Britain and its people are not safe, former Nato chief warns Parliament
He told the upper chamber: 'Bearing in mind the difficult world that we live in and have to survive in, this is what I firmly believe: we are underinsured, we are underprepared, we are not safe.
'This country and its people are not safe.
'The British people are faced with a world in turmoil, with great power competitions spilling over now into conflict, with constant grey zone attacks on our mainland, and with Russia – often with the co-operation of Iran, China and North Korea – challenging the existing world order.
'We simply in this country are not safe.'
The Labour peer wrote the review alongside the former commander of the joint forces command, General Sir Richard Barrons, and defence adviser Dr Fiona Hill.
Artificial intelligence, drones and a £1 billion investment in homeland missile defence all form part of the review's plan to keep the UK safe in the face of threats from Vladimir Putin's Russia and the rise of China.
As peers debated the review on Friday, Lord Robertson said: 'When we say in the report that we are unprepared, it is an understatement.
'We don't have the ammunition, the training, the people, the spare parts, the logistics, and we don't have the medical capacity to deal with the mass casualties that we would face if we were involved in high-intensity warfare.
'Over the years, and I suppose I must plead guilty to that as well, we took a substantial peace dividend, because we all believed that the world had changed for the better.'
He continued: 'Sadly, we were not alone in that. There may have been over-optimism, but at worst, wishful thinking, but the brutal, full-scale invasion of Ukraine by Putin's Russia three years ago was a savage wake-up call for all of us.
'This world we now live in has changed out of all recognition, and we have got to change as well.'
Lord Robertson told the upper chamber he is 'confident' the review will 'intimidate our enemies, inspire our friends, invigorate our defence industry, and make our country safer'.
Conservative shadow defence minister Baroness Goldie pressed the Government to be specific about the amount of money and timing needed for defence spending to reach 3% of GDP.
She said: 'In this exciting and brave new world for defence, the elephant in the room is money, and none of this excellent aspiration proposed by the review means anything without attaching pound signs to the proposals.
'Ambition must translate into specific financial commitment.'
Former military chief Lord Stirrup said the Government's spending would need to be restructured to be 'anywhere near 3.5% of GDP for defence by 2035'.
'There is no sign of any urgency on any side of the political divide on addressing this crucial matter,' the crossbench peer added.
Former top diplomat Lord Hannay of Chiswick said forms of soft power such as overseas aid and the BBC World Service should be prioritised alongside hard power.
'We really do need to take another look at the hard power soft power balance, recognising that we need them both,' the crossbench peer said.
Conservative former defence minister Lord Soames of Fletchling said the British people needed to be told what they should do in the event of a cyber attack that knocked out the internet and phone networks.
Lord Soames, who is the grandson of Second World War prime minister Sir Winston Churchill, called for the public to have food stocks at home.
He said: 'I believe that unless the public has some idea of the sense of urgency, the only way really to wake people up is to establish either a minister or ministry of civil defence, charged with training millions of people how to respond to an attack.'
Meanwhile, Tory peer Lord Harlech, who is a reservist, said the Government needed to pay more attention to the Territorial Army and other reserve forces.
He said: 'For too long, we have treated reserves as an afterthought. A just-in-case solution. Too often called on at short notice, handed out outdated kit, sidelined from training opportunities and then expected to deliver at the same standard as regulars.
'If we are to rely more heavily on the reserves, as the review suggests, then we must be honest about what that actually requires.
'It means giving them the same standard of equipment, no more trickle-down hand-me-downs. It means equal access to courses and training opportunities.
'Too often, reserves find themselves bumped off areas by cadets or even airsoft groups. That is not how a serious military trains.'
Labour's Baroness Goudie criticised the review for failing to mention gender, adding: 'The exclusion of women from peace process does not lead to stability. It leads to a relapse.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
25 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trainers' chief backs radical alternative to government's gambling tax plan
A radical alternative to Treasury plans to 'harmonise' the rate of tax paid on online sports betting and high-risk casino gaming products received support from one of racing's key stakeholder groups on Monday when Paul Johnson, the chief executive of the National Trainers' Federation, said proposals from the Social Market Foundation thinktank, which will be published on Tuesday, 'have the full backing of the NTF'. The Social Market Foundation report – titled The Duty to Differentiate: How gambling tax reform can raise revenue for the government, reduce harm to the public and save British horse racing – was written by Dr James Noyes, a senior fellow at the SMF, with a foreword by Alex Ballinger MP, a member of the all-party parliamentary group for Gambling Reform. In a sharp contrast to the Treasury's proposal for a unified rate of duty, Noyes argues that online gaming, on slots and other fixed-margin casino products such as roulette, is 'under-taxed' at its current rate of 21% of gross profits, pointing out that 'in some European jurisdictions, tax on remote casino is closer to 40%, and in some US states it is over 50%'. The report suggests that the tax rate on gaming products should be raised to as high as 50%, while in one chapter Noyes also proposes changes to the regime around betting tax and the Levy system, which returns money to racing from off-course betting. Online operators at present pay an additional 10% of their gross profits on racing turnover in Levy, which represents, as Noyes points out, 'a de facto horse-racing betting duty of 25%' when combined with the current 15% charge for betting duty. He suggests a change to the ratio of duty to Levy, combined with an extension of the Levy to bets on overseas racing, would improve significantly the proportion of overall betting turnover that is returned to the sport. The SMF report notes that Martin Cruddace, the chief executive of the major racecourse group Arena Racing Company, recently proposed an inversion of the rates charged for Levy and betting duty, but suggests that this 'does not go far enough' to address 'systemic underfunding'. It proposes that a reduction to 5% of gross profits for racing bets alone, alongside an increase to 20% for the Levy, 'would ensure fiscal neutrality for the betting industry, while fundamentally reorienting the distribution of revenue in favour of the sport'. Johnson was among several representatives of racing's key stakeholder groups who met Noyes last week to discuss the SMF proposals, and said on Monday that the report is 'a sensible and informed piece of work that could be a route for the government to resolve the issues that have beset the sport in recent years and which are affecting our ability to compete with other jurisdictions'. He added: 'Whilst our immediate priority has been to ensure that the Treasury does not inflict a significant blow on racing via tax harmonisation, we are aware that success here does not resolve the challenges faced by the sport at present, or undo some of the damage inflicted in recent years. 'The SMF proposes a tax solution that is mindful of the very different social and economic aspects of different types of gambling, and which seeks to support a sport that means a great deal to the British public.' In his foreword to the SMF report, Ballinger, the Labour member for Halesowen, said that 'as the Treasury considers changes [to the tax regime around gambling], it is vital that they reflect the real impact of gambling on people's lives', and describes its 'practical' proposals as 'smart, fair ideas that deserve serious attention'. Ballinger said: 'The evidence is clear: some gambling products – like online slots – cause far more harm than others', adding: 'These harms carry huge costs, from personal debt and family breakdown to rising pressure on public services. Our tax system should reflect this.' The British Horseracing Authority released research on Monday which suggests that tax harmonisation at a rate of 21% could lead to an industry-wide revenue loss of 'at least £330m in the first five years' and put '2,752 jobs at risk in the first year alone'. The BHA has also launched an online petition which calls on the government to 'rethink' its plans on gambling taxation. The Betting and Gaming Council (BGC), the main body representing the gambling industry in the UK, said on Monday that arguments for a hike in gaming taxes were 'naive'. 'Some naively argue that tax increases should target gaming while sparing sports betting or carving out horse racing,' a BGC spokesperson said. 'But the reality is our members don't ringfence products in that way, these are integrated businesses. Any tax rise, whether on betting or gaming, affects the whole operation. That means less money available for sponsorship, media rights and support for sports like racing, which is especially vulnerable to changes in the customer offer.' The Goodwood Cup is the feature event on the opening afternoon of Glorious Goodwood on Tuesday, when the locally trained Sunway (3.05) could prove to be a decent each-way alternative to Aidan O'Brien's Illinois, the runner-up in last year's St Leger, in the two-mile Group One contest. Illinois has progressed steadily since his near-miss in the Doncaster Classic and put up a career-best to finish a seven-length runner-up behind Trawlerman in the Gold Cup at Ascot last time. Sign up to The Recap The best of our sports journalism from the past seven days and a heads-up on the weekend's action after newsletter promotion He is also Ryan Moore's pick for Tuesday's race ahead of his three-year-old stable companion, Scandinavia, but he looked a little ill-at-ease on the undulations at Chester in May and does not have as much to spare on ratings as an early price of around 6-4 might suggest. Scandinavia, meanwhile, will be making his third start at a staying trip in the space of six weeks, and at around 14-1, Sunway makes plenty of appeal to spring a surprise. Goodwood 1.20 Tony Montana (nap) 1.55 Zavateri 2.30 Kinross 3.05 Sunway 3.45 Dream Composer (nb) 4.20 Naval Light 4.55 Dash Of Azure 5.30 Cinque Verde Beverley 2.10 Blue Yonder 2.45 Rosso Levanto 3.20 Jeddaal 4.00 Haberdash 4.35 Believe In Glory 5.10 Catch Cunningham 5.47 Mayberry Moon Ffos Las 5.42 Neptune Legend 6.15 Shetakesthegold 6.50 Sundiata Keita 7.25 Zilfee 8.00 Fifty Sent 8.30 Zooks Ripon 6.00 Al Shaham 6.30 A'Ali G 7.05 Silver Chamber 7.40 Canaria Queen 8.10 Ferrari Gold 8.40 Homeland David Menuisier's colt has not raced beyond 12 furlongs since finishing just a length and a half behind Illinois in the St Leger, and remains unexposed at staying trips. He was also less than a length behind Los Angeles in last year's Irish Derby during a run of five straight starts at Group One level, and a sharp two miles around Goodwood could be the ideal track and trip for Sunway to register a first success at the highest level since his juvenile campaign. Goodwood 1.20: Tony Montana did not appreciate the drop back to a mile for the Royal Hunt Cup last month and is better judged on his two-length second behind an unexposed rival over track and trip in May. That was his first start for eight months and he is just 4lb higher now, while a draw in stall six is also in his favour. Goodwood 1.55: Eve Johnson Houghton's unbeaten Zavateri was an 18-1 shot for the July Stakes last time but his one-length win was backed up by a decent time. The market may be underestimating him again at around 7-1 to defy a 3lb penalty. Goodwood 2.30: The veteran Kinross has form figures of 1-2-1-3 in the last four renewals of this race and looked as good as ever when finishing a close second in a Group Three at Haydock last time. Goodwood 3.45: The eye-catcher at the likely prices is Dream Composer at around 20-1. Last year's Dash winner at Epsom rarely runs a bad race over this course and distance and is back down to his last winning mark.
South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Trump speaks of ‘great love' for Scotland and labels Starmer a ‘tax cutter'
Mr Trump spoke of his 'great love' for Scotland and said he wanted to see the nation 'thrive' ahead of his discussions with the Prime Minister that were expected to focus on Gaza and trade. The American leader attacked Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan as a 'nasty person' and hailed both Sir Keir and Nigel Farage as 'great men' as the leaders took a series of questions across domestic and foreign affairs. The president also indicated that the US may not impose heavy tariffs on British pharmaceuticals, telling reporters that 'we certainly feel a lot better' about the UK working on drugs that will be sold in the States compared to other nations. Mr Trump and Sir Keir took questions for more than an hour in a meandering press conference ahead of their meeting at Turnberry on Tuesday afternoon. Referring to the Prime Minister and the Reform UK leader, the US president said: 'I happen to like both men. I like this man (Sir Keir) a lot, and I like Nigel. 'And, you know, I don't know the politics over here. I don't know where they stand. I would say one is slightly liberal – not that liberal, slightly – and the other one is slightly conservative, but they're they're both good men.' He added: '(Sir Keir) did a great thing with the economy, because a lot of money is going to come in because of the deal that was made. But I think that, I think that immigration is now bigger than ever before.' The president had earlier said that he thinks Sir Keir, who has been in office for more than a year, will be 'a tax cutter.' The two leaders were expected to discuss trade as part of their meeting, weeks after Mr Trump unveiled a new tariff regime for goods entering the US from other nations. Asked by reporters whether his plans for an import levy on medicines would affect the UK, the US president told reporters: 'We will be announcing on pharmaceuticals some time in the very near future. We have a very big plan on pharmaceuticals. 'We want to bring a lot of the pharmaceuticals back to America, where they should be.' He later added: 'You also have a good pharmaceutical business – we'll be dealing with you on pharmaceuticals also – and we certainly feel a lot better with your country working on pharmaceuticals for America than some of the other countries that were … with the relationship we have, you would not use that as a cudgel. You wouldn't be using it as a block.' During the same press conference, Mr Trump described the Labour London mayor Sir Sadiq as a 'nasty person' who has done 'a terrible job', while Sir Keir jumped to his defence. Speaking to reporters, the US president said: 'I'm not a fan of your mayor. I think he's done a terrible job, the Mayor of London … a nasty person.' The Prime Minister intervened to say: 'He's a friend of mine, actually.' The question session inside the President's Turnberry resort came after he suggested that the UK is 'doing a fantastic thing' in trying to reduce immigration via small boat crossings. Mr Trump said he knows 'nothing about the boats' when asked about the issue but said 'my hats are off to you' if the UK is trying to reduce immigration. Sir Keir and his wife Lady Starmer were greeted by the President and a chorus of bagpipes as they arrived in South Ayrshire on Monday. When Mr Trump was asked about how he would deal with small boats, Sir Keir explained that it refers to people who are crossing the Channel. Mr Trump told reporters: 'If you're stopping immigration and stopping the wrong people … my hats are off to you. You're doing, not a good thing, you're doing a fantastic thing. 'So, I know nothing about the boats, but if the boats are loaded up with bad people, and they usually are, because, you know, other countries don't send their best, they send people that they don't want, and they're not stupid people, and they send the people that they don't want.' Turning to the Prime Minister, Mr Trump added: 'And I've heard that you've taken a much stronger stance on this.' The latest data from the Home Office indicates that 122 people crossed the Channel in small boats on Saturday. Asked about tariffs on whisky, Mr Trump said: 'We'll talk about that, I didn't know whisky was a problem. I'm not a big whisky drinker but maybe I should be.' And he said of the special relationship: 'Our relationship is unparalleled.' The meeting between the leaders comes as part of Mr Trump's five-day, private trip to Scotland. No 10 said they reiterated calls for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and agreed to continue talks on the UK-US trade deal during their private talks at Turnberry. They also discussed plans for the president's upcoming state visit in September, a Downing Street spokesperson said.
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Readers discuss migrant protests, Labour's left-wing, water systems and taxes
Do you agree with our readers? Have your say on these MetroTalk topics and more in the comments. It's so depressing that a heinous crime is being used as a political football to attack refugees. Far-right activists claim that the reason they are targeting a hotel housing asylum seekers in Epping is because one of those asylum seekers was arrested for allegedly attempting to kiss a 14-year-old girl (Metro, Mon). Rates of sexual assault are just as high among men born and bred here as they are among ethnic minorities or migrants. Why aren't these activists also protesting about that? When a white Brit is said to have committed a sexual offence, where are all these guys? Fighting for better prevention strategies and higher rates of police investigation? Nope. They're busy finding some other reason to bash the migrants. Because this isn't about safety. It's about racism. Charlie Parrett, Stoke When I want to solve a problem, I go after the cause. If Nigel Farage and other right-wing politicians actually cared about migration, they'd try to get to the bottom of what's causing it. We've already tried to limit benefits to migrants and the right to bring their families with them, so it isn't that. The ones who come illegally don't have the right to claim benefits anyway. People are risking their lives to come here. Why? If there's not a pull, then there must be a push. These people's homelands are being torn apart in a hellstorm of totalitarianism, war and famine. If you want to stop people coming here, you have to help sort out the countries they're coming from. Remember – if someone's talking about a problem but they're not trying to solve the problem, then they're trying to use the problem to serve their own ends. Helen Shaw, Liverpool Robert Hughes (MetroTalk, Mon) says Jeremy Corbyn's new party will only benefit the Conservatives and Reform by splitting Labour's left-wing vote. Perhaps if Labour offered any sort of concession or appealed to the left wing of its party (its not really extreme considering Labour call themselves democratic socialist) then Corbyn's party wouldn't have nearly as much momentum. They have nobody to blame but themselves. Maybe Labour should worry about their own voter base rather than trying and failing to appeal to the right? James Freeman, Bognor Regis Our junior, now called 'resident', doctors are either striking or leaving altogether because we don't have the money to pay them enough. Our water system is collapsing because we don't have the money to take it back under public ownership. We can't give disabled people the extra help they need because we don't have the money for their 'pip' personal independence payments. We don't have the money to help children with special educational needs, either. All because chancellor Rachel Reeves refuses to tax the unused wealth of the super-rich. People say that if we have a wealth tax, these super-rich people will leave. And maybe some of them will. But a lot of them won't. People aren't motivated by money alone. They're motivated by where they and their families want to live and work. Is it really worth bankrupting our country just to hold on to as many super-rich people as possible? And besides, if we're so broke that our basic infrastructure is starting to fall apart, surely that would be a good reason for those people to leave anyway. Rob Slater, Norfolk The death of a child from measles in Liverpool this month highlights the UK's decline in vaccination rates. Some areas are seeing rates below the 95 per cent target recommended by the World Health Organization. More Trending Sadly, this will lead to more deaths from preventable diseases. The spread of lies and disinformation – particularly on social media – is leading to a misplaced distrust in vaccines. Vaccines have been proven to be safe and have saved millions of lives, including from Covid. If vaccination rates continue to fall, we will see more tragic deaths that could have been easily prevented as well as outbreaks of previously eradicated diseases. Mark Dawes, London MORE: Noel and Liam Gallagher's brother Paul Gallagher, 59, charged with rape MORE: Back-to-school coats sorted – Regatta has kids covered (literally) with up to 50% off MORE: If your dry cuticles are screaming for help this new launch is the answer
