Judge denies request for more testimony as Kouri Richins' case moves ‘full speed ahead' to trial

Yahoo

24-02-2025

A judge on Friday ruled against letting Kouri Richins' attorneys question more detectives.
Attorneys for Richins — a Kamas mom accused of killing her husband and then writing a children's book about grief — had asked the court to reopen the opportunity for testimony about what evidence should be presented at trial, including audio from an interview along with cellphone and electronic data. The defense attorneys claimed there were problems with a state's witness testimony at a recent hearing.
Summit County prosecutors called the request "a cheap litigation trick" and claimed the request was based on feelings rather than fact. Prosecutors explained that although one officer testified about not knowing Richins had an attorney, another officer when preparing for the hearing had said he did know she had an attorney.
In response to prosecutors calling the defense attorneys' request "desperate" and "poppycock," Richins' attorneys said they "will not sink to that level, and we will continue to do what we must to protect our client's rights and hold the prosecution accountable for their actions."
Richins' attorney Kathryn Nester said a summary provided to the defense team by prosecutors said three witnesses had relayed conversations about whether or not Richins could be interviewed.
Third District Judge Richard Mrazik said during a hearing on Friday that regardless of whether the officers knew Richins had an attorney, the interview did not violate her Sixth Amendment rights. He said the discussion of what the officer knew is irrelevant to the Sixth Amendment because prosecutors had not yet filed charges or committed to prosecuting her. He said this is a different question than her Fifth Amendment rights, which concern whether she had a right to counsel.
Richins' attorneys at the hearing on Friday said prosecutors and officers discussed whether to interview Richins on that day, which she claimed also breached attorney conduct rules. Mrazik said they could talk about that aspect again in court, but he would need her to provide Utah case law about it first.
During the hearing, attorneys also discussed the jury questionnaire in detail, but the judge said it would not be sent out yet because Richins' attorneys plan to ask for the jury trial to be held in another venue, likely Salt Lake County.
On Tuesday, Utah's Supreme Court issued a final decision confirming decisions made by the 3rd District Court that the jury selection in the case would be remote and that jurors could be pulled only from Summit County. Mrazik had said he was fine with the request to have jury selection in person and to include potential jurors from Salt Lake County, something attorneys on both sides agreed on, but the decision was ultimately up to the presiding judge in the district.
Likely because these requests were denied, Richins attorneys are seeking to instead have the jury trial in Salt Lake County with jurors who may be less familiar with the case and people involved in it.
On March 4, attorneys will present oral arguments around what evidence can be shown at trial. Richins is also scheduled for hearings on March 17 and 18 to discuss other motions before her trial begins in April.
Mrazik encouraged the attorneys to work together on timing and said there has been no motion to delay the trial. If there was a request to delay the trial, he would be "disinclined" to grant it. He said "it is full speed ahead" toward trial, noting to the attorneys that pressure from the time is only going to increase as it gets closer.
Richins was arrested in 2023 and later charged with murder in the 2022 death of her husband, Eric Richins, who was 39. During the year between his death and her arrest, Kouri Richins published a children's book about grief. She is accused of administering a fatal dose of fentanyl to her husband in March 2022 and has also been charged with giving him a lethal dose of drugs on Valentine's Day a few weeks earlier.
The jury during Richins' upcoming trial will be asked to determine whether she is guilty of charges of aggravated murder and attempted murder, first-degree felonies; two counts of filing a fraudulent insurance claim, a second-degree felony; and one count of forgery, a third-degree felony.