
Should I bring cash when I visit the US? Businesses hit tourists with 10% surcharge for credit cards
During a five-day trip through Long Island, business after business imposed significant fees for paying with plastic. Others insisted on payment in cash – in the very nation that invented credit cards 75 years ago.
Visitors to the US in the coming summer will need to take reserves of dollars in cash or accept a typical price hike of 3 or 4 per cent on meals, accommodation and other tourist services.
The main driver of the surcharges appears to be the percentage deducted from the business's revenue by the financial institution.
Credit card issuers in the US vie to attract new members with increasingly generous incentives. These rewards are funded by the cut they take from transactions.
In the UK and EU, the 'interchange fee' that card firms may charge is capped at 0.3 per cent. But in the US, the only limit to commission is what the market will bear. In New York State at least, it appears a tipping point has been reached.
Sometimes the arrangement is described as a 'cash discount incentive'.
A bicycle rental firm in Montauk displays a notice by the till reading: 'This business has a cash discount incentive of 3.5 per cent. All goods and services are priced for cash payment. Purchases made with a credit card will receive a small non-cash adjustment, which will be displayed on your receipt.'
Along the street, a busy and successful diner now insists on payment in cash.
Further east in Oyster Bay, another diner has doubled the complexity of its menu by listing cash and credit card prices, with the latter showing a 3 per cent surcharge. A local garden centre applies a 3.5 per cent fee, shown on stickers with dual pricing.
In these examples traders are upfront about the fee. But nearby motel simply adds a 2.99 per cent credit card surcharge to the quoted rate without warning the customer.
While debit cards are supposed to be charge-free, it appears that some businesses surcharge any plastic.
With sales tax and a minimum 18 per cent tip added to the cost of a meal out, a credit card surcharge of 4 per cent can push the extras above 30 per cent – to the point where the price quoted on menus in dollars will represent the final cost to the traveller in pounds sterling.
Closer to New York City, the surcharge habit has been picked up by convenience stores – which typically add 10 per cent to the price of items, sometimes with a minimum credit card fee of a dollar or two.
Large organisations such as the Long Island Rail Road, leading tourist attractions and big brands including Nathan's Famous hot dogs absorb credit card charges. However, British visitors who simply rely on their usual plastic payment card are likely to be hit by a foreign transaction fee of up to 2.99 per cent.
Cards including Halifax Clarity and those issued by First Direct do not make such a charge. But withdrawing cash dollars from an ATM is likely to trigger a flat fee of $3.50 (£2.80).
Rob Burgess, founder of the frequent-flyer website Head for Points, said he is resigned to paying extra for plastic.
'Personally, I would swallow the card fees,' he said. 'I don't want to be faffing around with fees for cash withdrawals, the potential costs of changing back unused money and the general grief that comes with paying in cash – not least because you quickly end up with a pocket bulging with coins because, when you add the sales tax, everything you buy comes to an odd total.
'I also find that I tend to overtip if paying cash because you never like to ask for change. If you're paying on a card you can add whatever percentage you want. If that means the bill is $43.34 then that's fine. If you were paying cash you'd probably put down $45 and leave it.'
Tipping levels are steadily increasing, with some restaurants providing calculations of the gratuity based on 20, 25 or 30 per cent of the bill.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
20 minutes ago
- Reuters
Audi cuts forecast over US tariffs and restructuring costs
July 28 (Reuters) - German automaker Volkswagen's premium brand Audi lowered its full-year financial guidance on Monday, citing the impact of higher U.S. import tariffs and ongoing restructuring costs. The Ingolstadt-based company now expects revenue of between 65 billion euros and 70 billion euros ($76 billion and $82 billion), down from its previous forecast of 67.5 billion euros to 72.5 billion euros. Audi also cut its operating margin forecast to 5% to 7%, compared to the earlier range of 7% to 9%. Audi said it is still assessing the implications of the trade deal reached between the United States and the European Union on Sunday. The agreement set a 15% baseline U.S. tariff on imports from the EU, including cars, which had previously faced customs duties of 27.5%. "Should the 15% tariff stay in place long-term, it would still put Audi at a competitive disadvantage, because its key peers have a more pronounced U.S. production footprint," said Fabio Hoelscher, an analyst from Warburg Research. Audi is among the carmakers most exposed to U.S. tariffs as it has no manufacturing facilities in the United States. Although the deal provides clarity on the new tariff regime, enabling better operational and strategic planning, the 15% rate still represents a structural shift from the 2.5% rate before U.S. President Donald Trump took office, said Pal Skirta, equity analyst from Metzler Equities. That leaves German carmakers facing persistently higher U.S. tariffs on their exports and long-term competitiveness challenges, he said. The Volkswagen Group also cut its full-year guidance on Friday after taking a $1.5-billion tariff hit in the first half of 2025. Global automakers have booked billions of dollars of losses and some issued profit warnings due to U.S. import tariffs. The European industry is also facing stiffening competition from China, and domestic regulations aimed at speeding up the electric-vehicle transition. ($1 = 0.8535 euros)


Reuters
20 minutes ago
- Reuters
Musk says Tesla, Samsung sign $16.5 billion chip supply deal
SEOUL, July 28 (Reuters) - Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab CEO Elon Musk said the U.S. automaker had signed a $16.5 billion deal to source chips from Samsung Electronics ( opens new tab, a move expected to bolster the South Korean tech giant's loss-making contract manufacturing business. Samsung's shares jumped as much as 6.8% to their highest since September last year after news of the deal. Musk said Samsung's new chip factory in Taylor, Texas will make Tesla's next-generation AI6 chip, potentially re-energizing the project that has faced long delays amid Samsung's difficulties in retaining and attracting major clients. "Samsung agreed to allow Tesla to assist in maximizing manufacturing efficiency. This is a critical point, as I will walk the line personally to accelerate the pace of progress. And the fab is conveniently located not far from my house," Musk said in a post on X on Monday. "The $16.5B number is just the bare minimum. Actual output is likely to be several times higher," he said in another post. According to a senior analyst at NH Investment & Securities, Ryu Young-ho, Samsung's Taylor fab "so far had virtually no customers, so this order is quite meaningful". In October, Reuters reported that Samsung had postponed taking deliveries of ASML ( opens new tab chipmaking equipment for its Texas factory as it had not yet won any major customers for the project. It has already delayed the plant's operational start to 2026. While no timeline was provided for AI6 chip production, Musk has previously said that next-generation A15 chips will be produced at the end of 2026, suggesting A16 would follow. Lee Dong-ju, an analyst at SK Securities, expects production in 2027 or 2028, but Tesla has a history of missing its targets. Samsung currently makes Tesla's A14 chips, which power its Full Self-Driving driver assistant system, while TSMC is slated to make the AI5, initially in Taiwan and then Arizona, Musk has said. Samsung, the world's top memory chip maker, also produces logic chips designed by customers through its foundry business. The Texas project is central to Samsung Chairman Jay Y. Lee's strategy to expand beyond its bread-and-butter memory chips into contract chip manufacturing. Samsung currently holds just 8% of the global foundry market, far behind industry leader TSMC ( opens new tab, which has a 67% share, data from market researcher Trendforce show. Samsung had earlier announced the $16.5 billion chip supply deal without naming the client, saying the customer had requested confidentiality about the details of the deal, which will run through the end of 2033. Three sources briefed about the matter told Reuters that Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab was the customer for the deal. The deal with Tesla comes as Samsung, which is due to report its earnings on Thursday, faces mounting pressure in the race to produce artificial intelligence chips, where it trails rivals such as TSMC and SK Hynix ( opens new tab. This lag has weighed heavily on its profits and share price. Pak Yuak, an analyst at Kiwoom Securities, said the deal would help reduce losses at Samsung's foundry business, which he estimates exceeded 5 trillion won ($3.6 billion) in the first half of the year. Analysts say Samsung has struggled to retain key clients, with many defecting to TSMC for advanced chips, underscoring technological challenges the firm faces in the race to stay relevant in the capital intensive business. TSMC counts Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab, Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab and Qualcomm (QCOM.O), opens new tab among its customers. It is not clear whether the Samsung-Tesla deal is related to ongoing trade talks between South Korea and the United States. Seoul is seeking U.S. partnerships in chips and shipbuilding amid last-ditch efforts to reach a trade deal to eliminate or reduce potential 25% U.S. tariffs. ($1 = 1,378.7000 won)


Reuters
20 minutes ago
- Reuters
Explainer: Why Big Alcohol needs US tariff relief in five charts
LONDON/NEW YORK, July 27 (Reuters) - European Union wine and spirits producers could emerge among the few winners of a EU-U.S. trade deal agreed at the weekend that some European officials consider unbalanced. The high-level agreement, which imposes a 15% baseline duty for most EU goods entering the United States, is set to include tariff exemptions for some agricultural products, still to be hammered out. Alcoholic beverages could be among those, according to trade and industry officials. "We are optimistic that in the days ahead this positive meeting and agreement will lead to a return to zero-for-zero tariffs for U.S. and EU spirits products," Distilled Spirits Council President and CEO Chris Swonger said in a statement in response to the U.S.-EU agreement. On Monday, French Trade Minister Laurent Saint Martin also said he expected the spirits sector to be exempted from U.S. tariffs. If confirmed, an exemption would offer a lifeline to alcohol players including the world's biggest spirits maker, Diageo (DGE.L), opens new tab, Pernod Ricard ( opens new tab, Remy Cointreau ( opens new tab and Campari ( opens new tab, all of which are very exposed to vast U.S. market and whose profits have already taken a big hit as consumers spend less on drink. Shares in Pernod, Diageo and Campari initially rose in early trade. But they stood 1.3%, 0.4% and 0.3% lower by 0707 GMT. Shares in Remy fell 2.2%. Alcohol is among the EU's top exports to the United States, worth about 9 billion euros ($10.5 billion) in 2024, according to Eurostat data, with certain products like Remy Martin cognac and champagne required to be produced in specific European regions. About one-third of all exports of Irish whiskey such as Pernod Ricard's Jameson are destined for the United States. Earlier in July, President Donald Trump had threatened a crippling 30% tariff that some industry experts said could stop flows of certain EU goods towards the United States. The United States accounts for about 18% of exports for another exclusively French product, champagne. Of all exports of cognac from its namesake region in France, about 43% end up in the United States. LVMH ( opens new tab owns Hennessy Cognac. Remy Cointreau, which makes more than 70% of its sales from French-made cognac, is among the alcohol makers hit hardest by tariffs. It has pegged the hit from tariffs imposed globally at about 45 million euros. For cognac makers, the U.S. tariffs represent a fresh challenge after producers of the drink managed this month to avert the threat of duties of up to around 35% from China. For Spanish and Italian wines, around 14% and 24% of total exports, respectively, are sold in the United States. Beer brewers and makers of popular ready-to-drink cocktails will, however, continue to face tariffs on imported aluminum they may use for cans. Under the EU-U.S. deal struck on Sunday, Washington will continue to impose a levy of 50% on steel and aluminum entering the United States. ($1 = 0.8518 euros)