OAB Sponsors the Inspirational 'Safar' Tour for Dialogues with Visionary Leaders - Middle East Business News and Information
The tour kicked off with its first session at the Middle East College Theater in Muscat Governorate, followed by the second at the Sultan Qaboos Youth Complex for Culture and Entertainment in Salalah. The final session will be held at the Sohar University Theater. The sessions are moderated by Mohammed Al Hinai, founder of the youth podcast Jalsat Karak, a platform that promotes creativity in Oman's cultural landscape.
The tour features distinguished guests, including Dr. Hani Al Qadhi, Senior Consultant in General and Trauma Surgery, Visiting Professor at the University of British Columbia in Canada, and Director General of Health Services in Dhofar Governorate. Also featured is Dr. Lamya Al Haj, Associate Professor at Sultan Qaboos University and PhD holder in Biology from University College London. Recognized as one of the leading young scientific figures in Oman and globally, she has made significant contributions in technology, education, and community service, and has been honored with numerous prestigious regional and international awards.
Sulaiman Al Harthi, Chief Executive Officer of OAB, stated:'OAB is proud to sponsor the inspirational 'Safar' tour, a prominent cultural event in the Sultanate of Oman. Our participation reflects the Bank's commitment to contributing meaningfully to the social and economic objectives of Oman Vision 2040. The innovative perspectives shared by these distinguished Omani leaders are catalysts for transformation and a powerful source of inspiration for youth, empowering them to lead the country toward its ambitious goals.'
He added: 'Our involvement in such purposeful programs and events reaffirms OAB's dedication to strengthening community engagement, particularly among the youth. As a well-established financial institution in the Sultanate, the Bank continues to develop and support initiatives that align with the goals of sustainable development and contribute to economic growth.'
OAB further reinforces its leadership in driving the banking sector toward comprehensive digital transformation and innovation in financial solutions that elevate customer experience. The Bank is proud of the success of its innovative services and the positive impact of its flagship programs—Ruwad Al Arabi and National Leadership Development—in supporting the goals of Oman Vision 2040. These initiatives aim to enhance skills, develop national talent, stimulate innovation, boost the competitiveness of Omani youth in the job market, and support SMEs in growing, expanding, and launching projects that promote sustainability and economic diversification in the country.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily News Egypt
3 days ago
- Daily News Egypt
CIB reports Q2 2025 consolidated revenue of EGP 27.8bn
Commercial International Bank (CIB) reported second-quarter (Q2) 2025 consolidated net income of EGP 16.7bn, or EGP 4.88 per share, marking a 7% increase from Q2 2024. The bank's management commented: 'Building on a strong start to the year, CIB delivered another solid set of financial results in Q2 2025, closing the first half with top and bottom lines of EGP 54.9bn and EGP 33.3bn, representing growth of 18% and 21%, respectively, over the previous year. This was achieved despite the easing monetary cycle and supported by the stability in the foreign exchange market, reflecting the true resilience of CIB, underpinned by the strength of our core business performance. This is further evident in our year-on-year growth in USD terms, with revenues up 14% and net income up 17%.' Each of the Bank's business lines performed robustly, enabling CIB to support corporate and individual clients as they navigated market dynamics. Despite relative normalization in local currency deposit market rates, total deposits continued to grow, increasing by a healthy 21% year-on-year. Both retail and corporate deposits contributed, rising by 22% and 21%, respectively. This growth was driven by continued momentum across all business segments and was accompanied by an increase in the share of current and savings accounts (CASA) to total deposits—from 54% last year to 59% by end of first-half 2025—helping manage cost of funds and maintain margins. Meanwhile, gross loans expanded impressively by 50% year-on-year, adding EGP 165bn, driven mainly by corporate loans, which grew by 57% (EGP 149bn). Over 40% of this corporate lending was directed towards capital expenditure (CAPEX). At the same time, lending to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) continued to grow, reaching 29% of the loan portfolio, exceeding the Central Bank of Egypt's minimum requirement. Retail loans also showed strong growth of 23%, adding EGP 16bn, primarily in personal loans, credit cards, and mortgage loans. As a result, CIB maintained its position as the largest private-sector lender in the Egyptian banking sector, with a gross loan portfolio of EGP 496bn in of the first half of 2025—or EGP 523bn when including securitization deals—capturing a private-sector corporate loan market share of 9.23%. This robust balance sheet momentum supported strong revenue growth of 18% year-on-year, which would have been 23% when excluding the exceptional foreign exchange income generated in the first half of 2024. Growth was driven by a 24% increase in net interest income (NII) and a normalized 21% rise in non-interest income. The latter was largely underpinned by genuine growth in sustainable streams: net fee and commission income increased by 22%, reflecting active lending during the year, with loan fees recording an impressive 42% rise, and card fees nearly doubling, driven by a 38% increase in the credit card portfolio from the end of the first half of 2024. All of this was enabled by CIB's solid digital infrastructure, which reinforced its leadership in digital banking and alternative channels. The Bank saw a significant increase in transaction volumes and values, reaching 1.9 million users on its online banking platforms in of the first half of 2025, a 17% rise from the same period in 2024, while transaction values grew by 58% to EGP 2.3trn across all digital channels. Total provisions accrued this quarter were similar to the previous quarter, amounting to EGP 695m for the first half of 2025—down from EGP 2.24bn in the first half of 2024. This decrease was largely due to the adoption of the recalibrated Expected Credit Loss (ECL) calculation, which was successfully validated by a third party and communicated to the Central Bank of Egypt, with final approval pending. Despite slower provision accumulation, the Bank preserved its highest-in-market coverage for expected losses: loan loss provisions covered 8.9% of the gross loan portfolio, 12.6% of the unsecured portion, and 338% of non-performing loans (NPLs). Notably, even when excluding provisions, the Bank's bottom line still recorded a healthy 14% year-on-year growth in the first half of 2025. This strong profitability accommodated healthy capital utilization, as reflected in risk-weighted asset (RWA) growth, with CIB ending the period with a Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) of 28.4% and a Common Equity Tier I (CET1) capital ratio of 23.6%. This solid capital base supported one of the highest returns to shareholders, with Return on Average Equity (RoAE) reaching 40.5% for the first half of 2025. Looking ahead, management remains optimistic about Egypt's economic recovery while preparing for various scenarios, supported by CIB's resilient balance sheet, prudent risk management, and operational readiness. Revenues Second-quarter 2025 standalone revenues reached EGP 27.8bn, up 13% from the second quarter of 2024. First-half 2025 standalone revenues were EGP 54.6bn, an 18% increase over the first half of 2024, driven by a 23% rise in net interest income, partially offset by a 30% decrease in non-interest income. Net Interest Income First-half 2025 standalone net interest income totaled EGP 51.2bn, up 23% year-on-year, achieved with a total Net Interest Margin (NIM) of 8.94%. Local currency NIM improved by 51 basis points to 13.1%, while foreign currency NIM declined by 114 basis points to 2.71%. Non-Interest Income Standalone non-interest income for the first half of 2025 stood at EGP 3.47bn, down 30% year-on-year. Trade service fees grew 5% to EGP 1.72bn, with an outstanding balance of EGP 302bn. Operating Expense Operating expenses reached EGP 7.54bn in the first half of 2025, a 35% increase year-on-year. The cost-to-income ratio rose by 180 basis points to 13.8% but remained comfortably below the Bank's target ceiling of 30%. Loans Gross loans reached EGP 496bn, growing 24% or EGP 96.3bn year-to-date (YTD). Adjusting for the appreciation of the Egyptian pound, real growth was 25% or EGP 99.2bn. Local currency loans grew by 29% (EGP 80.5bn), while foreign currency loans rose by 16% ($377m). As of February 2025, CIB's total loan market share stood at 4.72%, and private-sector corporate loan market share at 9.23%. Deposits Total deposits rose to EGP 1.04 trillion, a 7% or EGP 72.3bn increase YTD, with real growth of 9% (EGP 82.2bn) net of currency appreciation. Local currency deposits increased by 8% (EGP 43.1bn), and foreign currency deposits grew by 10% ($790m). As of February 2025, CIB's deposit market share was 6.96%. Asset Quality Standalone non-performing loans accounted for 2.63% of the gross loan portfolio, covered 338% by the EGP 44.1bn loan loss provision balance. Impairment for credit losses saw a net release of EGP 346m in the first half of 2025, compared to a charge of EGP 2.06bn in the same period of 2024. Capital and Liquidity Total Tier Capital reached EGP 209bn, equivalent to 28.4% of risk-weighted assets by June 2025. Tier I capital stood at EGP 174bn, representing 83% of total Tier Capital. Liquidity remained well above regulatory requirements: the local currency liquidity ratio was 55.0% (regulator threshold: 20%) and foreign currency liquidity ratio was 74.0% (threshold: 25%). Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) was 207% for local currency and 216% for foreign currency, while the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) was 530% for local currency and 407% for foreign currency—significantly above the Basel III requirement of 100%.
Mid East Info
4 days ago
- Mid East Info
Personal sanctions against ICU: why Europe and Ukraine might make such a decision
By Sergey Lyamets, Ukrainian journalist The well-known Ukrainian financial group ICU disguises its interests through offshore companies and affiliated structures and interferes in international restructurings. The secretary of the new NSDC (National Security and Defence Council of Ukraine), Rustam Umerov, may want to have a quick victory. Then he might find this information interesting. Ties with Russian business have become a ready-made recipe for the effective introduction of sanctions. The harsh reality is that the NSDC may target Ukraine's largest government bond trader, Investment Capital Ukraine (ICU). I wrote about the hidden reason why sanctions may have been imposed on Petro Poroshenko. The reason for this is the unethical behaviour of ICU towards the holders of the so-called LPNs. Even before the invasion, Alfa-Bank's VIP depositors were offered a special investment product – Loan Participation Notes (LPN) issued by the Dutch company EMIS Finance B.V. These are high-yield bonds: Alfa-Bank returned the funds raised to Ukraine and used them to issue new loans and then shared the profits with its VIP clients. The deal was mutually beneficial, and Alfa Club became the most powerful VIP banking system in Ukraine. But with the outbreak of a full-scale war, the bank was nationalised, and the money of Ukrainian depositors was 'suspended'. The former owners of Alfa agreed to return the money but asked to wait. They proposed a restructuring scheme for LPNs that has already been used by influential Ukrainian families. Most of the LPN issues have already been restructured. Now they just have to wait for their money. But there are just a few tranches left, the control of which was once bought up by the ICU group. The holders, who no longer believed in getting their money back, sold their LPNs to the group at a large discount. ICU now owns these securities and has blocked the restructuring. Obviously, they expect special benefits. I doubt that they will succeed – the weight categories are slightly different. But they certainly managed to take other tranche participants hostage. Why is Poroshenko involved [Poroshenko involved] here? Because ICU is still associated with 'The Grey-Haired'. According to my information, this could have been the real motivation for the NSDC's sanctions against the former president. Undoubtedly, there were other reasons. But you'll agree that everything coincided in time. A new episode in this case has recently emerged. ICU decided to finally take control of the other LPN holders. So far, in 'its own' tranches, but it is possible that it will want to expand its success. At first glance, the details are purely technical. ICU has initiated the procedure of changing the trustee and paying agent from BNY Mellon to GLAS (Global Loan Agency Services Ltd). BNY Mellon is a world-renowned financial group with an impeccable reputation. GLAS, on the other hand, specialises in distressed and disputed assets and often acts in the interests of the client rather than the market. The vote for the GLAS appointment will take place at the end of July, and ICU is currently collecting votes in support. Given that they already have a majority of LPNs, the 'choice' is a formality. In fact, they will vote for themselves. This means that the restructuring will fail, and the LPN debts will finally 'hang'. The stakes have gone up. If previously ICU held to ransom its allies in a tranche, now it will take full control of them. Perhaps this will affect other LPN holders. The replacement of the trustee looks like a preparation for a forceful takeover of the restructuring process, in order to dictate terms to the rest [of the holders]. If BNY Mellon is replaced by GLAS, the question will be posed as follows: influential Ukrainian families will only receive their money if ICU receives its own – and on its own terms. Perhaps the group's goal is to buy out other LPNs at a discount. In fact, the group has done this more than once. Their business model is to buy out debts cheaply (20-30%) and then to get their repayment at 100% of the face value. To pull off such an operation, you first need to create an artificial crisis and show that the money will not be returned at all. And then, you 'solve the problem'. At first glance, the conflict over the restructuring of EMIS Finance B.V. bonds seems to be a routine dispute over debts. According to my sources, the LPNs of the former owners of Alfa-Bank are held by influential families in Ukraine and some large companies. Arm-twisting is likely to cause them to react strongly against it. ICU's aggressive actions may well backfire on it, even in the form of harsh sanctions from the EU and Ukraine. In Ukraine, ICU is known as a well-known seller of government bonds, but its real activities are behind the scenes. It concerns the servicing of the funds of two former presidents (Yanukovych and Poroshenko) and close cooperation with Russian business. I wrote here about cooperation with Poroshenko. Let's talk a little bit about ICU's cooperation with Russian business. It is not about innocent purchases of real estate in Crimea, although the NSDC is willing to impose sanctions even for that. We are talking about cooperation with VTB, one of the three largest state-owned banks in Russia. Until 2014, 22.7% of ICU was owned by the wife of VTB's former First Deputy Chairman of the Board, Yuri Solovyov. The OCCRP investigation showed that 22.74% of ICU Holdings Ltd. (BVI) was owned by Cordova Management Ltd., which was controlled by 'Ulyutina G.O.' from Moscow. The initials and surname allude to Galina Olegovna Ulyutina, the wife of Yuri Solovyov. Valeria Gontareva and Solovyov himself were friends. Ulyutina withdrew from ICU's list of shareholders in August 2014. As you know, Gontareva also withdrew from ICU. But contacts were not severed. Already in the Poroshenko era, ICU was actively working with RCB Bank (Cyprus, formerly VTB) through its structures. Of course, to find the evidence, one has to dig through the financial statements. It will be necessary to investigate the controlled entities in the UK and Cayman Islands, the use of GLAS and proxy votes (in particular, through FPP, which will be discussed below). The National Security and Defence Council will probably be interested in studying the cooperation of ICU with Cleary Gottlieb lawyers (who are putting pressure on Ukraine in the case of Yaresko's warrants). The search promises to be fruitful. For example, let's take the British structure FPP Asset Management LLP, which is controlled by ICU, or their actions are closely synchronised. Former ICU managers worked for this company. In FPP's 2018-2019 financial statements, ICU Holdings Ltd. was directly listed as the majority shareholder (>50%). Subsequently, the chain of ownership was concealed through the Cayman-based FPP Global Holdings Ltd. This allowed ICU to get out of the disclosure procedure. However, according to financial market participants, ICU co-owner Makar Paseniuk has repeatedly admitted this: 'FPP is us'. Why is FPP important? Because the company was involved in the EMIS debt restructuring process. It was through this structure that ICU held positions in EMIS bonds and voted against the restructuring. The company posed as an independent holder, although it was the good old ICU. The aim was probably to create the appearance that it was not ICU that was opposed to the restructuring, but an allegedly 'opposition' group of LPN holders. But before that, FPP played a different role. Presumably, through FPP, ICU implemented joint projects with VTB, including the SPAC Emerging Markets Horizon Corp. A SPAC is a shell fund in which everyone can contribute money to invest in promising companies. Emerging Markets Horizon Corp was raising $250 million via Nasdaq to buy assets in Eastern Europe (possibly also in Ukraine). It was jointly managed by representatives of VTB Capital and FPP. The fund failed to raise funds and was liquidated in 2023. Perhaps because of the war. FPP's client structure also included the Cyprus-based Justy Five Fund with assets of up to €100 million, which is backed by Kirill Zimarin, former CEO of RCB Bank (ex-Russian Commercial Bank, which belonged to VTB Group). Zimarin is now the owner of Finstella, which has no formal ties to VTB. But it is quite possible that the connection with Russian business has been preserved. Why is ICU here? According to my sources, the company was previously financed through RCB Bank for hundreds of millions of dollars, including through the BVI CIS Opportunities Fund. This fund should be checked for servicing the accounts of VTB's management (including Andrey Kostin, Yuri Solovyov, Herbert Moos and Natalia Solozhentseva). A separate question is whether the fund's money was invested in ICU products. For example, there is a well-known line of cooperation: the Russian Burger King Russia restaurant chain was jointly controlled by the CIS [Opportunities Fund] (through Xomeric Holdings Ltd) and VTB. ICU owned a 35% stake in the chain, and they officially announced that they had withdrawn from co-ownership only after the full-scale invasion [of Ukraine]. It is logical to assume that cooperation with VTB had been flourishing before, despite the annexation of Crimea and Donbass. However, there is one interesting point: despite the announcement of its withdrawal, ICU continues to own a stake in Burger King Russia. Here is a quote from a BBC article dated 3 October 2023: 'ICU Group, a large Ukrainian investment firm, owns a 35% stake. ICU Group told the BBC it has no control over the joint venture or operations in Russia and other countries covered by the franchise deal. It said the firm was 'at the final stage of exiting' the franchise agreement with terms agreed with a buyer. The company added it had abstained from managing the joint venture and investing in it and had not received any dividends since the war began.' So it appears that there was a statement, but no actual exit . I have only lightly touched on the issue of ICU's ties to Russian business. All indications are that the ties are not just with Russian businesses, but with the leading state-owned Russian business. If an objective investigation confirms these links, what are the consequences? ICU is registered in London. If the links with VTB are confirmed, this could be a violation of the financial market participant's code of ethics. British regulators are tough on violations, as unethical behaviour undermines confidence in the market as a whole. Cooperation with VTB means that ICU could have dealt with assets or persons on the EU sanctions lists. As for ICU's actions to restructure LPNs, they follow the toxic models of the Poroshenko-Gontareva era: offshores, aggressive actions, imitation of an agreed position, circumvention of information disclosure requirements. If it turns out that ICU, through FPP and GLAS, is creating an infrastructure of pressure on the market and its participants, it could cost the group its licence. Such an unfair practice may also alert European regulators (ICU plans to move one of its offices to the EU). The tools used by ICU are an example of toxic behaviour that undermines confidence in markets. Through its affiliates, ICU interferes with restructuring processes, disguises beneficiaries, blocks market decisions and acts against the interests of independent holders. In Ukraine, exposing the facts of cooperation with Russia is a direct path to sanctions. Sanctions may be followed by the loss of licences, nationalisation of the bank and securities trader, and reputational damage. I'm pretty sure that ICU has influential patrons in the Ukrainian government, but each of them has a limit beyond which they simply retreat. I repeat myself: this is just one of the possible scenarios. It could be realised if ICU goes to open war with influential Ukrainian families, and they decide to strike back. I have sent detailed questions to the ICU owners to clarify the stated facts. Two weeks have passed and there is still no response. If any responses are received, I'll let you know. Texts published in the Opinion section do not necessarily reflect the position of the UNIAN editorial board. You can read more about our editorial policy at this link
bnok24
5 days ago
- bnok24
Lime Consumer Finance Joins Egypt's FinTech Ecosystem with a Seamless Education-Centric App
the largest platform for education financing in Egypt and a wholly owned entity of First Abu Dhabi Bank Group in the UAE, has officially launched in the fintech ecosystem, with a specialised focus on educational financing as its first strategic entry point Licensed by Egypt's Financial Regulatory Authority (FRA), Lime offers structured, transparent, and accessible solutions for families in Egypt. While education marks the beginning, Lime's app is designed to expand into other essential life sectors, paving the way for broader financial empowerment Lime enables families to plan and pay for education across a holistic network of nurseries, schools, and universities. With over 30% of Egypt's population under the age of 15 (CAPMAS, 2025), education finance has become a natural priority. The app features installment options ranging from 6 to 12 months for amounts up to EGP 1 million, with digital onboarding and financing approvals granted within minutes, ensuring speed, convenience, and regulatory compliance Mr. Ahmed Mohsen, CEO and Managing Director of Lime Consumer Finance, stated: 'With an initial investment of USD 9.4 million, Lime enters the market at a time when Egypt is witnessing a parallel surge in private education demand and digital financial inclusion—fueled by a young population and supportive national policies He added: 'We're proud to be contributing to Egypt's Financial Inclusion Strategy by addressing a real need. Lime fills a critical gap by offering structured, transparent, and accessible financing solutions—and this is just the beginning. With a strong investment in technology, we aim to deliver a unique digital journey for customers, with approvals granted in minutes using a state-of-the-art credit decision engine On the expertise front, Lime's Board of Trustees brings together multidisciplinary expertise across key sectors essential to the company's mission: Ms. Mariam El Samny, Head of Consumer Banking at FABMISR; Mr. Refaat Zayed, Head of Retail Credit at FABMISR; Mr. Abdallah El Ebiary, Managing Director at Alvarez & Marsal's Sovereign Advisory Services; Mr. Mohamed El Kalla, CEO of CIRA Education; Ms. Magda Habib, CEO and Founder of Dawi Clinics and Mr. Omar Bassiouny, Founding Partner at Matouk Bassiouny and Group Head of Corporate and M&A Backed by the strength and experience of First Abu Dhabi Bank Group and guided by a multidisciplinary board, Lime is committed to driving financial inclusion and sustainable impact across Egypt's evolving fintech landscape. Education is Lime's starting point, but the app is designed for future expansion into other high-impact sectors Google News تابعونا على تابعونا على تطبيق نبض
