X says French accusations of data tampering and fraud are politically motivated
X was responding to an announcement earlier this month from the Paris prosecutor's office, which said it was opening an investigation into the two alleged offences.
Both offences involved an 'automated data processing system', according to prosecutors, who provided few details of the alleged wrongdoing.
They are potentially punishable in France with a jail term of up to 10 years.
The platform said French authorities were carrying out a 'politically-motivated criminal investigation into X over the alleged manipulation of its algorithm and alleged 'fraudulent data extraction''.
'X categorically denies these allegations,' it said in a post from its Global Government Affairs account.
French authorities have launched a politically-motivated criminal investigation into X over the alleged manipulation of its algorithm and alleged 'fraudulent data extraction.' X categorically denies these allegations.
This investigation, instigated by French politician Eric… — Global Government Affairs (@GlobalAffairs) July 21, 2025
The prosecutor's office has said it acted on information that two people provided in January to its cyber crimes unit.
One of them is a member of parliament, and the other is a senior official in a French government institution. It did not identify them or the institution.
Prosecutors said the two people alleged suspected use of X's algorithm for the 'purposes of foreign interference', without providing details.
The platform said it 'remains in the dark' about the the specific allegations.
'However, based on what we know so far, X believes that this investigation is distorting French law in order to serve a political agenda and, ultimately, restrict free speech.'
The Paris prosecutor's office said that it has asked X to grant police investigators access to its algorithm, as part of the probe.
The request was made in a letter last week, it said. It said that 'investigators are bound by confidentiality and that only those in charge of the investigation will have access'.
The office said it has not had a formal response from X.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
6 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
‘Bailey may have been a lot of things – but he didn't kill Sophie', says ex-lover Jules as she makes bold ‘framed' claim
JULES Thomas believes she knows who killed Sophie Toscan du Plantier — and is adamant it wasn't her ex-lover Ian Bailey. Now she is going to tell all in a new book she is currently writing, as she battles a life-threatening blood 5 Ian Bailey and Jules Thomas, who is set to tell all in her new book Credit: PA:Press Association 5 Sophie Toscan du Plantier was found badly beaten outside her holiday home in Schull, West Cork, in December 1996 Credit: Copyright remains with handout provider 5 Ian Bailey was convicted in absentia by a French court of Sophie's murder Credit: � 2024 PA Media, All Rights Reserved The talented painter told how Sophie's brutal And Jules said she will never forgive the Although she didn't name names, she said the killer is someone who is well connected with the forces of law and order. Jules also believes that person was involved in a relationship with the READ MORE IN IRISH NEWS Her comments come as Sophie's family in Jules said: 'I will tell my side of the story in this book. 'I want to get the truth out there while I am alive. Ian Bailey may have been a lot of things, but he did not kill Sophie. I can tell you now, he didn't have it in him to kill anyone — he couldn't kill a turkey, for God's sake.' Most read in Irish News Jules was Ian's alibi on the night Sophie, 39, was killed. She claims detectives were hoping she would change her story after she and 'NEVER A DANGER' She recalled: 'When the 'Well, here we are all these years later and, guess what? Ian didn't kill me. He has passed on and I am still here. He was never a danger to me or anyone else.' Jules added: 'The Gardai, as far as I am concerned, tried to frame Ian for the murder and, in doing so, ruined both our lives. 'They never seriously looked at any other suspects. 'In this book, I will tell the public what actually went on and put the record straight. 'The Gardai did everything to try and get me to change my story, but the truth is the truth. I kept telling them Ian did not kill Sophie, but they wouldn't listen.' Bailey was arrested twice over the killing but never charged. He was convicted in absentia by a French 5 The house of Sophie Toscan du Plantier, in Cork Credit: News Group Newspapers Ltd 5 New DNA testing is underway in hopes of finding the answer to the mystery Credit: AFP - Getty
Irish Examiner
9 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Will tech giants finally take online safety for children seriously?
The wild west of social media self-regulation has come to an end, but the battles that will define this new era have only just begun after a very busy week in this hotly contested space. Last Monday, the second part of Ireland's regulator Coimisiún na Mean's Online Safety Code came into force. It came after a nine-month lead in time for companies to prepare its systems for the code aimed at keeping people, particularly children, safe online. This Part B of the nascent code means that the video-sharing platforms under its remit that allow pornography, like X, must use effective age assurance controls to make sure children can't watch it. In other words, the Elon Musk-owned platform formerly known as Twitter must make sure people are aged 18 or over to view porn that is available on it. There are other aspects to it too including prohibiting and sharing of content harmful to children such as content promoting eating disorders, self-harm or suicide, cyberbullying, hate speech, and extreme violence. Critics have claimed parts of the code are too vague and don't provide clear enough timelines to take action against those in breach. These same critics say it will be on the regulator to show it has the teeth to hold platforms to account. In theory, X or any of the other firms to which it applies like Meta and Youtube could face heavy penalties if they don't adhere to it. €20m or 10% of turnover, whichever is greater, can come in fines for breaches of the code. The latter percentage figure could run into billions of euro for some firms. But, just because the code came into force on Monday, it didn't mean things had changed overnight. Fine Gael TD Keira Keogh, who chairs the Oireachtas Children's Committee, said the following day that children could still set up accounts which 'opens a doorway to unlimited inappropriate, disturbing and damaging content'. 'Parents are understandably frustrated that as of now, nothing has changed and their kids are still at risk of being exposed to all that is sinister in the world of social media,' she said. Given the availability and proliferation of the kinds of nasty content people have become used to on social media feeds, advocates had stressed how much firms shouldn't be let avoid their obligations any longer now Coimisiún na Meán had its powers in place. 'Platforms have benefited from a substantial nine-month implementation period since the Code's publication in October 2024, allowing them more than enough time to develop robust age verification systems other than self-declaration, stringent content controls to prevent child exposure to harmful material, and clear and easy-to-use reporting systems,' charity CyberSafeKids said. It appears that the regulator agreed. No age checks On Wednesday, Coimisiún na Meán wrote to X seeking an explanation as to why there were still no age checks to watch pornography and asking them for an explanation as to how they were complying with their obligations by Friday. 'Platforms have had nine months to come into compliance with Part B of the Code,' it said. 'We expect platforms to comply with their legal obligations. Non-compliance is a serious matter which can lead to sanctions including significant financial penalties.' The regulator also said it would take further action if there is evidence of non-compliance with the Online Safety Code. 'We are continuing to review all of the designated video-sharing platforms to assess their compliance with the Code and will take any further supervisory, investigative or enforcement action required,' it added. The pressure on X and other platforms isn't just coming from Ireland. Across Europe, regulators are trying to get to grips with regulating this kind of content online. In the UK, its Online Safety Act sets out children's codes which came into force on Friday that will see some services, including pornographic websites, starting to check the age of UK users. Again, non compliance can see a fine of 10% of turnover, or even its executives jailed. From Friday, anyone trying to access pornographic content in the UK would've been met with a new check on their age before they could access that site, as platforms clearly got the UK's message. On the other hand, concerns have been raised over a wider restriction on content deemed 'unsuitable' and whether that amounts to censorship online. At home, the Irish regulator's work also fits in with wider European legislation, namely the Digital Services Act, and investigations from the European Commission into major platforms. It's all very complex, but our Online Safety Code sits with the Digital Services Act and the EU's laws on terrorist content online. All together, they're supposed to allow regulators to hold the social media companies to account in a variety of ways. In the UK, Reddit and Bluesky introduced age checks in advance of the new rules coming into force there too showing that platforms are clearly hearing the obligations they now face. Picture: Anatoliy Babiy Under the Digital Services Act, for example, the European Commission recently opened formal proceedings against sites including Pornhub and XVideos while member states also grouped together to take action against smaller pornographic platforms. The Commission said these major sites hadn't put in appropriate age verification tools to safeguard minors. An in-depth investigation is now under way. Curiously timed as it fell within the same week as Ireland's and the UK's safety codes came into force, X did publish the methods it will use to check users ages, which include the use of a live selfie with an AI used to determine age or using someone's email address to estimate their age. 'We are required by regulations including the UK's Online Safety Act, the Irish Online Safety Code and the European Union Digital Services Act, to verify your age for access to certain types of content,' X said on its website. In Ireland, the regulator prescribes that age checks must be robust, effective and protect privacy and it's understood it will be considering X's proposals in this regard. Even in lieu of that, age verification on X appeared to have already come into force as access to such content became restricted over the weekend. Things are changing and changing quickly. Charities working in this space have said that while the legislative obligations on platforms are now clearly present where they hadn't been before, enforcement will be key. In a statement to the Irish Examiner, CyberSafeKids said: 'What we expect to see over the next 12-24 months is tech companies finally stepping up and accepting responsibility and accountability to ensure children are not accessing platforms that were not designed for them in the first place and that they're shielded from the kinds of harmful content they contain. It is still early to fully assess how aggressively and effectively Coimisiún na Meán will act on enforcement; initial results suggest continued and predictable heel-dragging from the large social media providers, so proactive monitoring and swift intervention are now key for the integrity of the Code. It said that if companies continue to drag their heels, the regulator must act firmly to impose quick and substantial financial penalties for non-compliance. Meanwhile, online safety coordinator at the Children's Rights Alliance Noeline Blackwell said given Coimisiún na Meán had opted for a principles-based approach, we will be very reliant on the regulator to be proactive to ensure companies meet their obligations. 'Its Commissioners will need to ensure that they have the people, the expertise, the finances that they need and they will then need to have the will to follow up with the companies,' she said. 'We believe that it is extremely urgent that platforms are scrutinised for compliance and taken to task if they do not comply. 'The real urgency with these regulations is that every day, every hour that the appropriate safeguards are missing is an hour, a day that children active on these platforms are at risk of harm from all the issues that the Code is meant to protect them from. That's the whole point of the legislation. 'It's not a game between the regulator and any or all of the platforms. It's a real threat to children when these systems are not in place.' Read More Social media aimed at kids is driven by profit, not safety
Sunday World
9 hours ago
- Sunday World
Son of Kinahan boss Thomas ‘Bomber' Kavanagh set up roofing company after prison release
Trainee accountant was jailed for trying to help criminal dad Jack from Tamworth, Birmingham a trainee accountant, became caught up in Bomber's criminal enterprises when he tried to help his father orchestrate a lighter sentence for drug smuggling. The plot involved acquiring and then hiding a stash of handguns, machine guns and ammunition and then alerting the National Crime Agency (NCA) to its location with X marking the spot on a map. The scheme was foiled after the NCA uncovered incriminating messages on encrypted EncroChat which had been cracked by French counterparts. Jack was arrested in May 2023 at Malaga Airport by officers from the Spanish National Police while he was travelling to Turkey. The house in Tamworth, near Birmingham He was extradited to the UK where he pleaded guilty to conspiring to possess firearms and ammunition. But in December last year, Judge Philip Katz KC accepted he was more of an 'enthusiastic messenger' than an 'organiser' as he sentenced him to three years and one month in prison. Effectively Because he had already effectively served his time on remand, the sentence secured Jack's release from Belmarsh prison, from where he appeared by video-link for his sentencing. Judge Katz told him: 'Although I accept you got involved out of misguided loyalty to your father, you entered into this agreement with your eyes open.' Unlike, Thomas Kavanagh, who was 'a notorious and leading member of an organised crime group', the defendant had no previous convictions and was a young man of good character, the court was told. Now, seven months after gaining his freedom, and as fresh financial woes were heaped on Bomber this week when the Crown Prosecution Service hit him with a €1.26 million proceeds of crime bill, Jack has taken the first steps towards building his own legal enterprise. Company documents show Jack – whose nationality is registered as Irish – registered Oakline Roofing Limited as a new company with him as its sole director on June 29. The company is one of three companies headquartered out of Bomber's family home in Sutton Road, Mile Oak, Tamworth. Two other companies, a security company and a car sale company, are shown as being headquartered at the same address. The Sunday World previously revealed that the Crown Prosecution Service had imposed a freezing order on any sale of the fortified Tamworth Property pending the outcome of the proceeds of crime probe into his activities. Kavanagh, 57, who headed UK operations for the mob and cartel lieutenant 'Flash' Gary Vickery, 42, were present to hear the outcome of the proceed of crime probe hearing in Ipswich Crown Court on Friday morning. Looking tanned and trim in a dark grey T-shirt as he sat in an interview room in Belmarsh prison, Kavanagh listened on with his arms folded as the hearing went through his assets. Officers estimated that Kavanagh's criminal profits were in the region £12.2m, but recoverable assets amounted to £1,123,096.84. 'This includes his 50% share of his fortified family mansion in Tamworth, Staffordshire, money from the sale of various other properties in the UK and a villa in Spain, and approximately £150,000 of high-end bags, clothes and accessories which were discovered when Kavanagh's house was searched following his initial arrest in 2019,' they said. Jack Kavanagh (left) and father Thomas 'Bomber' Kavanagh Today's News in 90 Seconds - July 27th
