
A Decade of Marriage Equality
But when I went back home to Ohio, it was almost as if the wedding never happened. The state, where I still live, didn't recognize same-sex marriages. For years, my husband and I couldn't file taxes or claim benefits as a married couple. Only the Supreme Court's 2015 ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges — a case filed against Ohio's health director — forced every state to legally recognize marriages like mine.
No policy decision has had more of an effect on my life. Of course, there's the legal side — the taxes and government benefits. But there has also been a cultural shift. Growing up, my peers routinely used 'gay,' 'queer' and the F-slur to insult each other. I distinctly remember a high school classmate interrupting health class to shout, 'It's Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve!'
Yet here was the country's highest court legalizing my marriage. After the ruling, the president at the time, Barack Obama, celebrated the decision, lighting the White House in rainbow colors. I finally got the validation that teenage me, surrounded by bigotry, thought he never would.
Thursday was the 10th anniversary of that ruling. As part of The Times's coverage of the milestone, the Modern Love column asked readers to describe what the ruling has meant for them. I recommend reading all of their lovely stories. Below are some excerpts.
Adam Wallenfang, Chicago:
In America, we're taught that we can become anything we want. But growing up gay meant putting asterisks next to my aspirations.
I could become a teacher (which I did), but it would be touchy to be openly gay. I could fall in love (which I did), but my marriage would be only as binding as the Swiss cheese network of states that recognized it. I could become a father (which I did), but that act of devotion would be mired in legalities that felt designed to dissuade.
Obergefell erased many of those caveats, making my and my husband's hopes feel possible. Someday, our daughter will learn that her country once forbade her dads to marry. But when we tell her that she can become anything she wants in today's America, the message will be truer.
Neil Rafferty, Birmingham, Ala.:
My partner and I were born and bred in Alabama. We learned to swim in these rivers. Our blood permeates this red soil. Alabama is our home. And we weren't going to get married anywhere else. We met in 2004, served together in the Marines under 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell,' survived it all. With Obergefell, we were finally able to marry. In our home, where we belong, with the people we love.
Marina Rota, Los Angeles:
For decades I felt superior to the institution of marriage. I didn't need anyone to tell me that my relationships were valid or how they should be celebrated. But in 2022, my partner, Sara, was diagnosed with A.L.S. and would soon be gone. I was devastated — and, suddenly, desperate to marry her.
Without marriage, there would be no legal record of our love, nor any spiritual record in the form of ceremony. I could not live with that.
So there we were in our living room, just two days before Sara passed, saying our vows in front of a rabbi. I stood beside Sara in her wheelchair, while her sons and our friends held the huppah. Autumn light streaming through our windows, I was deeply grateful for the right to marry the woman I love.
Brandon Carrillo, Stamford, Conn.:
After the decision, my mother burst into my bedroom, yelling, 'You can get married!' My sexuality felt taboo within my family of Filipino and Mexican immigrants. Their silence left me isolated and anxious. But that morning, that tension began to break. My mom's face, filled with joy, ironically communicated so much of her unspoken fear. For both of us, Obergefell meant that I could be accepted and protected throughout our country. Smiling, I replied, 'I can.'
More anniversary coverage
Nearly two thirds of Americans approve of same-sex marriage. But support has dropped among Republicans, and conservatives are soon expected to ask the Supreme Court to hear a challenge to Obergefell.
Adam Liptak, The Times's Supreme Court reporter, looked back on the day of the decision.
Some veterans of the marriage equality movement see similarities between their struggles and battles over trans rights.
Trump's Policy Bill
The Senate voted 51-49 to begin debating Trump's policy bill. It's still unclear whether Republican leaders can find enough votes to pass the measure and send it back to the House.
The bill would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts and add new ones, while slashing spending on safety-net programs like Medicaid. Experts estimate it would add around $3 trillion to the federal debt over the next decade.
The House and Senate versions of the bill differ in important ways. See a comparison.
Instead of explicitly reducing benefits for the poor under the bill, Republicans are making them harder to get and to keep by piling on paperwork.
Weeks after a spat with Trump, Elon Musk criticized the bill again. He called it 'utterly insane and destructive.'
More on Politics
Gov. Tim Walz gave a eulogy at the funeral of the assassinated Minnesota lawmaker, Melissa Hortman, and her husband, Mark. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris were there.
Catholic bishops across the U.S. are expressing opposition to Trump's immigration agenda. Some have showed up at courthouses to deter ICE agents.
New York Mayor's Race
One key to Zohran Mamdani's success in the Democratic primary for mayor New York City: a visually rich social media campaign.
Mamdani drew tens of thousands of new voters to the polls with the help of an army of volunteers and small donors.
After Mamdani's victory over Andrew Cuomo, The Times's Emma Goldberg asked: Have Millennials finally figured out how to topple boomer bosses?
International
The Israeli military issued broad evacuation orders for neighborhoods of Gaza City, amid growing calls by Trump for a cease-fire deal.
Iran's leaders are at odds over how to address the crisis brought on by the 12-day war with Israel and the U.S., Roger Cohen writes.
McDonald's thrives in Ukraine, a testament to the country's rebounding economy.
Two assassins killed a Nicaraguan human rights activist in Costa Rica, increasing suspicions that Nicaragua's government is targeting its enemies on foreign soil.
Other Big Stories
In the 1970s, when courts tended to deny custody to lesbian mothers, an underground network helped them seize back their children.
Jurors in the federal trial of Sean Combs are set to begin deliberating tomorrow. Here are takeaways from the closing arguments.
Should establishment Democrats embrace Mamdani, a democratic socialist?
No. Democrats shouldn't capitulate to radical figures in the way that Republicans did. 'It's irresponsible for mainstream Democrats to think it can't happen to us,' William Daley writes for The Wall Street Journal.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News24
43 minutes ago
- News24
All Blacks great Kaino on Savea's ceiling: ‘He doesn't have a roof' as France Test series looms
Be among those who shape the future with knowledge. Uncover exclusive stories that captivate your mind and heart with our FREE 14-day subscription trial. Dive into a world of inspiration, learning, and empowerment. You can only trial once. Start your FREE trial now Show Comments ()


Forbes
43 minutes ago
- Forbes
3 Red Flags You Are Romanticizing As Love, By A Psychologist
These three red flags might look like love, but in reality, they're clear signs that someone isn't ... More right for you. Here's how to learn the difference. When a relationship ends despite your best efforts to make it work, you might think 'I just wanted to be loved.' Perhaps you even convince yourself that you're not meant for the love you're seeking. You may even start to feel that relationships never work out for you, and no matter how much you pour into them, you always come out empty-handed. If this pattern holds true for most of your relationships, it doesn't mean you don't deserve healthy love. Instead, you may be replaying certain relational patterns that land you the same outcome each time. More often than not, we mistake familiar pain for love. This is often a childhood dynamic that follows you into adult relationships. With each cycle of seeking love and failing to get it in your life, you might notice that what you've been drawn to isn't a form of love after all. Here are three red flags we tend to misinterpret and romanticize as love, and how to identify them. 1. You Mistake Emotional Intensity For Passion Emotional intensity in dysfunctional relationships manifests as extreme lows followed by extreme highs. You may experience intense feelings and a preoccupation with your partner that borders on obsession, or may be drawn to partners who feel this way about you. In such a dynamic, every fight threatens to break your relationship, shake your foundation and make you question your self-worth, but every make-up comes with the certainty of forever — a mindset where you believe love will win it all no matter how hard it gets. In such relationships, it's hard to find your footing or make space for what matters because you're always on damage control. You forget that true love offers safety without unrealistic expectations, acceptance without conditions and validation without needing to earn it. Individuals with an anxious attachment style are especially prone to this dynamic, as emotional inconsistency can magnify their longing. This is where people often mistake unpredictability for love. A 2018 study published in Interpersona investigated the link between emotional intensity and romantic feelings in 80 young adults. It found that moderate stress in romantic relationships can heighten romantic feelings, creating a cycle where instability feels more compelling than peace. In contrast, feelings decreased under both low and high levels of stress. The next time you are ruminating about your relationship, ask yourself, 'Is this really pushing me toward connection or am I just addicted to intensity?' 2. You Are Chasing Validation, Not Love When you're stuck in a romanticizing pattern, you often chase validation instead of love. What drives you — often unconsciously — is the belief that, 'If I can finally get this person to love me, then I'll be worthy.' You seek their validation because, deep down, you may believe, 'I am not enough' — a belief that likely formed in childhood when your needs were dismissed or you were seen as too demanding. This internalized shame shows up in relationships as striving for approval, blaming yourself when things go wrong and surrendering your agency to avoid rejection. You don't look for someone who gets you — you look for someone to save you from addressing the aspects of yourself that you are too embarrassed to look at. A 2019 study published in the International Journal of Psychophysiology concluded that emotional neglect was associated with reduced oxytocin levels and insecure attachment patterns which collectively predicted higher social fear and avoidance. That is, when your need for safety is not met, it can impact you at both physiological and psychological levels, fueling the need to gain validation, avoid confrontation and re-establish a sense of safety. So, in relationships, whenever you catch yourself overdoing it — trying too hard to show your worth or overperforming for others — it's not love you may be seeking, but validation. Ask yourself, 'Do I really want this person to love me or do I just need them to see me — so I can finally feel worthy of loving myself?' 3. You Are Mistaking Control For Security When people think of security in love, they think of someone they can rely on in times of need. Someone who can take the wheel from them when they are too tired to drive, take over household responsibilities while they rest or support them through a difficult time. Emotionally, it's the equivalent of them drawing a blanket over you as you sleep. You know with certainty that they're there for you. That's what security looks like for most — the sense that no matter what life throws at them, they won't be facing it alone. That's often not the case when you end up romanticizing control as security. These dynamics look subtle. It could be your partner: You may mistakenly start to believe that such signs of manipulation are care. A 2016 study published in Sex Roles investigated how certain romantic beliefs — such as idealizing love at all costs, viewing jealousy as a sign of commitment or believing that romantic relationships should be intensely emotional — are related to the tendency to romanticize controlling behaviors. The researchers surveyed 275 heterosexual women aged 18 to 50 and found that women who endorsed these beliefs were significantly more likely to view controlling behaviors (such as jealousy, possessiveness or making decisions for the partner) as romantic. This romanticization, in turn, was related to higher reported rates of both psychological and physical intimate partner violence. Instead of acknowledging these red flags, people may interpret them as signs of love. What feels like security may, in fact, be the normalization of control. When you're torn between love and what's right, ask yourself, 'If my closest friend were going through this, would I still think it's okay?' When you recognize that you may have been romanticizing red flags all along, you can finally begin to choose a connection that feels safe, steady and real. Want to know if control dynamics are shaping your relationship? Take this science-backed test to find out: Relationship Control Scale
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
13 Family 'Rules' That Were Just Shame With A Smile On Top
Navigating family life often feels like a labyrinth of rules and unspoken expectations. While some guidelines are meant to protect and nurture, others insidiously mask shame under a veneer of love and concern. These seemingly benign 'rules' can leave you questioning your worth, choices, and even your identity. Here, we unmask 13 of these well-intentioned yet detrimental family edicts that many, perhaps even you, have encountered. In a family setting, the mandate to keep a cheerful face often suppresses genuine emotions. The insistence on appearing perpetually happy can invalidate any real feelings of sadness, anger, or discomfort, forcing you to bury them deep inside. According to Dr. Brené Brown, a research professor at the University of Houston, this pressure often leads to emotional disconnect and shame instead of fostering authentic joy and connection. A smile should be a natural expression of happiness, not a mask to hide your true emotional state. The directive to always look on the bright side can feel like emotional gaslighting. It implies that acknowledging discomfort or dissatisfaction is akin to failure or weakness, limiting your capacity for self-compassion. Families may believe they're encouraging resilience, but they often end up teaching repression instead. True emotional strength comes from facing and processing your emotions, not faking happiness for others' comfort. This age-old adage can sometimes carry a hidden undertone of obligation and guilt. Familial loyalty is often romanticized, implying that any deviation from the family's collective narrative or values is a betrayal. When used as a tool for manipulation, this rule can prevent you from forming genuine connections outside your immediate circle. It can also stifle personal growth if you feel you must prioritize family ties over your own well-being or aspirations. While the idea of unwavering familial support is comforting, it can become toxic if it silences your individual voice. It suggests that you must tolerate harmful behavior simply because it comes from a family member. In reality, the strength of relationships should be based on mutual respect and support, not on blood ties alone. Authentic relationships, whether with family or friends, should make space for individual growth and diversity of thought. This unwritten rule insists that family issues remain behind closed doors, effectively stifling conversations about important, sometimes painful, matters. This forced silence is often a breeding ground for shame and isolation, preventing you from seeking necessary help or perspective. A study published in the Journal of Family Psychology highlights how secrecy within families can increase stress and decrease overall well-being. Openness and communication are vital to resolving conflicts and fostering a healthy family environment. The demand for privacy can feel like a blanket of shame, covering up anything deemed unacceptable. It encourages a culture of secrecy, where family issues are hidden like skeletons in a closet, only to fester and grow more dangerous over time. Addressing problems openly can be liberating and is often the first step toward healing and understanding. True familial strength lies not in secrecy, but in the courage to face challenges together. This old-school adage often targets the youngest in the family, but its impact can linger long into adulthood. It suggests that your contributions, thoughts, and feelings are less valuable than those of the adults around you. The long-term effect is a lack of confidence in expressing your own ideas and an ingrained belief that your voice doesn't matter. To thrive, you need the freedom to speak up and participate in the dialogue of your life. Silencing young voices under the guise of respect can be stifling. It implies that compliance and silence are virtues, while curiosity and opinion are nuisances. This rule not only diminishes self-worth but also curtails the development of critical thinking and self-expression. A family should be a safe space for nurturing the voices of all its members, young and old alike. While it might sound protective and caring, this rule often dismisses your autonomy and personal desires. It suggests that your family has the ultimate authority over your life decisions, overshadowing your own ability to make choices. According to Dr. Shefali Tsabary, a clinical psychologist, this type of overbearing guidance can stifle individuality and create a dependency that hinders personal growth. Parents and family members should aim to guide, not dictate, offering support while respecting personal boundaries. The presumption of knowing what's best can be demeaning and disempowering. It implies that you're incapable of charting your own path, which can lead to resentment and a lack of confidence in your decision-making abilities. Encouraging independence and self-discovery is key to developing a healthy sense of self. Family should serve as a supportive foundation, not a controlling force in your life journey. Meant to preserve the family's image, this rule can perpetuate a culture of secrecy and shame. It implies that any personal or familial issues should be hidden rather than addressed, denying you the opportunity to seek external support or advice. While maintaining privacy is important, it shouldn't come at the cost of your mental and emotional health. Sometimes, airing out the metaphorical laundry is necessary to clean up the mess and start anew. The fear of judgment and gossip often keeps families from opening up about their struggles. This rule reinforces the idea that vulnerability is a weakness, rather than a strength, preventing healing and growth. By fostering an environment where honesty and openness are valued, families can break free from the chains of shame. Seeking help or simply sharing your story can be a powerful step towards resolution and peace. This familiar rule discourages challenging the status quo, often to maintain a superficial sense of harmony. It suggests that any disruption or disagreement is inherently negative, fostering an environment where important issues are ignored for the sake of peace. According to conflict resolution expert Dr. John Gottman, avoiding conflict can actually lead to more significant problems in the long run. Constructive disagreements are essential to growth and understanding, both individually and collectively. The fear of causing waves can lead to a stagnant environment where real issues are never addressed. It can inhibit personal and familial development, as the focus remains on maintaining a façade of tranquility. True harmony arises not from the absence of conflict but from the ability to navigate and resolve it effectively. Encouraging open dialogue and embracing differences can lead to more resilient and dynamic family relationships. This gender-specific rule perpetuates harmful stereotypes and emotional repression. It suggests that vulnerability is a weakness, especially for males, limiting the full expression of human emotions. By teaching boys to suppress their tears, families inadvertently promote a stoicism that can lead to emotional disconnect and mental health struggles. Emotions are universal, and everyone deserves the space to express them freely, without fear of judgment. The notion that boys should be tough and unemotional is an outdated concept that hinders personal growth. It fosters a toxic masculinity that equates sensitivity with weakness, discouraging empathy and emotional intelligence. Encouraging emotional expression in all genders is crucial for developing well-rounded, compassionate individuals. Acknowledging and embracing emotions leads to healthier, more fulfilling relationships with oneself and others. This implicit expectation can trap you in a cycle of guilt and obligation. It suggests that familial support comes with strings attached, turning acts of love into transactional relationships. Such a mindset fosters resentment and undermines the authenticity of family bonds. True support should be offered freely, without the expectation of repayment or reciprocation. The pressure to 'repay' your family for their sacrifices can be overwhelming. It implies that love and care are commodities to be traded, rather than expressions of genuine affection and commitment. Relationships based on reciprocity rather than obligation are healthier and more sustainable. Family support should empower you to pursue your own path, not weigh you down with a sense of indebtedness. This rule often serves to protect the family's image rather than its members. It suggests that the family's reputation is more important than individual well-being, fostering a culture of silence and repression. While discretion can be valuable, it shouldn't come at the cost of your mental and emotional health. Being honest about familial issues is sometimes necessary for healing and growth. The demand for secrecy can feel like a heavy burden, silencing your voice and denying you the opportunity to seek help or understanding. It implies that airing grievances or sharing experiences is a betrayal of the family unit. In reality, addressing and confronting issues openly can lead to healthier, more resilient relationships. True familial strength is built on a foundation of honesty and trust, not silence and secrecy. Respect is indeed important, but this rule can be used to discourage critical thinking and personal agency. It implies that age automatically grants wisdom and authority, discounting the value of youthful perspectives. While it's essential to show respect, it shouldn't mean blind obedience to outdated or harmful ideas. Families should encourage open dialogue and mutual respect across generations, fostering an environment where everyone's voice is heard. This rule often masks a fear of challenge and change, stifling innovation and development. It suggests that questioning authority is a sign of disrespect, rather than an opportunity for learning and growth. Embracing generational differences can lead to richer, more dynamic family relationships. Encouraging respectful dialogue and critical thinking across age groups can bridge gaps and foster greater understanding and connection. Often wielded as a tool to maintain control, this rule stifles individuality and critical thinking. It suggests that questioning or disagreeing with authority is disrespectful, discouraging open communication and personal expression. Suppressing your voice in the name of respect can lead to a lack of confidence and stunted personal development. Families should foster an environment where questions and discussions are welcomed, not silenced. The fear of being labeled rebellious or difficult can keep you from speaking your truth. It implies that compliance is more valuable than authenticity, fostering a culture of silence and submission. Encouraging open dialogue and respectful disagreement can lead to more meaningful and fulfilling relationships. True respect is earned through mutual understanding and communication, not enforced through silence and submission. This high-pressure rule suggests that mistakes are unacceptable, fostering a fear of failure that can paralyze personal growth. It implies that success is the only measure of worth, discouraging risk-taking and innovation. In reality, failure is a natural and necessary part of life, providing valuable lessons and opportunities for growth. Embracing mistakes as stepping stones rather than obstacles can lead to more resilient and adaptable individuals. The pressure to succeed at all costs can lead to burnout and a lack of self-worth. It suggests that your value is tied to your achievements, rather than your character and effort. Encouraging a growth mindset, where failure is seen as a learning opportunity, can foster resilience and self-confidence. Families should support and celebrate effort and progress, not just outcomes, cultivating a culture of learning and growth.