From Dropout to Builder: How Ajay Gupta Made Rishihood Inclusive
'Who are our universities designed for?' is a question that has resonated with numerous changemakers for centuries. As the conversations about NEP 2020 dominate the higher education landscape, with a focus on multi-disciplinary learning and wider access, the role of higher educational institutions grows manifold. Social-impact models pioneered by universities such as Rishihood tend to become a statement where many higher educational institutions in India lack ramps on their premises, have narrow toilets that are not wheelchair-friendly, and neglect to include Braille in their libraries.
However, do you know that the country's first fully accessible university, Rishihood, was conceptualized by a man who is himself a dropout and who is himself in a wheelchair due to an 80% locomotor disability?
Ajay Gupta is the co-founder of Rishihood University. He is also the renowned founder and CEO of Bachpan Play Schools and Academic Heights Public Schools (AHPS) and is thus no stranger to the education landscape. His vision for inclusive education seeks to rewrite the lived reality of thousands and lakhs of students with disabilities in India. In the process, he aims to build an inclusive society, because for India to be a developed country, it is important that everyone grows to their full potential, breaking every barrier. Mr. Ajay Gupta alongside Rishihood University members, uniting for a purpose-driven conversation at the event.
In a conversation with the Time Business News, Ajay Gupta shared, 'I have always believed that education should not be a privilege that depends on accessible infrastructure, assistive technologies, and inclusive culture. Education should be a choice and a right, very well in alignment with the Right to Education (RTE) Act. For that to happen, our educational institutions need to take the first step.'
Ajay Gupta further shared that the inspiration for Rishihood University came while looking for the best universities in India for his daughter, but finding none that could be called inclusive. According to him, 'I think that every parent wants to raise a responsible and empathetic child for whom inclusivity is the norm. Inclusivity is not only for PwDs. It is for the country's best.'
Disheartened by his experiences in school and college, encouraged by his early ventures in the Indian education system, and confident in his capability to start a fully accessible university, he discussed the idea with his close associate and family friend, Mr. Rakesh Aggarwal, on a trip to Shimla. It all eventually led to the birth and evolution of Rishihood University, and a number of visionaries and changemakers joined the board of founders over the years.
As India debates the future of its universities with respect to AI integration, foreign collaborations, and credit frameworks, it may be time to also ask who still remains on the outside looking in. Ajay Gupta's own educational experiences were filled with numerous hardships, but he did not fail the education system that failed him, emerging as not only one of the most impactful business leaders in inclusive education but also as an investor in emerging startups that are making a similar difference through faculty sensitization and support systems for inclusion.
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
6 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
Will the UK government ban VPNs?
With the passing of the Online Safety Act on July 25, 2025, sites now need to verify UK users' ages if they wish to access content that has been deemed adult. Due to the manifold security and privacy concerns raised by the act, UK residents have started to find various ways to avoid having to submit personal information to verify their age, including using the best VPNs. This is because a VPN allows you to simply connect to a overseas server from within the UK and avoid age checks altogether. However, the rise in demand for VPNs has led some to fear that they will be next on the legislative chopping block – but is there any truth to this? NordVPN: our top-rated VPN overallFrom our testing, we consider NordVPN to be the best VPN for most people. This is down to its rock-solid security and privacy, excellent speeds and great unblocking performance. Prices start from £2.31 / $2.91 per month for a two-year subscription, which includes an exclusive four months free for Tom's Guide readers. Plus, you can get an Amazon gift card worth up to £50 / $50 if you sign up for NordVPN's Plus or Complete memberships. A 30-day money-back guarantee applies to all subscriptions. Due to one of the key features of VPNs being the ability to mimic connecting from another country (see our list of best Netflix VPNs to see what this looks like in action), there is some concern that the Labour government will clamp down on them. Sarah Champion, Labour MP for Rotherham, stated in 2022 regarding VPNs and the Online Safety Act that "there is a real threat that the use of virtual private networks – VPNs – could undermine the effectiveness of these measures." She went on to suggest that "If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems." In a post on X on July 28th, Champion responded to news of VPNs topping App Store charts by saying "I did warn the last government this would happen." Despite this, the Labour government does not appear to be considering banning VPNs. While Peter Kyle, Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, stated via X that those that oppose the Online Safety Act are "on the side of predators," he also told Sky News that there were currently no plans to ban VPNs. He did, however, state that he would be looking "very closely" at their use as, according to Kyle, 'the vast majority of adults in [the UK]' were abiding by the Act's guidelines. Were the UK to attempt to ban VPNs, it would join the likes of China, Iran, and Turkmenistan, among others, all of whom have either banned or restricted the use of VPNs due to their ability to circumvent censorship and content restrictions. However, it is still possible to access VPNs in these countries, despite the attempted bans. Obfuscation using Shadowsocks, or simply using newer servers that have not yet been blacklisted, can allow for connections. Governments are also unable to directly regulate VPN providers that are based outside their jurisdiction. The infeasibility of blocking VPNs has not stopped other countries from trying, however. This can make life more difficult for VPN users, not to mention the chaos that would likely occur due to VPNs being incredibly common among business users. China is at the forefront of internet surveillance and censorship, and has some of the strictest VPN laws, but it still cannot achieve total victory over VPNs – particularly those focused on privacy. Let us assume that the UK government does decide to block VPNs. While this would likely be ineffectual, due to the ability to completely anonymously pay for a VPN with cryptocurrency – or in the case of Mullvad and Proton VPN, with cash – and the level of obfuscation VPNs use to avoid detection, it would still set an extremely dangerous precedent. The UK is already a world leader in mass surveillance, thanks to GCHQ and NSA collaboration. Putting privacy even further out of reach of the masses would be a move that should set alarm bells ringing in all of our heads. The UK banning VPNs is ultimately a fairly unlikely outcome. However, we cannot be certain that VPNs won't end up in the government's firing line eventually. Privacy is not, and should never become, a crime. We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example: 1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service). 2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad. We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.
Fox News
18 hours ago
- Fox News
The trade deal countdown is on
Fox News national correspondent Griff Jenkins reports on the upcoming trade deal deadlines and the 'Pelosi Act' on 'Special Report.'
The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
Hawley had ‘good chat' with Trump after stock trading ban beef
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) said he had a 'good chat' with President Trump on Wednesday, after the president railed against him for supporting a bill that would prohibit lawmakers, future presidents and vice presidents from trading stocks. Hawley, the Senate bill's sponsor, was the only Republican to join all Democrats in narrowly voting the Honest Act out of committee. In an interview Wednesday evening on Fox News, the senator was asked to respond to Trump's sharp criticism, including his description of Hawley as a 'second-tier senator.' 'Well, that's not the worst thing that's been said about me, even today, Jesse,' Hawley told host Jesse Watters. 'So, listen, I had a good chat with the president earlier this evening, and he reiterated to me he wants to see a ban on stock trading by people like Nancy Pelosi and members of Congress, which is what we passed today.' Hawley's bill was originally called the Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments, or PELOSI, Act — a nod to the criticism former Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has faced amid scrutiny over her husband's stock trading. The Missouri Republican dropped the seemingly contentious name in exchange for Democrats' support. In the latest iteration of the bill, he also expanded the ban to apply to presidents and vice presidents. Pelosi on Wednesday also signaled her support for Hawley's legislation. 'If legislation is advanced to help restore trust in government and ensure that those in power are held to the highest ethical standards, then I am proud to support it — no matter what they decide to name it,' she said in a statement. Hawley made clear in the interview that the legislation would still target the kind of stock-trading that Republicans have come to associate with the Pelosis, despite a lack of evidence of insider trading. 'It is absolutely vital we put a stop to this,' the GOP senator said. 'Pelosi shouldn't just be investigated. She should be prosecuted. And we need to make what she is doing, and other members of Congress is doing, illegal.' 'You shouldn't be able to go up to Congress and get rich by trading on information that only you have and not members of the public,' he added. 'Right now, lots of members of Congress are getting by with it. We need to make the whole thing illegal.' Asked why the president called him a ' second-tier senator,' Hawley suggested Trump was misinformed about the contents of the bill. 'I think that the president, a number of people who are opposed to banning stock trading, had said to the president that he would be covered by the bill. He'd have to sell Mar-a-Lago and sell assets,' he told Watters. 'Not the case at all.' 'The president and the vice president and all their assets are totally exempted,' he added.
