
Perth café's small bar bid blocked by noise regulations
The owners of La Mortazza, just 3km from the CBD in North Perth, were told their plans were 'incompatible with its setting'. The City of Vincent's rules forbid exceeding 49 decibels in the evening, and the plans, rated at a similar level to a beer garden, were at 54dB. Both levels are deemed to be moderate — or about the same level as a household refrigerator, normal speaking or light traffic.
Renowned sustainable cities expert Peter Newman said strict noise regulations were 'unreasonable and uneconomic'.
'It's part of living in a city,' he said, emphasising the City of Vincent was under pressure to increase housing density due to its close proximity to small bars, cafes and urban life — often not available in Perth's outer suburbs.
Professor Newman said that urban living requires working out how to co-exist, not have bans or blanket restrictions.
'It's unreasonable in terms of the future of that area because it's going into decline and people who want to live there are younger, and they want urban activity,' he said.
'Noise is a part of life, and it's welcomed.' Woodville Reserve and La Mortazza cafe is claimed to be 100 metres apart. Credit: Google Maps
La Mortazza director Raffaella D'Alonzo said the process had been long and challenging — but the council's decision, made this week, would be appealed.
'We are very upset,' she said. 'Any business owner wants to grow. We've outgrown the daytime service and just wanted to try.'
'We wanted to have a very small menu, only what was fresh from the season, and beer with some wine or Prosecco from Italy,'
'Nothing crazy, nothing where people get smashed, or drunk, very simple.'
La Mortazza is at the ground floor of a three-storey apartment building on busy Fitzgerald Street — just three blocks from the intersection with Angove Street. The plans were to extend trading hours until 9pm on Thursday to Saturday to become a small bar.
Vincent chief executive David MacLennan said nearby residents had been consulted but suggested the owners had included 'beer garden' in their application — a claim in dispute. Staff member Abano Perruzza and owner Raffaella D'Alonzo pictured at cafe La Mortazza in North Perth. Credit: Ian Munro / The West Australian
'As the business is approved as a small bar, we requested a noise assessment that more accurately reflects what can be reasonably expected when operating as a small bar,' he said. 'In providing this assessment, the second acoustic assessment included a reference to noise levels that were equivalent to a beer garden.'
Some locals supported the extension. Brenton Williams, who lives two doors away, said what the cafe brought to the community outweighed other issues.
'We need to remember what actually brings a community vibrancy – if you're looking for peace and quiet I'm not sure why you're living in a city, let alone North Perth,' he told Tuesday night's council meeting.
'I've experienced noise, and this is not noise.'
West Australian Music chief executive Owen Whittle said that the Environmental Protection Act (1997) requires venues to keep noise emissions low but can be sometimes vary in application by local governments.
'A lot of that will come down to the zoning rules and kind of authorities that local governments have,' he said. Outside of La Mortazza. Credit: Supplied
Mr Whittle said that sometimes venues can face challenges due to noise readings being taken outside of buildings, which may not accurately represent the noise impact inside homes.
'Noise emissions are measured from the closest wall of a residential building to the venue generally,' he said.
'That can often create a lot of difficulties for those venues, because it's not those noise readings aren't necessarily taken from inside, and they're not necessarily going to be a true representation of the kind of noise emissions or their impact on amenity,'
'They can be increased because, of course, the noise from outside of our building can be far higher than what might be in someone's living room or bedroom.'
Australian Hotel Association chief executive Bradley Woods said that small bars have become increasingly popular as they 'offer vibrant spaces that contribute to their local communities'.
'It's important to strike a balance between supporting local business growth and maintaining the amenity of surrounding residential areas,' he said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


SBS Australia
12 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Google threatens to sue if YouTube is included in Australia's kids social media ban
Google has been warned threats to sue won't sway the potential late inclusion of YouTube in Australia's world-first social media ban for children. The tech giant wrote to Communications Minister Anika Wells declaring it was considering its legal position if its video sharing platform was included in the ban for children 16 and under. The letter, first reported by the Daily Telegraph, flagged the ban could be challenged on the grounds it restricts the implied constitutional freedom of political communication. Signals the Australian government was contemplating an "abrupt policy reversal" prompted Google to seek further clarity. "YouTube is a video sharing platform, not a social media service, that offers benefit and value to younger Australians," a YouTube spokesperson said. "We have written directly to the government, urging them to uphold the integrity of the legislative process and protect the age-appropriate experiences and safeguards we provide for young Australians." The social media ban is due to come into effect in December. Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and Snapchat were among platforms covered when legislation passed parliament. YouTube was exempted, in a move TikTok described as a "sweetheart deal". But e-Safety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant has recommended a rethink, citing research showing children were exposed to harmful content on YouTube more than any other platform. Children are exposed to harmful content on YouTube, e-safety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant says. Source: AAP / Lukas Coch "The new law will only restrict children under the age of 16 from having their own accounts - not accessing content on YouTube or any other service through links from the school or in a 'logged-out' state," she told the National Press Club in June. "There is nothing in the legislation that prevents educators with their own accounts from continuing to incorporate school-approved educational content on YouTube or any other service just as they do now." Prime Minister Anthony Albanese took a dim view of Google's attempt to muscle in on the decision-making process. "The minister will make these assessments ... independent of any these threats that are made by the social media companies," he told ABC TV on Sunday. "I say to them that social media has a social responsibility. A YouGov poll suggested widespread support for the ban. "There is no doubt that young people are being impacted adversely in their mental health by some of the engagement with social media and that is why the government has acted." The early findings of an age-verification trial found technologies could block young kids from social media platforms, but not without loopholes. Platforms will face penalties worth up to $50 million if caught not taking reasonable steps to prevent children 16 and under from creating accounts.


Perth Now
14 hours ago
- Perth Now
PM defiant as YouTube warns of legal action
Anthony Albanese says Labor will stand up to 'threats' from social media giants, following news Google has threatened to sue the federal government if YouTube us included in the under-16 social media ban. The parent company of the videostreaming platform has written to Communications Minister Anika Wells stating it was considering a High Court challenge, adding a ban would diminish the 'implied constitutional freedom of political communication,' The Daily Telegraph has reported. While YouTube was not originally included in the social media ban, slated to start in December this year, eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman-Grant has said the platform should not be exempt as it exposed children to harmful content. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese confirmed Communications Minister Anika Wells had yet to make a decision on whether YouTube would be included in the under-16s social media ban. NewsWire/ Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia 'Leading the world' Speaking to the ABC, the Prime Minister said a decision had yet to be made by Ms Wells, but said a conclusion would be made 'independent of any of these threats that are made by the social media companies'. 'There is no doubt that young people are being impacted adversely in their mental health by some of the engagement with social media and that is why the government has acted,' he said. 'One of the things that concerns some of the social media companies is that we are leading the world and I'm proud that we're prepared to stand these people up effectively from their threats.' YouTube has repeatedly opposed the proposed ban, stating it offered educational benefits, and helps children and teenagers connect with communities and provide mental health information and support for marginalised groups. The owners of YouTube, Google, has threatened the federal government with a High Court challence. NewsWire/ Aaron Francis Credit: News Corp Australia However Ms Inman-Grant has argued that, while the site does offer educational benefits, the video platform was 'by far' the most used by children. She also noted that under-16s would still be able to access YouTube without an account and teachers would also be able to use it as a learning tool in schools. 'And when we asked where they were experiencing harm and the kinds of harms they were experiencing, the most prevalent place where young Australians experienced harm was on YouTube – almost 37 per cent,' she said in July. 'This ranges from misogynistic content to hateful material, to violent fighting videos, online challenges, disordered eating, suicidal ideation.'

Sydney Morning Herald
15 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
YouTube threatens to sue if roped into social media ban
Google has been warned threats to sue won't sway the potential late inclusion of YouTube in Australia's world-first social media ban for children. The tech giant wrote to Communications Minister Anika Wells declaring it was considering its legal position if its video-sharing platform was included in the ban for children aged 16 and under. The letter flagged the ban could be challenged because it restricted the implied constitutional right to freedom of political communication. 'YouTube is a video-sharing platform, not a social media service, that offers benefit and value to younger Australians,' a YouTube spokesperson said. Loading 'We have written directly to the government, urging them to uphold the integrity of the legislative process and protect the age-appropriate experiences and safeguards we provide for young Australians.' The social media ban is due to come into effect in December. covered when legislation passed parliament. YouTube was exempted in a move TikTok described as a 'sweetheart deal'.