European Powers Plan Fresh Nuclear Talks With Iran
Britain, France and Germany, known as the E3, "are in contact with Iran to schedule further talks for the coming week", the source said.
The trio had recently warned that international sanctions against Iran could be reactivated if Tehran does not return to the negotiating table.
Iran's Tasnim news agency also reported that Tehran had agreed to hold talks with the three European countries, citing an unnamed source.
Consultations are ongoing regarding a date and location for the talks, the report said.
"Iran must never be allowed to acquire a nuclear weapon. That is why Germany, France and the United Kingdom are continuing to work intensively in the E3 format to find a sustainable and verifiable diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear programme," the German source said.
Israel and Western nations have long accused Iran of seeking to develop nuclear weapons, a charge Tehran has consistently denied.
On June 13, Israel launched a wave of surprise strikes on its regional nemesis, targeting key military and nuclear facilities.
The United States launched its own set of strikes against Iran's nuclear programme on June 22, hitting the uranium enrichment facility at Fordo, in Qom province south of Tehran, as well as nuclear sites in Isfahan and Natanz.
Iran and the United States had held several rounds of nuclear negotiations through Omani mediators before Israel launched its 12-day war against Iran.
However, US President Donald Trump's decision to join Israel in striking Iranian nuclear facilities effectively ended the talks.
The E3 countries last met with Iranian representatives in Geneva on June 21 -- just one day before the US strikes.
Meanwhile on Sunday, Russian President Vladimir Putin held a surprise meeting in the Kremlin with Ali Larijani, top adviser to Iran's supreme leader on nuclear issues.
Larijani "conveyed assessments of the escalating situation in the Middle East and around the Iranian nuclear programme", Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said of the unannounced meeting.
Putin had expressed Russia's "well-known positions on how to stabilise the situation in the region and on the political settlement of the Iranian nuclear programme", he added.
Moscow has a cordial relationship with Iran's clerical leadership and provides crucial backing for Tehran but did not swing forcefully behind its partner even after the United States joined Israel's bombing campaign.
Iran and world powers struck a deal in 2015 called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which placed significant restrictions on Tehran's nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief.
But the hard-won deal began to unravel in 2018, during Trump's first presidency, when the United States walked away from it and reimposed sanctions on Iran.
European countries have in recent days threatened to trigger the deal's "snapback" mechanism, which allows the reimposition of sanctions in the event of non-compliance by Iran.
After a call with his European counterparts on Friday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the Western allies had no grounds for reactivating sanctions.
"If EU/E3 want to have a role, they should act responsibly and put aside the worn-out policies of threat and pressure, including the 'snap-back' for which they (have) absolutely no moral (or) legal grounds," Araghchi said on X.
However, the German source on Sunday said that "if no solution is reached over the summer, snapback remains an option for the E3".
Iran last week said there would be no new nuclear talks with the United States if they were conditioned on Tehran abandoning its uranium enrichment activities.
"If the negotiations must be conditioned on stopping enrichment, such negotiations will not take place," Ali Velayati, an adviser to supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was quoted as saying by the state news agency IRNA.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
an hour ago
- Int'l Business Times
Tariff Negotiations With US 'Not Finished', Says Philippines
Negotiations over the Philippines' new 19 percent US tariff rate are "not finished", a key government economic adviser said Thursday, tamping down fears over the deal's potential impact on the agriculture sector. President Ferdinand Marcos flew back to the country late Wednesday after a three-day trip to Washington that saw him emerge from a meeting with Donald Trump having shaved a single point off a 20 percent levy on Filipino goods. What might "seem like a very small concession" was in fact a "significant achievement", Marcos told reporters who questioned if the Philippines -- a longtime US treaty ally -- was getting the short end of the stick. The US president, meanwhile, touted "zero tariffs" on American goods headed to the archipelago nation of 115 million. But Marcos economic adviser Frederick Go said Thursday that tariffs would not be dropped in every category. "The negotiations are not yet finished. Our technical working groups will continue to work with their counterparts from America to finalize the details of this arrangement," he told reporters in Manila. "There are still many things to be discussed." Since the Trump meeting, the Marcos administration has downplayed the potential effects of the tariffs, noting just 16 percent of the country's exports go to the United States, with about two-thirds being electronic components not subject to levies. On Thursday, Go said that while tariffs would disappear for certain agricultural products like soy and wheat, key areas such as sugar, corn, rice, fish and pork would remain protected for Filipino farmers. "I can guarantee to you we studied our biggest industries in the country where we are a significant market producer. We didn't include those in our arrangements with the United States," he said. Go also touted the benefit to Filipino consumers of dropping some tariffs, particularly on pharmaceuticals. "Medicines are expensive in the Philippines. If they are tariff-free, then that can lower the price of medicine in our country," he said. Jesus Felipe, an economics professor at Manila's De La Salle University, told AFP the actual number of Philippine exports hit by the full tariff would likely be low. "That's the number (19 percent) that has been flagged, but our feeling is that many products -- a substantial share of Philippine exports to the US -- will have to be exempted." While predicting the effect on Philippine GDP would effectively be "nothing", Felipe said the "imperialist attitude" with which the United States was treating smaller countries remained worrying. Countries with far larger US trade deficits like China, Mexico and Canada had "much more power and leverage" to fight back, he said. "The Philippines cannot retaliate."
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Germany updates: Munich Airport plans deportation terminal – DW – 07/24/2025
Germany's second-largest largest airport is reportedly planning a "repatriation terminal" to process migrant deportations. Meanwhile, German Catholics have criticized the humanitarian situation in Gaza. DW has Central Committee of German Catholics (ZdK) said on Thursday that it was "appalled" by the suffering being endured by Palestinians in the Gaza Strip and called on the German government to ensure the enforcement of international law. "The humanitarian situation for the civilian population in Gaza is catastrophic," ZdK President Irme Stetter-Karp told the Redaktionsnetzwerk Deutschland (RND). While acknowledging that Israel "has a legitimate right to defend itself against the terrorist organization Hamas," she said that didn't absolve the Israeli government from its responsibility to respect international law. Stetter-Karp also said Israel's military operations were impacting the civilian population to an "unjustifiable" extent and highlighted the acute threat of starvation, illness and death facing children in the besieged enclave. "We are aghast that 875 Palestinians have been killed while trying to access aid at the distribution centers in Gaza," she said. "This approach by the Israeli government must end immediately!" Stetter-Karp also highlighted the plight of Palestinian Christians in the occupied West Bank, who she said were increasingly the targets of Israeli settler violence. Germany's second-largest airport is reportedly planning to construct a special deportation terminal in which police will process the repatriation of migrants to be deported. According to a planning document seen by the Reuters news agency, the so-called "repatriation terminal" at Munich Airport is to be around 60 meters long and spread over two floors. The facility, which is designed to facilitate "up to 100 arrivals and departures processing up to 50 individual measures and group charter flights daily," is planned for 2028 and will also include a "central check-in in order to coordinate repatriations efficiently," according to the document. German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt and Bavarian Interior Minister Joachim Herrmann, both of the Christian Social Union (CSU), the Bavarian sister party of the conservative Christian Democrats (CDU), have taken a strong stance on deportations of migrants with criminal convictions or rejected asylum claims. Munich Mayor Dieter Reiter, of the center-left Social Democrats (SPD), said the deportation of those convicted of crimes to their home countries was a sensible measure. "Therefore I don't think it's fundamentally wrong to propose such a terminal," he said. But political support is not universal. Local Green Party politician Gülseren Demirel told the broadsheet: "We are more than critical of a specific terminal for deportations." Welcome to DW's coverage of developments in Germany on Thursday, July 24. Despite Germany's dramatic defeat in the Euro 2025 semifinal last night, we all have to carry on, so here's what's on the agenda today:
Local Germany
2 hours ago
- Local Germany
Rail link through new Denmark-Germany tunnel ‘delayed by several years'
Delays in building a rail link between the new Fehmarn Belt tunnel and the railway on the German mainland could set the project back years, according to new reports. A document from Germany's federal railway authority, the Eisenbahn-Bundesamt, has been reported by Danish regional media as stating that it will take Germany's national rail company Deutsche Bahn six and a half years to construct a 2.2-kilometre railway tunnel between the island of Fehmarn and the German mainland. The tunnel is needed in order to connect the mainland German rail network to the Fehmarn Belt link, an 18-kilometre underwater tunnel currently under construction. The link, which is scheduled for completion in 2029 and will also carry road traffic, will connect Rødbyhavn on the Danish island of Lolland with Fehmarn in Germany. READ ALSO: King Frederik opens section of Denmark-Germany tunnel Construction of the additional tunnel on the German side has yet to receive final approval and is therefore yet to start. Given the six-year build time, this means trains are unlikely to begin running across the Fehmarn Belt before the end of 2032 at the earliest. The company Femern A/S, which is part of Sund & Bælt, is directing the Danish side of the tunnel project. The company did not comment directly on the reported directive from the German rail authority. Advertisement 'We are aware of articles currently circulating in the German media about the Fehmarn Sound tunnel,' Sund & Bælt head of media communications Jens Villemoes told Ritzau in a written comment. 'Should the timetable for the German infrastructure change, we expect the German government to inform the Danish government,' he added. Danish transport minister Thomas Danielsen told news wire Ritzau he had been informed of a directive issued by the German rail authority which states that the build time for the second tunnel would be six years. 'My ministry has contacted the German Ministry of Transport to request a detailed clarification,' the minister told Ritzau, adding he was 'following the matter closely.' Danielsen stressed that cars and other road traffic will still be able to cross the Fehmarn once the Denmark-Germany link is completed. That is because there is already a road bridge, the Fehmarn Sound Bridge, between the island of Fehmarn and mainland Germany. However, earlier reports have suggested that the project may also face a delay for the road connection. In its annual report in 2024, Sund & Bælt wrote that the scheduled opening of the road crossing in late 2029 was 'a significant challenge.'
