
‘Was kicked out of Mr India and replaced by Amrish Puri; felt belittled, hurt, jealous', says Anupam Kher: ‘I wouldn't have played it so stiff'
'Arrogance, if used in the right manner, is not a negative quality… Jealously is also very healthy if used in the right manner,' he said in appearance on Raj Shamani's podcast. Asked when he felt jealous, the actor said, 'When I was removed from Mr India and replaced as Mogambo by Amrish Puri. I felt small. After watching the film, I knew that I wouldn't have played the character so stiffly. Me and Shekhar had a different idea for the character, he would've been more Machiavellian.'
Also read – Anupam Kher recalls shutting down Aamir Khan on Dil He Ke Manta Nahin sets 'with an English phrase': 'He complained to Mahesh Bhatt'
Explaining further about what he felt at the time, Anupam said, 'I felt belittled. I wondered why I had been replaced, why I had been fired. It's natural to feel small. They did it for themselves. But that I understand now. Back then, I felt inferior, hurt, and jealous. 'How could he get the role?'' Anupam said that he watched Jack Nicholson's One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest five times in a row when he was studying at the FTII. 'Professional jealously makes you want to push yourself,' he said.
In an earlier interview, Anupam had revealed that he was replaced after having filmed a large portion of the movie. 'Mogambo's role was offered to me before Amrish Puri. However, after one or two months, the filmmakers replaced me. When you are dropped from a film then generally an actor feels bad, but when I watched Mr India and saw Amrishji's work as Mogambo then, I thought that makers of the film took the right decision by casting him in their film,' Anupam had said earlier. In his autobiography, Amrish Puri admitted that he was apprehensive about taking on the role after so much of the movie had already been shot. 'I thought to myself, 'inhe ab jaakar meri yaad aayi (Now they remember me?)'' he wrote.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
21 minutes ago
- Economic Times
JioStar posts Rs 581 crore net profit in Q1 driven by IPL
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads JioStar, the joint venture between Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) and Walt Disney, reported a net profit of ₹581 crore for the quarter ended June, according to RIL's quarterly financial company recorded an EBITDA of ₹1,017 crore and operating revenue of ₹9,601 crore, driven by the strong performance of the Indian Premier League (IPL) 2025. This comes despite ongoing challenges in the entertainment segment due to reduced FMCG advertising said the IPL delivered its highest-ever revenue across TV and digital this year. JioStar holds both TV and digital rights for the IPL in the Indian the TV entertainment segment continued to face pressure, the impact was offset by strong sports and subscription revenues. The company finalised subscription deals with all major distribution operators, aiding better monetisation and tighter cost the FY25 period spanning November 14, 2024, to March 31, 2025, JioStar reported a net profit of ₹229 crore on operating revenue of ₹9,497 crore, with an EBITDA of ₹774 November 14, 2024, RIL and Disney completed the merger of Star India and Viacom18, forming JioStar. RIL controls the JV with a 56% stake, Disney holds 37%, and the remaining 7% is owned by Bodhi Tree the latest quarter, JioStar's streaming platform, JioHotstar, saw its subscriber base surge to 287 million during the IPL season, fuelled by its hybrid advertising and subscription model with limited free access. On television, JioStar reached more than 800 million viewers during the company also expanded its footprint in the Free-To-Air (FTA) Hindi general entertainment channel (GEC) segment with the relaunch of Star Utsav and Colors Rishtey on DD Free Dish. It had a 35.5% share in the entertainment TV 2025 marked a watershed moment for JioStar, achieving a combined reach of 1.19 billion viewers across TV—primarily Star Sports—and JioHotstar. The platform drew 652 million digital viewers, a 28% year-on-year increase, making it JioHotstar's most successful IPL season to television, the tournament delivered a 5.1 TVR and clocked over 514 billion minutes of watch time. The IPL 2025 final set a new digital benchmark, becoming the most-watched T20 match ever online with 237 million viewers and a peak concurrency of 55.2 million, surpassing the previous high of 35.9 million. The final also drew 189 million viewers on TV, making it the most-watched IPL match in broadcast the IPL, JioStar's sports portfolio featured marquee events such as the ICC World Test Championship (WTC) Final. The network also secured exclusive digital streaming rights for India's five-Test series against England from Sony Pictures Networks India, further strengthening its sports recorded its highest-ever monthly entertainment watch time in June 2025. The latest season of Criminal Justice delivered the strongest opening for any OTT original this year, according to Ormax Media, while Kesari 2 emerged as the most-watched film across all languages on the content continued to gain traction. Captain America: Brave New World debuted as the second most-watched film of the quarter, while Mufasa: The Lion King became the most-watched international film ever on Plus retained its leadership in the Hindi GEC segment, with six of the top ten shows during the general entertainment channels also performed strongly. Star Pravah, Star Jalsha, Star Maa, and Asianet continued to lead in their respective markets. The network also maintained its dominance in niche genres such as kids, youth, and English entertainment.


India.com
28 minutes ago
- India.com
Chris Gayle, Pollard And Co. To Shine In 18K Gold As West Indies Champions Unveil Iconic Jersey For WCL 2025
With icons like Chris Gayle, Dwayne Bravo, and Kieron Pollard in their ranks, the West Indies Champions are set to light up the World Championship of Legends (WCL) 2025, beginning July 18 across England. Sanctioned by the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB), the tournament will run till August 2, featuring matches in Birmingham, Northampton, Leicester, and Leeds. WCL 2025 promises to be a nostalgic and electrifying celebration of cricket's greatest names. Marking a blend of heritage and high fashion, the West Indies Champions have revealed a luxurious jersey designed by Lorenze, crafted with genuine 18K gold accents, available in 30g, 20g, and 10g editions. Far beyond traditional sportswear, the jersey pays tribute to the legendary lineage of West Indies cricket, from the likes of Sir Clive Lloyd to the mighty Chris Gayle. 'This is not just a jersey, it's wearable history,' said Raj Karan Duggal, Founder of Lorenze. 'It merges premium design with West Indian pride, creating a timeless collectible that honours the glory of our cricketing legends.' Ajay Sethi, Chairman of Channel2 Group Corporation and owner of the West Indies Champions, echoed the sentiment: 'With so many cricketing greats in our team, this jersey stands as a symbol of excellence and respect. WCL 2025 is one of the top global events, and we're aiming to bring the trophy home.' This year's WCL boasts a powerhouse cast of retired and iconic players, including: India: Yuvraj Singh, Harbhajan Singh, Shikhar Dhawan, Suresh Raina Australia: Brett Lee, Chris Lynn, Shaun Marsh England: Eoin Morgan, Moeen Ali, Sir Alastair Cook South Africa: AB de Villiers, Hashim Amla, Chris Morris, Wayne Parnell West Indies: Chris Gayle, Dwayne Bravo, Kieron Pollard As the action unfolds, fans can expect vintage rivalries, unforgettable performances, and a celebration of cricket's golden era on English soil.


NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Hey Bollywood, What Is It With The 'Bong Babe' Fetish?
In the new Netflix film, Aap Jaisa Koi, love is a lesson. Shrirenu Tripathi (R. Madhavan), a middle-aged professor in Jamshedpur, is arranged to be married to Madhu Bose (Fatima Sana Shaikh), a French tutor in Kolkata. The attraction is immediate. Shrirenu, the 42-year-old virgin, had abandoned the idea of being with anyone, let alone someone like the radiant Madhu; he is naturally thrown off when she likes him back. Everything goes well till a roadblock surfaces. The man turns out to be conservative and the woman is not pleased. In Hindi cinema, difference has been the cornerstone of love. Contrast - behavioural (introvert-extrovert) and social (class and caste) - attracts. It brings people together and emboldens them to fight against others. Love is the bridge where they meet, and the journey to be together supplies the story. The higher the stakes, the greater the love story. The Veers And Salims Of Bollywood Classic love stories share similar friction, if not the arc. They also have something else in common: men, mostly, did the heavy lifting. If in Mughal-e-Azam (1960), Salim mobilised an army to protect Anarkali, the woman he loved, then in the post-liberalised India of Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge (1995), Raj crossed oceans to woo the unrelenting parents of Simran, the woman he loved. Prem in Maine Pyar Kiya (1989) surrendered a life of plenty to prove his love for Suman, and in Veer-Zaara (2004), a cross-border love story stacked against impossible odds, Veer, an Air Force officer from India, arrived in Pakistan to meet Zara. Salim and Anarkali in Mughal-E-Azam (1960) With time, female passivity changed faces without much change in fate. Audacious women were written, but the pluck felt superficial. Geet in Jab We Met (2007) ran away from home, but she still needed Aditya to bring her back; a decade later, Bitti Mishra in Bareilly Ki Barfi smoked with her father, and yet, her fate swung between two men. These are sweeping instances, punctuated, yes, by a few exceptions, but the reading holds water. The Bengali Woman As An Antithesis In comparison, someone like Madhu is portrayed as an antithesis. Her autonomy feels as attentive as complete. She has a well-defined job, her family rallies around her, she is vocal about her sexual needs and, more crucially, none of this changes when she falls in love. She takes efforts to meet Shrirenu as much as he does - a detail that speaks volumes about the shared duties they assume. Later, when he shames her, she calls him out. Rani Chatterjee in Rocky Aur Rani Kii Prem Kahaani (2023) had the same attributes. She fell in love with Rocky, an indulgent man-child in Delhi with a closed world-view. Passion ran high, yet she refused to budge to tradition. In both cases, modernity is not a personality trait but a subtext of their persona. More similarities follow: they pair chiffon saris with sleeveless blouses. Madhu reads Sartre, and, if probed, Rani's favourite author might well be Simone de Beauvoir. Both are culturally inclined and philosophically profound. In private, they possibly worship Tagore and wept the day the Left government lost power in West Bengal. And, in case you did not notice, they are Bengali. The 'Prototype' The 'strong-willed Bengali woman' prototype has existed in Hindi films. Madhu and Rani stand on the shoulders of other self-reliant women like Piku (Shoojit Sircar's 2015 Piku) and Vidya Basu (Sujoy Ghosh's 2012 Kahaani). Sure, there are the many renditions of the uncompromising Parvati from Devdas, and Vikramaditya Motwane reimagined O. Henry's The Last Leaf as Lootera (2013) with an unyielding Bengali woman at the centre. But even other films have used this prototype. In Vijay Lalwani's Karthik Calling Karthik (2010), a twisted thriller on an introvert, the free-spirited female character is a Bengali;. Aziz Mirza's Phir Bhi Dil Hai Hindustani (2000) features a ruthless journalist who, of course, is also a Bengali. Rani's stereotypical Bengali family in Rocky Aur Rani Kii Prem Kahaani (2023) As real women started staking more claims in public spaces, women in love stories awaited a facelift. Naturally, it made sense for makers (Karan Johar and co) to harness this trope for a wider appeal, to reinvent the Hindi film heroine in romantic films as a Bengali woman in love. Culture comes with the territory, and so does defiance. But Rani and Madhu's representation has been a misrepresentation. If they are to be believed, then a Bengali woman reads Tagore for breakfast, recites Sukumar Ray for lunch, and finishes her day with a Satyajit Ray film. She lives in a giant house, her liberal outlook is without a blindspot, and even though she might have toured across the globe, College Street is her favourite street. The Allure Of The 'Bhodromahila' Granted that accusing Hindi filmmakers of exaggeration is akin to complaining about the monsoon in Mumbai. Some things go hand in hand. But the depictions have prompted a wider discourse, because by reiterating a certain kind, propped up by specific caste and class, these films seem to dictate that only the affluent, outspoken, plucky and Liberal Bengali woman (the Bhodromohila to the Bhadralok) is deserving of love. Or, that her story is worth telling. A couple of days back, an account on Instagram thoughtfully questioned the stereotype and asked: "Is every modern Bengali woman really a Rani Chatterjee or a Madhu Bose?" The answer, of course, is no. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Basundhara (@gangsofcinepur) But here's the thing: even a forthcoming Rani Chatterjee or a radical Madhu Bose, in the off chance that they exist, were not born as one. Unlike what might be suggested, liberalism is not stuffed in our potatoes, nor is it a virus Bengali women are born with (in a bizarre segue in Aap Jaisa Koi, a hitherto timid woman starts calling out patriarchy after falling in love with a Bengali man, like she has been "infected"). Even the most rebellious of Bengali women have had to earn their rebellion; even the most well-turned-out, sari-clad Bengali woman has had to fight for her sleeveless blouses. One is not born but becomes Rani Chatterjee or Madhu Bose. Still Raising Boys In a country like India, where women shrinking themselves to make space for others is the default, such characters are far-fetched on some days and aspirational on others. Perhaps that is the allure. Cinema, after all, is a site of wish fulfilment. But it is also the medium of representation, a space to see and be seen. By assuming that Bengali households are untouched by patriarchy - a belief that collapses when one considers the mounting cases of rape and abuse in West Bengal in this year alone - these films undercut and erase the struggle of Bengali women who stand up for themselves despite, and not because of, their surname. By not showcasing the labour built into it, they squander the chance of celebrating feminism. One can argue that such portrayals, however excessive, are designed to subvert the androcentric gaze of love. But women are somehow still getting shortchanged. If, in the past, they were offered ornamental parts in romantic films, then now, they are burdened with the task of teaching men. If, earlier, they waited for grown-up men to show up, then now, they are tasked with rehabilitating boys. Love is no longer the bridge where two people meet but an ideological minefield where one community is pitted against the other. And somehow, despite the cultural agency of female characters, the one gaining from it is - still - not them. (Ishita Sengupta is an independent film critic and culture writer from India. Her writing is informed by gender and pop culture and has appeared in The Indian Express, Hyperallergic, New Lines Magazine, etc.) Disclaimer: These are the personal opinions of the author