logo
ESOPs like what they're hearing in Trump 2.0

ESOPs like what they're hearing in Trump 2.0

Politico16-06-2025

QUICK FIX
TAKING STOCK: Proponents of expanding a corporate set-up that allows workers to accrue ownership stakes in companies are bullish on the Trump administration clearing regulatory hurdles they believe have hindered their growth for years.
Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer gave a speech in Washington last month praising the 'transformative power' of Employee Stock Ownership Plans and vowed to ensure that the department would do more to foster 'rather than discourage them.'
'I understand how poor regulation and misguided agency agendas can directly impact business success, so it's my mission to support you, not regulate you into oblivion,' she said.
ESOP advocates have long distrusted DOL's Employee Benefits Security Administration, which regulates these programs as well as other retirement offerings. They contend that in their zeal to protect workers from being ripped off and saddled with overpriced shares, the agency makes it overly cumbersome to set up an ESOP and makes investment advisers fearful of litigation.
'Fiduciaries are taking so many prophylactic steps that they're literally withering ESOPs on the vine,' said James Bonham, president of the ESOP Association, the group that held the event where Chavez-DeRemer spoke. '[There are] millions American workers who will never have the opportunity to have an ESOP benefit because of EBSA.'
President Donald Trump's EBSA nominee, Daniel Aronowitz, vowed during his confirmation hearing earlier this month to 'end the war on ESOPs' and said that DOL for years has been 'nitpicking the professional judgement' of experts tasked with fairly valuing companies — an integral step of the process.
The industry wants the Trump administration to end an enforcement project at EBSA involving ESOPs that has been in place since 2005.
'There's nothing special about it anymore, other than it allows them to go after ESOPs,' Bonham said.
They are also hopeful that the administration will propose an overhauled 'adequate consideration rule' after taking issue with the version proposed at the tail end of President Joe Biden's tenure as required by the SECURE 2.0 Act.
Industry members are also calling on EBSA to stop using 'common-interest agreements,' in which the agency shares certain information with outside attorneys. Congressional Republicans have blasted the agreements as a way to circumvent discovery rules and allow private plaintiffs access to information they couldn't otherwise access.
The Biden administration took steps to mend fences with ESOP advocates and foster worker-owned businesses, including by establishing an Employee Ownership Initiative within EBSA.
'I totally understand the concerns from the community that EBSA has historically been overly aggressive and discouraged people from pursuing ESOPs,' said Lisa Gomez, who led the office under Biden.
'We were making strides toward improving the relationship,' that's now being overlooked, she added.
Gomez also warned that swinging too far in the other direction risks harming the reputation of ESOPs and making companies that offer them less desirable, if workers start to associate them with false promises.
'Some workers have heard bad stories, and are afraid of going to those companies,' she said.
GOOD MORNING. It's Monday, June 16. Welcome back to Morning Shift, your go-to tipsheet on labor and employment-related immigration. Deloitte is allowing employees to use stipend benefit funds to buy LEGOs — your host recommends the model U.S. Capitol set. Send feedback, tips and exclusives to nniedzwiadek@politico.com, lukenye@politico.com, rdugyala@politico.com and gmott@politico.com. Follow us on X at @NickNiedz and @Lawrence_Ukenye. And Signal @nickniedz.94.
Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories.
AROUND THE AGENCIES
MONEY BACK: The Department of Labor said Friday that it has completed recovering billions of unspent Covid-era funding to states.
DOL pulled back $1.4 billion in March and was pursuing the remaining approximately $3 billion, which had been allocated for emergency unemployment insurance programs set up early in the pandemic response.
'The pandemic is long behind us – it's the federal government's responsibility to return unusable COVID-era funding to the American people and ensure these dollars are being utilized effectively,' Chavez-DeRemer said in a statement.
More agency news: 'Employee groups challenge 'favorite EO' question as agencies begin rollout,' from the Government Executive.
Efficiency alert: 'The Elon Musk DOGE legacy that just won't die,' from Axios.
LEGAL BATTLES
A PYRRHIC VICTORY? A federal judge on Friday ordered the reinstatement of three Democratic members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission ousted by Trump.
Judge Matthew Maddox, a Biden appointee in the district of Maryland, ruled that the White House's attempt to remove the commissioners in May was illegal, as they were only allowed to be fired 'for neglect of duty or malfeasance in office,' — which the Trump administration never alleged. Instead, Trump has claimed nearly unlimited power to hire and fire executive branch officials as he deems fit and that for-cause protections violate the Constitution's separation-of-powers.
But the win for Alexander Hoehn-Saric, Mary T. Boyle and Richard Trumka Jr. may be short-lived.
The Supreme Court has already overruled similar reinstatements from Democrats fired from the National Labor Relations Board and the Merit System Protections Board ordered by lower-court judges.
And the high court signaled a desire to revisit a nearly century-old precedent that has underpinned the authority of so-called independent executive agencies like the NLRB, MSPB — and CPSC.
A CPSC case-study: 'They're Chic, They're Quiet, and They Might Be Filled With Mold,' from The New York Times.
On The Hill
PRESSING ON: Dozens of House Democrats on Friday urged the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to rescind the Trump administration's move to sharply deprioritize claims of workplace discrimination based on an individual's gender identity.
'Discrimination against transgender and nonbinary people is a serious and ongoing issue,' the lawmakers wrote to Acting Chair Andrea Lucas. 'Yet, under your leadership, the EEOC has abdicated this responsibility under the law when it comes to transgender and nonbinary workers.'
Lucas has embraced the Trump administration's policy that recognizes male and female as the sole, immutable genders and has instructed agency staff to backburner gender-identity cases while prioritizing ones involving corporate diversity efforts.
An EEOC spokesperson confirmed receiving the letter but did not provide additional comment.
Related: 'Ditched by Trump's EEOC, job applicant advances bias lawsuit against Sheetz,' from HR Dive.
More Hill news: 'Bill Cassidy Blew It,' from The Atlantic.
Unions
FOR THE RECORD: Add former Labor Secretary Marty Walsh to the list of Biden administration officials who say they thought it was inadvisable for him to run for a second term.
'If the president had asked me, I would have suggested to him that he doesn't have to run again,' Walsh said on Teamsters' General President Sean O'Brien's podcast released last week. (The media project is not affiliated with the union.)
Walsh added later on in the conversation that he sees merit in having more generational turnover in the Democratic Party, without directly mentioning Biden.
'I'm not saying throw out the old people, but if you've been there for 30 years, it's time to step aside and let somebody come in,' he said.
Still, Walsh defended the former president against accusations that his mental acuity was slipping and chastised those who he described as attempting to launder their own reputations by dishing anonymously about Biden.
'It infuriates me when I see that,' he said.
Walsh, now the head of the NHL Players Association, said he had personally seen how both Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris were better when they were in unscripted environments. He added that he thinks it was a strategic mistake during the presidential race to not allow them to go off-the-cuff more frequently.
Speaking of 46: Biden is scheduled to give a talk about leadership and the future of work in San Diego on July 2 at the Society for Human Resource Management's annual conference. Media outlets this spring reported that Biden was finding a cool market for lucrative speaking engagements in his post-presidency.
IMMIGRATION
A GROWING CONCERN: The Trump administration is reportedly paring back immigration enforcement in the farming and hospitality sectors following concerns from agricultural interests about cutting into their labor supply.
The New York Times, Associated Press and Wall Street Journal each reported that Immigration and Customs Enforcement issued revised guidance to agency staff to place a 'hold on all work site enforcement investigations/operations on agriculture (including aquaculture and meat packing plants), restaurants and operating hotels.'
That shift does not extend to individuals caught up in criminal investigations. But is a notable relaxation in the Trump administration's all-out push to beef up immigration arrests, detentions and deportations.
The change-of-tune has also been rather sudden. White House border czar Tom Homan was championing worksite raids to Semafor on Wednesday, and the Washington Post reported Friday that things had not immediately changed after Trump's social media posts on the topic Thursday — citing administration officials and Homan as well.
Republicans are left in a bind of their own making, conceding that some immigrants are, to refashion the 2008 phrase, too important to deport — at least for the time being.
WHAT WE'RE READING
— 'These Robots Do Windows,' from The New York Times.
— 'Judge approves $69M class action settlement in UnitedHealth 401(k) litigation,' from the Minneapolis Star-Tribune.
— 'Millions of Working People Could Lose Medicaid Under Proposed Work Requirements,' from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
THAT'S YOUR SHIFT!

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' clears key Senate hurdle after high drama
Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' clears key Senate hurdle after high drama

CNBC

time23 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' clears key Senate hurdle after high drama

The Senate on Saturday cleared a key procedural hurdle to advance President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill," bringing the massive spending legislation one step closer to passage after weeks of painstaking negotiations. The Senate vote delivered a boost for Republican Majority Leader John Thune's bid to get the bill to Trump's desk by July 4. But it was not without drama. The vote on the motion to proceed was open for hours on Saturday night, and only passed after three Republican holdouts gave in and voted yes. The hours of uncertainty underscored the tricky path forward for the massive package. The procedural vote tees up a final vote on the megabill in the Senate likely sometime Sunday or Monday. Democrats, led by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, are forcing the 940-page bill to be read out loud once it heads to full debate on the Senate floor Sunday. "We will be here all night if that's what it takes to read it," Schumer wrote Saturday on X. While the package cannot officially pass the upper chamber until the final vote, the procedural vote was considered a big test for Thune. The vote comes after weeks of turmoil and tension over the massive package that exposed bitter policy disputes and emboldened some firm Republican holdouts. The sweeping domestic policy package will also have to be passed again in the House, which just narrowly passed its own version of the bill last month. Some House Republicans have already expressed opposition to key elements of the Senate version of the bill — most notably deep cuts to Medicaid — likely foreshadowing a close vote in the lower chamber. Both Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson hold narrow majorities in their respective chambers, meaning they can only afford to lose the support of a small number of Republican lawmakers to pass the package in a party-line vote. Meanwhile, Trump continues to urge lawmakers to get the package passed before Republicans' self-imposed July 4 deadline. "President Trump is committed to keeping his promises, and failure to pass this bill would be the ultimate betrayal," the White House said in a statement of administration policy on Saturday. This is breaking news. Check back for updates.

Nike stock price: Why shares are rising despite the shoe giant's revenue decline and serious tariff warning
Nike stock price: Why shares are rising despite the shoe giant's revenue decline and serious tariff warning

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Nike stock price: Why shares are rising despite the shoe giant's revenue decline and serious tariff warning

Shares in Nike, Inc. (NYSE: NKE) are trading much higher this morning after the company announced its Q4 2025 results. Yet those results saw Nike post some of its worst earnings in a while, along with a warning that President Trump's tariffs would cost the company $1 billion in the near term. He was buried in a mushroom casket. Soon he'll be part of the soil CEO of an $11 billion builder empire warns that these housing markets face a short-term oversupply Lifting the veil on the critical—and oft-times overlooked—factors driving AI growth Here's what you need to know about Nike's latest earnings and why the stock is up. Yesterday, the iconic shoemaker announced its Q4 2025 and full-year fiscal 2025 earnings. The results weren't great. For fiscal 2025, Nike reported full-year revenues of $46.3 billion—a 10% decline from fiscal 2024. The company's Q4 2025 revenues totaled $11.1 billion—down 12% from the same quarter a year earlier. The company also posted an earnings per share of 14 cents for its Q4. That EPS was down significantly from the 99 cents the company posted in the same quarter a year earlier. However, perhaps most alarming was the fact that Nike confirmed it would take a $1 billion hit in its current 2026 fiscal year due to the tariffs imposed by President Trump on countries worldwide. The two countries where Nike makes a significant amount of its goods are China and Vietnam. Earlier this year, Trump placed a 46% tariff on goods manufactured in Vietnam and a triple-digit rate on goods made in China. He later reduced both rates, temporarily, to 10% and 30% respectively. Still, Nike chief financial officer Matt Friend said on Nike's earnings call that the tariffs currently in place will result in a 'new and meaningful' cost to Nike, notes CNBC, adding that the company estimates that 'a gross incremental cost increase to Nike of approximately $1 billion.' You would think that Nike's warning of up to $1 billion in tariff-related costs and its pretty dismal Q4 results would send the stock down, not up. But NKE stock is currently up, and significantly, as of the time of the writing. In premarket trading, NKE shares are currently up over 10% to $68.85. There are a few likely reasons for this. First is that, while Nike's Q4 wasn't anything to write home about, the company actually came in above most Wall Street estimates. Analysts had expected Nike to have a pretty poor quarter already, and indeed, as noted by CNBC, Nike had previously said its Q4 would be the low point of its turnaround. This turnaround involves Nike's pivot to return its focus to athletes and shift away from its recent history of trying to cater to the wider 'lifestyle' segment of the population. The turnaround was initiated after Nike brought in a new CEO, Elliott Hill, last October. For its Q4, analysts had been expecting revenue of $10.72 billion and an EPS of 13 cents. So though Nike's Q4 results were disappointing, especially compared to earlier quarters, its actual revenue of $11.1 billion and adjusted EPS of 14 cents came in above expectations—something investors typically reward. But another reason the stock is likely rising in premarket trading is also related to that $1 billion hit Nike is expecting. Though the company says it expects the 10-figure hit this financial year, CFO Matt Friend also said Nike expects to 'fully mitigate' Trump's tariff costs over time. Nike will mitigate these tariff costs by using a three-pronged approach: adjusting its supply chain sources getting its suppliers to absorb some of the costs raising prices on U.S consumers later this year Despite Nike's 10% price surge this morning, shares in the company are still down significantly for the year. As of yesterday's close, Nike shares were sitting at $62.54—down more than 17% for the year. However, that was still significantly above its April lows of nearly $52 per share after President Trump unleashed his 'Liberation Day' tariffs on the world. Over the past 12 months, Nike's shares were down more than 33% as of yesterday's close. This post originally appeared at to get the Fast Company newsletter: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump megabill narrowly advances in Senate despite GOP defections
Trump megabill narrowly advances in Senate despite GOP defections

The Hill

time27 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump megabill narrowly advances in Senate despite GOP defections

Senate Republicans on Saturday narrowly voted to advance a sprawling 1,000-page bill to enact President Trump's agenda, despite the opposition of several GOP lawmakers. Two Republicans voted against advancing the package: Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who opposes a provision to raise the debt limit by $5 trillion and Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), who says the legislation would cost his state $38.9 trillion in federal Medicaid funding. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) changed his 'no' vote to 'aye' and holdout Sens. Mike Lee (R-Utah), Rick Scott (R-Fla.) and Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) also voted yes to advance the bill. The bill had suffered several significant setbacks in the days and hours before coming to the floor, at times appearing to be on shaky ground. Perhaps the most notable was a ruling by the Senate parliamentarian earlier this week that a cap on health care provider taxes, which is projected to save billions of dollars in federal Medicaid spending, violated the Senate's Byrd Rule. GOP leaders were able to rewrite that provision for it to remain in the bill. And the legislation appeared in danger moments before vote when Sen. Tim Sheehy, a freshman Republican from Montana, threatened to vote against the motion to proceed if the bill included a provision championed by Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) directing the Interior Department to sell millions of acres of public lands. Sheehy agreed at the last minute to vote for the legislation after GOP leaders promised he would get a vote on an amendment to strip the language forcing the sale of public lands from the bill. That allowed Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) pulled off a major victory by moving the legislation a big step closer to final passage. Thune hailed the legislation Saturday as a 'once-in-a-generation opportunity to deliver legislation to create a safer, stronger and more prosperous America.' He cited $160 billion to secure the borders and beef up immigration enforcement and $150 billion to increase the Pentagon's budget, as well as an array of new tax cuts in addition to the extension of Trump's expiring 2017 tax cuts. He pointed to the bill's elimination of taxes on tips and taxes on overtime pay for hourly workers as well as language allowing people to deduct auto loan interest when they buy a new car made in the United States. President Trump has set a July 4 deadline for Congress to get the bill to his desk. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) blasted his Republican colleagues for unveiling the 940-page Senate substitute amendment late Friday night, giving senators only a few hours to review the legislation before the vote. 'Hard to believe, this bill is worse, even worse than any draft we've seen thus far. It's worse on health care. It's worse on [the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.] It's worse on the deficit,' he said. Schumer slammed Republicans for advancing the bill before having an official budgetary estimate from the Congressional Budget Office. 'They're afraid to show how badly this will increases the deficit,' he said. 'Future generations will be saddled with trillions in debt.' A preliminary analysis by the Congressional Budget Office circulated by Senate Finance Committee Democrats Saturday estimates the bill will cut Medicaid by $930 billion, far more substantially than the legislation passed last month by the House. Tillis cited the impact on Medicaid as the reason he voted 'no' on the motion to proceed and plans to vote 'no' on final passage. 'I cannot support this bill in its current form. It would result in tens of billions of dollars in lost funding for North Carolina, including our hospitals and rural communities,' he said in a statement. 'This will force the state to make painful decisions like eliminating Medicaid coverage for hundreds of thousands in the expansion population, and even reducing critical services for those in the traditional Medicaid population,' he warned. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), a critical swing vote, said she voted to advance the legislation out of 'deference' to the GOP leader but warned that doesn't mean she will vote 'yes' on final passage. She said that Senate negotiators improved the legislation before releasing it Friday but added that she wants to make additional changes. 'Generally, I give deference to the majority leader's power to bring bills to the Senate floor. Does not in any way predict how I'm going to vote on final passage,' Collins told reporters. 'That's going to depend on whether the bill is substantially changed,' she said. 'There are some very good changes that have been made in the latest version but I want to see further changes and I will be filing a number of amendments.' Former senior White House advisor Elon Musk blasted the Senate bill on social media shortly before the vote, calling it full of 'handouts to industries of the past,' referring to the oil, gas and coal industries. 'The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country! Utterly insane and destructive. It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future,' he wrote on X, the social media platform he owns. Schumer told Democratic senators before the vote that he would force the clerks to read the entire 1,000-page bill on the Senate floor, which is estimated to take up to 12 hours and delay the start of debate and the start of a marathon series of amendment votes, known as a vote-a-rama. It's unclear whether Republican senators will keep the Senate in session overnight Saturday into Sunday morning to have the bill read aloud on the floor, an exhausting process for the Senate floor staff. An overnight reading of the bill would leave the clerks and floor staff weary before senators are scheduled to hold 20 hours of debate on the legislation and then launch into a multi-hour vote-a-rama.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store