How the Know-Nothings, Free Soilers and other third parties shaped US politics
From the Anti-Masonic Party in the early 1800s to last year's ill-fated No Labels, nascent political parties have been a near-constant feature of U.S. politics. Some are impactful, others ephemeral, but few endure for long.
Though the Republican and Democratic parties have had a lock on political power since the Civil War, they have remade themselves over and over, often when faced with the prospect of losing voters to third parties.
The name Musk chose, the America Party, is bland compared to some of history's more memorable movements — the Know-Nothing Party, the Bull Moose Party, the Dixiecrats.
Musk's plans remain murky, but some of his public comments suggest he's eying a limited goal, focusing on a handful of House races to gain influence without trying to win a majority.
'One way to execute on this would be to laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts,' Musk wrote on X. 'Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people.
Here's a look at how third parties have made their mark through American history, even without winning the White House or congressional majorities.
Anti-Masonic Party
The first third party, the Anti-Masons emerged in 1828 in opposition to the Freemasons, a secret society. The disappearance of William Morgan, a former Mason who had threatened to expose secrets, fueled widespread paranoia about the shadowy group, which many believed was covertly controlling the government.
The Anti-Masons evolved into a broadly anti-elite party. They were the first party to hold a convention to nominate a presidential candidate and to adopt a party platform, pioneering enduring staples of American democracy.
They held seats in the House for a decade, peaking at 25 after the 1832 election. That year, Anti-Mason presidential nominee William Wirt won Vermont, becoming the first third-party candidate to get electoral college votes, though his seven electoral votes did not affect Andrew Jackson's decisive victory over Henry Clay.
The Anti-Masons were largely absorbed into the Whig Party.
Free Soil Party
'Barnburner Democrats' and 'conscience Whigs,' anti-slavery factions, joined with remnants of the short-lived abolitionist Liberty Party to form the Free Soil Party after the Mexican American War. Free Soilers won a handful of House seats between 1848 and 1854.
Former President Martin Van Buren, who had served one term as a Democrat a decade earlier, was the Free Soil presidential nominee in 1848 but didn't win any electoral votes.
As the U.S. expanded westward, the Free Soil Party advocated banning slavery in the new territories but not abolishing it in the places it already existed. The party described its principles with the slogan 'free soil, free speech, free labor and free men.' Free Soilers pitched opposition to slavery on economic rather than moral grounds, arguing that expanding slavery would take jobs from Northern whites.
The party dissolved after the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 thrust slavery further into the political fray, upending the political coalitions. Despite its short life, however, the Free Soil Party laid the groundwork for the Republican Party.
'Know-Nothings'
The outgrowth of a secretive nativist movement, the anti-Catholic American Party opposed immigration, especially of Catholics. If asked about the party, members would say they 'know nothing,' leading to the nickname.
Know-Nothing nominee Millard Fillmore, a former Whig Party president, won Maryland and its eight electoral votes in the 1856 election.
Though they won only a handful of House seats, the Know-Nothings showed there was a deep interest in anti-immigration policies and the political salience of ethnic and religious divisions.
Populists
Agricultural distress late in the 19th century catalyzed the rise of the Populists, who advocated aggressive economic and political reforms.
Known formally as the People's Party, Populists wanted to nationalize railroads, enact a graduated income tax and directly elect senators. They supported the free coinage of silver in opposition to the gold standard's fixed monetary supply.
In the 1896 presidential election, the Populists cross-nominated Democratic nominee William Jennings Bryan, remembered for his 'Cross of Gold' speech calling for free silver. The movement was largely absorbed into the Democratic Party after that.
The party was a force in only two presidential elections, but many of its reforms — including a graduated income tax and the direct election of senators — were adopted during the later progressive era.
Progressive Party (Bull Moose Party)
The Bull Moose Party formed to back Teddy Roosevelt's 1912 campaign to return to the White House, which he ceded after losing the Republican nomination to William Howard Taft in 1908.
Roosevelt came in second in the electoral college, finishing ahead of Taft, by then the incumbent. Roosevelt's 88 electoral votes were the most ever won by a third-party presidential candidate. By splitting the Republican vote with Taft, he allowed Democrat Woodrow Wilson to win.
The Bull Moose platform included women's suffrage, an eight-hour workday and a crackdown on big business. Roosevelt's strong showing showed the popularity of such reforms, and many were later embraced by both major parties.
Dixiecrats
Southern Democrats opposed to civil rights legislation formed the segregationist States' Rights Democratic Party. Better known as the Dixiecrats, the party lasted for just one presidential election, nominating South Carolina Gov. Strom Thurmond, who won four Southern states in 1948.
The success of the Dixiecrats broke decades of Democratic dominance in the South and made clear that civil rights was a potent wedge issue, an insight that Richard Nixon would later exploit in his 'southern strategy' to win over white voters in the South.
Reform Party
Billionaire Ross Perot put fiscal conservatism at the center of his largely self-funded presidential campaigns in 1992 and 1996.
Perot won 19% of the popular vote in 1992, enough to help tilt the election to Bill Clinton. Perot's campaigns put a spotlight on the federal budget deficit and the growing national debt, a major force in 1990s policymaking.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jacob Soboroff To Join MSNBC As It Builds News Division In Advance Of Comcast Split
Jacob Soboroff will be part of the MSNBC team as it splits from Comcast and sister network NBC News later this year. Soboroff will serve as senior national and political correspondent for the network. More from Deadline Charlamagne Tha God Responds To Trump, Calls Out His "Authoritarian Strategy," But Adds, "I'm Rooting For You, But I Need You Focused" Senate Confirms Jeanine Pirro To Serve As U.S. Attorney For D.C. In Reaction To Dismal Jobs Report, Donald Trump Says He's Ordered Commissioner Of Labor Statistics To Be Fired As NBC News political and national correspondent, Soboroff has covered presidential campaigns and elections, the family separation crisis of 2018, and appeared as a correspondent and fill-in anchor on Today. He covered the Los Angeles wildfires earlier this year, with personal accounts of its impact on his hometown. The fires will be the subject of an upcoming book, Firestorm, to be published on Jan. 6. Soboroff also has been reporting on the ICE raids in Los Angeles, building on his experience covering immigration. He wrote the book Separated: Inside an American Tragedy, and was executive producer of Errol Morris' documentary Separated, based on his work. Soboroff first joined MSNBC in 2015. He'll be part of the network's live event, MSNBCLIVE '25, on Oct. 11. MSNBC will be part of Versant, the newly named comoany that will include former Comcast cable channels and other assets. With NBC News no longer as a sister network, MSNBC has been building up its own news division. Best of Deadline 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Emmys, Oscars, Grammys & More
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fmr. Commerce Sec. Wilbur Ross explains Trump's BLS suspicions
Tariffs on countries like Japan and Switzerland remain in place as Trump pushes to improve the US trade balance. Wilbur Ross, former US Commerce Secretary, joins Opening Bid to discuss trade policy and prospects for a China deal. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Opening Bid. So what's next on the trade deal front? Want to welcome back onto Opening Bid, longtime investor Wilbur Ross. Mr. Ross served as the U.S. Commerce Secretary in President Trump's first term and has had a close relationship with the president for decades. Mr. Secretary, always nice to get some time with you. Appreciate you coming on here. Um, before we get into the topic of trade, I'm sure you've seen what's been going on, uh, with the president, uh, dismissing or firing the BLS commissioner. You know, you're a longtime investor. Do you still believe that the economic data coming out of the government? Well, I think what is a little bit suspicious about the most recent BLS data is it came out shortly after the Fed FOMC meeting where Trump was hoping to get rates reduced. And clearly, if the two big revisions had come out before the meeting, it would have been more likely that the FOMC would cut rates. And that's the second time that that sort of suspicious behavior occurred. Remember, just before the presidential election, they also had two months of very good, uh, labor results, and then a day or two after the election, they made a massive correction in both months. Again, had that been out before the election, it would have been helpful to Trump. So, I can understand why he would be suspicious at least of the timing as to whether the underlying data themselves are correct. I I would really have no way to know. But it is a little spooky that there were two recent events, big numbers, big changes, uh, that could have helped Trump, had they been more timely. Do you believe, uh, Mr. Secretary, uh, before we get into the trade, I, like the president, noted on Friday after the numbers were hit, that this data is rigged, not only the jobs data, but perhaps other data that the government provides? Well, I think that's just speculation. Um, I certainly never tried to influence the data that came out of the Bureau of Economic Analysis, which is part of Department of Commerce. We never had any problems like that during my term. But we also never had the kinds of events that I just described to you that naturally make one a little suspicious. Mr. Secretary, on the on the trade front, um, since we last talked, tariffs have stayed in place for many countries. I mentioned Japan at 15%, Switzerland now at 39%. Are tariffs the new normal for the duration of the president's, uh, second term here in your view? Or is there an opportunity to take these 15% tariff rates that that Japan is now paying and negotiate them down further? Well, I think the president has made clear that if there are further reductions by other countries, that he would take that into account. So, his target is really improving our balance of trade. That's one of his major objectives. And that can either be done by holding back the trade of foreign countries through tariffs or by everybody cutting it together. So, I think trade policy will continue to be a centerpiece of his administration, but that doesn't mean everything will be increasing. What gets, uh, a deal with China over the finish line? Well, China, as you know, is going to be having their big party Congress very, very shortly. And, as you may know, I've felt for some time that it was unlikely that they would make a radical change in policy before the Party Congress. They don't normally do that. And, uh, I think that Congress is either this week or next week. So, we should know pretty soon if anything different will come out of that. But certainly, the news that was out today about the critical materials, uh, being still restricted, that was not very encouraging. Uh, Mr. Secretary, the fact that China has not solidified a deal with the U.S. on trade, is it likely then that its tariff rate will be higher than what we saw, uh, from the likes of Japan and, of course, the European Union? Well, it's up pretty high right now. And it's, um, I I don't know whether he would make it even higher, but, you know, once you get to about 30 or so percent on the tariffs, it doesn't make too much difference if you go beyond because 30 odd percent is very, very hard for a country to absorb. And as a result, 30 or so percent is the demarcation between are you going to be doing trade with them or not. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Media CEO Nunes loses defamation lawsuit over Rachel Maddow show
By Jonathan Stempel NEW YORK (Reuters) -A federal judge dismissed a defamation lawsuit by Devin Nunes, the former California congressman and now chief executive of Trump Media and Technology Group, against NBCUniversal over a comment by Rachel Maddow about his dealings with a suspected Russian agent. U.S. District Judge Kevin Castel in Manhattan ruled on Friday that no reasonable jury could find Maddow demonstrated actual malice toward Nunes in March 2021 when discussing a package addressed to him from pro-Russia Ukrainian legislator Andrii Derkach on MSNBC's "The Rachel Maddow Show." Nunes received the package in December 2019, when the Republican was the ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Maddow told viewers that Nunes "refused to hand it over to the FBI, which is what you should do if you get something from somebody who is sanctioned by the U.S. as a Russian agent." Nunes said Maddow knew the package was turned over promptly. She and her executive producer, who were not defendants, claimed to rely on other sources when creating the segment. NBCUniversal is a unit of Comcast. In a 24-page decision, Castel said Nunes, a longtime supporter of U.S. President Donald Trump, failed to show Maddow was aware of a July 2020 article in Politico saying the FBI had received the package. The judge found no clear and convincing evidence that Maddow had a "high degree of awareness of probable falsity," or any evidence that "defendant's admitted political bias caused defendant to act with a reckless disregard of the truth." Nunes' lawyers and Trump Media did not immediately respond on Monday to requests for comment. Lawyers for NBCUniversal did not immediately respond to similar requests. The U.S. Treasury Department sanctioned Derkach in September 2020 for trying to interfere in that year's U.S. presidential election to help Trump, who lost to Democrat Joe Biden. Federal prosecutors in Brooklyn, New York charged Derkach in December 2022 with unrelated money laundering and sanctions violations. He remains at large. The case is Nunes v NBCUniversal Media Inc, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 22-01633.