Australia and China call for more dialogue, cooperation at leaders' meeting
The meeting between the two leaders comes as China tries to capitalise on US President Donald Trump's sweeping trade tariffs by presenting itself as a stable and reliable partner. Chinese officials have expressed interest in expanding a decade-old free trade deal and cooperating in artificial intelligence.
China was willing to 'promote further development in the China-Australia relationship,' Xi said in remarks at the start of the meeting.
Australia valued its ties to China, its largest trading partner, and welcomed 'progress on cooperation' under the free trade deal, Albanese said in response, adding that Australia's national interest would guide Canberra's approach to the relationship.
'Dialogue needs to be at the centre of our relationship,' the prime minister said. 'I welcome the opportunity to set out Australia's views and interests and our thinking on how we can maintain peace, security, stability and prosperity in our region.'
Albanese is expected to meet Chinese Premier Li Qiang later on Tuesday. He has previously said resources trade, energy transition and security tensions would be key topics for discussions in Beijing.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Australia, which regards the United States its major security ally, has pursued a China policy of 'cooperate where we can, disagree where we must' under Albanese.
In the run-up to the visit, China signalled repeatedly it was open to deeper cooperation.
On Tuesday, the state-owned China Daily newspaper published a glowing opinion piece about the visit and said it showed countries with different political systems could still cooperate.
However, any cooperation is likely to be constrained by long-standing Australian concerns around China's military build-up and the jailing of Australian writer Yang Hengjun.
Beijing has also separately criticised Canberra's increased screening of foreign investment in critical minerals and Albanese's pledge to return a Chinese-leased port to Australian ownership.
Australia's exports to China, its largest trading partner, span agriculture and energy but are dominated by iron ore, and Albanese has travelled with executives from mining giants Rio Tinto, BHP and Fortescue, who met Chinese steel industry officials on Monday, at the start of the six-day visit.
Bran Black, CEO of the Business Council of Australia, said Australia's Bluescope Steel would also be at Tuesday's business roundtable, along with China's electric vehicle giant BYD, Chinese banking executives, Baosteel and state-run food group COFCO.
'First and foremost we use fixtures such as this to send a signal that business-to-business engagement should be welcomed and encouraged,' Black told Reuters on Tuesday. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
23 minutes ago
- Business Times
Four trust types that make or break AI projects
COMPANIES invest heavily in artificial intelligence (AI), yet as many as about 80 per cent of AI projects fail. Why? Natalia Vuori (one of this article's co-authors) and her colleagues discovered that success hinges not just on the technology, but on something not easily quantifiable: various forms of trust. In other words, what employees think and feel about AI's capability. This matters even in organisations with strong cultures of trust. The researchers conducted an in-depth study at TechCo, a Scandinavian software firm of about 600 employees implementing an AI-powered knowledge-mapping tool. This tool collected data from employees' digital activities to create a visual expertise map showing who knew what across the organisation. Through interviewing TechCo's managers and employees (on condition of anonymity) and analysing data on usage of the AI tool, the researchers uncovered four forms of trust among employees. Each form of trust leads to different behaviours that could directly impact the success or failure of AI initiatives in organisations. The study, now published in the Journal of Management Studies, also points to actions through which leaders can foster various forms of trust in AI. 1. Full trust: High cognitive and emotional trust Employees with full trust believed in the AI tool's capabilities (cognitive trust) while feeling comfortable with the technology (emotional trust). As one manager said: 'I perfectly understand the logic (behind the tool), if you improve the way you're harnessing the knowledge and insights of people, if you make it easier for people to find each other, that makes perfect sense.' A people-centric approach that acknowledges both thinking and feeling dimensions of trust is essential. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up These employees saw strategic applications beyond the tool's basic functions. One of them noted: 'You can observe who you're collaborating with, as well as who you're not collaborating with... you can consider your own conduct and determine what kind of individuals you need to work with.' Emotionally, these employees felt positive about AI: 'I think it's where the world is going, and for me... if I'm working now and I'm being paid, why shouldn't it be transparent?' Significantly, employees with full trust didn't change their digital behaviours, providing the AI with accurate data needed for optimal performance. 2. Uncomfortable trust: High cognitive trust and low emotional trust The second form of trust involved employees who recognised the tool's value but worried about its implications. One manager said: 'That's a wonderful idea that you would somehow be able to figure out who would be the best expert for this... But at the same time, just when you may have started with the positive potentials, you may not have noticed these negative potentials.' Many feared the potential misuse of data: 'There is always the worry that those data will be used for something else I don't have any control over... For example, against us. Now, it's focused on people, not from the management side. But I guess companies want to be more efficient, and – well, there's a fine line.' To handle this cognitive-emotional conflict, these employees began to be wary of their digital footprints. They limited the information visible to the AI by marking calendar events as private or using generic descriptions. 3. Blind trust: Low cognitive trust and high emotional trust Some employees questioned the AI tool's competence while still feeling comfortable with it. As one interviewee said: 'I sometimes feel like it is not tracking the amount of time I've spent on either technology properly.' Another said the map generated by the tool did not accurately reflect the expertise of some colleagues. 'It was hard to find the person with actual knowledge.' Despite these concerns, they didn't feel threatened by the technology: 'I am not concerned about sharing information because I know that the information... is information that generally could benefit other people to find as well.' Interestingly, these employees responded by detailing their digital footprints. They added more information to their calendars, project entries and online discussions to help improve the tool's performance. As one employee explained: 'Let's take a step forward and provide the necessary details to make our tool more efficient.' 4. Full distrust: Low cognitive and emotional trust Employees with full distrust neither believed in the tool's capabilities nor felt comfortable with it. They described negative experiences ('I tried using (the tool), and nothing worked at all') and questioned its fundamental approach ('We shouldn't trust only data or digital services to make decisions'). These employees also experienced negative emotions, particularly fear. One confided: 'I feel that it is dangerous. My fear is that it may be the misuse of data. They (the collected data) are used against you in some cases.' Their responses were the most damaging to the AI system – either withdrawing their data entirely ('I just opt out') or actively manipulating their digital footprints by using certain keywords to shape how they appeared in the system. These behaviours created a vicious circle. When employees withdrew, confined or manipulated their digital footprints, the AI received imbalanced or inaccurate data, decreasing its performance. As one interviewee noted: 'Some experts disappeared from the visual map.' Lower performance reduced trust further, leading to decreased usage until eventually, the project failed. How to make your AI initiative stick If there's one key insight from the study, it is that a people-centric approach that acknowledges both thinking and feeling dimensions of trust are essential. Trust is not just a monolithic, one-size-fits-all concept. For a start, leaders introducing an AI tool to the workplace should provide comprehensive training that explains how AI works, its capabilities and its limitations. Such efforts build cognitive trust. Leaders should also develop and communicate clear AI policies that define what data will be collected and how it will be used. This helps employees understand the tool's role, what it's capable of and, as importantly, how employees' concerns and personal protection will be addressed. When people feel at ease, they are more likely to form emotional trust. This brings us to the point of managing expectations about AI performance. Managers should encourage patience during early stages when results may be inconsistent. Celebrate AI-driven achievements or improvements to demonstrate progress and reinforce the value of the AI initiative. The study also shows that leaders must address feelings, not just facts. Share your own enthusiasm about AI's potential benefits. Create psychological safety by encouraging the open expression of concerns about AI. Address anxieties with empathy rather than dismissal. When employees feel their emotions are acknowledged, they're more likely to develop positive connections with new technologies. Remember: True AI transformation starts not with algorithms, but with a sophisticated understanding of various forms of trust and fostering them as part of your AI initiative. Quy Huy is the Solvay chaired professor of technological innovation and a professor of strategic management at Insead Natalia Vuori is an assistant professor at the department of industrial engineering and management of Aalto University This was first published in Insead Knowledge
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Albanese's China visit signals trade-led reset: Professor
Weihuan Zhou, Professor at the Faculty of Law and Justice at the University of New South Wales, tells CNA that Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's recent visit to China highlights a renewed focus on economic cooperation despite previous tensions and strategic concerns.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Former Tibet Communist Party chief gets suspended death sentence over bribery
Find out what's new on ST website and app. FILE PHOTO: Wu Yingjie attends a news conference on the economic and social development of Tibet, in Beijing, China May 22, 2021. REUTERS/Martin Pollard/File Photo BEIJING – The former Communist Party head of Tibet was handed a suspended death sentence on July 16 for taking bribes worth almost US$50 million (S$64 million), a court in China has said. Wu Yingjie, who served as party secretary of the Tibet Autonomous Region from 2016 to 2021, illegally accepted bribes totalling more than US$47.8 million, an intermediate court in Beijing said in a statement on WeChat. The court said his crimes were 'particularly serious, the social impact particularly vile' and caused 'particularly heavy losses' for the country and people. President Xi Jinping has overseen a wide-ranging campaign against official corruption since coming to power more than a decade ago, with critics saying it also serves as a way to purge political rivals. The court said Wu used his official positions in the region stretching back to 2006 to give companies and individuals help on contracts and business operations. Wu was given a two-year reprieve after he pleaded guilty and confessed details of his actions that were previously unknown to the authorities, the court said. Suspended death sentences are typically converted to life imprisonment if the convict commits no further crimes during the reprieve period. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Over 600 Telegram groups in Singapore selling, advertising vapes removed by HSA Singapore Strong argument for cockpit video recording, says Iata chief in wake of Air India crash report Singapore Here comes the sun: Less rain, more warm days in second half of July Asia Former deputy minister seen as surprise front runner for Malaysia's next Chief Justice: Sources Singapore Baby died after mum took abortion pills and gave birth in toilet; coroner records an open verdict Business Tycoon Robert Kuok's daughter Kuok Hui Kwong appointed CEO of Shangri-La Asia Singapore Acute psychiatry services to be expanded across all healthcare clusters: MOH Singapore New network links Home Team psychologists, mental health bodies to boost emergency response Wu was expelled from the party in December over 'serious violations of discipline', a common euphemism in China for corruption. He was assigned to Tibet's department of education after graduating from university and rose through the ranks for about two decades. United Nations experts have raised alarm at Chinese government policies aimed at assimilating Tibetan people culturally, religiously and linguistically through the schools system. The US Treasury Department sanctioned Wu in 2022 over human rights violations in Tibet. AFP
