Your craving for sugar or caffeine and what it reveals of how you cope with stress
No, I might initially protest, mostly out of a vague sense of health consciousness or guilt from the overpriced caffeinated drink I already bought that morning. Then, someone always coaxes: 'It's okay, just treat yourself.'
It rarely takes much convincing. I cave, like clockwork, and end up reaching for a chocolate waffle, a fizzy drink or maybe a tiny pack of chips to push through a particularly tedious task.
We tell ourselves it's all right in moderation, that these little indulgences serve a purpose. After all, what is a little sugar or caffeine if it gives us the jolt we need to power through the day?
Yet, more often than not, I've reached the bottom of the cup or the last bite of a snack before I've even finished the task for which I needed that boost.
This begs the question: Is this 'treat' truly helping? Or have we trained ourselves to believe that it does?
I turned to a dietitian and psychologists to find some answers.
When does a reward become a crutch? And are there better ways to lift our mood or productivity without needing to unwrap a snack or grab a cup of latte?
PHYSICAL BENEFITS FROM 'TREATS'
First, the positive news. The health experts said that going for the occasional snack does offer a real, physiological boost – at least in the short term – but it depends on the type and portion of the 'treat'.
Ms Annabelle Johnson, an accredited dietitian in private practice here, said that consuming sugar can stimulate the brain's 'reward system', leading to a release of dopamine and feeling of pleasure.
A moderate intake of beverages containing caffeine such as coffee and tea may also carry health benefits and lead to a productivity boost, she added.
For example, a cup of espresso might help someone who had a poor night's sleep to focus better at work, though reaching for a third or fourth cup of coffee is likely to be excessive.
'Caffeine is a stimulant that works in the brain. It can increase alertness in many people, though the effect differs between individuals and the dose of caffeine,' Ms Johnson said.
However, she cautioned that excessive intakes of sugar can be associated with unstable blood sugar and in turn, unstable energy levels, while excessive caffeine intake can lead to anxiety, heart palpitations and insomnia.
Ms Ooi Sze Jin, founder and psychologist at mental health social enterprise A Kind Place, said that the benefits gained from snacking for an energy boost is 'definitely not just placebo'.
The not-so-positive news is that our bodies may negatively adapt to the physical effects of relying on such snacks.
Ms Ooi pointed out that caffeine may block 'sleepy signals' in one's brain but also constricts blood vessels.
'With regular use, your brain adapts to this. When you don't have caffeine, those vessels dilate, which is a key reason for withdrawal headaches,' she added.
'So there are genuine physical effects, but the habit and expectation create a strong psychological pull that can feel like a need even when the physical boost isn't as strong.'
FILLING A PSYCHOLOGICAL NEED
Indeed, beyond the physical effects that an afternoon cuppa provides, what often keeps the habit going is the psychological boost that these 'treats' give, the health experts said.
Mr Muhammad Haikal Jamil, founder and senior clinical psychologist at ImPossible Psychological Services, said that turning to daily sweet treats usually performs 'an emotional function instead of a physiological one'.
Eating confectionery may fulfil an emotional need to feel rewarded and satisfied. It can also be a way to self-soothe during periods of stress, providing a temporary emotional lift, he added.
'Even though we may be feeling stressed, treating ourselves provides us with a sense of control in our ability to improve our mood. Enjoying the sweet treat also provides a window for us to take a break away from the stressors faced.'
Ms Ooi the psychologist said that a sugary snack or caffeinated drink can be a learned shortcut to cope, but the person would not learn how to process stress and manage one's emotions in healthier ways.
'A healthy treat is a conscious, occasional reward or pleasure. A crutch is used to escape or numb feelings, often leading to guilt later and preventing you from building better coping skills.'
Though snacking may not be a greater cause for concern compared to other coping strategies for stress such as substance abuse, Mr Haikal emphasised the importance of moderating any coping strategy that one adopts, even beneficial ones such as exercising.
'Over-reliance on a certain coping strategy usually occurs as a result of our attempt to escape an overwhelming stressor. However, we are not addressing the issue or developing our ability to overcome them,' he added.
In my example, therefore, if I keep "treating" myself during a slump, it can become a psychological crutch when consuming sweet treats crosses the threshold into 'emotional eating', where I am simply trying to 'eat away' negative emotions to suppress feelings about work and deadlines.
A key sign to watch for is difficulty stopping once you start or feeling compulsive cravings for sweets in response to stress, Mr Haikal said.
YOUR BODY MAY BE TELLING YOU OF DEEPER NEEDS
Though snacking wisely can help one feel satisfied while keeping energy levels up, Ms Johnson the dietitian said that one would be better off taking the right amounts of carbohydrates, fat and protein in meals because these can support stabler energy levels.
She also pointed out that reliance on quick fixes such as a sugary snack or a dose of caffeine might be masking the primary source of one's low energy such as sleep deprivation.
'Our energy levels are affected by a myriad of factors from a lack of a balanced diet, poor sleep, chronic stress or chronic health conditions. Thus, it is important to take a step back and consider the root cause of how we are feeling,' Ms Johnson said.
A desire to snack to boost energy could be coming from yet-to-be-uncovered chronic health conditions such as nutritional deficiencies, insomnia and diabetes, she added.
Besides, drinking too much caffeine could be dangerous for anyone, not least those who may have prevailing health issues such as kidney or heart problems, Ms Johnson cautioned.
She proposed picking up good habits that can support an energy slump. Apart from having a balanced snack, work towards staying hydrated and going for a walk instead.
Mr Haikal said that it would not be enough to try and eliminate your reliance on sweet treats or caffeine since that may leave you feeling unfulfilled.
You must know why it is unhealthy in the long run and accept it in the first place.
You may also have to learn that there are other ways to handle a problem (stress) instead of choosing a quick fix (unhealthy snack) all the time. This means, for example, developing a mindset of understanding that you do not have to get rid of negative emotions immediately.
You have to want to make active choices towards healthier alternatives based on your interests and preferences.
Banking on snacking to cope with tough emotions may reinforce one's tendency to avoid problems and weaken resilience, or one's natural ability to bounce back from stress, Ms Ooi said.
Instead, you may consider turning to non-consumption rewards such as stepping away from work for a quick walk or chatting with a colleague. These can be much more effective in the long term because they can train the brain to associate rewards to healthier activities.
'Awareness is key. Start by observing when and why you crave them without judgment. Then, make tiny changes. Reduce the amount gradually such as opting for less sugar or a smaller coffee cup,' Ms Ooi suggested.
While I personally make no promises to give up the occasional afternoon snack, working on this article has been a useful exercise in reflection.
The red velvet latte I bought to motivate myself – rich with chocolate and good intentions – was scarfed down before I'd written a single word.
What did help, in the end, was the promise of having some company from my colleague for the journey home, if I met my self-imposed deadline.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
15 hours ago
- CNA
CNA938 Rewind - The Wellness Hour - Are you overtracking your health?
In today's digital age, tracking your health has never been easier. But how much is too much, and what happens when it causes anxiety? Hui Wong speaks with Dr Lin Hong-hui, founder of The Psychology Atelier with a special interest in Attachment Framework about when health vigilance becomes health anxiety.
CNA
3 days ago
- CNA
A common assumption about ageing may be wrong, study suggests
A new analysis of data gathered from a small indigenous population in the Bolivian Amazon suggests some of our basic assumptions about the biological process of ageing might be wrong. Inflammation is a natural immune response that protects the body from injury or infection. Scientists have long believed that long-term, low-grade inflammation – also known as 'inflammageing' – is a universal hallmark of getting older. But this new data raises the question of whether inflammation is directly linked to ageing at all, or if it's linked to a person's lifestyle or environment instead. The study, which was published recently, found that people in two non-industrialised areas experienced a different kind of inflammation throughout their lives than more urban people – likely tied to infections from bacteria, viruses and parasites rather than the precursors of chronic disease. Their inflammation also didn't appear to increase with age. Scientists compared inflammation signals in existing data sets from four distinct populations in Italy, Singapore, Bolivia and Malaysia; because they didn't collect the blood samples directly, they couldn't make exact apples-to-apples comparisons. But if validated in larger studies, the findings could suggest that diet, lifestyle and environment influence inflammation more than ageing itself, said Alan Cohen, an author of the paper and an associate professor of environmental health sciences at Columbia University. 'Inflammageing may not be a direct product of aging, but rather a response to industrialised conditions,' he said, adding that this was a warning to experts like him that they might be overestimating its pervasiveness globally. 'How we understand inflammation and ageing health is based almost entirely on research in high-income countries like the US,' said Thomas McDade, a biological anthropologist at Northwestern University. But a broader look shows that there's much more global variation in ageing than scientists previously thought, he added. The study 'sparks valuable discussion' but needs much more follow-up 'before we rewrite the inflammageing narrative,' said Bimal Desai, a professor of pharmacology who studies inflammation at the University of Virginia School of Medicine. INFLAMMATION IS DIFFERENT IN DIFFERENT PLACES In the study, researchers compared blood samples from about 2,800 adults between 18 and 95. People in the more industrialised Chianti region of Italy and in Singapore both showed the types of proteins that signal inflammageing. The Tsimane group in Bolivia and the Orang Asli group in Malaysia, on the other hand, had different inflammatory markers likely tied to infections, instead of the proteins marking inflammageing. (The four datasets used blood samples with subjects' informed consent, whether written or verbal, and institutional approval.) The fact that inflammation markers looked so similar in groups from industrialised regions, but so different from the others, is striking, said Aurelia Santoro, an associate professor at the University of Bologna who was not involved in the study. 'This suggests that immune cells are activated in fundamentally different ways depending on context.' The Tsimane population's protein markers were less linked to inflammageing than the Orang Asli's; authors speculated that this might be because of differences in lifestyle and diet. Some experts questioned the findings' significance. Vishwa Deep Dixit, director of the Yale Center for Research on Aging, said it's not surprising that lifestyles with less exposure to pollution are linked to lower rates of chronic disease. 'This becomes a circular argument' that doesn't prove or disprove whether inflammation causes chronic disease, he said. Either way, the findings need to be validated in larger, more diverse studies that follow people over time, experts said. While they had lower rates of chronic disease, the two Indigenous populations tended to have life spans shorter than those of people in industrialised regions, meaning they may simply not have lived long enough to develop inflammageing, Dr Santoro said. THE PROBLEM MAY BE TIED TO URBAN LIVING Because the study looked at protein markers in blood samples, and not specific lifestyle or diet differences among populations, scientists had to make educated guesses about why industrialised groups experience more inflammageing, Dr Cohen said. Dr McDade, who has previously studied inflammation in the Tsimane group, speculated that populations in non-industrialised regions might be exposed to certain microbes in water, food, soil and domestic animals earlier in their lives, bolstering their immune response later in life. At the same time, people in urbanised, industrial environments are 'exposed to a lot of pollutants and toxins,' many of which have ' demonstrated pro-inflammatory effects,' he said. Diet and lifestyle could also play a part: The Tsimane tend to live in small settlements with their extended family and eat a largely plant-based diet, he said. There might also be good and bad types of inflammation, Dr Cohen said. While the indigenous populations did experience inflammation from infection, those levels weren't tied to chronic disease later in life. That could mean that the presence of inflammation alone isn't as bad as we thought, he added. It's not clear if people can do anything to manage inflammageing late in life. People who want to age more healthily may be better off eating better and exercising more to regulate immune response in the long run, instead of focusing on drugs or supplements advertised to target inflammation, Dr Cohen said.
CNA
6 days ago
- CNA
Walking 7,000 steps a day a huge boost to health: Research
People who walk 7,000 steps a day have a dramatically lower risk of a broad range of serious health problems, the largest review of the evidence yet said Thursday. The most widely promoted target for people tracking their number of steps is 10,000 – but that figure reportedly originally came from a 1960s marketing campaign for a Japanese pedometer. To find a more scientific target, an international team of researchers sifted through 57 previous studies that covered 160,000 people. The results published in the Lancet Public Health journal found that walking 7,000 steps a day nearly halved people's risk of early death from all causes, compared to 2,000 steps. The study also looked into health problems not previously covered by research into step counts. Walking 7,000 steps a day was linked to people's risk of dementia falling by 38 per cent, depression dropping 22 per cent and diabetes decreasing 14 per cent. It was also associated with lower rates of cancer and falls, though the researchers warned this was based on less evidence. "You don't need to hit 10,000 steps a day to get major health benefits," Paddy Dempsey, a study co-author and medical researcher at Cambridge University, told AFP. "The biggest gains happen before 7,000 steps, and then benefits tend to level off," he said. While people's speeds vary widely, 7,000 steps adds up to roughly an hour of walking throughout the day. Dempsey emphasised that people already managing 10,000 or more steps should keep it up. But he had a message for people who might find 7,000 steps daunting: "Don't be discouraged". "If you're only getting 2,000–3,000 steps a day, aim to add an extra 1,000 steps. That's just 10–15 minutes of light walking spread across the day," he said. Andrew Scott, a researcher at the University of Portsmouth not involved in the study, said that "it demonstrates that overall more is always better". "People should not focus too much on the numbers, particularly on days where activity is limited," he added. The World Health Organization recommends at least 150 minutes of moderate to intense physical activity a week. Nearly a third of people worldwide do not reach this target, according to the WHO.
