soviet split and the 1979 Vietnam-China war, arose from competing Marxist visions. While strategic motives existed, communism's universalist mission to eradicate non-proletarian systems prioritised ideology, aligning with the destruction of non-Communist cultures.
Victims-The loss of pluralistic civilisations:
Christian, Islamic, and Communist aggression devastated non-Abrahamic civilisations. Roman and Greek cultures were subsumed by Christianity; Egypt's Coptic heritage was marginalised by Islam. Pre-Islamic Arab-paganism vanished, and Persian-Zoroastrianism was nearly eradicated, with survivors fleeing to India as Parsis.
Mesoamerican civilisations—Maya, Inca, Aztec—were destroyed by Spanish conquests, and Indigenous Australian societies faced cultural erasure under British rule. Hindu and Buddhist civilisations lost territories like Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Maldives, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Tibet to these aggressors. In India, the huge Muslim population creates demographic tensions. These losses underscore the destructive impact of universalist ideologies on pluralistic civilisations, with even resilient survivors like Hinduism facing profound erosion.
Religion and ideology over economics:
The primacy of religion and ideology in historical and contemporary conflicts stems from their universalist mandates. Christianity's Great Commission (Matthew 28:19) propelled missionary zeal and colonial expansion. Islam's concepts of jihad and ummah drove conquests and cultural dominance. Communism's vision of class struggle and proletarian revolution sought global ideological supremacy.
While economic factors played a role, they were often secondary to ideological imperatives. For example, the Crusades (1095–1291) aimed to reclaim Jerusalem but secured trade routes as a byproduct. Soviet expansion prioritised ideological control over Eastern Europe, with economic gains as a secondary outcome. Ideology unified aggressors, casting non-believers as existential threats.
Intra-system conflicts further highlight ideological dominance. Catholic-Protestant wars, Sunni-Shia rivalries, and Sino-Soviet tensions arose from competing interpretations of truth, not mere economic disputes. Non-Abrahamic societies, lacking similar universalist drives, often adopted defensive postures to protect their pluralistic or localised traditions.
Enduring conflicts, driven by Christianity, Islam, and communism, manifest through conquest, colonisation, missionary efforts, immigration and ideological subversion.
These actions aim to impose a universalist vision. Historically, Christianity pursued global dominance through conquest, colonisation, evangelisation, and cultural imposition.
Today, Islam expands its influence in the Christian West and Hindu India through legal and illegal immigration, increasing Muslim populations.
Muslim migration patterns suggest motives beyond economics, as migrants bypass wealthy, less-populated Middle Eastern Islamic nations in favour of non-Muslim countries. Similarly, Bangladeshi and Rohingya Muslims frequently migrate illegally to Hindu-majority India, altering its demographics, yet rarely seek refuge in nearby Islamic states like Malaysia or Indonesia. These patterns suggest a strategic demographic expansion targeting non-Muslim societies for transformation.
The Hindu resilience and suffering:
Hindutva exemplifies a resilient yet heavily impacted survivor. It withstood Islamic invasions and rule, and British colonialism but lost territories like Afghanistan (once Gandhara), Pakistan, Bangladesh and parts of Southeast Asia to Islam. India's growing Muslim population poses ongoing demographic challenges, reflecting the continuation of Islamic expansion.
The exceptions:
The Mongol invasions (13th century), a non-Abrahamic aggression, devastated Islamic, Christian, and Buddhist regions, partly in response to Islamic provocations like execution of Mongol envoys (1218 CE). Unlike Christianity, Islam, and communism, the Mongols lacked a universalist ideology and eventually assimilated into Islam, limiting their comparability.
Japanese imperialism (1931–1945), rooted in Shinto nationalism, was another short-lived exception, defeated in 1945. These cases align with reactive resistance to expansionist ideologies but do not match the sustained aggression of universalist systems.
Conclusion:
For the past 2,000 years, Christianity, Islam, and communism, propelled by unyielding universalist zeal, have unleashed relentless conflicts and genocides, obliterating pluralistic civilisations—Roman, Greek, Persian, Mesoamerican, and Indigenous Australian—while resilient Hindutva suffered profound territorial and demographic wounds.
The Mongol invasions, a fleeting exception, ultimately succumbed to Islam, mirroring broader resistance to such expansion. Since their emergence, these ideologies have banished lasting peace, their insatiable drive for global supremacy raging unchecked, ceaselessly reshaping the world at the grievous cost of pluralistic and localised traditions.
(The writer is a retired IPS officer, and a former Director of CBI. Views are personal)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
27 minutes ago
- India.com
T Raja Singh Resigns As BJP MLA, Cites Leadership Concerns In Telangana Unit
New Delhi: BJP MLA T. Raja Singh has tendered his resignation from primary membership of the Bharatiya Janata Party, citing concerns over the appointment of Ramchander Rao as the new Telangana BJP state president. In a strongly worded letter addressed to Union Minister Kishan Reddy, Singh expressed the discontent of 'lakhs of Karyakartas, leaders, and voters' who he believes are being ignored as the party prepares for its first opportunity to form a government in the state. Singh, elected thrice consecutively from Goshamahal, stated that his decision was motivated not by personal ambition but by the collective pain and frustration of grassroots workers who feel "sidelined and unheard", a sentiment he claims is being driven by individuals with 'personal interests' clouding the central leadership's judgment. 'At a time when BJP stands at the threshold of forming its first government in Telangana, such a choice raises serious doubts about the direction we are heading,' Singh wrote, warning that the party risks 'avoidable setbacks' by overlooking seasoned local leaders. Over media reports of the possibility of party leader Ramchander Rao being appointed as Telangana BJP chief, BJP MLA T. Raja Singh resigns from the party's primary membership, citing shock and disappointment — ANI (@ANI) June 30, 2025 N Ramchander Rao, a seasoned criminal lawyer and veteran leader of the Telangana BJP, is well-known for his long-term commitment to the party. A trusted associate of the late Arun Jaitley, Rao has also held the position of member of the Bar Council of India. According to an India Today report, the party sources said that the BJP leadership reached out to Ramchander Rao on Sunday evening, first with a call from organisation secretary Chandrasekhar to confirm how many years he had been with the party. This was followed by another call asking him to file his nomination for the state president post on Monday. The leadership ensured he was the sole contender. T Raja observed that the Telangana BJP possessed capable senior MLAs and MPs with strong credibility and local connections, yet these were overlooked. Instead, he accused some centralized figures of influencing decisions behind closed doors. In his letter, Singh requested Kishan Reddy to inform the Speaker of the Telangana Legislative Assembly that he was no longer a BJP member. Despite resigning from the party, he reaffirmed his commitment to the ideology of Hindutva and pledged to continue supporting the Hindu community in Goshamahal. 'While I may be stepping away from the party, I remain fully committed to the ideology of Hindutva and the service of our Dharma and the people of Gosharmahal,' he said. Calling it a difficult but necessary decision, he said, 'The silence of many should not be mistaken for agreement. I speak not just for myself, but for countless karyakartas and voters who today feel let down.' Singh also appealed directly to the BJP's national leadership, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi, party president J.P. Nadda, Amit Shah, and B.L. Santhosh—urging them to reconsider the appointment for the state leadership. Raja Singh signed off the letter with 'Jai Hind. Jai Shri Ram.' Singh's resignation adds momentum to growing criticism over top-down decisions within party ranks in Telangana. With the BJP aiming to significantly expand its presence in the state legislature, discontent from senior MLAs may impact its electoral calculus. Party officials have not yet issued a public response. It remains to be seen whether Singh's resignation prompts further internal discussion or sparks similar moves among other disillusioned members.


Indian Express
37 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Leadership issues: Firebrand Telangana BJP MLA Raja Singh resigns from party
Upset over the possible appointment of Ramchander Rao as BJP's Telangana President, the party's firebrand MLA Raja Singh on Monday wrote to Union Minister G Kishan Reddy saying that he is resigning from the primary membership of the saffron party. Reddy is presently the state chief and the party high command is likely to announce new successor on Tuesday. Singh said the decision to appoint the new head of the party in the state has come as a shock and disappointment, not just to him, but to lakhs of Karyakartas, leaders, and voters who have stood by the party through every high and low. 'With great sadness, I have decided to resign from the primary membership of the Bharatiya Janata Party. I request you, Shri Kishan Reddy ji, to kindly inform the Hon'ble Speaker of the Telangana Legislative Assembly that T Raja Singh is no longer a member of the BJP,' he said in the letter. 'There are many capable senior leaders, MLAs, and MPs within Telangana who have tirelessly worked for the growth of BJP and who have the strength, credibility, and connections to lead the party forward. Unfortunately, it appears that some individuals, driven by personal interests, have misled the central leadership and taken decisions by running the show from behind the curtain, he alleged. 'This not only undermines the sacrifices of grassroots workers but risks pushing the party into avoidable setbacks,' he said. He said he has been a dedicated Karyakarta, elected three times in a row with the blessings of the people and support of the party. 'But today, I find it difficult to stay silent or pretend that all is well. This is not about personal ambition, this letter reflects the pain and frustration of lakhs of loyal BJP Karyakartas and supporters who feel sidelined and unheard,' Singh said. Though he may be stepping away from the party, the Goshamahal legislator said he remains fully committed to the ideology of Hindutva and the service of Hindu Dharma and the people of his constituency.


The Hindu
44 minutes ago
- The Hindu
MLA Raja Singh announces resignation from BJP, opposes central leadership choice of Ramachander Rao as party's Telangana chief
Rebellion spilled out into the open in the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) party ranks with three time Goshamahal MLA and rebel without a pause T. Raja Singh has sent shock waves in the party by announcing his resignation from primary membership of the party. The legislator expressed his disappointment over the high command choosing former MLC N. Ramchander Rao as the Telangana party president on Monday (June 30, 2025). In a letter addressed to the party president and Union Minister for Coal & Mines G. Kishan Reddy, Mr. Singh said the decision to appoint Mr. Rao has come as a 'shock' and disappointment' not just to him but to lakhs of loyal party workers, leaders and voters. But, the MLA who had earlier expressed his interest in the top post, also said though he stepping away from party, he remains fully committed to the ideology of 'Hindutva'. 'This is a difficult decision but a necessary one and the silence of many should not be mistaken for agreement. I humbly appeal to the Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Home Minister Amit Shah and national general secretary B.L. Santosh to reconsider the decision', he wrote. 'Telangana is ready for BJP but we must choose the right leadership to honour that opportunity and not let it slip away. There are many capable senior leaders, MLAs and MPs who have tirelessly worked for the growth of BJP. They have the strength, credibility and connect to lead the party forward,' he said, in his unprecedented letter. Mr. Raja Singh has accused that some individuals driven by personal interests had misled the central leadershipz and took decisions running the show from behind. 'This is not about personal ambition, this letter reflects the pain and frustration of lakhs of loyal workers who feel 'side-lined' and 'unheard'. The party had the best opportunity to come to power in Telangana, but that hope is slowly being replaced by disappointment and frustration 'not because of the people, but because of the leadership placed at the helm,' he claimed.