Hydrating vs moisturising: What's the difference and which one does your skin really need
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Understanding the difference is essential for choosing products that truly benefit your skin. Whether your skin is dry, dehydrated, oily, or sensitive, targeting the right issue can improve texture, reduce irritation, and restore balance. Backed by dermatologists and clinical research, this guide helps you decode your skin's needs and build a routine that works—from the inside out.
The Science: Hydration adds water, moisturisation seals it in
Hydration refers to increasing the water content within the skin. Hydrators contain humectants like hyaluronic acid, glycerin, panthenol, and urea, which draw water from the environment or deeper layers of the skin into the outermost layer, the epidermis. According to the
(AADA) and research published in Dermatologic Therapy, humectants are essential for improving skin hydration, especially in dehydrated skin types.
Moisturisers, on the other hand, help to lock in that water using occlusives (like petrolatum, beeswax) and emollients (such as ceramides and fatty acids). These create a barrier over the skin to prevent transepidermal water loss (TEWL). As explained by cosmetic chemist Perry Romanowski, moisturisers are typically oil-based, while hydrators are water-attracting—both playing different but complementary roles.
'Moisturisers form a protective seal that prevents water from escaping, while hydrators absorb water and hold it on the skin,'—
, The Beauty Brains.
How to know what your skin really needs
Dry skin
Dry skin lacks oil and struggles to retain moisture. You'll benefit most from rich, occlusive moisturisers. Look for:
Petrolatum, shea butter, plant oils (like coconut or jojoba)
Emollients such as ceramides or fatty alcohols
A 2017 review in
suggests that occlusives are most effective for very dry or barrier-compromised skin.
Dehydrated skin
Dehydrated skin lacks water, and it can feel tight or look dull—even if it's oily. You need a hydrating serum followed by a light moisturiser. Best ingredients include:
Hyaluronic acid
Aloe vera, glycerin, honey
Hyaluronic acid is well-documented in clinical trials to hold up to 1,000 times its weight in water, making it a hydration powerhouse.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Oily or acne-prone skin
Oily skin can also be dehydrated. When that happens, the skin may overcompensate by producing more oil, worsening breakouts. Dermatologists recommend using
Water-based, non-comedogenic hydrators and gel moisturisers
Lightweight ingredients like niacinamide or squalane
According to the AADA, using oil-free, non-acnegenic products is critical in maintaining balance without clogging pores.
Why water alone isn't enough to hydrate skin
Simply rinsing your face or splashing on water doesn't hydrate — it may actually dry you out. As water evaporates, it pulls away natural oils, worsening dryness.
The AADA warns that frequent cleansing without moisturising can lead to tight, flaky skin. Instead, always apply a humectant followed by a moisturiser after washing to trap hydration in the skin barrier.
Many products do both; it's the ingredients that matter
Most modern moisturisers contain a blend of humectants, occlusives, and emollients, meaning they can hydrate and moisturise simultaneously. The form—cream, gel, balm—affects texture and experience more than function.
What's key is reading the ingredients list.
According to the study, their uses typically include:
Humectants: For thick, scaly, dehydrated skin
Emollients: For improving skin texture and smoothness
Occlusives: For sealing in moisture and preventing flare-ups like eczema
So, while product labels might use 'hydrator' or 'moisturiser' loosely, understanding what's inside matters more than the branding.
Support skin hydration from within
Topical products do help, but internal hydration is essential. According to the AADA and nutritional studies:
Aim to drink at least half your body weight (in pounds) in ounces of water daily
Eat water-rich foods like cucumbers, strawberries, watermelon, and oranges
Limit hot showers and opt for gentle cleansers and fragrance-free products
Always apply moisturiser immediately after washing to prevent moisture loss
Also, the AADA recommends regular sun protection, stress management, and avoiding smoking, as these affect your skin's ability to retain moisture.
Whether your skin is dry, dehydrated, oily, or sensitive, there's no one-size-fits-all. Instead, tailor your routine based on what your skin lacks, water, oil, or both. By choosing the right balance of hydrating and moisturising ingredients, and staying hydrated from the inside, you'll help your skin function at its best—smooth, healthy, and glowing.
Also Read:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UPS posts fall in second-quarter profit and revenue
(Reuters) -United Parcel Service reported a decline in second-quarter profit and revenue on Tuesday, as demand took a hit from new "de minimis" tariffs on low-value Chinese shipments and mounting risks from President Donald Trump's trade policies. The company reported adjusted net income of $1.55 per share for the quarter ended June 30, from $1.79 per share a year earlier. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
William Watson: Government-managed trade is sure to fail again
Those are some trade deals Donald Trump is shaking hands on — but so far not releasing details about. The U.S. gets tariff-free access to other countries while other countries pay stiff across-the-board tariffs going into the U.S. The U.K. pays 10 per cent, the EU and Japan 15 per cent, Indonesia and the Philippines 19 per cent and Vietnam 20 per cent. What China will pay remains to be determined. It typically pushes back more in response to Trump's jibes and jabs. Perhaps President Xi Jinping read the sections of the Art of the Deal about the need to stand up to bullies. Silly question: If a virtue of tariffs is that they're clean and simple, as the U.S. president always says, wouldn't it be a lot easier to have the same across-the-board rate for all countries? And whatever happened to 'reciprocity,' which the White House was big on a couple of months ago? Tariffs of 10-20 per cent for other countries' goods going into the U.S. but zero for American goods entering other countries are hardly 'reciprocal.' Yes, the rates chosen supposedly reflect the amount of procedural protectionism or non-tariff barriers (NTBs) that countries impose on U.S. goods. Except that no systematic study of that in fact much-studied problem has produced numbers that look like the pattern the deals reveal. And of course the U.S. itself is no stranger to NTBs and procedural protectionism. Just ask our softwood lumber industry. What the emerging regime looks like most is affirmative action for American businesses. They evidently can't compete with wily foreigners deploying unfair practices against them. And they're unwilling to abide by the (presumably rigged) decisions of international trade tribunals set up, under U.S. leadership actually, to make sure governments discriminate as little as possible against one another's firms. Even as the Trump administration abolishes affirmative action from U.S. society in general, it imposes it in international trade. Also strange are the commitments by other countries to invest given dollar amounts in the U.S. and to buy given amounts of U.S. goods, especially Boeing aircraft. Japan's going to buy 100 Boeing planes (not clear yet whether doors will be extra) and invest $550 billion in the U.S., with the U.S. somehow getting 90 per cent of the profit on this investment. Details to follow. When we economists teach international trade theory we customarily talk about (to cite the classic example) Portugal selling wine to the U.K. in return for wool. But in the real world, the non-communist parts of it at least, countries generally don't buy and sell goods and services to each other. Rather, people and companies in their millions and billions decide what goods and services to buy and their accumulated choices generate the trade flows we see. That type of trade system accords very well with the traditionally very American view that governments should not run economies, people and businesses should, with the government restricting itself to policing property rights and providing good public services at a reasonable tax price. But now governments, America's included, apparently want to manage the intricate details of the supply chain. In support of the Trump tariffs, some American politicians say it's simply not efficient for car parts to cross the Canada-U.S. or U.S.-Mexico border several times before cars are complete, as sometimes happens. But who are they to say? Since 1965's Canada-U.S. Auto Pact car companies have decided, free of tariffs, how best to put cars together. If it made economic sense to make and assemble all the parts in one location — if that's what maxed out their profits — you can bet that's what they'd do. If they don't do that, it's because that isn't the most efficient way to do things, given costs, technologies and transportation costs. Politicians should stick to matters such as Jeffrey Epstein and let car companies figure out how best to make cars. Why have Americans traditionally resisted government micro-management of the economy? Have a listen to the soundtrack of Hamilton. Because they abhor the concentration of power in a politico-industrial complex. Because not even a stable genius in the White House — not to suggest that's what we have now — would be smart enough to outsmart the combined intelligence and creativity of the entire American population when channelled through price- and efficiency-revealing markets. And, finally, because the invisible hand of competition is the best way to restrain the grasping hand of corruption. Corruption is not unknown in the private sector, of course. Humans are humans everywhere and always prey to temptation. But if you have competition — which in a small country like Canada is often provided by imports and foreign investors — companies or individuals that go astray get punished in the marketplace. And decisions don't get made for political reasons. Donald Trump always says he wants Canadian auto jobs to move to Michigan and Ohio, which, no coincidence, are two battleground states. Every president, not just the transparently venal, will favour places he wants his party to win in the next election, whenever that is. The only way to avoid such corruption is to remove power from politicians and vest it in markets. William Watson: All checks, no balances here in Nastyland William Watson: Our better-funded military will need to be more lethal I do understand such arguments are in disfavour at the moment. I bet the future vindicates them, as it always does. But the process won't be fun. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Video: Inter and Atalanta directors arrive as crucial Lookman talks expected
Inter President Beppe Marotta and Atalanta CEO Luca Percassi have both arrived for a meeting of the Serie A league council on Tuesday, where it is expected that crucial talks for Ademola Lookman will take place. Watch: Inter and Atalanta directors arrive ahead of Lookman talks A customary Lega Serie A meeting is taking place in the city of Milan on Tuesday. The meeting is thought to be of particular interest to Inter and Atalanta, who both have directors in attendance as transfer talks for African player of the year Lookman heat up. ⚫️🔵Beppe Marotta in Lega: la domanda è sempre quella — Daniele Mari July 29, 2025 …e arriva subito dopo Luca Percassi — Daniele Mari July 29, 2025 According to various outlets in Italy, the Nerazzurri are expected to come back in with a new and improved bid for the 27-year-old in the imminent future. BERGAMO, ITALY – MARCH 01: Ademola Lookman of Atalanta is challenged by Hans Nicolussi Caviglia of Venezia during the Serie A match between Atalanta and Venezia at Gewiss Stadium on March 01, 2025 in Bergamo, Italy. (Photo by) Atalanta are reportedly holding out for a price tag of €50m, which means that an offer of €45m plus €5m in bonuses could be enough to strike an agreement. Marotta has already suggested that the matter will be closed 'in two to three days' either way.
