How DevSecOps is powering the vibecoding movement in Indian tech
's tech scene is shifting in ways few could have imagined just a few years ago. One of the buzzwords driving this change – vibecoding - isn't just hype. It marks a deeper shift in how software gets built: less about rigid syntax, more about expressing ideas and letting AI do the heavy lifting. Developers, both seasoned and new, are working alongside tools like
GitHub Copilot
to move from thought to code in a matter of seconds. But with this evolution comes a big caveat: security. When code is being spun out so quickly, old security models that came in at the end of the process just don't cut it anymore. That's where DevSecOps finds its footing. It's not some optional extra; it's becoming the scaffolding that holds this entire AI-driven building process together.
So, what exactly is vibecoding?
The term itself comes from
Andrej Karpathy
, a well-known voice in AI. Vibecoding describes a new style of software development - one where you tell the machine what you want, and it gets you there without needing to type every semicolon yourself. Think of it as coding by intention. Tools like Copilot or Codex make this possible by turning natural language into functioning code.
In India, where there's no shortage of tech talent and curiosity, vibecoding is taking off. It opens the door for people who may not have deep coding backgrounds, enabling designers, analysts, even hobbyists to contribute in meaningful ways. That kind of inclusivity is reshaping who gets to build, and how fast they can go from idea to execution, resulting in faster prototyping and quicker time-to-market.
Security in the age of AI-generated code
While vibecoding offers tremendous benefits, it also introduces new security concerns. AI-generated code may carry vulnerabilities inherited from training data or produce insecure implementations if user prompts are vague. The high volume and speed of generated code make traditional, reactive security methods insufficient.
Security now needs to be embedded from the very beginning and not as an afterthought. That's where DevSecOps becomes crucial, integrating security into every stage of development to keep pace with this evolving paradigm.
DevSecOps: Fueling secure vibecoding at scale
DevSecOps refers to the integration of security into every phase of the software development lifecycle (SDLC) ranging from design and development to testing and deployment. As vibecoding accelerates development timelines, DevSecOps ensures that this speed doesn't come at the cost of safety. Here's how:
1. Embedding security early ('Shift left and everywhere')
The core principle of DevSecOps is 'shifting left,' meaning embedding security checks as early as possible. When AI is generating large volumes of code, tools like static application security testing (SAST) and software composition analysis (SCA) can run seamlessly within development environments. They offer immediate feedback on vulnerabilities and third-party risks, allowing developers to address issues upfront rather than post-release. Additionally, DevSecOps promotes 'everywhere' security, extending protection into runtime environments and incident response systems to ensure ongoing vigilance.
2. Automation that keeps up with the pace
Vibecoding doesn't just move fast, it outpaces the old development cycle by a mile. DevSecOps helps keep that momentum going by automating security tasks within CI/CD pipelines. Instead of pausing to run manual checks, teams rely on built-in scans, simulated attacks, and automated policy validation. These tools flag issues early, often before a human even reviews the code. It's a way to stay secure without stepping off the gas.
3. Building a security-conscious mindset
More than just tools, DevSecOps is about mindset. In a vibecoding world, where even non-traditional developers are shaping software, everyone needs at least a basic sense of what secure coding looks like. That might mean understanding how vague prompts can lead to risky output or simply knowing what red flags to watch for. The goal isn't perfection; its awareness baked into the creative process.
4. Making compliance less of a bottleneck
For Indian companies working across borders, compliance is a constant challenge. DevSecOps helps by embedding legal and regulatory checks into the development flow itself. Whether it's GDPR, local data laws, or sector-specific policies, these guardrails run quietly in the background, cutting risk and proving that trust isn't optional, it's foundational.
5. Tearing down the silos
DevSecOps isn't just about tools, it's about people working together. In fast-paced, AI-driven development, silos between developers, security experts, and ops teams can slow things down or let issues slip through the cracks. DevSecOps helps break those walls. Security teams can offer real-time guidance on how to handle AI-generated code safely, while ops folks ensure that what gets shipped is secure and stable. When everyone's in the loop, the whole system runs smoother and safer.
Tackling roadblocks and peering into the future
Adopting DevSecOps across India's tech ecosystem isn't exactly a walk in the park. The journey is riddled with real-world challenges: a talent gap that keeps widening, organizational pushback rooted in traditional hierarchies, and the technical headache of embedding security into sprawling, often outdated codebases. Yet, things are shifting. Platforms are beginning to offer more holistic training by blending DevSecOps with generative AI and that fusion is slowly demystifying both fields for the next generation of developers.
That said, the future isn't just about patching up today's gaps. As AI evolves, DevSecOps is expected to become far more dynamic with self-repairing security systems that don't just react but also anticipate. In the era of vibecoding, where software is shaped as much by instinct and creative drive as by logic, these adaptive systems could become the linchpin. They won't just protect code. They'll empower creators to build boldly without fear of leaving vulnerabilities in their wake.
Final thoughts
Vibecoding is a new lens through which we're reimagining software development: quicker, sharper, and inclusive. But speed and creativity mean little without security. This is where DevSecOps earns its stripes as a core philosophy baked into the build process.
As India rides the crest of its AI revolution, DevSecOps will remain the silent force ensuring that this wave of progress doesn't crash under its own weight. For every line of code written in rhythm and flow, there must be an underlying cadence of security. And in that balance lies the true promise of the future.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Microsoft launches GitHub Spark: What is it, how it works and more explained
TL;DR GitHub Spark AI platform allows users to use natural language to develop app No configuration, hosting, or API key management needed Users can deploy their apps instantly with a single click Get a GitHub repository with Actions and Dependabot Users can leverage Copilot agents for deeper iteration Microsoft has unveiled GitHub Spark, a new AI platform that is designed to bridge the gap between idea and implementation – all without users having no coding knowledge. This tool allows users to build and deploy full-stack apps in minutes using natural language. Thomas Dohmke, CEO of GitHub, says that GitHub Spark – which was first shown at GitHub Universe 2024 annual developer conference in San Francisco – 'takes you from idea to deployment in minutes.' Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, who announced the availability of the tool said that GitHub Spark is 'a new tool in Copilot that turns your ideas into full-stack apps, entirely in natural language.' 'I love playing with Spark myself, but even more, I've loved seeing what you're building,' he added. Here's an explainer on what is GitHub Spark and what it does GitHub Spark is an AI platform – currently in public preview for Copilot Pro+ users – that leverages the power of large language models (LLMs) to help users create an app even if they do not have any coding knowledge. Initially, the platform is powered by Claude Sonnet 4 for natural language-to-app capabilities. Users can simply describe their app idea, and Spark will construct it, including both frontend and backend functionalities. This experience extends to integrating AI into apps, with support for LLMs from leading providers like OpenAI, Meta, DeepSeek, and xAI, all without the need for complex API key management. According to GitHub, the platform boasts a 'no setup required' approach, bundling data, LLM inference, hosting, deployments and GitHub authentication out-of-the-box. This means developers and even non-technical users can use the platform without having any AI infrastructure. Once an app is built, it can be published with a single click, GitHub says. GitHub Spark offers visual editing and Copilot agent mode support GitHub Spark also offers flexibility in development. Users can iterate on their ideas using natural language, visual editing controls, or even code with integrated GitHub Copilot code completions. For those who prefer to dive deeper, Spark allows for the creation of a full GitHub repository with GitHub Actions and Dependabot automatically incorporated, ensuring everything stays synchronized and not trapped in a sandbox environment. FAQs Q: What is GitHub Spark? A: GitHub Spark is a new platform that allows users to build and deploy full-stack apps from natural language descriptions, accelerating the development process. Q: How does GitHub Spark work? A: Users describe their app ideas in natural language. Spark, powered by LLMs like Claude Sonnet 4, translates this into a functional application, handling everything from frontend and backend code to data storage, hosting and AI integration. Q: Who can use GitHub Spark? A: GitHub Spark is currently available in public preview for Copilot Pro+ users. Rollout to additional customers is planned for the future. Q: What kind of applications can you build with GitHub Spark? A: Users can build full-stack intelligent applications, from simple internal tools to more complex web applications with integrated AI features like chatbots or recommendation systems. Q: Do you need to be a coder to use GitHub Spark? A: No, GitHub Spark is designed to be accessible to both seasoned developers and non-technical users. Q: Where can users get started with GitHub Spark? A: Users can visit to build their first app, or sign up for a Copilot Pro+ account to gain access. 7 Reasons that make Samsung GALAXY Z FLIP7 different from others AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
OpenAI to reportedly launch GPT-5 language model in August
OpenAI is all set to launch its next-generation language model — GPT-5. As reported by The Verge, the company may launch the upgraded GPT-5 model in mid-August. The report also adds that the new language model is undergoing safety training and internal evaluations. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Recently, OpenAI CEO also revealed on social media platform X (formerly known as Twitter) that company will soon release GPT-5. Altman also detailed some of the capabilities of the upcoming language model on a recent podcast appearance. OpenAI to soon launch GPT-5 model As reported by The Verge, the GPT-5 model has been in training since late 2023 and is now undergoing some final safety checks. The company is expected to launch the upgraded language model by mid-August. It is also said that GPT-5 model may power Copilot, ChatGPT and other Microsoft Integrated services. What's New in GPT-5? While OpenAI hasn't released full technical details, insiders suggest GPT-5 will: * Deliver better factual accuracy and fewer hallucinations * Improve multimodal understanding, including images and audio * Offer more nuanced reasoning and contextual awareness * Be more customisable for enterprise and developer use OpenAI is reportedly prioritising robust safety testing before the rollout, aiming to address concerns around misinformation, bias, and misuse. The potential August release of GPT-5 would continue OpenAI's aggressive development cycle, pushing the boundaries of what large language models can achieve.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump's order to block 'woke' AI in government encourages tech giants to censor their chatbots
Tech companies looking to sell their artificial intelligence technology to the federal government must now contend with a new regulatory hurdle: proving their chatbots aren't "woke." President Donald Trump 's sweeping new plan to counter China in achieving "global dominance" in AI promises to cut regulations and cement American values into the AI tools increasingly used at work and home. But one of Trump 's three AI executive orders signed Wednesday - the one "preventing woke AI in the federal government" - marks the first time the U.S. government has explicitly tried to shape the ideological behavior of AI. Several leading providers of the AI language models targeted by the order - products like Google's Gemini and Microsoft's Copilot - have so far been silent on Trump's anti-woke directive, which still faces a study period before it gets into official procurement rules. While the tech industry has largely welcomed Trump's broader AI plans, the anti-woke order forces the industry to leinto a culture war battle - or try their best to quietly avoid it. "It will have massive influence in the industry right now," especially as tech companies are already capitulating to other Trump administration directives, said civil rights advocate Alejandra Montoya-Boyer, senior director of The Leadership Conference's Center for Civil Rights and Technology. The move also pushes the tech industry to abandon years of work to combat the pervasive forms of racial and gender bias that studies and real-world examples have shown to be baked into AI systems. "First off, there's no such thing as woke AI," Montoya-Boyer said. "There's AI technology that discriminates and then there's AI technology that actually works for all people." Molding the behaviors of AI large language models is challenging because of the way they're built and the inherent randomness of what they produce. They've been trained on most of what's on the internet, reflecting the biases of all the people who've posted commentary, edited a Wikipedia entry or shared images online. "This will be extremely difficult for tech companies to comply with," said former Biden administration official Jim Secreto, who was deputy chief of staff to U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo, an architect of many of President Joe Biden's AI industry initiatives. "Large language models reflect the data they're trained on, including all the contradictions and biases in human language." Tech workers also have a say in how they're designed, from the global workforce of annotators who check their responses to the Silicon Valley engineers who craft the instructions for how they interact with people. Trump's order targets those "top-down" efforts at tech companies to incorporate what it calls the "destructive" ideology of diversity, equity and inclusion into AI models, including "concepts like critical race theory, transgenderism, unconscious bias, intersectionality, and systemic racism." The directive has invited comparison to China's heavier-handed efforts to ensure that generative AI tools reflect the core values of the ruling Communist Party. Secreto said the order resembles China's playbook in "using the power of the state to stamp out what it sees as disfavored viewpoints." The method is different, with China relying on direct regulation by auditing AI models, approving them before they are deployed and requiring them to filter out banned content such as the bloody Tiananmen Square crackdown on pro-democracy protests in 1989. Trump's order doesn't call for any such filters, relying on tech companies to instead show that their technology is ideologically neutral by disclosing some of the internal policies that guide the chatbots. "The Trump administration is taking a softer but still coercive route by using federal contracts as leverage," Secreto said. "That creates strong pressure for companies to self-censor in order to stay in the government's good graces and keep the money flowing." The order's call for "truth-seeking" AI echoes the language of the president's one-time ally and adviser Elon Musk, who has made it the mission of the Grok chatbot made by his company xAI. But whether Grok or its rivals will be favored under the new policy remains to be seen. Despite a "rhetorically pointed" introduction laying out the Trump administration's problems with DEI, the actual language of the order's directives shouldn't be hard for tech companies to comply with, said Neil Chilson , a Republican former chief technologist for the Federal Trade Commission. "It doesn't even prohibit an ideological agenda," just that any intentional methods to guide the model be disclosed, said Chilson, head of AI policy at the nonprofit Abundance Institute. "Which is pretty light touch, frankly." Chilson disputes comparisons to China's cruder modes of AI censorship. "There is nothing in this order that says that companies have to produce or cannot produce certain types of output," he said. "It says developers shall not intentionally encode partisan or ideological judgments." With their AI tools already widely used in the federal government, tech companies have reacted cautiously. OpenAI on Thursday said it is awaiting more detailed guidance but believes its work to make ChatGPT objective already makes the technology consistent with Trump's directive. Microsoft, a major supplier of online services to the government, declined to comment. Musk's xAI, through spokesperson Katie Miller, a former Trump official, pointed to a company comment praising Trump's AI announcements but didn't address the procurement order. xAI recently announced it was awarded a U.S. defense contract for up to $200 million, just days after Grok publicly posted a barrage of antisemitic commentary that praised Adolf Hitler. Anthropic, Google, Meta, and Palantir didn't respond to emailed requests for comment Thursday. The ideas behind the order have bubbled up for more than a year on the podcasts and social media feeds of Trump's top AI adviser David Sacks and other influential Silicon Valley venture capitalists, many of whom endorsed Trump's presidential campaign last year. Their ire centered on Google's February 2024 release of an AI image-generating tool that produced historically inaccurate images before the tech giant took down and fixed the product. Google later explained that the errors - including generating portraits of Black, Asian and Native American men when asked to show American Founding Fathers - were the result of an overcompensation for technology that, left to its own devices, was prone to favoring lighter-skinned people because of pervasive bias in the systems. Trump allies alleged that Google engineers were hard-coding their own social agenda into the product. "It's 100% intentional," said prominent venture capitalist and Trump adviser Marc Andreessen on a podcast in December. "That's how you get Black George Washington at Google. There's override in the system that basically says, literally, 'Everybody has to be Black.' Boom. There's squads, large sets of people, at these companies who determine these policies and write them down and encode them into these systems." Sacks credited a conservative strategist who has fought DEI initiatives at colleges and workplaces for helping to draft the order. "When they asked me how to define 'woke,' I said there's only one person to call: Chris Rufo. And now it's law: the federal government will not be buying WokeAI," Sacks wrote on X. Rufo responded that he helped "identify DEI ideologies within the operating constitutions of these systems." But some who agreed that Biden went too far promoting DEI also worry that Trump's new order sets a bad precedent for future government efforts to shape AI's politics. "The whole idea of achieving ideological neutrality with AI models is really just unworkable," said Ryan Hauser of the Mercatus Center, a free-market think tank. "And what do we get? We get these frontier labs just changing their speech to meet the political requirements of the moment."
