SHAREHOLDER INVESTIGATION: Halper Sadeh LLC Investigates VBTX, HMST, VRNA, STR on Behalf of Shareholders
Veritex Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: VBTX)'s sale to Huntington Bancshares Incorporated. Under the terms of the agreement, Huntington will issue 1.95 shares for each outstanding share of Veritex. If you are a Veritex shareholder, click here to learn more about your legal rights and options.
HomeStreet, Inc. (NASDAQ: HMST)'s merger with Mechanics Bank. The proposed transaction values HomeStreet at a pre-transaction estimated equity value of $300 million. Upon completion of the proposed transaction, HomeStreet shareholders are expected to own approximately 8.3% of the combined company. If you are a HomeStreet shareholder, click here to learn more about your rights and options.
Verona Pharma plc (NASDAQ: VRNA)'s sale to Merck for $107.00 per American Depository Share. If you are a Verona shareholder, click here to learn more about your legal rights and options.
Sitio Royalties Corp. (NYSE: STR)'s merger with Viper Energy, Inc. If you are a Sitio shareholder, click here to learn more about your legal rights and options.
Halper Sadeh LLC may seek increased consideration for shareholders, additional disclosures and information concerning the proposed transaction, or other relief and benefits on behalf of shareholders. We would handle the action on a contingent fee basis, whereby you would not be responsible for out-of-pocket payment of our legal fees or expenses.
Shareholders are encouraged to contact the firm free of charge to discuss their legal rights and options. Please call Daniel Sadeh or Zachary Halper at (212) 763-0060 or email sadeh@halpersadeh.com or zhalper@halpersadeh.com.
Halper Sadeh LLC represents investors all over the world who have fallen victim to securities fraud and corporate misconduct. Our attorneys have been instrumental in implementing corporate reforms and recovering millions of dollars on behalf of defrauded investors.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Contact Information:Halper Sadeh LLCDaniel Sadeh, Esq.Zachary Halper, Esq.(212) 763-0060sadeh@halpersadeh.comzhalper@halpersadeh.com https://www.halpersadeh.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
14 minutes ago
- The Star
Intel shares slide on quarterly loss, foundry business exit risk
FILE PHOTO: A smartphone with a displayed Intel logo is placed on a computer motherboard in this illustration taken March 6, 2023. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/ File Photo (Reuters) -Intel shares fell 5% in premarket trading on Friday after the chipmaker forecast steeper-than-expected quarterly losses and warned of a potential exit from its foundry business despite new CEO Lip-Bu Tan's turnaround plans. Tan on Thursday hinted at departing from ex-CEO Pat Gelsinger's core strategy, warning that without demand-backed investment, Intel risks exiting the foundry business, jeopardizing $100 billion in assets and increasing its reliance on TSMC. As part of its foundry business reform, the company may reserve the advanced 18A manufacturing process for its products and proceed with 14A only if a major external partner commits, Tan stated in a post-conference call. "Intel Foundry is a big story, and currently people are questioning how successful 18A is. A failure in 18A would be a broken story," said Hendi Susanto, portfolio manager at Gabelli Funds. Intel also halted or scrapped several fab projects in the U.S. and Europe, citing financial discipline. Once a leader in American chipmaking, Intel has lost ground after years of strategic missteps, lagging far behind rivals Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices. The company's stock has gained 12.8% so far this year, while Nvidia and AMD have jumped about 30% and 34%, respectively. Since taking the helm in March, Tan has divested businesses, laid off employees and redirected resources as part of his strategic reset to revive the embattled chipmaker. "There are no more blank checks," Tan wrote in a memo to employees on Thursday, announcing further job cuts as Intel aims to reduce its workforce by 22% to 75,000 by year-end. "I don't think he's scaling back… I think they're maybe redirecting. I would prefer them to build it out, but only if they have customer commitments," said Ryuta Makino, analyst at Gabelli Funds, who's also an Intel shareholder. Intel trades at a 12-month forward price-to-earnings ratio of 42.55 versus 33.90 for Nvidia and 32.12 for AMD. (Reporting by Rashika Singh and Arsheeya Bajwa in Bengaluru, Samuel Indyk in London; Editing by Amanda Cooper and Vijay Kishore)
Malaysian Reserve
6 hours ago
- Malaysian Reserve
Cars.com to Announce Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results
CHICAGO, July 24, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Inc. (NYSE: CARS) (d/b/a 'Cars Commerce Inc' or the 'Company'), an audience-driven technology company empowering the automotive industry, today announced that it expects to report its financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2025, on Thursday, August 7, 2025. The Company will host a conference call with a live webcast at 8:00 a.m. CT/9:00 a.m. ET on the same day to discuss the results. The conference call will be hosted by Chief Executive Officer, Alex Vetter and Chief Financial Officer, Sonia Jain. Those interested are invited to listen to the live webcast online at A webcast replay will be available shortly afterwards by visiting Events on the Investor Relations website. ABOUT CARS COMMERCE Cars Commerce is an audience-driven technology company empowering the automotive industry. The Company simplifies everything about car buying and selling with powerful products, solutions and AI-driven technologies that span pretail, retail and post-sale activities – enabling more efficient and profitable retail operations. The Cars Commerce platform is organized around industry-leading brands such as the flagship automotive marketplace and dealer reputation site award-winning website and digital retail technology and marketing services from Dealer Inspire, essential trade-in and appraisal technology from AccuTrade, a reputation-based dealer-to-dealer wholesale auction from DealerClub and exclusive in-market media solutions from the Cars Commerce Media Network. Learn more at
The Star
7 hours ago
- The Star
Trump's order to block 'woke' AI in government encourages tech giants to censor their chatbots
Tech companies looking to sell their artificial intelligence technology to the US federal government must now contend with a new regulatory hurdle: prove their chatbots aren't "woke.' President Donald Trump's sweeping new plan to counter China in achieving "global dominance' in AI promises to cut regulations and cement American values into the AI tools increasingly used at work and home. But one of Trump's three AI executive orders signed July 23 – the one "preventing woke AI in the federal government' – marks the first time the US government has explicitly tried to shape the ideological behavior of AI. Several leading providers of the AI language models targeted by the order – products like Google's Gemini and Microsoft's Copilot – have so far been silent on Trump's anti-woke directive, which still faces a study period before it gets into official procurement rules. While the tech industry has largely welcomed Trump's broader AI plans, the anti-woke order forces the industry to leap into a culture war battle – or try their best to quietly avoid it. "It will have massive influence in the industry right now,' especially as tech companies are already capitulating to other Trump administration directives, said civil rights advocate Alejandra Montoya-Boyer, senior director of The Leadership Conference's Center for Civil Rights and Technology. The move also pushes the tech industry to abandon years of work to combat the pervasive forms of racial and gender bias that studies and real-world examples have shown to be baked into AI systems. "First off, there's no such thing as woke AI,' Montoya-Boyer said. "There's AI technology that discriminates and then there's AI technology that actually works for all people.' Moulding the behaviours of AI large language models is challenging because of the way they're built and the inherent randomness of what they produce. They've been trained on most of what's on the internet, reflecting the biases of all the people who've posted commentary, edited a Wikipedia entry or shared images online. "This will be extremely difficult for tech companies to comply with,' said former Biden official Jim Secreto, who was deputy chief of staff to U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo, an architect of many of Biden's AI industry initiatives. "Large language models reflect the data they're trained on, including all the contradictions and biases in human language.' Tech workers also have a say in how they're designed, from the global workforce of annotators who check their responses to the Silicon Valley engineers who craft the instructions for how they interact with people. Trump's order targets those "top-down' efforts at tech companies to incorporate what it calls the "destructive' ideology of diversity, equity and inclusion into AI models, including "concepts like critical race theory, transgenderism, unconscious bias, intersectionality, and systemic racism.' For Secreto, the order resembles China's playbook in "using the power of the state to stamp out what it sees as disfavored viewpoints." The method is different, with China relying on direct regulation through its Cyberspace Administration, which audits AI models, approves them before they are deployed and requires them to filter out banned content such as the bloody Tiananmen Square crackdown on pro-democracy protests in 1989. Trump's order doesn't call for any such filters, relying on tech companies to instead show that their technology is ideologically neutral by disclosing some of the internal policies that guide the chatbots. "The Trump administration is taking a softer but still coercive route by using federal contracts as leverage,' Secreto said. "That creates strong pressure for companies to self-censor in order to stay in the government's good graces and keep the money flowing.' The order's call for "truth-seeking' AI echoes the language of the president's one-time ally and adviser Elon Musk, who frequently uses that phrase as the mission for the Grok chatbot made by his company xAI. But whether Grok or its rivals will be favored under the new policy remains to be seen. Despite a "rhetorically pointed' introduction laying out the Trump administration's problems with DEI, the actual language of the order's directives shouldn't be hard for tech companies to comply with, said Neil Chilson, a Republican former chief technologist for the Federal Trade Commission. "It doesn't even prohibit an ideological agenda,' just that any intentional methods to guide the model be disclosed, said Chilson, who is now head of AI policy at the nonprofit Abundance Institute. "Which is pretty light touch, frankly.' Chilson disputes comparisons to China's cruder modes of AI censorship. "There is nothing in this order that says that companies have to produce or cannot produce certain types of output,' he said. "It says developers shall not intentionally encode partisan or ideological judgments. That's the exact opposite of the Chinese requirement.' So far, tech companies that have praised Trump's broader AI plans haven't said much about the order. OpenAI on Thursday said it is awaiting more detailed guidance but believes its work to make ChatGPT objective already makes the technology consistent with what the order requires. Microsoft, a major supplier of email, cloud computing and other online services to the federal government, declined to comment Thursday. Musk's xAI, through spokesperson Katie Miller, a former Trump official, pointed to a company comment praising Trump's AI announcements as a "positive step' but didn't respond to a follow-up question about how Grok would be affected. xAI recently announced it was awarded a U.S. defense contract for up to US$200mil, just days after Grok publicly posted a barrage of antisemitic commentary that praised Adolf Hitler. Anthropic, Google, Meta, and Palantir didn't immediately respond to emailed requests for comment Thursday. AI tools are already widely used in the federal government, including AI platforms such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini for internal agency support to summarize the key points of a lengthy report. The ideas behind the order have bubbled up for more than a year on the podcasts and social media feeds of Trump's top AI adviser David Sacks and other influential Silicon Valley venture capitalists, many of whom endorsed Trump's presidential campaign last year. Much of their ire centered on Google's February 2024 release of an AI image-generating tool that produced historically inaccurate images before the tech giant took down and fixed the product. Google later explained that the errors – including one user's request for American Founding Fathers that generated portraits of Black, Asian and Native American men – were the result of an overcompensation for technology that, left to its own devices, was prone to favoring lighter-skinned people because of pervasive bias in the systems. Trump allies alleged that Google engineers were hard-coding their own social agenda into the product, and made it a priority to do something about it. "It's 100% intentional,' said prominent venture capitalist and Trump adviser Marc Andreessen on a podcast in December. "That's how you get Black George Washington at Google. There's override in the system that basically says, literally, 'Everybody has to be Black.' Boom. There's squads, large sets of people, at these companies who determine these policies and write them down and encode them into these systems.' Sacks credited a conservative strategist who has fought DEI initiatives at colleges and workplaces for helping to draft the order. "When they asked me how to define 'woke,' I said there's only one person to call: Chris Rufo. And now it's law: the federal government will not be buying WokeAI,' Sacks wrote on X. Rufo responded that, in addition to helping define the phrase, he also helped "identify DEI ideologies within the operating constitutions of these systems.' – AP
