Gaza mediators working to bridge gaps in Doha talks
Disagreements over Israeli troop presence in Gaza are blocking progress.
Over 58 000 Palestinians and 1 200 Israelis have died since the war began.
Mediators are pursuing 'innovative mechanisms' to bridge the gaps between Israeli and Hamas delegations after a week of Gaza truce talks in Qatar, an official with knowledge of the negotiations told AFP on Monday.
The indirect talks had appeared deadlocked over the weekend, with each side accusing the other of staking out positions that prevented a deal from being reached.
'Mediators are actively exploring innovative mechanisms to help bridge the remaining gaps and maintain momentum in the negotiations,' the official said, requesting anonymity to discuss sensitive matters.
The talks in Doha were focused 'on the proposed maps for the redeployment of Israeli forces within Gaza', the official added.
On Saturday, Palestinian sources told AFP that Israel's proposals for keeping troops in the territory were preventing progress towards a deal.
Egypt's head of intelligence, Hassan Mahmoud Rashad, was also in Doha for the talks, meeting with Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al-Thani to discuss 'ways to coordinate the efforts of the mediators to advance the negotiation process', an official with knowledge of his visit said.
At least 58 386 Palestinians, most of them civilians, have been killed since the start of the war, according to the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza.
The war began with Hamas's 7 October 2023 attack on Israel, which resulted in the deaths of at least 1 219 people, also mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on Israeli figures.
Of the 251 hostages seized by militants during the attack, 49 are still being held, including 27, the Israeli military says, are dead.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ben Shapiro Says Megyn Kelly's Epstein Sources Are Complicit in One of History's ‘Greatest Cover-Ups'
Ben Shapiro came after Megyn Kelly's sources who she says claim Jeffrey Epstein was an asset for America or Israel – but insist on remaining anonymous. While on Monday's episode of 'The Megyn Kelly Show,' the host and Shapiro sparred over whether or not the deceased American financier, child sex offender and sex trafficker Epstein was also an asset for America or Israel. Kelly was adamant she had sources that said 'not only do we believe he was an agent, but we don't believe he killed himself.' More from TheWrap Ben Shapiro Says Megyn Kelly's Epstein Sources Are Complicit in One of History's 'Greatest Cover-Ups' | Video 'Better Go Mad in the Wild' Subject Frantisek Klisik Dies Hours After Film Wins at Karlovy Vary Film Festival 'Final Destination Bloodlines' Star Richard Harmon Joins Fox's 'Memory of a Killer' With Patrick Dempsey Barack Obama Urges Democrats to Ditch 'Navel-Gazing' and 'Toughen Up' Against Trump 'I mean, that's fine,' Shapiro said. 'They should come out, and they should say that, and then they should say who's covering that up.' He added: 'I have the names of the people who are making the claim that Jeffrey Epstein killed himself, and that the most gross and sort of extreme of the conspiracy theories … the most extreme version of the theory, is not true. I have the names of the people who are claiming that they are all in the administration. And this is my point. If other people want to make those claims that are counter to that, then they should provide evidence, or at least put their names on it, so we can question them about that as well, because otherwise we're just in the realm of pure speculation, and frankly, I just don't find that useful.' Kelly countered that Shapiro exclaiming her sources were not valid because they did come out with the information public is not fair. She pointed to the fact that doing so could be dangerous both professionally and personally because 'they don't want to be the one to cross Trump.' Shapiro scoffed at that and added that coming out with information on Epstein would only make the whisteblower richer. 'I'm not saying you should name them,' he said. 'I'm saying they should name themselves, because otherwise, they are being complicit in one of the greatest cover-ups in the history of America.' Shapiro continued: 'If somebody came out today, and they were a whistleblower on the greatest scandal in the history of the American Republic, they would make more money tomorrow than in their entire life working for the FBI. That's ridiculous.' Epstein has had Trump's MAGA base turning on each other across the board since the DOJ and FBI's memo last week revealed that the Trump-mandated investigation into Epstein's criminal past 'did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.' This came mere months after Bondi told Fox News that she was in possession of a list of that very nature. CNN even reported that Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino was considering a resignation over the memo and the reaction from many of Trump's consituents. 'Dan Bongino has told people he is considering resigning as the deputy director of the FBI over the fallout that has continued ever since this memo was released,' Kaitlan Collins said. 'The anger inside the MAGA base has only continued to grow instead of going away as some officials inside hoped it would.' Watch the full conversation between Kelly and Shapiro above. The post Ben Shapiro Says Megyn Kelly's Epstein Sources Are Complicit in One of History's 'Greatest Cover-Ups' | Video appeared first on TheWrap.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Gaza hostage talks stalled by Knesset recess, not IDF troop placement
It seems that Netanyahu purposely waited to pull out the Morag Corridor issue to temporarily muddy talks just a bit longer until it is closer to the Knesset recess date of July 27. Those critics of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu who ignore that he has a serious and coherent ideology for his national security decisions and impute to him acting solely based on political-personal motives often miss the boat on a far more complex picture. This is especially true when talking about the big picture: Whether Netanyahu could have cut a hostage deal in a certain month as opposed to several months later. But for much smaller calculations: Regarding the timing of a hostage deal, a few days or weeks this way or that way, politics is often overwhelmingly mixed in with the specific date when Netanyahu chooses to finalize an agreement. It is true that part of why Netanyahu did not end the war and sign a full hostage deal in spring 2024 was to keep his government afloat when Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich threatened to topple him. But Netanyahu also was not satisfied ideologically that Hamas was sufficiently beaten at that point in the war (its Rafah battalions were fully intact) to end the military pressure and leave Hamas the way it was. In contrast, by the time Netanyahu flew off for Washington last week, he was mostly ready for another ceasefire deal with Hamas, for at least 60 days, and possibly for ending the war entirely. That means that a large part of the reason there has been a delay in finalizing a deal at this point, though probably not a long delay, likely has to do with the Knesset recess. In fact, pretty much all of the issues that Netanyahu and Hamas disagreed about during the last ceasefire of January to March had been resolved by the middle of last week. Back in the January-March period, Netanyahu was willing to extend the ceasefire beyond early March for the return of more hostages as long as he did not need to explicitly say this would end the war. Hamas was not willing to give over any more hostages without a much clearer end to the war being part of any new deal. Mostly Israel's 'stick' of four more months of battering Hamas has gotten it to bend on this, with the 'carrot,' which the US has used to lure Hamas into the likely new deal being a stronger guarantee from US President Donald Trump (after seeing that he could order back Israeli aircraft from attacking Iran post that ceasefire), that he will get Netanyahu to end the war after the 60 days initial ceasefire expires. Meaning, Trump is telling Hamas he will get Netanyahu to stop, whether the prime minister says so out loud or not. So Hamas is now pretty much accepting Netanyahu's terms from January-March, but suddenly, mid-week last week, a new issue cropped up. Netanyahu wants to hold on to the Morag Corridor, which now cuts off Khan Yunis (mid-southern Gaza) from Rafah (deep southern Gaza), effectively making Rafah a more Hamas-free area for Palestinian civilians. Now, there are plenty of good, serious military reasons to want to hold onto the Morag Corridor. The largest one is the displacement of Hamas's political rule from the several hundred thousand Palestinians in Rafah, something that could deeply undermine its ability to reconstitute itself militarily. Initially, the IDF told The Jerusalem Post during a visit to the Morag Corridor in April that its primary purpose was to make it easier to finish off the small remaining Hamas terrorists in Rafah. But the IDF has long dispensed with those Hamas forces (the second time the IDF has beaten Hamas in Rafah after beating a larger group of them in summer 2024). In the past, Defense Minister Israel Katz has said that the purpose of Morag is to 'increase the pressure [on Hamas] to release the hostages, and to build a bridge for the continuation of operations for defeating Hamas.' IDF sources have said that Hamas's weapons manufacturing capabilities have been hit hard by IDF actions, but that it still retains a variety of makeshift facilities. In that light, having more forces in the Morag Corridor makes it easier to act speedily against such facilities when they are discovered and before Hamas manufacturers can escape. But all of these are somewhat beside the point. Israel and Netanyahu cannot say that Morag is a make-or-break issue because they only built it in April. It was not make or break for 18 months of the war before that. And Netanyahu could have placed the issue of the Morag Corridor on the table before going to Washington to try to resolve it. Moreover, despite past statements, Katz explicitly let slip to the Post and other journalists days before Netanyahu flew to Washington that the Morag Corridor was not a make-or-break issue. IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Eyal Zamir and most of the IDF high command do not view Morag as a reason to hold up another hostage deal. And this is Zamir, the popular IDF chief who is viewed as aggressive, not Herzi Halevi, the IDF chief of October 7 who some viewed (justifiably or not) as more passive. Rather, it seems that Netanyahu purposely waited to pull out the Morag Corridor issue to temporarily muddy talks just a bit longer until it is closer to the Knesset recess date of July 27. Netanyahu is worried that Smotrich could try to topple the government. But once the recess is about to start, and certainly once the recess starts, that threat will be postponed until the Knesset returns in late October. And once it is late October, after a 60-day ceasefire, Netanyahu can either decide to go back to war or to initiate elections on his own, which would be set for some time in 2026, which will mean he will have survived most of his term. It is also possible that Netanyahu still is trying to use Morag to avoid a deal to further uproot Hamas's political control over the Palestinian civilian population – and to keep his government stable for deeper into 2026. But most of the signals from Netanyahu – as well as the leak from Katz and the clear position of Zamir – point to a relatively imminent deal. If this is how it plays out, it would be virtually identical to the delay of the last ceasefire with Hamas by a few weeks. That ceasefire could have started in early January, but instead started only on January 19 – since Netanyahu wanted the deal signed as close to Trump's inauguration day as possible. So while it is simplistic to say Netanyahu over several months has only made decisions based on politics, it is quite possible that IDF soldiers and Palestinian civilians who are killed in Gaza in this short period over the coming days could have been saved if the political calendar was not a critical factor in reaching the exact date for a deal.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Hamas uses Gaza's rubble as a tactical advantage against the IDF
Hamas apparently believes that the IDF views ruined areas as secure. As such, it thinks that it can move more freely in these areas. Recent terrorist attacks in Gaza against IDF forces have revealed that Hamas and other groups in Gaza are exploiting the landscape to carry out attacks. What this means is that Hamas may view Israel's continued destruction of urban areas as a possible opportunity to exploit. Throughout the war, many Gazan neighborhoods have been reduced to rubble. In some cases whole towns have been razed. The policy of razing areas has been articulated in the media and among voices in politics in Israel. Most buildings in Gaza are presented as acceptable targets because terrorists could use them. It is also believed that many buildings conceal tunnels or tunnel shafts and entrances. The theory is that if you destroy the building, the enemy can't use it. However, Hamas appears to be shifting tactics to take advantage of the ruins. In Khan Yunis, Beit Hanun, and other places this appears to be the tactic. Its terrorists can hide in the ruins of buildings and move from one place to another. The group apparently believes that the IDF views ruined areas as secure. As such, it thinks that it can move more freely in these areas. It knows that the IDF has entered and claimed to have cleared many urban areas, such as Jabaliya in Gaza. It always returns to these areas afterward. Hamas has another reason for using the rubble. The terror organization controls the central camps and Gaza City and it knows that the IDF is reluctant to enter those areas. That is apparently where the terror group is holding the 50 hostages. At the very least, Hamas knows that Israel is afraid that could be the case. Thus, the group feels relatively secure in 30% of Gaza. Hamas terrorists can then infiltrate the other 60-70% percent and wait for targets of opportunity to appear. A recent report indicated that this is what Hamas and other groups are doing. They send cells back into the rubble and wait. They wait for an IDF armored vehicle to appear; or to identify a road that the IDF is using. The deadly attacks in Beit Hanun and Khan Yunis in the first weeks of July illustrate the new Hamas tactic. This must lead to a question about whether the policy of destroying buildings in Gaza is effective. It is possible that this policy has diminishing returns. It's not clear what percentage of Gaza has been reduced to ruins, but it appears that a large part of the areas where the IDF operates, comprising 60-70% percent of Gaza, has been badly damaged. Areas near the Israeli border are earmarked for a future buffer zone. Beit Hanun is apparently one of those areas. However, it appears that dozens of terrorists are still hiding there. The IDF has gone in now to clear them out. Will this work this time? Will the same clearing work this time in Jabaliya, Sheijaya, and Zeitoun in northern Gaza? Hamas has been able to tie down several IDF divisions for 645 days of war. Now, it appears to be adapting to the new situation. The question is whether the IDF is also adapting. The incidents in Khan Yunis and Beit Hanun illustrate that Hamas tactics should be examined and studied. The rubble across most of Gaza could become a threat just as deadly as terrorists hiding in civilian homes and schools.
