logo
Ivy Tech freezes tuition through 2026–27 academic year

Ivy Tech freezes tuition through 2026–27 academic year

Yahoo07-06-2025
INDIANAPOLIS — The Ivy Tech Community College State Board of Trustees has voted to freeze tuition and mandatory fees for the next two academic years, ensuring no increase for both 2025–26 and 2026–27.
The decision reflects the college's commitment to ensuring affordability and delivering value for Hoosiers, the school said, and follows Gov. Mike Braun's request and a unanimous recommendation by the Indiana Commission for Higher Education that all public higher education institutions freeze tuition to support Hoosiers.
'The action by our State Board reflects our commitment to putting students first,' said Dr. Sue Ellspermann, president of Ivy Tech Community College. 'Holding tuition flat builds on our years of work to improve affordability, access and completions for students, and that effort has brought positive outcomes for the state.'
In-state tuition for full-time students taking 12 or more credit hours will remain at $2,577.11 per semester; tuition for part-time students will remain at $178.38 per credit hour. Out-of-state tuition rates will also remain unchanged. Ivy Tech's innovative Ivy+ Textbooks program, which provides students with all required textbooks and course materials at a low, predictable cost, will continue at $18 per credit hour in 2025–26 and $18.25 in 2026–27.
The tuition freeze is part of Ivy Tech's broader mission to eliminate financial barriers and deliver high-quality, workforce-aligned education and training to Hoosier students, Ellspermann said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rep. Vernon Smith receives Sagamore of the Wabash award
Rep. Vernon Smith receives Sagamore of the Wabash award

Chicago Tribune

timea day ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Rep. Vernon Smith receives Sagamore of the Wabash award

For Rep. Vernon Smith, receiving a state award was surprising but still rewarding. 'It's one of the highest awards that you can receive from the governor's office,' said Smith, D-Gary. 'I was absolutely exhilarated to be the recipient.' Smith recently received the Sagamore of the Wabash award, which is the highest honor an Indiana governor can give, according to the governor's office. Smith received the award at a dinner celebrating his recent retirement from Indiana University Northwest, he said. The state representative worked in education in Gary for nearly 60 years, he said, and as a teacher, assistant principal and principal in the Gary Community School Corporation from 1966 to 1992. Smith became a member of the Indiana House of Representatives in 1990, according to the Indiana House Democratic Caucus' website. Before his time at the statehouse, Smith served on the Gary Common Council, starting in 1972. At the statehouse, Smith serves as ranking minority member of the Indiana House Education Committee and is a member of the Local Government Committee. According to the governor's website, former Gov. Ralph Gates created the Sagamore of the Wabash award during his 1945-1949 term. 'Sagamore' is a Native American term that means a subordinate chief or someone a chief would look to for advice, according to the Merriam-Webster dictionary. Since Gates, each Indiana governor presented the award to various Hoosiers, but the total number of recipients is unknown, according to the governor's website. 'I appreciate the award,' Smith said. 'I had a chance to serve with (Gov. Mike Braun) for four years in the House. But, this shows he has respected my tenure, both as an educator and as a public servant. It felt really good that he chose me.' Braun's office did not respond to a request for comment about the award. In a Thursday statement, Gary Mayor Eddie Melton congratulated Smith on receiving the Sagamore of the Wabash. He said the city is proud to call Smith one of their own. Melton and Smith worked together at the Indiana Statehouse while Melton served as state senator. Melton said the two worked to advance legislation that broadened outreach for the state's 21st Century Scholars program. They also collaborated on a House bill to reestablish an elected school board in Gary and a Senate bill to restore local control to the Gary Community School Corporation. 'These victories and honors show what's possible when leaders put the community at the center of every decision and highlight the lasting impact Rep. Smith has made on countless lives through his advocacy, mentorship, and leadership,' Melton said in his statement. 'His voice for education and economic opportunity has guided Gary through moments of challenge and transformation to secure vital resources and hope for our future.' The Gary Common Council recognized Smith for his service to local education and as state senator at its Tuesday meeting. Council members also congratulated Smith for receiving the Sagamore of the Wabash. 'We are so proud of you,' said Councilwoman Mary Brown, D-3rd. Brown said Tuesday that she's known Smith and his family for years, and it's made her proud to watch him progress as an educator and politician. Brown read a proclamation that recognized Smith for his service to the city during Tuesday's council meeting. Other council members recalled times that Smith mentored them throughout their political careers. Councilman Kenneth Whisenton, D-at large, recalled a summer he spent interning at the Indiana statehouse, where he told Smith he would never get involved with politics, and it 'broke (Smith's) heart.' Whisenton was elected to the council in late 2024, after state Sen. Mark Spencer, D-Gary, resigned. 'I called you several months ago, and I said, 'Doc, I think God is talking to me and telling me to get involved with city politics,'' Whisenton said. 'I said, 'I don't know what to make of it.' The first thing he said was, 'Do it. Run.'' Whisenton said he wouldn't be on council without Smith, and he's thankful to have him in his life. Councilman Darren Washington, D-at large, also said Smith played a large role in his political career. He recognized Smith for the work that he's done to help young Black males in Gary and throughout the state. 'I've learned so much from you,' Washington said. 'I'm thankful you've been part of my life.' Smith is grateful he's had an opportunity to impact various lives in Gary, both as an educator and state senator. He wasn't expecting to receive the Sagamore of the Wabash, and he said it's been great to receive the recognition. 'I've had the chance to impact the lives of so many young people from kindergarten through graduate school,' Smith said. 'I'm not the kind of person that's looking for praise … I try to be as humble as I can while serving God's people.'

How Indiana's U.S. representatives voted on the 'Big Beautiful Bill'
How Indiana's U.S. representatives voted on the 'Big Beautiful Bill'

Indianapolis Star

time3 days ago

  • Indianapolis Star

How Indiana's U.S. representatives voted on the 'Big Beautiful Bill'

Hoosiers in the U.S. House of Representatives on July 3 voted along party lines for the final approval of President Donald Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill," with Indiana's seven Republicans voting in favor of the bill and the two Democrats voting bill now goes to the president's desk for his signature ahead of the Fourth of July. The massive budget reconciliation bill, which narrowly passed the U.S. Senate on July 1, passed the House on a vote of 218-214. It is likely to impact Hoosiers through tax cuts and spending cuts to federally supported programs, such as Medicaid. Thousands of Indiana residents could lose access to the public health insurance program for low-income Americans, as well as SNAP benefits. But the bill also makes permanent the 2017 tax cuts from the first Trump term, which were due to expire at the end of this year and would have resulted in a $1,900 average tax increase for Hoosiers in 2026. The bill goes further on other tax cuts, eliminating clean energy tax credits and instituting a short-term tax break on tips and overtime wages. More: From taxes to Medicaid, 4 ways Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' could impact Hoosiers Indiana representatives' votes remained unchanged from their initial votes on the bill when it left the House in late May, despite skepticism some Republican members expressed over changes in the Senate that are expected to increase the national debt. U.S. Rep. Victoria Spartz threatened to withhold her vote on a procedural step to advance the bill but later voted with Republicans to allow the bill to proceed. U.S. Rep. Marlin Stutzman posted on X July 1 that changes made in the Senate include "unacceptable increases to the national debt and the deficit." In the post Stutzman said he was "willing to work through the 4th" to improve the bill but voted for its passage on July 3. "This bill was not perfect, but it gives all Americans a fresh start by curbing the last 4 years of disaster under Joe Biden," Stutzman said in a July 3 post following the passage of the bill. U.S. Rep. Frank Mrvan, a Democrat representing Northwest Indiana, said in a post on X he voted against the measure because it creates uncertainty for Hoosiers. "I opposed this measure because I cannot in good conscience leave people behind," Mrvan said. "The Republican Majority made a decision to prioritize their elite donors and corporations, and now our seniors, veterans, hard-working Americans, women, children and those yet to be born will pay with increased costs and possibly their lives." The House vote follows a Senate vote earlier this week where Vice President J.D. Vance cast a tie-breaking vote to advance the bill on a 51-50 vote. Both U.S. Sens. Todd Young and Jim Banks voted in favor of the bill. Big Beautiful Bill 101: What you need to know about Trump's tax bill USA TODAY contributed to this story. Contact IndyStar state government and politics reporter Brittany Carloni at and government accountability reporter Hayleigh Colombo at hcolombo@

IDEM issues deregulation report under Gov. Braun's orders. Advocates question need, impact
IDEM issues deregulation report under Gov. Braun's orders. Advocates question need, impact

Indianapolis Star

time4 days ago

  • Indianapolis Star

IDEM issues deregulation report under Gov. Braun's orders. Advocates question need, impact

The state agency charged with protecting Indiana's environment and Hoosiers from industrial pollution completed its first step to 'reduce excessive environmental regulation' and fulfill obligations imposed by Gov. Mike Braun. Braun issued an executive order earlier this year requiring state agencies to revisit any environmental regulations that 'impose unnecessary burdens on businesses, communities, agencies or industries' in the state. The order also requires agencies to identify 'overly burdensome' regulations and policies and report ways to revisit or rescind them no later than July 1. The Indiana Department of Environmental Management fulfilled this requirement in a new report that outlines 10 items for review. These regulations and policies range from streamlining pollution and discharge permits to making it easier for firefighters to conduct open-burn training. The agency not only plans to pursue changes in state regulations, but says it wants to encourage federal agencies such as the EPA to also change regulations. In a letter of support for IDEM's report, Braun said states going beyond federal environmental standards create complexity for businesses and farmers, and federal baselines are an appropriate limit. 'We need to unleash the productive side of our economy, while protecting and preserving our state's natural resources,' Braun wrote. IDEM said in its report it remains committed to reducing regulatory burdens that do not benefit Hoosiers and the environment. Industry groups said they welcome the changes in regulations and believe quicker permitting and fewer regulations will bring economic benefits. But environmental advocacy groups oppose the roll-back and contend the state is already behind on protecting Indiana's air and water and the health of Hoosiers. They also questioned why IDEM is tasked with protecting business interests over the environment. Kim Ferraro, managing attorney at Conservation Law Center, said Braun's executive order reinforces a false premise that regulating the environment is bad for the economy. 'There is no evidence to support that,' Ferraro said. 'It's dangerous that we keep putting it out there as the choice we have to make because that's a false choice.' The Conservation Law Center joined with other advocacy groups to submit comments to IDEM, but Ferraro said the premise of Braun's executive order was aimed at getting input from industry and did not focus on the burdens deregulation would have on Hoosiers. 'Current regulation doesn't meet the law in that it doesn't go far enough,' Ferraro said. 'That imposes many costs on Hoosiers in terms of medical costs and health care bills. It's bad for human health and the environment and not based in reality or best available science.' These burdensome costs on human health and the environment are what IDEM should be paying attention to, not the monetary costs of doing business, she said. 'Why is this on environmental agencies to roll back policies?' Ferraro asked. 'There are many other state agencies charged with promoting business interests, are they not doing their job? It seems strange to have (IDEM) promote industry interests.' The groups also argue in their comments that Indiana already faces serious environmental challenges that require the state to go beyond federal standards, and Braun's order imposes an unnecessary burden on state agencies. Others, however, are eager to see Braun's order play out. 'By making sure that our environmental regulations through IDEM match up closely or exactly with the federal regulations, it provides employers with regulatory certainty,' said Ashton Eller, the vice president of governmental affairs at the Indiana Manufacturers Association. He believes manufacturers who operate nationwide will be enticed to come to Indiana when they see the state's regulations are streamlined with the federal government. Eller said he's aware of the potential health impacts of environmental deregulation, but views Braun's directive as a modernization of regulations — not an elimination. 'Manufacturers are aware of the environmental outcomes upon health,' Eller said. He noted the report acknowledges it's possible to be good stewards of the environment without stifling growth through excessive government mandates. "We couldn't agree more,' he said. IDEM sought public input as part of its effort evaluating existing regulations. A selection of those comments was included in the agency's report to Braun. The department received about 1,000 comments from various groups and will review them all while it considers the next steps. Some farming groups submitting comments thought the state could do more than the federal standards. Two comments focused on Indiana's confined animal feeding operation laws on farms. The state's regulations are stricter than federal guidelines, but both commenters supported IDEM's current regulations. They cited how Indiana's regulation offers protection to farmers against nuisance lawsuits and environmentally related litigation. A large selection of the comments IDEM provided in its report came from industrial groups. One submission asked IDEM to change the verification timeline for wastewater discharge lagoons from once yearly to every five years to coincide with federal permit renewals, while another expressed support for streamlining state permits for coal mining facilities. Earlier this year, the U.S. EPA announced it also would look into permitting reforms across the country to streamline energy investment, and one coal-mining company urged IDEM to continue to review and update state regulations in alignment with these changing federal priorities. If IDEM decides state laws that exceed federal regulations should stay in place, the department has until Oct. 31 to review those rules and regulations. The agency must then provide a written report to Braun and the Legislative Council by Dec. 31. The 10 regulations and policies IDEM outlined in its report to Braun were chosen so the agency may clarify or rescind them. The agency in its report said it is committed to making sure its regulations are consistent with current law, supported by best available science and are not 'unduly burdensome.' Here are the 10 items with brief descriptions of what they are: Underground storage tank forms: IDEM says these forms, used during changes in facilities with these tanks, are redundant and duplicative due to federal requirements. Prior approval for fire training at an open burn: IDEM says fire departments requesting prior approval to train with an open burn is burdensome and recommends removing this requirement. Streamline pollution discharge permitting: Facilities currently have three years to come into compliance with pollution discharge permits known as NPDES. IDEM believes this timeline is out-of-date and recommends extending it to five years, in line with U.S. EPA. Redefining biomass and feedstock: The state wants to look at new definitions for biomass and feedstock to clear up confusion on what can be used in anaerobic digesters used for recycling items like manure and food waste. Emissions Reduction Plan for malfunctions: IDEM is considering revising or removing the requirement that air pollution-permitted facilities submit a plan to reduce emissions that resulted from a malfunction. Remove IDEM certification requirement for some tax deductions: IDEM is currently required to certify if certain systems or devices qualify for tax deductions. IDEM says the process is unnecessary and recommends removing the requirement. Electronic waste fund flexibility: Revenue from electronic waste registration and recycling is currently limited to the administration expenses. IDEM recommends expanding what the fund can be used for, like outreach and collection. Extend some waste permits: Solid and hazardous waste permits range from three to five years in length. IDEM proposes extending certain permits to 10 years to reduce the paperwork burden for applicants. Streamline application for alternative water discharge limits: Facilities, like steam-powered electricity generators, which release heated water into rivers and streams are typically bound by temperature limits, unless they can prove their proposed limit won't harm the natural environment. IDEM suggests streamlining the application process to remove burdens and uncertainty for facilities. Rescind environmental penalty guidance: Documents guiding civil penalties for breaches of environmental regulations and penalties for leaking storage tanks will be rescinded. IndyStar's environmental reporting project is made possible through the generous support of the nonprofit Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust. Karl Schneider is an IndyStar environment reporter. You can reach him at Follow him on BlueSky @ or X @karlstartswithk.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store