Tackling the gender inequality issue in the South African workplace
Pay disparity is huge in South Africa, affecting women's quality of life
Reports on the pay gender gap show that South African women have a salary that is 23%-35% lower than men having the same role. This significantly hinders women's wealth creation trajectory in the country, leading to inequalities that can become exponential in the long run. In the broader society, undervaluing the professional contribution of African women can also take a toll on their mental health, at the same time affecting their extended families and children. The pay disparity issue is major, and it is unfair to think how this discrimination limits women from achieving a better quality of life – especially when they do have the skills required to build successful careers.
For instance,
African women are underrepresented in leadership positions
While African women are part of the country's workforce, only 7% of JSE-listed organisations have women working as executives. But this is a minor percentage, and having more women in leadership is essential to drive change in South African workplaces. The lack of women in roles requiring decision-making skills stifles innovation, enforcing a male-dominated culture, which only perpetuates gender inequality. Tackling this issue ultimately comes down to promoting diversity and inclusion in the workplace – that's the only way women (and society) can progress.
Different barriers prevent women from joining corporate boards in the country. Firstly, the business culture is a significant factor, as from a historical perspective, African women have experienced high rates of unemployment, financial dependence and even
Caregiving duties place significant pressure on African women
The best work environments are those where employers feel like their well-being matters and where they don't have to
Their caregiving duties significantly impact their professional lives and their ability to earn an income. They feel pressured to meet all the expectations, and finding a balance between professional and personal life gets too overwhelming. There is also a dichotomy between women's earning and spending that needs to be considered. While they are the ones to make most decisions regarding household purchases, women generate less income than their husbands, which can cause tension in the relationship. Women are considered less than ideal workers due to their responsibilities, and of course, achieving equity in the workplace will never be possible if women are excluded only because they have children to look after. Hence, it becomes essential to accommodate
Creating equitable and diverse workplaces in the African society: a matter of collective commitment
South Africa is clearly moving in the right direction when it comes to gender equality, but there's still a lot to be done to bridge the gender gap. Companies need to do their own part in achieving this goal by prioritising the search for female talent to fulfil executive roles. In the long run, a culture shift would be required to remove stereotypes and gender biases in the workplace. However, this change is a significant one, and it will likely take time to be implemented.
As the world becomes more and more uncertain, it's essential to have leaders who can lead with empathy and inform through honest and effective communication. And women demonstrate these strengths, making them suitable for leadership positions. Hence, organisations, policymakers, and society should work together to overcome all those barriers and build workplaces that support everyone's contribution, no matter their gender. Only by tackling the gender diversity issue in South Africa can the country thrive and tap into the full potential of its female top talent. It's important to remember that women are just as capable as men, and they deserve a chance at a better quality of life, so to see change, it's essential to work on challenging stereotypes effectively.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
2 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Cannabis reform without legal legitimacy is an illusion
Commercialisation of the trade requires cohesive regulation. File photo South Africa's cannabis economy is poised for transformation, but it is being built on a legal contradiction. The department of trade, industry and competition has proposed a national licensing authority and commercialisation framework. Yet the Cannabis for Private Purposes Act (CfPPA) of 2024 still prohibits all forms of cannabis trade, cultivation for profit and distribution. This is not a technical oversight. It is a constitutional fault line. We cannot licence what the law criminalises. Until the Act is amended to include commercial provisions or a new enabling Cannabis Commercialisation Act is passed, the department's proposals remain legally unenforceable. Officials risk overreach. Entrepreneurs face uncertainty. People are left in limbo. Even the government acknowledges this. In a parliamentary Q&A session in June, the department's minister, Parks Tau, said: 'It is the intention of the [department] to address this aspect as soon as cannabis has effectively been removed from the Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act.' While this reflects a degree of momentum, it's legally insufficient. Removing cannabis from the Drugs Act may lift criminalisation, but the CfPPA continues to prohibit dealing, trading and cultivation for commercial gain. In short, even if cannabis is no longer classified as a drug, it still cannot be sold or licensed under the Cannabis for Private Purposes Act when the Act comes into operation. This legal misalignment has real-world consequences. The department's policy framework, while ambitious, suffers from structural blind spots: It focuses narrowly on licensing without transitional support for informal traders; It fails to protect small-scale cultivators from being displaced by large corporations; It omits regulatory clarity around cannabis clubs and urban dispensaries; It overlooks enforcement coordination across the South African Police Service, municipalities, and regulatory bodies; and It excludes meaningful integration of indigenous knowledge systems into product development. One major omission is the legal ambiguity about cannabis clubs, private collectives facilitating cultivation and sharing among adult members. Since the Haze Club case was dismissed in 2022 and its appeal withdrawn in 2024, the status of grow clubs remains undefined. This vacuum has enabled the proliferation of illicit urban clubs and pseudo-dispensaries selling untested products to non-members, tourists and minors, often with no age verification or dosage controls. What South Africa needs is regulatory clarity, not criminal silence. Rather than banning cannabis clubs outright or letting them proliferate unchecked, the law should define them, regulate them and use them as strategic tools within a broader commercialisation policy. Ignoring their existence only empowers the illicit market. South Africa must not repeat the mistakes seen elsewhere. In Thailand, decriminalisation without proper controls led to youth exposure and market chaos. The government reversed its policy in 2025, reclassifying cannabis as a controlled herb, shuttering thousands of dispensaries, and leaving farmers in limbo. In Italy, a sudden 2025 ban on low-THC products erased billions in legal revenue, criminalised compliant retailers, and triggered European Union-level legal challenges. In the United States, fragmented state-by-state regulation has caused enforcement confusion, increased youth access, and resurgence of illicit trade, particularly in states failing to fund education and safety programmes. In Canada, even with national legalisation, spikes in underage consumption, impaired driving and workplace incidents exposed the limits of reform absent cultural readiness and public health investment. And in Mexico, international price competition with the US led to cannabis crop abandonment, pushing rural farmers into more dangerous illicit drug markets. The common thread across these countries? Commercialisation without cohesive regulation, especially about cultivation, processing, distribution, retail, enforcement, education and cultural integration. Cannabis is not just a commodity. It's a cultural and constitutional indicator, reflecting whether we are capable of reform that is inclusive, ethical and enforceable. A well-regulated industry could empower rural cooperatives, restore trust with legacy growers, elevate local brands on the global stage and reduce harm in urban youth sectors. Properly regulated cannabis clubs offer promise. If legally recognised and governed, they could provide: controlled, adult-only access aligned with privacy rights; peer-based harm reduction and responsible usage education; traceable supply chains that reduce street-level trade; municipal licensing opportunities and tax reinvestment models; the promotion of community accountability and reinvestment; and entry-level platforms for small-scale cultivators operating in compliant, cooperative models. The time has come to move beyond fragmented intent. Commercialisation needs: Legislative legitimacy: Amend the CfPPA or pass a Cannabis Commercialisation Act; End-to-end value chain governance: Link licensing to retail, enforcement, and branding; Transitional and inclusive models: Support informal traders and vulnerable communities; Cannabis club regulation: Recognise and govern clubs under civic and constitutional frameworks; Enforcement clarity: Align the police, municipalities and DTIC to police illicit trade and protect minors and the vulnerable; and Ethical branding and indigenous knowledge integration: Elevate products that reflect our biodiversity and cultural heritage. Develop premium South African cannabis products for global markets. South Africa can build a cannabis economy that is just, lawful, inclusive, and resilient. But it starts with fixing the foundation. Anything less is not reform. It is an illusion.' Adv Simi Pillay-van Graan is the chief executive of Trikar Enterprise Solutions.
Mail & Guardian
3 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Nkabane's axing saves budget as first phase of Appropriations Bill is approved
Former minister of higher education Nobuhle Nkabane. (X) The National Assembly has approved the 2025-26 Appropriations Bill by 262 votes to 90, pushing through the first step in finalising the national budget, despite tension in the All 10 parties that form the GNU — the ANC, Democratic Alliance (DA), Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP), Patriotic Alliance (PA), Freedom Front Plus (FF+), Good party, Rise Mzansi, the African Christian Democratic Party (ACDP), the United Democratic Movement (UDM) and Al Jama-ah — supported the Bill. The vote followed a day-long sitting at the Cape Town International Convention Centre, where Deputy Finance Minister 'Without passing this Bill, the government will lose authority to spend beyond 45% of last year's budget after July,' Masondo said. This meant departments would not be able to pay salaries or sustain basic services. He urged MPs to stay focused and ensure that service delivery was not interrupted. 'This Bill must be passed in full to allow departments to function properly,' he said. The Bill allocates R1.2 trillion over the medium term. Of this, R400 billion has been earmarked for transport infrastructure, R220 billion for energy initiatives and R160 billion for water and sanitation. Additional funds have been allocated to public health, education and social protection. MPs were allowed to indicate if they wished to vote differently from their party, but none did. Committee chairperson Mmusi Maimane called for efficient governance despite the difficult economic conditions. 'This budget takes place under severely constrained economic conditions. We must ensure our budgeting processes are efficient so that the people of South Africa can participate fully in their own appropriation.' Despite the passage of the Bill, the debate exposed tensions in the coalition government partners, with DA MP Andrew Whitfield making it clear that support for the budget should not be mistaken for consensus. 'We don't need a national dialogue. We need more dialogue between the ANC and the DA,' he said, referring to unresolved tensions between the two parties over corrupt ministers in the ANC's ranks. The DA had initially signalled it would not support the individual budgets of departments implicated in corruption, but changed its mind after President Cyril Ramaphosa removed higher education minister Ramaphosa dismissed Nkabane earlier in the week and appointed her deputy, MPs warned Manamela that they would do to him what they did to Nkabane if he did not perform, with EFF MP Sihle Lonzi saying they would work with him because he had shown a willingness to fix students' accommodation problems at tertiary institutions and the dysfunction of the National Student Financial Aid Scheme. The Patriotic Alliance's Ashley Sauls criticised delays and politicking ahead of the Bill, arguing that the DA had only supported it after scoring political points against the ANC in the form of Nkabane's axing. 'What we've learnt through this process is that we've placed politics above people,' Sauls said. Good party leader Patricia de Lille said the Bill was necessary but insufficient. 'A basic income grant is not radical. What is radical is a country where half the population lives in poverty,' she said. Rise Mzansi leader Songezo Zibi said although the departmental budgets are not perfect, debating forever without supporting the Bill would imperil the poorest in the country. The IFP, FF+ and UDM, while supporting the Bill, raised concerns about the lack of targeted interventions, with IFP MP Nhlanhla Hadebe arguing that poverty and youth unemployment were not being adequately addressed. The Freedom Front Plus MP, Wouter Wessels, called for tighter fiscal controls, while the UDM's Nqabayomzi Kwankwa said the budget offered hope but fell short on public participation. 'The budget makes us feel like we are going to get there,' he said. The official opposition uMkhonto weSizwe party and Economic Freedom Fighters opposed the bill. EFF legislator Omphile Maotwe accused the coalition government of using the national budget to manage internal power plays. 'For the supervisors in the government on neoliberal unity, led by the chief supervisor Ms Helen Zille [the DA federal council chair] the budget is the tool to fight political squabbles,' Maotwe said. The MK party's Wesley Douglas described the Bill as 'morally indefensible', accusing the unity government of betraying its mandate, while the ATM's Vuyolwethu Zungula said white-owned businesses still retain 'a large portion of the state budget'. 'That is not transformation,' he said. The United Africans Transformation and National Coloured Congress parties also voted against the Bill, arguing it entrenched inequality and failed to break from 'neoliberal policies'. Attendance was decisive. Of the ANC's 159 MPs, 144 were present while the DA had 76 of 87 MPs in attendance. The IFP had 12 out of 17 and the PA's legislators were in full attendance, with all nine voting in favour of the budget. The FF Plus's five members were present and voted in favour. All ACDP, UDM, Rise Mzansi, Al Jama-ah, ActionSA and Build One South Africa MPs were also present. The Appropriations Bill now proceeds to its second stage, which involves detailed vote-by-vote scrutiny of departmental allocations. The final reading is expected before the end of the month, after which the Bill will be sent to the National Council of Provinces for concurrence.
eNCA
4 hours ago
- eNCA
Freezing of assets on the line as US moves to sanction ANC officals
JOHANNESBURG - A US bill targeting South Africa has cleared its first legislative hurdle. The US South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act of 2025 calls for a full review of ties and possible sanctions against some ANC officials. International Relations expert Dr. Kingsley Makhubela says the sanctions could have dire consequences for those officials, including the freezing of assets held abroad and a ban on travel to the US. He says the bill would also require the US administration to re-evaluate its overall foreign policy stance toward South Africa. A key concern is the potential threat to the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), a cornerstone of US-Africa trade that allows select African countries, including South Africa, preferential access to US markets with few or no tariffs to export there. AGOA is seen as crucial to driving investment. The House Foreign Affairs Committee approved the bill on Tuesday, with a majority of lawmakers on the committee objecting to South Africa's close ties with Russia and China. The committee chairman, Brian Mast, added that the ANC's direct engagement with Hamas leaders and the country's case against Israel at the International Court of Justice are further proof of worsening relations between South Africa and the US. Makhubela says it's urgent that South Africa adopts a foreign policy strategy to navigate its relationship with the US. However, internal divisions within the Government of National Unity (GNU) are making this difficult.
