Ukraine blames Russian strike for power cut to Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant
The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Rafael Grossi, acknowledged that power had been restored after 3 1/2 hours. But he added in a statement on X that nuclear safety 'remains extremely precarious in Ukraine.'
Ukraine's energy minister blamed Russian shelling for severing the last power line to the plant and its six reactors. The country's power distribution operator said its technicians had taken action to restore it.
Europe's biggest nuclear power plant, which is not operating but still requires power to keep its nuclear fuel cool, switched during the outage to running on diesel generators, the IAEA said.
The organization has repeatedly warned of the risk of a catastrophic accident at Zaporizhzhia, which is located near the front line in the war in Ukraine. Its reactors are shut down, but the nuclear fuel inside them still needs to be cooled, which requires constant power.
The plant's Russia-installed management issued a statement on Telegram saying the high-voltage line to the plant had been restored.
The statement said there had been no disruptions to operations at the plant, no violations of security procedures and no rise in background radiation levels beyond normal levels.
The IAEA had earlier said that the plant had lost all off-site power for the ninth time during the military conflict and for the first time since late 2023. 'The ZNPP currently relies on power from its emergency diesel generators, underlining (the) extremely precarious nuclear safety situation,' it said.
Ukrainian Energy Minister German Galuschenko wrote on Telegram that a Russian strike had cut off the plant.
'The enemy struck the power line connecting the temporarily occupied (Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Plant) with the integrated power system of Ukraine.'
Ukrenergo, the sole operator of high-voltage lines in Ukraine, said its specialists had brought it back into service.
'Ukrenergo specialists have brought back into service the high-voltage line which supplies the temporarily occupied power station,' it said on Telegram.
Neither the IAEA nor the plant's Russian-installed management initially cited a cause for the cut-off. Russian forces seized the Zaporizhzhia station in the first weeks of Russia's February 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Each side regularly accuses the other of firing or taking other actions that could trigger a nuclear accident.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
9 hours ago
- Arab News
Germany to deport convicted Syrians
BERLIN: Germany is to start deporting Syrians with criminal records, the Interior Ministry has said, days after Austria became the first EU country to do so in recent years. The ministry had instructed the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees to take action against 'dangerous Syrian individuals and delinquents,' a spokesman said. The spokesman stressed that committing serious crimes meant one was excluded from the protection afforded by asylum and could lead to the revocation of any such status already granted. An agreement reached by the coalition made up of Chancellor Friedrich Merz's conservatives and the Social Democrats provided for deportations to Afghanistan and Syria 'starting with delinquents and people considered a threat,' the spokesman added. To that end, the ministry was in contact with the relevant Syrian authorities, he said. Between January and May, the Federal Office has opened more than 3,500 procedures that could lead to the revocation of asylum rights granted to Syrian nationals, the ministry said in an answer to a question in parliament. Refugee status had been withdrawn in 57 cases and lower-level protection in 22 other cases, said the ministry. During the same period, around 800 Syrians have returned home as part of a voluntary repatriation program funded by Germany, to which 2,000 have so far signed up. Around a million Syrians live in Germany, most of whom arrived during the major exodus between 2015 and 2016. But since the December 2024 fall of President Bashar Assad, several European countries, including Austria and Germany, have suspended asylum procedures as far-right parties have campaigned on the issue. Austria's Interior Ministry on Thursday deported a Syrian criminal convict back to Syria, saying it was the first EU country to do so officially 'in recent years.'
Arab News
9 hours ago
- Arab News
Migrants cast a shadow on Starmer-Macron summit
LONDON: Britain and France are friends again following the rancour of Brexit, but the record number of irregular migrants crossing the English Channel in small boats remains a major point of friction. The issue will feature during a state visit to Britain by French President Emmanuel Macron starting Tuesday and new measures to curb the dangerous journeys are expected to be announced on Thursday following talks with Prime Minister Keir Starmer. More than 21,000 migrants have crossed from northern France to southeast England in rudimentary vessels this year, providing a massive headache for Starmer as the far-right soars in popularity. Images of overloaded vessels leaving French beaches with law enforcement officers appearing to just watch on exasperate UK politicians and the unforgiving tabloid press. • More than 21,000 migrants have crossed from northern France to southeast England in rudimentary vessels this year, providing a massive headache for the UK prime minister. • Starmer, who led his Labour party to a sweeping victory in an election last year following 14 years of Conservative rule, has vowed to 'take back control' of Britain's borders. • But in the first six months of 2025, there was a 48 percent increase in the number of people arriving on small boats compared to last year. 'We pay for French cops' buggy, 4x4s and drones, but migrants still sailing,' complained The Sun newspaper on Wednesday, in a reference to the so-called Sandhurst Treaty. The 2018 agreement, that runs until 2027, sees Britain finance actions taken in France to stop the migrants. Starmer, who led his Labour Party to a sweeping victory in an election last year following 14 years of Conservative rule, has vowed to 'take back control' of Britain's borders. But in the first six months of 2025, there was a 48 percent increase in the number of people arriving on small boats compared to last year, with the government blaming extended dry weather. The annual record of 45,774 reached in 2022 could be broken this year, which would deal a massive blow to Starmer as Euroskeptic Nigel Farage's Reform UK party leads national polls. A new border control law going through Britain's Parliament would give law enforcement counter-terror style powers to combat people-smuggling gangs. The UK has also signed agreements with countries on migrant transit routes, including Iraq, Serbia, and Germany. But Starmer needs strengthened cooperation with France, and key announcements were expected following their talks. Under pressure from London, Paris is considering tweaking its laws to allow police to intercept migrant boats up to 300 meters from France's shoreline. Currently, French law enforcement only intervene at sea to rescue passengers at risk of drowning. The two governments are also working on a migrant exchange program. A pilot project would see Britain capable of returning to France someone who has crossed the Channel by boat, according to several media sources. France in exchange could deport an equivalent number of people to Britian, provided they have the right to live there, such as through family reunification. Paris wants to expand the agreement to the EU so that readmissions can be shared among several countries. According to Britain's Interior Ministry, migrants who crossed the Channel between March 2024 and March 2025 were mainly Afghans, Syrians, Eritreans, Iranians, and Sudanese. French officials have claimed that Britain attracts migrants because the lack of a national identity card makes it easier to work illegally. Starmer's government has cracked down on illegal work — arrests increased by 51 percent from July 2024 to the end of May, compared to the previous year, it says. But Peter Walsh, a researcher at Oxford University's Migration Observatory, doubts that it is easier to work illegally in Britain than in France. 'You have to demonstrate that you have the right to work. If an employer doesn't carry out those checks, then they can face serious sanctions, fines and imprisonment. That's the same in France and the UK,' he said. Walsh believes the English language and presence of family members in Britain are key attractions, as well as Britain's departure from the EU. 'If you've claimed asylum in the EU and been refused, you can actually come to the UK and have another shot because we will not know that you've actually been refused in the EU,' he said. Last year, she became a British citizen and now works as a nurse. Tsegay says there is a 'hostile environment' toward irregular migrants in Britain, saying they were often presented as 'criminals' rather than people 'contributing to society.' She wants Starmer and Macron to focus on improving safe routes for migrants fleeing war-torn countries as a way to stop them risking the Channel crossings. 'These people come here to seek safety,' Tsegay said.
Arab News
10 hours ago
- Arab News
Turning populism's tools against populism
For UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and other leaders confronting right-wing populist headwinds, the challenge is not only to govern competently, but to do so in ways that make reform visible, fast and politically meaningful to persuadable voters. Otherwise, with voters in many countries beginning to doubt that public policy can actually improve their lives, populism will keep gaining ground, fed by the idea that progressive politics amounts to technocratic talk with no results. Democratic governments of all political stripes are almost universally failing to recognize this new terrain of political legitimacy. Too many policy programs are built on assumptions from a bygone era: that a consensus can be built gradually, that behavioral change (like the shift to preventive health systems) will be politically rewarded, and that evidence-based policymaking can overcome 'alternative facts.' This failure reflects a political choice. After all, fiscal rules are almost always broken for war. Hence, in March, incoming German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, before he even took office, convinced the Bundestag to loosen the country's constitutional 'debt brake' to allow for €500 billion ($589 billion) in off-budget infrastructure investments and to exclude defense spending above 1 percent of gross domestic product from the government borrowing limit. To be sure, defense has long been a powerful tool to galvanize citizens. But it is a go-to issue for populists, who rely on nostalgia for a mythical past when the nation was supposedly strong and united. For those who genuinely want to lead the nation, such rhetoric will not work. Whether he intended it or not, Starmer's recent speech echoing the nationalist and racially charged 'rivers of blood' speech of Enoch Powell, a British Tory of the 1960s and 1970s, will only alienate many of his voters. Such language inevitably rings hollow in a country as deeply multicultural as today's UK. The choice for progressives is whether to focus on building more housing and other 'stuff,' or to reimagine the political and institutional machinery that provides for such goods. The first option may bring some wins in the short term, but only the second one can deliver a lasting transformation that voters will not soon forget. Besides, too many governments lack the capacity to deliver even short-term wins. Reform plans tend to be overly bureaucratic and old technocratic habits have dulled the current generation's political instincts. While plans often read well in manifestos, they fail to shift public perceptions or deliver outcomes that ordinary voters will feel and appreciate. To develop the organizational muscle to deliver meaningful results fast, progressive governments must invest in creative, agile bureaucracies that know how to get things done. The situation demands not only more ambition, but also a sharper sense of how reforms will be received in a political ecosystem defined by short attention spans and deep institutional distrust. Policies need to be thought through both strategically (for the long term) and tactically (short term). That means focusing on local settings, where legitimacy is rooted. Cities are not only ideal testing grounds, they are also where many elections are won, where social and economic divides are most visible, and where inclusive, experimental governance can make a direct, tangible difference. Rather than pursuing national reforms that will take a decade or more to implement, progressive leaders should craft local policies to deliver results (from green jobs and affordable housing to preventive healthcare) within a single mayoral term. The reform process needs symbols and stories grounded in everyday experiences, not Excel spreadsheets. Mariana Mazzucato and Rainer Kattel Governments can learn from their digital and design teams. The UK's Government Digital Service and New York City's Civic Service Design Studio have shown how cross-disciplinary teams working outside traditional silos can create new channels for citizen engagement, streamline public services and change the bureaucracy from within. These efforts are effective not only practically, but also politically, offering proof that governments can learn, adapt and deliver. This — not Elon Musk wielding a chainsaw — is what government efficiency really looks like. The climate agenda underscores the need for public sector agility. Although climate-risk messaging is strong and based firmly in science, it has failed to jump-start the necessary reforms at scale. Clearly, the green transition must be treated not only as an environmental issue, but as a defense strategy — as the only path for achieving durable economic and territorial security. The UK's new industrial strategy, the first of its kind in almost a decade, is a step in this direction. But individual policy programs are tactical. Democratic governments also need new foundations for how to think about the economy, statecraft and value creation over time. That means moving beyond the narrow metrics of cost-benefit analysis or GDP growth. These metrics reflect a linear logic that no longer applies. Our policy tools must reflect the nonlinear, adaptive and deeply interconnected character of the problems we face, whether climate collapse, rising inequality or technological disruption. Public finance, for example, should be seen not as a constraint but as a tool for shaping innovation and investment. Outcomes-oriented budgets — not fiscal conservatism — should be a government's default position. Such a broad intellectual shift must be institutionalized across the public sector, including through expert communities that can inform policy from within the government to ensure delivery. Governments will need to build this capacity as a core function of statecraft, not as an add-on. Make no mistake: the populist far right has not only moved fast, it has built a powerful, well-organized movement that has achieved outsize influence, especially through control of the media narrative. To confront this, democratic-minded governments need to distinguish between the populists' illusion of speed (all the 'efficiency' propaganda) and the reality of what it takes to govern and build lasting capacity. The right often champions static efficiency — doing the same things faster or cheaper. But what we need is dynamic efficiency: the ability to adapt, learn and transform systems to meet complex, evolving challenges. Reform can no longer be treated as a technical process, because politics inevitably involves theater. Progressives must put on a performance with a purpose. The reform process needs rituals, symbols and stories grounded in everyday experiences, not Excel spreadsheets. The far right has understood this, to devastating effect. While the West's democratic governments should not mimic their populist opponents, they do need to meet them on the emotional and cultural terrain where politics is ultimately decided. The future of democratic governance depends on it.
