Kenya drops terror charges against activist Boniface Mwangi – DW – 07/21/2025
The prominent Kenyan activist Boniface Mwangi was charged with unlawful possession of ammunition on Monday in a case stemming from his alleged role in street protests against the government.
Mwangi's supporters had feared he would be charged with the more serious offense of terrorism.
He was freed on bond immediately after his appearance in court on Monday.
Authorities claim Mwangi helped organize unrest during the June 25 protests, which turned violent and left at least 19 people dead.
The protest itself had been called to remember victims of police violence at another major protest against President William Ruto's government on the same date last year.
Mwangi, 42, was arrested on Saturday and accused by the Directorate of Criminal Investigations with the "facilitation of terrorist acts", which he denied, declaring in an image on X: "I am not a terrorist".
Police said they recovered several items from his home, including unused teargas canisters, a 7.62mm blank round, mobile phones, a laptop, and notebooks.
The charge sheet states that Mwangi was "found in possession of noxious substances to wit three teargas canisters without lawful authority." He also faces a charge for possessing a single round of blank ammunition illegally.
On Sunday, police had said they planned to arraign Mwangi on Monday for facilitating "terrorist acts" linked to the protests.
Boniface Mwangi's attorney Njanja Maina has said the activist never possessed any of the items police claim to have found.
Mwangi's wife, Njeri, said on social media that security personnel had raided their home "talking of terrorism and arson."
The courtroom in Nairobi was packed with supporters and activists, many draped in Kenyan flags, including Mwangi himself.
He was bailed out immediately after his appearance in court on Monday.
"The truth is our president is scared of young people, because young people are organising by themselves, they are going to the streets, they are demanding better," Mwangi told supporters and journalists outside the court.
Who is Boniface Mwangi?
Mwangi, a longtime anti-corruption campaigner and former parliamentary candidate, is known for his outspoken criticism of police abuses and state repression.
His arrest comes amid renewed unrest in Kenya, triggered last month by the death of political blogger Albert Ojwang in police custody.
Ojwang's death, which police first claimed was a suicide, sparked national outrage after an autopsy pointed to physical assault. The protests have built on earlier demonstrations against the high cost of living, corruption, and alleged police brutality.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
In May, Mwangi was briefly detained and deported from Tanzania after attending a court hearing for opposition leader Tundu Lissu.
He later alleged that Tanzanian security officers had assaulted him and Ugandan activist Agather Atuhaire during custody.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
4 hours ago
- DW
Columbia University disciplines students over protests – DW – 07/23/2025
The Ivy League school's actions include suspensions, expulsions and even revoked degrees against various students involved in anti-Israel protests on campus. Columbia University is suspending and expelling dozens of students who participated in pro-Palestinian protests by seizing a part of the school's main library in early May and encamping at campus in the spring of 2024, the university said in a statement on Tuesday. A student group at the school said some 80 students had been informed of their punishments on Monday. Some students have been put on probation, some suspended from one to three years, while others face revocation of degrees and expulsions. Following the protests, the university began an investigation into rules violations, banned participants from the campus and placed them on interim suspension, it said. The Ivy League school said the students were assessed individually and given the chance to make their case followed by a weekslong deliberation process. It issued its final determinations on Tuesday. "Disruptions to academic activities are in violation of University policies and rules, and such violations will necessarily generate consequences," the university said in its statement. "Our institution must focus on delivering on its academic mission for our community. And to create a thriving academic community, there must be respect for each other and the institution's fundamental work, policies, and rules," the statement read. Columbia was the epicenter of nationwide campus protests last year against the war in Gaza. The Trump administration has put intense pressure on the prestigious university and others, accusing them of failing to address alleged antisemitism. It also cut $400 million in federal funding for the university. Columbia has agreed to implement a series of policy reforms in an attempt to regain the federal funding. That included overhauling the student disciplinary process and adopting a new definition of antisemitism. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
DW
8 hours ago
- DW
Trump accuses Obama of 'treason,' without providing evidence – DW – 07/23/2025
Donald Trump has accused his predecessor of treason over a probe into Russian interference with the 2016 election. Trump made the remarks while deflecting questions about an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. US President Donald Trump accused former President Barack Obama of "treason" on Tuesday without providing evidence. Trump cited his intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard, who on Friday declassified documents that allegedly showed how Obama administration laid the groundwork for an investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. "It's there, he's guilty. This was treason," Trump said in the Oval Office on Tuesday. "They tried to steal the election, they tried to obfuscate the election. They did things that nobody's ever imagined, even in other countries," Trump claimed, without offering any proof. Trump's remarks came as he deflected questions from journalists about the Justice Department's decision to interview Jeffrey Epstein's former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted of helping the financier sexually abuse underage girls and is now serving a lengthy prison sentence. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The office of the former president later hit back with a statement saying Trump's "bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction." "Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response," said Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush. "But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one." A 2017 assessment by the US intelligence community concluded that Russia used social media disinformation, hacking and bot farms to damage Democrat Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign and bolster Trump. But the same assessment determined that the impact was likely limited and there was no evidence that Russia's efforts altered the election outcome. In 2020, a bipartisan report by the Senate Intelligence Committee — spearheaded by then acting chairman Marco Rubio, now Trump's secretary of state — found that the Trump campaign sought to "maximize the impact" of leaks of Democratic documents stolen by Russian military intelligence.
DW
17 hours ago
- DW
Zimbabwe: Can patriotism be legislated? – DW – 07/22/2025
The ruling Zanu-PF party appears determined to further criminalize dissent in Zimbabwe. Its lawmakers are seen to be trying to entrench legislation that can be used to target those who flag the government's shortcomings. Lawmakers from the ruling ZANU-PF party in Zimbabwe are moving a motion to further criminalize government critics. They're advocating for a comprehensive strategy to promote patriotism and national identity. Proposed measures include formalizing a national ideology, establishing a national institute of ideology and integrating "patriotic" education into the curriculum. The motion comes on top of the contested Patriotic Act of 2023, which was seen to effectively closed the door on dissent In Zimbabwe. It makes provision for criticism issues such as provision of health care, basic services and accountability to be judged criminal. The government dismissed criticism, saying the legislation was necessary to hold accountable individuals who threaten "national interests." It said the legislation was modeled on the Logan Act in the US, which bars citizens from engaging in certain unauthorized communications with foreign governments. In Zimbabwe, violations could result in life imprisonment and death, termination of citizenship, suspension from voting or holding public office. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video In a recent parliamentary debate, ZANU-PF MP Ophious Murambiwa suggested that it should be criminal to speak "evil" about Zimbabwe. "The most important issue is to love our country, let us praise our country in all circumstances, whether in good or bad times, during the night or day," Murambiwa said. The motion has prompted opposition lawmakers and human rights groups to push back harder. "Patriotism is not blind loyalty. It is not empty slogans. True patriots question injustice, challenge corruption and demand systems that serve people not a selected few," Prosper Mutseyami, an opposition MP, said. "Our patriotism must ignite participation, ensuring that every Zimbabwean plays an active role in shaping the future." Human rights activists say its another attempt to silence dissent. "You cannot necessarily legislate patriotism," Nigel Nyamutumbu, the Media Alliance of Zimbabwe programs manager, told DW. "It is a concept that can naturally clamp down on the requisite freedoms. Patriotism is not a legal concept but rather a political nationalist ideology." Activists have in the past been accused of treason and unpatriotic behavior for expressing concerns over human rights abuses, corruption, and governance in Zimbabwe. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Citizens have expressed concern over what they fear are attempts to enforce a one-party state. ZANU-PF, with its absolute majority in parliament, is seen to be abusing its authority and violating the constitution. "As parliamentarians we are supposed to uphold the constitution," Gladys Hlatshwayo an opposition MP told DW. "Section 119 of the constitution demands that parliament protects the constitution and democratic governance." To play this audio please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 audio In June 2025, Zimbabwe's High Court struck down sections of the Patriotic court ruled that the drastic penalties prescribed by the Patriotic Act infringed on various sections of the country's constitution. Several civic organizations and a private citizens had petitioned the court, arguing that the legislation was overly broad and vague had high potential for abuse and misuse. "The most patriotic people are those who hold their government to account. A government must not be seen as the most dangerous institution," Eric Chisora, a political analyst, told DW. "Whatever they [ZANU-PF lawmakers] are doing is unreasonable and irrational. Citizens' rights must be protected." Political and civic rights activists are calling for the repeal of colonial legacy laws which they say are retrogressive. Laws such as the Criminal Law Codification and Reform Act, with provisions have been used to incriminate government critics, date back to Zimbabwe's pre-independence era when they were used to suppress Black majority rule. The activists are concerned over the shrinking of democratic space under Emmerson Mnangagwa, Zimbabwe's president since 2018. "We are now living in a country where there is no freedom of expression due to the number of pieces of legislation being passed by the ZANU-PF regime," Blessing Vava, executive director of the Crisis in Zimbabwe Coalition, told DW. "When you see a government passing repressive laws, just know that it is not a popular government. Zimbabweans must fight to defend the constitution."
