
Moment furious driver HEADBUTTS van's window & screams ‘get out of the way' in blazing road rage row
Published: Invalid Date,
THIS is the shocking moment a furious driver headbutted a van's window before launching into a furious road rage rant.
As temperatures soared during the heatwave last week, one van driver struggled to keep his cool after coming face to face with another vehicle at a junction in West Kensington, London.
6
6
6
The pair of vans almost collided while trying to turn at the intersection, causing one driver to completely lose his head.
In incredible footage, the hot-headed driver can be seen with his face close to the driver-side window of the other van, shouting at the motorist.
He can be heard shouting "get out of the f**king way" before pulling on the other van's door handle.
As other frustrated motorists begin to blare their horns, it appears to set the angered van driver off, inspiring him to smack his head against the other van's window.
Onlookers were left disgusted as the enraged van driver turned even more foul with his language, at one point even threatening the motorist.
He appears to scream out: "I'll f**king kill you man. Get out of the f**king way. Get out of the way."
Midway through his foul-mouthed tirade, the driver then walks around to the other side of the vehicle.
Sounds of the man hitting the vehicle appear to echo through the street, with the angry driver continuing to shout: "Get out of my way."
Eventually, the rage-filled driver relents and returns to his motor - reversing it and then driving away.
Not before he leaves, however, the driver stops once more to look at the other motorist before shouting further expletives and gesturing at him.
Moment driver pounds car with bat before being rammed by 'idiot' motorist
One passerby, who wanted to remain nameless, said she heard the man shouting: 'Get out the way, move, get out the f**king way.'
Ironically, the driver of the motor transporting ice remained cool and calm during the tirade.
Temperatures hit around 27C in London on Friday, when the shocking exchange took place.
The passerby explained that they believed the ice van driver should have given priority to the other vehicle.
They added: "However, it does not give any right for the man to behave aggressively and shout and go full on rage.
'I genuinely thought he was about to drag the ice driver out of the van and start a fight.
'It was a hot summer Friday afternoon, and the heat probably didn't help the situation.'
Members of the public were left shocked by the footage.
Lee Willis said: 'Telling him to get out the way then he is the one who moves.'
Another added: 'For god sake, one of you just move out the way, takes more of a man not to have so much ego.'
6

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Battle for the car boot king's millions: Son of father-of-19 businessman suing his stepmother over £43million fortune after he was cut from the will
The son of a multimillionaire 'car boot king' who was left nothing when his father died is suing his stepmother for a slice of his family's enormous £43million fortune. Richard Scott - who died aged 81 in 2018 - made a fortune running the UK's second biggest boot fair from his 'vast' Cheshire farm, where ITV 's 'Car Boot Challenge' was filmed. The father-of-19's eldest son and 'favourite' Adam Scott - described as his dad's 'golden boy' - says he sacrificed his life to work on the farm side-by-side with his tycoon parent from the age of nine, and was promised it would all be his one day. But after the death of Adam's mother, Richard remarried in 2016 to his former cleaner Jennifer Scott - who was 28 years his junior and younger even than his son - and then wrote Adam out of his will, leaving Jennifer in control of his estate and farmland, which she says could now be worth up to £43million. Now Adam, 62, is suing his step-mother, 60, as executor of Richard's estate, claiming his father was not in his right mind when he signed his two final wills, having been diagnosed with a form of dementia that left him barely able to speak. He also says his father promised him he would have the right to take over the farm after his death and that he sacrificed everything to commit to 'a life of hard and unrelenting physical work' on the back of those promises. But lawyers for Jennifer claim Richard knew exactly what he was doing when he disinherited his first born after Adam's relationship with his father 'completely broke down' when he tried to get Richard sectioned, claiming his father beat Jennifer. They also say he has no claim to his father's estate on the basis of the alleged promises, having already been handed land and property worth over £10million before Richard's death. London's High Court heard that 'mercurial character' Richard was 'a ruthless, single-minded and highly successful businessman who built up a valuable property empire' before switching to running giant and lucrative car boot sales. He fathered an astonishing 19 children, lawyers for Jennifer told the court, six with his first wife, plus six illegitimate children during that relationship, followed by another seven with Jennifer, who was working as his cleaner when the pair first got together in 1994. Richard and Jennifer eventually married in 2016 just two years before his death in a controversial wedding disrupted by Adam, who tried to prevent the union going ahead, claiming his father didn't have the mental capacity to marry. 'It is common ground that on April 22 2016 Adam attended the registry office and alleged that Richard lacked capacity to marry,' Alex Troup KC, for Jennifer, told Mr Justice Richards. 'That led to Richard being interviewed by four registrars and a lawyer from the local council, all of whom were satisfied that he did have capacity to marry. The wedding therefore went ahead.' By the time he died of cancer, Richard owned 'a huge quantity of land' around Chelford, Cheshire, which has been officially valued for probate at around £7million. However, Jennifer claims it is now worth £43million based on offers she has received and development potential. Adam's lawyers say he spent more than 40 years helping his father run the 'vast, sprawling' farm and managing the car boot sales he held on part of it, and had been in line to inherit it on the basis that he would pay the probate value of the land. The cash would then have been split between his many siblings. But in 2016, just months after his second marriage, Richard signed the two wills which disinherited Adam and left Jennifer in control of his wealth, as executor and a major beneficiary. Jennifer's two sons, Gordon and William Redgrave-Scott, and Adam's sister Rebecca Horley were also made beneficiaries of the last wills. Challenging the will's validity, Adam is also bringing an alternative claim under the law of proprietary estoppel - a legal remedy that can be used when a landowner has promised property will be transferred to someone else at a later date - only to later go back on that vow. Constance McDonnell KC, for Adam, told the judge: 'At the heart of this case is a relationship between a father and a son, their shared devotion to the family farm in Cheshire, and a recognition by the father of his son's willingness to commit to a life of hard and unrelenting physical work. 'This case is a paradigm example of a dedicated child's claim to a farm, pursuant to a parent's promise of inheritance. 'Adam seeks a remedy equivalent to the provision made for him by his father Richard in a will dated June 23 1995, which implemented the promises made to Adam. 'On those terms, Adam would acquire a 40-year tenancy of his father's farm and an option to purchase the farm at its probate value. 'It came as no surprise to any of the witnesses that Richard promised Adam that he would be able to farm the farm by succession, and that Adam acted in reliance on that promise by dedicating himself to the farm, and by making extraordinary sacrifices in doing so, including the loss of his marriage and the loss of family holidays and other time with his children. 'Adam's work enabled the farm to generate a profit, which Richard enjoyed the benefit of and which enabled him to discharge his own expenses, including private school fees for the children he had with Jennifer, as well enabling re-investment in the farm. 'It also allowed the farm to function smoothly and with minimal labour costs despite Richard's ongoing health problems, which began as early as 1976.' She said the evidence supporting Adam's claim about the promises is 'very extensive' and that the judge would need to decide whether his dad going back on them was 'unconscionable.' 'In a case like the present, where decades of work and life-changing decisions have been made in reliance on a promise, the conscience of the court should be shocked,' she said. Turning to Richard's mental state when he made the 2016 wills, the barrister said the tycoon had been diagnosed with a form of dementia in 2011 and had been hardly able to communicate by the time they were signed. 'Richard's medical records include clear evidence of his ability to make decisions and to have insight having been eroded by his dementia,' she said. 'Adam submits that there can be no presumptions in favour of his father's knowledge and approval of the September and December 2016 wills. By this time, his dementia had left him incapable of speaking more than an occasional word. 'He sought to communicate in writing and by gestures, but could write no more than a few words or numbers. Jennifer acted as Richard's "translator", purporting to explain what he intended to others. 'Richard died just over seven years ago. Since that time, the parties have been locked in combat and, despite occasional cessations of hostility, no peace has been achieved. 'Nothing could be further from Richard's plan in 1995 that Adam - his "golden boy" - would carry on with the farming enterprise to which they were both dedicated, and that his other children would be provided for either by rental income or a lump sum paid into the estate in exchange for the farm. 'With regret, Adam has to rely upon the court to set right this unconscionable outcome.' Mr Troup, representing Jennifer, however told the judge that Richard had good reasons for cutting out Adam. He said that, in September 2013, Richard's GP, a psychiatrist, the police and two nurses had visited Pear Tree Farm with a view to sectioning him under the Mental Health Act 1983. 'But when they met Richard, they formed the view that he had capacity and therefore did not section him,' he said. 'A freedom of information request by Jennifer revealed that this visit was prompted by Adam, who had represented to social services that Richard had lost capacity. 'In July 2015, Adam alleged to social services that Richard was beating Jennifer and the children. That led to an investigation by social services, which was eventually closed, but the children were placed on a safeguarding register, which they found upsetting. Richard was angry with Adam for reporting him to social services and their relationship deteriorated as a result. 'On April 22 2016, Adam attended the registry office and alleged that Richard lacked capacity to marry. That led to Richard being interviewed by four registrars and a lawyer from the local council, all of whom were satisfied that he did have capacity to marry. The wedding therefore went ahead. 'Richard was a short-tempered, authoritarian father who expected his children to work hard on the farm and would brook no dissent. He is variously described by his children as 'controlling, manipulative and unpredictable'.....He was capable of falling out with his children.' In relation to the proprietory estoppel claim, the barrister told the judge that Adam had already been handed land and property worth over £10m by his father before he died. 'It is clear that Richard wanted his children to benefit from the fruits of his labours, and in that regard he treated Jennifer's children on an equal footing with the children of his first marriage,' he said. 'Adam worked on the farm for his father, and in the later years he did so to a greater extent than his siblings, but he was aware of Richard's mercurial character. 'He knew that Richard had five other children by his first marriage, and seven children by Jennifer, all of whom had an expectation of inheritance. 'Adam was rewarded for his work, including by Richard making lifetime gifts to him of substantial parcels of land, which have proved to be extremely valuable. 'Adam relies on a number of alleged statements made by Richard as assurances. Any statements made by Richard in Adam's early years were not sufficiently clear statements intended to be taken seriously. Adam himself states that 'when I was young it was just a hope…' 'Richard was an inherently unreliable character, whose track record was of breaking promises,' the barrister concluded.


BBC News
34 minutes ago
- BBC News
Man arrested after pedestrian hit by car in Leicester
A man has been arrested after a pedestrian was hit by a car in were called to Victoria Park Road, between the Welford Road and London Road junction, just after 00:15 BST on pedestrian - a man in his 30s - was taken to hospital with injuries not believed to be life-threatening or life-changing, said Leicestershire Police. A 32-year-old man has been arrested on suspicion of causing serious injury by dangerous driving and remains in custody, the force added. The road remains closed while police inquiries are urged to avoid the area and find alternative routes.


Daily Mail
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Moment man and woman shoplifters steal BABY clothes from one of Kate Middleton's favourite boutiques
A man and woman were caught on camera stealing baby clothes from a London boutique adored by the Princess of Wales. Blue Almonds on Walton Street, South Kensington, shared CCTV footage on social media in a desperate bid to catch the pair of thieves after they took several garments without paying. In the shocking clip, the man is seen discreetly stuffing three pieces of blue clothing down his shorts while pretending to pick dropped items off the floor. Making sure no one is looking, the thief - who is dressed in all black - shoves a tiny outfit down his clothes, before placing what looks like a baby hat in his pocket and then another item down his shorts. He then casually walks towards the door, waves goodbye to shopkeepers and strolls off. Meanwhile, a woman he is with - dressed in a white summer dress and sliders - promptly follows him out the door, looking back as she makes her exit. Blue Almonds, one of London's most exclusive - and expensive - baby stores, is a favourite of Princess Catherine, who has purchased items from the boutique for her own children. Kate and her mother Carole Middleton bought a £295 wicker basket for Prince George a few weeks before his birth. When visiting the boutique in April 2013, Kate and Carole spent up to an hour browsing the Moses baskets on sale, before purchasing a large white wicker version. Blue Almonds' previous clients are also said to include famous popstar Lily Allen. After the recent theft, Blue Almonds posted the ordeal on social media in a bid to catch the stealing duo. 'Please share this footage [...] it could help identify the individuals involved and increase the chances of them being caught,' they wrote. 'We were unfortunate to experience theft at our boutique, something that thankfully doesn't happen often, but it's still upsetting.' The boutique added: 'As a public service, we're sharing this footage to raise awareness and help warn other businesses in the area to stay extra cautious. 'If you recognise anyone in the footage, you can contact the police and give them this crime reference number 01/7719971/25 or contact us via Instagram, Facebook, or email. We will forward all information to the police.'