Bengal alleges Odisha detained nearly 100 of its migrants as Bangladeshis
Amid Odisha's crackdown on 'illegal immigrants' in the state since May, fresh discord bubbled up with its neighbouring state after the West Bengal government alleged that nearly 100 migrant workers from the state have been allegedly detained and 'sent to detention centres' on suspicion of being Bangladeshis.
According to TMC Rajya Sabha MP and chairman of the state's Migrant Welfare Board Samirul Islam, 'top administrative officials and police officers, under the instructions of Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, have reached out to their counterparts in Odisha' regarding the issue.
'But they are not releasing the poor migrant workers,' Samirul Islam said. 'What has happened is unconstitutional'.
'They are Indian citizens and residents of Bengal. They have gone to Odisha for work. But they have been detained and labelled Bangladeshis. They have been sent to the detention centre,' he said. 'We will bring them home'.
Targeting the CM Mohan Majhi-led Odisha government, Samirul Islam said, 'In state after state, under BJP rule, this is happening.' The development in Odisha comes after seven persons, including four youths and a couple, from West Bengal, who had been picked up by the Maharashtra Police and pushed into Bangladesh, were brought back last week following the intervention of the TMC government in West Bengal.
According to government sources, Bengal administration officials and the police are in touch with their Odisha counterparts and have furnished residential documents of those detained and pressed for their immediate release and return.
Contacted regarding the developments, a senior Odisha government official told The Indian Express that verifications are being done as part of a nationwide exercise in view of the recent developments in the neighbourhood. 'No one is being detained at any police station. We are just verifying their identities and are also in touch with the West Bengal government,' the official said.
Ravik Bhattacharya is the Chief of Bureau of The Indian Express, Kolkata. Over 20 years of experience in the media industry and covered politics, crime, major incidents and issues, apart from investigative stories in West Bengal, Odisha, Assam and Andaman Nicobar islands. Ravik won the Ramnath Goenka Excellence in Journalism Award in 2007 for political reporting.
Ravik holds a bachelor degree with English Hons from Scottish Church College under Calcutta University and a PG diploma in mass communication from Jadavpur University. Ravik started his career with The Asian Age and then moved to The Statesman, The Telegraph and Hindustan Times. ... Read More
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
25 minutes ago
- Mint
‘India's food security at risk': Why GTRI opposes import duty cut on US farm goods
India should retain its policy space in the agriculture sector under the proposed trade agreement with the US, the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) said on Monday. Any reduction in the import duties on American farm goods could compromise the country's food security, the think tank said. GTRI highlights that US agricultural products like rice, dairy, poultry and genetically modified soy benefit from deep subsidies, which gives them an unfair advantage over Indian producers. The body warns that such imports, if allowed with lower tariffs, could harm over 700 million rural livelihoods, especially during global price crashes, citing such cases, PTI reported. Speaking of historical data, it said that between 2014 and 2016, global grain prices collapsed -- wheat dropped below $160 per tonne wiping out farmers across Africa. If India removes tariffs, cheap, subsidised US grains could similarly flood Indian markets during global price crashes, the think tank cautioned. GTRI founder Ajay Srivastava said that India's dairy import restrictions, such as the requirement that animals not be fed meat, blood, or internal organs of other animals, block US dairy access. However, the US sees this as too strict, but imagine eating butter made from the milk of a cow that was fed meat and blood from another cow, he said. "India may never allow that. India's dairy sector is built on millions of smallholders with one or two cows or buffaloes. Opening it to subsidised US imports could destroy livelihoods," Srivastava said. Similarly, poultry imports, if eased, would affect local producers. The US also criticises India's rules on genetically modified (GM) food as unclear and not science-based, which makes it hard for American biotech exports to reach India. "India, however, is cautious due to strong public opposition to GM foods and concerns about environmental risks. It also notes that major regions like the EU are GM-free, and adopting GM crops could affect soil health and hurt India's exports," he added. He further said that India's loose supply chains mean GM traits could easily leak into domestic systems, contaminating local crops and hurting exports to GM-sensitive markets. Further, he said that US agricultural exports are propped up by massive subsidies. In some years, these subsidies exceeded 50 per cent of production value. Some instances are rice (87 per cent), cotton (74 per cent), canola (61 per cent) and wool (215 per cent). Products benefiting from such subsidies are apples, almonds, corn, dairy, poultry, and ethanol, all of which the US is keen to sell to India. Unlike the US, where agriculture is corporatised, Indian farming is a livelihood issue, and hence tariffs are essential to protect small farmers, manage price differences, and ensure food security of the country, the news agency reported.
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Controversial interview: X restores a/c of Indo-Canadian journalist
Toronto: The social media handle of a prominent Indo-Canadian journalist Sameer Kaushal was restored 72 hours after the platform X suspended it, following a post featuring an interview with a former pro-Khalistan extremist who alleged that Pakistan's spy agency had multiple agents in Canada and were covertly working with separatists targeting India. Indo-Canadian journalist Sameer Kaushal who had his handle suspended by X. (Supplied photo) Those allegations were voiced by Jaswal Atwal, who was convicted in Canada for the attempted murder of visiting Punjab Minister Malkiat Singh Sidhu in Vancouver Island in 1986. He was interviewed by Kaushal, the founder-editor of the digital outlet News Derby. Hours later Kaushal received a notice from X that his personal account, where he had posted the video of the interview, had been suspended for violating its 'rules against authenticity'. 'As an independent journalist, I rely on X as a vital platform for exercising freedom of speech and for delivering factual, daring journalism to the community. There is a possibility that some powerful forces may have targeted my account due to my commitment to reporting the truth,' Kaushal said in a statement. 'This sudden suspension has come as a complete surprise and is deeply concerning, as my account serves as a significant platform for communication, information sharing, and engagement with my community,' he added. The handle was finally restored on Monday. Atwal has been a controversial character who was once a hardcore supporter of Khalistan but turned against separatism and was given visas to travel to India as part of the amnesty launched by the Government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi in 2015. Atwal was famously present at a reception hosted by the Canadian government in Mumbai for then Prime Minister Justin Trudeau during his visit to India in February 2018, a development which caused Ottawa serious embarrassment. Canada later blamed 'rogue elements' in the Indian government for subverting the visit, without explaining how they managed to plant Atwal at an invite-only event organised by the Canadian government. In its annual report to parliament for 2024, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) noted, 'Pakistan conducts foreign interference against Canada to promote political, security and economic stability in Pakistan and to counter India's growing global influence. Canada is an attractive foreign interference target due to its significant South Asian community and presence of groups who may be utilised as pro- Pakistan or anti-India proxies.' It added per its assessment 'Pakistan will continue to target various levels of government as well as ethnic, cultural and religious communities, specifically in relation to electoral nomination processes. They may also target media.' Testifying before the foreign interference commission in October last year, senior Canadian intelligence official Vanessa Lloyd said Pakistan was 'trying to reduce the influence of India'. She also said while foreign interference usually related to suppression of voices, it 'may also have the opposite effect in terms of amplifying other voices, and in this particular case, influence of Pakistan is directly related to support of Khalistani extremism'.
Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Educationists question revisions in 3-language policy: How can schools adjust to frequent changes?
The state government's changing stance on the third language policy has led to a chaotic beginning to the academic year, according to teachers in Maharashtra. The government's announcement of the formation of a new committee for fresh recommendations on the issue has left many of them baffled, as unit tests are only a month away. Teachers have urged the government to wait until the next academic year before implementing any new decisions. After multiple revisions, the Maharashtra government on Sunday halted the three-language policy by revoking two contentious Government Resolutions (GRs) issued in this regard. As Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis made the announcement, he also informed about the formation of a new committee headed by Dr Narendra Jadhav to further analyse the policy of introducing a third language in Classes 1 to 5 of Marathi and English medium schools under the Maharashtra State Board. Questioning the government's intentions, Mahendra Ganpule, former head of the Maharashtra School Principals Association, said, 'The state is simply playing with the future of lakhs of young children. From the imposition of Hindi as the third language to making it optional and changing its learning goals, the government has altered its stance multiple times on the third language—so much so that it also included readjusting the timetable structure for schools.' 'It is not easy to fix a timetable for any school, which is generally finalised well before schools reopen after the summer break. But in June, a new structure was imposed to accommodate the third language, and now there is a pause on its implementation. How are schools expected to adjust to these frequent changes,' he asked. Ganpule highlighted how some schools might have had to rejig their timetable to match the new structure issued by the State Council for Educational Research and Training (SCERT), which now requires another revision. 'When will they focus on academics?' he questioned, pointing out that unit tests are approaching in August. The state's school education department initially introduced the third language in Class 1 and made it mandatory to teach Hindi. Following backlash, a revised order stated that students could opt for any other language in place of Hindi, but a teacher would be provided only if there were at least 20 students in a class requesting the alternative—thereby making Hindi the default third language. While opposition continued, School Education Minister Dada Bhuse later announced that in Classes 1 and 2, the third language would focus only on spoken skills, and the reading/writing component would be introduced in Class 3. Finally, the Chief Minister halted the entire process on Sunday by revoking the two GRs. 'Although the Chief Minister has announced the cancellation of the 'Three Languages from Grade 1' directive, considering past experiences, it is difficult to place trust in this,' said Dr. Madhav Suryavanshi, Chief Coordinator, Education Development Forum, Yashwantrao Chavan Center. He added, 'Previously, despite public assurances by the Chief Minister and the Education Minister that three languages would not be made mandatory from Grade 1, the government ultimately implemented the decision to mandate three languages from Grade 1 from this academic year. Unless an official order is issued cancelling the 'Three Languages from Grade 1' decision, this government's stance cannot be trusted.' Questioning the urgency, senior educationist Vasant Kalpande urged the state government to wait until the next academic year. 'This academic year has already started. Instead of disturbing it, it will be better if the government takes time to make a final decision. A new committee is set to study the three-language policy. They should be given time for a thorough study, and their recommendations should be made public for suggestions and objections before a final decision is taken.' Kalpande further emphasised that when educational decisions are made without taking into confidence all those concerned with the decision, then those become issues of identity. 'When educational issues take on the form of linguistic, caste-based, religious, or cultural identity matters, political interference becomes inevitable. This is exactly what happened in the case of this arbitrarily made decision. It can be avoided if adequate time is spent to follow the procedure.'
