
Oil consumers to fund tariff cut
Oil consumers are set to mainly fund the recent reduction in electricity tariffs up to 17% under the prime minister's relief package.
The National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) on Friday held a public hearing to consider the government's request for a tariff reduction of Rs1.71 per unit for consumers across Pakistan, including Karachi.
It was informed that total subsidy had been increased to Rs266 billion after adding Rs58.6 billion worth of petroleum development levy (PDL). Currently, the government is providing Rs266 billion in tariff differential subsidy to bridge the gap between actual and notified tariffs, which could rise to Rs324 billion with the latest tariff proposal.
The government has recently increased PDL from Rs60 to Rs70 per litre on petrol and diesel each but it announced that its impact would be redirected to electricity consumers. Now, it is believed that oil consumers will provide Rs58 billion in additional PDL to cross-subsidise the electricity consumers.
At the hearing, Nepra directed the Power Division to clear the confusion among consumers, especially the industrial sector.
While hearing a government petition for the tariff reduction of Rs1.71 per unit on account of additional PDL of Rs58.6 billion for three months, Nepra chairman stated that work was underway to firm up the prime minister's announcement of a power tariff cut of Rs7.69 per unit for industrial consumers and Rs7.41 per unit for domestic consumers, excluding lifeline users.
He added that consumers would receive an immediate relief of Rs5.03 per unit within the next few days, while the remaining relief would be provided in the quarterly tariff adjustment (QTA) for the third quarter.
Industrialist Aamir Sheikh acknowledged the tariff reduction but pointed out that there was a discrepancy as Nepra chairman cited a relief of Rs5 per unit whereas the Power Division indicated a reduction of Rs6.
The breakdown of QTA relief includes Rs1.9 per unit under the tariff differential subsidy, Rs1.71 under QTA and Rs1.36 under the fuel price adjustment (comprising Rs0.46 and Rs0.90 per unit).
"I hope Nepra will clarify whether the relief from the upcoming QTA will be given to consumers in the current quarter (April-June), meaning two QTA simultaneously, or it will be finalised now but will be implemented in the July-September quarter," he said. "If the next QTA is granted in this quarter and is around minus Rs1 per unit, this clarification would allow us to estimate a net relief of around Rs4 per unit and plan export sales accordingly," he added.
Arif Bilwani and Tanveer Barry also sought clarifications on several points raised during the public hearing.
The proposed decrease in tariff is required to be implemented through an increase in the tariff differential subsidy, with the government already securing cabinet's approval before submitting the request to Nepra. The relief will be applicable to all power distribution companies, including K-Electric (KE), for three months. However, officials clarified that lifeline consumers would not enjoy the benefit.
According to Power Division officials, the government aims to offset the cost through estimated savings of Rs58 billion by keeping petroleum prices stable over the next three months.
Additional relief is being provided through revisions in power purchase agreements as savings of Rs12 billion following negotiations with independent power producers (IPPs) had already been included in the recent QTA. The government is also negotiating with banks to cope with the circular debt. These talks are part of a broader strategy to finalise an arrangement that could slash liabilities in the power sector.
Officials clarified that the relief to consumers was being provided through quarterly adjustments instead of annual rebasing because of the current economic conditions.
Nepra officials confirmed that a relief of Rs1.36 per unit had already been granted under the fuel charges adjustment and with the proposed reduction of Rs1.71, consumers could receive an immediate cumulative relief of Rs5.03 to Rs5.04 per unit. The authority will review the submitted data and issue a formal decision.
Power Division officials emphasised that the continuation of relief measures would depend on macroeconomic stability, noting that the current financial situation did not allow for annual tariff rebasing, which was why quarterly adjustments were being used. The third quarterly adjustment request is expected to be submitted in the second week of April.
During the hearing, concerns were raised about the burden being placed on grid-connected consumers due to increasing net-metering connections, translating into a tariff hike of Rs1.5 per kilowatt-hour (kWh).
In response, Nepra officials stated that the government was actively deliberating on the issue and was expected to announce a decision soon. They added that adjustments may also be introduced during the upcoming tariff rebasing to ensure fairness while protecting grid consumers.
Rs3.02 relief for KE consumers
Separately, Nepra issued its decision on KE's petition for the provisional fuel charges adjustment for January 2025, indicating a relief of Rs3.02 per kWh. This will be passed on to consumers in April 2025 bills.
Nepra provisionally retained Rs2 billion in respect of adjustments on account of partial load, open cycle and degradation curves along with start-up cost pursuant to its decision regarding generation tariff for the period July 2023 onwards from the fuel charges adjustment for January 2025. It would be adjusted against pending KE claims to ensure that consumers are not burdened at a later stage.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Has Rs1.71/unit electricity relief vanished?
It was widely expected that the government would continue the Rs1.71 per unit electricity subsidy component—backed by the IMF staff-level agreement, which explicitly cited plans to fund the relief via additional Petroleum Levy collections. Yet, to the surprise of many, the subsidy appears to have quietly disappeared—if not formally withdrawn, then at least absent from the electricity bills issued for July 2025. Recall that the only component explicitly extended into FY26 was the Rs182 billion relief—equivalent to Rs1.71 per unit—for all non-lifeline consumers, financed through the enhanced Petroleum Levy. The government, in its communication with the IMF, had committed to maintaining this limited relief until June 30, 2026. Significant ambiguity now surrounds the fate of this relief and its continuity into FY26. The matter came up during Nepra's recent tariff hearing, but the Ministry of Energy's remarks did little to resolve the uncertainty. In its response, the Ministry noted that the 'average applicable consumer tariff in July 2025 would be lower by around seven rupees compared to July 2024.' While ostensibly reassuring, the phrasing raises more questions than it answers. No assumptions were disclosed, nor was it clarified whether the comparison referred to gross billing or adjustments embedded within the base tariff trajectory. With the Rs1.71 per unit subsidy now seemingly off the table, the month-on-month increase in tariffs for non-lifeline protected consumers—who account for the bulk of domestic electricity consumption—exceeds 30 percent. Previously, under the assumption of subsidy continuity, first and second protected slabs were projected to rise by 11 and 9 percent, respectively. They now stand to increase by 35 and 26 percent, respectively. Among non-protected slabs, effective tariffs for the first three categories are slated to rise by 12, 9, and 8 percent month-on-month. This development implies that effective tariffs in July may be materially higher than assumed—at odds with both prior policy signalling and the inflation projections built on that premise. Whether this reflects a temporary lapse awaiting formal notification, an oversight in tariff design, or a quiet policy reversal is yet to be clarified. What is clear, however, is that this shift—if sustained—has real implications that one hopes the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS) appropriately incorporates any change in effective tariffs into its CPI computation, lest the official inflation trajectory miss a key price signal affecting millions.


Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Iesco, Fesco and Gepco set for sell-off by Dec-end
ISLAMABAD: Three electricity distribution companies - Iesco, Fesco and Gepco - will be ready for privatisation by the end of December this year. This was stated by an official of the Power Division in the National Assembly Standing Committee on Economic Affairs' meeting held under the chairmanship of Muhammad Atif Khan. Additional Secretary Power Division Mehfooz Bhatti, in his presentation, told the committee that along with Privatisation Commission, the Power Division is working on the privatisation of all 10 Discos. He said that the privatisation process of Islamabad Electric Supply Company (Iesco), Gujranwala Electric Power Company (Gepco) and Faisalabad Electric Supply Company (Fesco) is already in advance stage. 'The due diligence process of these three Discos is in final stage and Financial Advisor has also been hired,' he said. The official said as per his information, the Privatisation Commission is working on the financial structure and by December this year, Expressions of Interest (EOIs) would be invited and terms and conditions of sale purchase agreement will also be finalised. Chairman Committee Atif Khan said that no one is stopping the government from privatising the Discos but it does not mean hiring in these Discos should be stopped. He said in his constituency for hundreds of kilometers there is only one lineman and because of this people were facing a lot of hardship in getting their complaints addressed. The Power Division official clarified that their ministry did not stop any Disco from hiring necessary staff. MNA Sher Ali Arbab said that as per his knowledge there are 80,000 vacancies in all 10 Discos but Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has given approval to hire only 20,000-25,000 personnel to keep things afloat. Members, unanimously, expressed concern over the methodology that exclusively targets Discos with minimal transmission and distribution losses for privatisation. The committee emphasised that by limiting privatisation to only the most efficient utilities, the government would be compelled to retain chronically underperforming Discos, thereby, exacerbating existing operational challenges and making their eventual privatisation virtually unattainable. The Power Division official informed the committee that their current installed capacity is 39,952 MW that includes 46 percent from clean energy and 54 percent from fossil. The power sector informed that there is overreliance on fossil than clean energy. The Power Division presented a comprehensive overview of Pakistan's current power generation capacity to the Standing Committee, reporting a total installed capacity of 39,952 MW. The energy mix analysis revealed a concerning imbalance, with fossil fuel-based generation accounting for 54 percent compared to just 46 percent from clean energy sources. The committee was informed that Pakistan's power sector currently faces a significant surplus of approximately 7,000 to 8,000 MW in electricity generation capacity. Members expressed serious concern over the substantial financial burden imposed by capacity payments for this unused electricity, which continues to strain the national exchequer despite serving no practical purpose. The committee members raised serious concerns regarding the inequitable distribution of development projects and budget allocations for Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in the proposed federal budget for 2025-26. The committee noted with concern that while KP has a substantially larger population than Gilgit-Baltistan (GB), both regions have been allotted only two new projects each, reflecting an unjust disparity. Furthermore, the budgetary allocations for development projects across provinces revealed that Balochistan receiving Rs209.6 billion, Punjab Rs76.6 billion, Sindh Rs145.9 billion, and KP Rs30.843 billion. The Economic Affairs Division (EAD) informed the committee that it has filed appeals and interim relief applications, with hearings ongoing and the next scheduled for September 2025. Meanwhile, the EAD has sought the federal cabinet's in-principle approval for a new legislative framework, the 'Foreign Contributions (NGOs and NPOs) Regulation Act, 2025,' to address the legal gaps. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Discos' June FCA: FPCCI flags objections and regulatory queries
ISLAMABAD: The Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI) has raised formal objections and regulatory queries on FCA of Discos for June 2025. In a letter to Registrar, Nepra, FPPCI said that while the proposed negative adjustment of Rs. 0.6541/kWh may appear consumer-friendly but it grossly under-represents the hidden inefficiencies, persistent opacity, and regulatory shortcomings plaguing the power sector. According to the FPCCI, the actual negative FCA, if inefficiencies were removed, would justifiably fall between Rs2.50/kWh to Rs3.00/kWh. Nepra's own Member (Technical) has consistently flagged major concerns across multiple FCA hearings. Drawing from these issues and recent disclosures-including the Rs. 244 billion overbilling scandal, system losses exceeding Rs. 267 billion, and long-standing unresolved outages- FPCCI has requested that NEPRA, while rejecting the current FCA proposal, seek direct and time-bound explanations from CPPA-G and the Power Division on the following points: (i) when will CPPA-G, ISMO, and NTDC be mandated to submit detailed, verifiable deviation and constraint logs before each FCA hearing, as required under principles of transparency? (ii) Why are completion timelines for key infrastructure-such as the Lahore North Grid, SCADAIII, and restoration of HVDC transmission-still unpublished despite repeated cost impacts due to underutilization and system constraints? (iii) What efforts have been made to resolve the Guddu ST-16 (747 MW) outage persisting since July 2022, and the Neelum-Jhelum Hydropower Plant (969 MW) shutdown since May 2024? What is the current status and who is accountable for the resulting losses exceeding Rs 150 billion? (iv) Why generic ISMO certificates are still being accepted as evidence during FCA hearings, especially when ISMO is not fully operational? Will Nepra now require these to be supported by publicly auditable dispatch data? (v) How does Nepra reconcile system losses at 17.55%-far above the allowed 11.43%-with recovery claims of 96.6%, especially when SEPCO and QESCO report recovery levels of only 25.8% and 38.7% respectively? Has Nepra verified the raw meter data? (vi) What enforcement action has Nepra taken against DISCOs involved in the 2024 and 2025 overbilling scandals? Why is there no public disclosure of disciplinary outcomes? (vii) Why were costly fuels like RLNG (Rs. 21.87/kWh) dispatched in June 2025 despite zero dispatch from HSD and large availability of hydel? Has Nepra reviewed the validity of PLAC claims made under such suboptimal dispatch? Why are Nepra's statutory obligations under Article 19A of the Constitution and Section 7(2)(f) of the NEPRA Act—to ensure public access to data-not being enforced rigorously? (ix) Why have the Service Level Agreements (SLAs) of K-Electric's plants been made publicly available for comments, while the Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) signed by CPPA-G which underpin uniform national tariffs-have never been published for public scrutiny. The FPCCI also asked why the Service Level Agreements (SLAs) of K-Electric's plants are made publicly available for comments, while the actual Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) signed by CPPA on which the entire nation's consumers are charged under the uniform tariff-are never subjected to public scrutiny? 'Is transparency only reserved for Karachi, or do the rest of the country's power contracts not deserve the same accountability?' FPCCI questioned. The association argues that power sector cannot be allowed to continue this selective opacity, systemic overbilling, and absence of accountability while the public pays for inefficiencies it did not cause. 'We urge Nepra to use this FCA proceeding to assert its independence, enforce disclosure, and direct corrective action through binding regulatory orders,' said the FPCCI. The Nepra will hold a public hearing on July 30, 2025 to be attended by the public and private sector. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025