logo
Sheva Koliwada women's group to launch indefinite JNPA channel blockade from August 15 over long-standing rehabilitation issues

Sheva Koliwada women's group to launch indefinite JNPA channel blockade from August 15 over long-standing rehabilitation issues

The Hindu5 days ago
Citing decades of unresolved grievances, the Sheva Koliwada Displaced Women's Organisation has announced an indefinite agitation to block the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Authority (JNPA) channel starting August 15, 2025. The protest is aimed at drawing attention to alleged administrative negligence and broken rehabilitation promises made to villagers displaced by the JNPT port project in Uran.
The organisation has accused the Raigad district collector, Kishan Javale, of failing to conduct a promised meeting to resolve critical issues relating to rehabilitation, fraud, the status of Hanuman Koliwada Gram Panchayat, and civic amenities at the transition camp.
The residents allege that although 17 hectares of land were earmarked for resettlement via a 1987 government notification, 15 hectares were later handed over to the Forest Department in 2022, without formally cancelling the original allocation. Kalyani P. Koli leading the protest said, 'This, they claim, has left 256 families—both farmers and non-farmers—without legal documents confirming their property rights even after 43 years of displacement.'
'The district collector has never visited the transition camp, despite repeated appeals,' said the organisation in its statement, adding that multiple letters and reminders since June 2025 have gone unanswered.
The group has also raised questions about the legitimacy of the Hanuman Koliwada Gram Panchayat, labelling it 'bogus' and citing a 1995 notification that they say was never officially annulled. They allege that police force was used to conduct elections and manipulate voter rolls in areas already under the jurisdiction of Uran Nagar Parishad, leading to illegal dual representation.
On November 20, 2024, The Hindu reported on how party workers tried to force them to vote. In June 2025, the residents moved the Bombay High Court over their four-decade of wait for rehabilitation.
Further, the organisation has accused government officials and law enforcement authorities of conspiring to defame and dismantle a women's water committee, which had been independently collecting dues for water supply in the transition camp. 'A gram sabha held under police protection in May 2025 reportedly passed a resolution maligning the committee's work,' Ms. Koli said.
The displaced families have also raised concerns about political interference in sarpanch reservations, alleging that quotas meant for Scheduled Tribes women were arbitrarily changed, thereby disenfranchising the rightful claimants.
Ms. Koli said, 'The Union Minister of Ports, Shipping and Waterways, Sarbananda Sonowal, had promised in January this year that land issues would be resolved within three months, a deadline that has lapsed with no action taken. JNPA Chairman's written assurance that land distribution would be completed by May 31 also remains unfulfilled as of July.'
A report submitted to the Centre in May by the Tehsildar of Uran reportedly acknowledged that the 0.91 hectares of land allocated to the displaced is inadequate and adversely impacts their socio-economic and health conditions. 'Despite this, no follow-up action has been taken,' she added.
Adding to the frustration is the alleged lack of basic amenities in the transition camp. The group claimed that since August 2024, after the District Collector and JNPA took over camp management, there has been no improvement in water supply, sanitation, or transparency in property valuation. A survey conducted by the Public Works Department in December to assess compensation value for homes and structures has not been disclosed to the affected families.
'The administration has turned a blind eye to our plight. The indefinite channel closure from August 15 is a last resort to demand justice,' the women's organisation stated, warning that essential port operations may be affected if their concerns continue to be ignored.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Another day, another adjournment
Another day, another adjournment

The Hindu

time13 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Another day, another adjournment

A continuing deadlock between the Treasury and the Opposition led to Wednesday's sitting mimicking that of Tuesday wherein continual protests from members of the Opposition led to as many as three adjournments before both houses called it a day. The Opposition continued to press the treasury for a discussion on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. As reported earlier, the revision exercise has ignited concerns about potential disenfranchisement with the process itself being allegedly mired in confusion and politics. Further aggravating concerns of the Opposition, the Election Commission has indicated that exercise would also be carried out in poll-bound states of West Bengal and Assam, among other states. In a social media post, Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi alleged the larger paradigm related to electoral malpractice and rigging. He held similar 'match fixing' took place in Maharashtra and Karnataka. 'In Bihar, votes of SC, ST, OBC and minority brothers and sisters are being stolen in the name of SIR,' he argued. The SIR is not the only point of contention this Session. The Opposition is also pressuring the government to hold a discussion on Operation Sindoor and the terrorist attack in Pahalgam. Though the treasury had affirmed their commitment for the discussion, a definite time and date was not ascertained. The paradigm however appeared to be heading for a conclusive end yesterday. The Hindu learnt that the Business Advisory Committee of the Rajya Sabha concurred for a 16-hour discussion on the subject next week, in line with the decision in the Lok Sabha. The house of Elders will initiate the discussion on Tuesday (July 29) a day after the Lok Sabha. However, there was no assurance forthcoming for a discussion on the electoral revision exercise in Bihar. Several proposed legislations find themselves entangled in the deadlock. Among them being a bill that seeks to accord reserved seats to members of the Scheduled Tribes in the Goan legislative assembly. Notwithstanding their population (about 1.5 lakh; as per the Primary Census Abstract, 2011), at present the state legislative assembly does not accord any reserved seats to STs. The bill seeks to readjust this paradigm. Do consider reading The Hindu's detailed reportage for deeper insights. The Sports Governance Bill is another crucial legislation mired in the stalemate. It seeks to lighten the load on the judiciary by instituting a Sports Tribunal, headed by a Supreme Court judge, to ensure speedy redressal of disputes. Kamlesh Srinivasan's reportage had pointed out that many National Sports Federations are caught in legal tussles that have been dragging on for years. Thus, harming their sport. With adjournments having marred proceedings in the initial three days, it would be poignant to see if any of the legislations find passage on Thursday. More importantly, how the discussions are facilitated to potentially bring an end to the impasse. Do follow our live coverage for real time updates on what transpires in the legislative corridors today. Until next time.

Complainant's SC/ST Status Alone Cannot Trigger Atrocities Act, Says Supreme Court
Complainant's SC/ST Status Alone Cannot Trigger Atrocities Act, Says Supreme Court

News18

time14 hours ago

  • News18

Complainant's SC/ST Status Alone Cannot Trigger Atrocities Act, Says Supreme Court

The SC has reiterated that the offence must be committed specifically on grounds of the victim's caste or tribal identity for the Act to apply The Supreme Court (SC) recently held that the mere fact of a complainant belonging to a Scheduled Caste (SC) or Scheduled Tribe (ST) community is not sufficient to attract the provisions of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The Court has reiterated that the offence must be committed specifically on grounds of the victim's caste or tribal identity for the Act to apply. The judgment was delivered on July 22, by a bench comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and Sandeep Mehta. The SC was hearing a petition challenging the initiation of criminal proceedings under Section 3(1)(r) of the SC/ST Act, along with sections 294, 323 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), arising from a domestic dispute between a man and his estranged wife. The appellant had approached the SC seeking quashing of the proceedings, arguing that there was no caste-based element to the dispute and that the SC/ST Act had been wrongly invoked. The Madhya Pradesh High Court had earlier declined to interfere with the criminal proceedings. Setting aside the High Court's order, the Supreme Court clarified that for an offence to fall within the purview of Section 3(1)(r) of the SC/ST Act, there must be a specific intention to insult or intimidate a person belonging to the SC or ST communities, and such conduct must occur in a place within public view. More importantly, the insult or intimidation must be 'on the ground that such person is a member of a Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled Tribe". The bench observed that the statute cannot be invoked solely because the complainant is a member of a protected community. The underlying motivation behind the alleged act must be to target the individual due to their caste identity. In the absence of such intent, the invocation of the SC/ST Act would not be legally sustainable. In the present case, the Court found that the allegations arose out of a matrimonial discord and that there was no specific averment or material to show that the alleged abuse or insult was targeted at the complainant because of her caste. The complaint lacked any assertion that the alleged acts were committed with caste-based malice or occurred in public view with the intention of humiliating the complainant on account of her caste. The Court relied on its earlier decision in Hitesh Verma v. State of Uttarakhand (2020), where it had similarly held that disputes of a purely private nature, such as property or domestic issues, do not attract the provisions of the SC/ST Act unless there is a clear indication of caste-based animus. In that case, the Court had cautioned against the misuse of the protective statute and emphasised that its application must be based on objective facts that demonstrate the commission of an offence specifically aimed at humiliating or oppressing a person due to their SC/ST status. Reiterating this position, the Court held that allowing the proceedings to continue under the SC/ST Act in the absence of necessary legal ingredients would be a misuse of process and would dilute the purpose of the statute. The judgment underscores the principle that special legislation enacted to protect marginalised communities must be applied with precision and not be extended to situations where its core requirements are not met. The Supreme Court proceeded to quash the proceedings under the SC/ST Act while leaving the charges under the Indian Penal Code to be decided on merits before the trial court. The decision reiterates the judiciary's approach to ensuring that while the rights of historically oppressed communities must be safeguarded, the criminal law must not be weaponised in situations where the essential statutory conditions are absent. This court has sifted cases where allegations under the SC/ST Act are made without establishing a direct link to caste-based motivation. view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Gujarat Congress leader files complaint against news channel editor, anchor for defamation
Gujarat Congress leader files complaint against news channel editor, anchor for defamation

Indian Express

timea day ago

  • Indian Express

Gujarat Congress leader files complaint against news channel editor, anchor for defamation

Former Union Minister and newly appointed Congress Legislature Party (CLP) leader in the Gujarat Assembly, Dr Tushar Chaudhary, has lodged a complaint of defamation and under Atrocity Act against the editor of a news channel and an anchor of another on Friday evening. Chaudhary has alleged that the journalists had defamed him and his father, former Chief Minister of Gujarat, the late Amarsinh Chaudhary. The complaint against Jagdish Mehta, group editor of Rajkot-based Headlines News channel, and Gopi Ghanghar, anchor of Ahmedabad-based Nirbhay News channel, was registered in Tapi district. The complaint was registered under Section 356 (Defamation) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and various sections of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. In the FIR, the Congress MLA from Khedbrahma has alleged that in a show aired on July 22 on Nirbhay News, Ghanghar made an objectionable statement against him. He said Mehta consented to the statements, which were 'defamatory for him and the entire tribal community'. He said in the FIR, 'A live news debate video came to my personal assistant's mobile phone on July 22' where the statements were made. Talking to The Indian Express, Chaudhary said, 'My father and I got elected from the ST reserved seat, and we are also leaders of the tribal community. Both the accused had uttered statements defaming me, my father and my entire community, and we will not let this go.' Speaking to The Indian Express, Ghanghar said, 'Chaudhary has lodged a complaint against me and Mehta, and we are also looking into ways to respond to it legally. Till now, I have not received any call from Tapi police.' Deputy Superintendent of Police, SC/ST cell, Tapi district, Nikita Shiroya said, 'We have registered an offence against both the accused. We will first gather the original video footage of the debate so that we can determine the topic of discussion, the statements made, and the context in which they were made. Currently, we are at the stage of collecting evidence, and if necessary, we will again contact the complainant and take his statement. We are also looking for both the accused and will see what they have to say.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store