
Grief In The Workplace: Why Addressing Loss Can Be Good For Culture
Endings can lead to new beginnings, growth, and lasting lessons. Yet all too often in the workplace we avoid talking about endings, whether it be the ending of a project, a client relationship, our retirement, or the most universal ending of them all, death.
'By avoiding conversations about endings, we never get to fully distill the learnings of the life cycle of a project or a company, and I think we can also add the ending of a human life into that because we live in a death-denying culture,' says Carla Fernandez, co-founder of The Dinner Party, a nationwide peer support community for young adult grievers between the ages of 21 and 45, and the author of Renegade Grief.
"Renegade Grief" is a new book that helps people navigate life after loss.
'What's happening around The Dinner Party table is time to process and reflect and learn about what has happened, and how the lessons from this loss experience can inform how we want to spend the rest of our precious lives,' Fernandez says. 'Yes, it's about grief. And yes, it's about somebody's death. But really it's about, how do we want to live moving forward? A lot of people around the dinner party table naturally reflect on the type of work that they want to do, since we spend such a large part of our lives at work.'
We are in a culture that often equates endings with failure rather than as part of a natural cycle, and thus avoid taking time to reflect on the patterns or lessons to be learned from the ending, or the transformations they may have sparked in us.
Carla Fernandez is on a mission to help companies become "grief ready."
In addition, Fernandez says that grief in particular in the workplace is too often seen as having baggage, and many think someone's loss is something we should not bring up or just try to forget and move on. 'My work with people who've experienced significant loss actually finds grief is this incredible initiation, where the person experiences a deepening of empathy and a strengthening of leadership abilities,' says Fernandez. 'Loss becomes this life experience that can allow someone to prioritize what's most important. A lot of the work that I'm doing is about how we reframe the experience of being a griever from something that we need to hide or feel shame about, and instead own as one of the most quintessential, deep human experiences we will all go through at one point or another.'
The cost of leaving grief unaddressed in the workplace can be high, as it may contribute to presenteeism, lower retention rates, and hinder psychological safety. One in nine employees faces a loss yearly, and grief-related losses may cost organizations around $75 billion annually. About half of employees will consider leaving their jobs if employers don't provide support after a loss.
Yet despite its impact, there has been little precedent set for addressing grief when it's present in the workplace. Most companies aren't equipped to handle grief and loss in the workplace, as is evidenced by the standard bereavement leave being only about three to five days. A few days of bereavement leave isn't a sustainable solution because grief isn't something that can be processed in a few days and moved on from. It's not linear, and trying to ignore it doesn't make it go away. Grief expert and author David Kessler says that grief must be witnessed, and The Dinner Party premise is about witnessing grief by bringing grievers together in community.
'Capitalism is a force that wants us to be on and productive, organized, and moving forward,' says Fernandez. 'But grief is this kind of energy that asks you to stop and rest and reflect and feel, and it doesn't always jive with the standard operating procedure of a company.' This prompted Fernandez to create a workplace program called Workplace Resilience that The Dinner Party's Executive Director Mary Pauline Diaz-Frasene now runs to offer talks and training to give organizations the tools and structures to be grief ready and create cultures of care.
When somebody on a team experiences a loss, it's about having the skills to support them, not by being their therapist, but by knowing the questions to ask to make sure that that person has what they need to re-enter the workforce. 'It's about normalizing conversations by teaching managers and leaders how to be more grief ready so that when an employee comes back from bereavement leave, the language of grief has already been introduced into a professional setting instead of being something that's taboo or not talked about.'
While healing from grief can be supported in community, there is a paradox in that grief is also an internal process that calls for inner reflection. This applies to endings of all kinds, and reflecting on our own inevitable ending can help infuse our losses, our relationships, our work, and our lives with more depth and meaning.
Krittika Sharma founded Maajhi to offer experiences and tools to empower people to humanize loss.
Krittika Sharma founded Maajhi to offer experiences and tools to empower people to humanize loss, grief, and find meaning. It's the first of its kind in India, and growing globally. The idea was born soon after her father, now retired air force Wing Commander Rakesh Sharma, her biggest role model and the first Indian astronaut, had a serious medical episode that put him in the hospital. She says the possibility of losing one of her most important people in her life felt unimaginable.
'I got drawn into grief work because of my lack of preparation, so it was this auto-ethnographic approach to understanding why I was so afraid of loss,' says Sharma. 'Then my father was in the hospital, and it can feel very isolating, like you're the only one who's going through it and no one really teaches us about it. But I recognized that I was not the only one who was feeling this way, and that there's a whole healthcare industry that's not talking about grief. There are cultures that don't talk about it.'
Sharma is normalizing these conversations in the workplace through guiding Fortune 100 corporate teams with practices such as death meditations, where you reflect on the end of your life, as well as writing your own obituary so you own your narrative. 'It's about truly humanizing loss, grief, and helping people see meaning through it all. Reflecting on death enables you to live life more fully,' she says.
An exercise such as a death meditation can help people reconnect to their purpose, their value system, and their humanity. This in turn can benefit workplace culture, since people who feel connected to purpose at work are more innovative, more productive, and have higher retention rates.
'A person's performance on the job is rooted in their values and engagement,' says Sharma. 'In some cases when we work with senior leadership, it's really about what they want to leave behind, how they've gone through this journey of getting to being a leader, and what are the values they want to pass on to their peers and their teams?'
Sharma sees these exercises as a pathway to bringing more humanity to work, because reflecting on death can help you live more intentionally. 'There's a reflective quality to a death meditation that actually fits into a corporate structure, because it enables people to apply the insights they get today rather than wait until they retire to ask themselves what they are doing with the finite amount of time they have,' Sharma says. 'It allows you to question yourself now, and you get to do something about it because insight leads to action. Is the way you're living your life enabling you to reach your potential both in and outside the workplace?'
Workplaces may be more open to creating space for conversations about grief and loss in a post-pandemic era after people felt grief on a collective level, and as geopolitics and technological advances such as AI lead to ongoing disruption and uncertainty.
'There are so many situations in which we don't talk about loss in its many forms unless it's right in front of us,' says Sharma. 'What I recognized about my own experiences with grief, or seeing others through it, is that there is a language of loss that we all inherently know but don't often use, and it belongs to all of us and changes our trajectories. There's thinking attached to it, which doesn't come up unless there's a safe space to address it. Like David Kessler said, grief isn't something that needs to be solved for; it needs to be witnessed.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
17 hours ago
- UPI
Trump opens new golf course, meets with Scottish first minister
July 29 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump opened his latest golf course and held talks with Scottish First Minister John Swinney as he concluded his trip to Scotland on Tuesday. Appearing at the Trump International Golf Links in Aberdeen with his sons Donald Jr. and Eric, and Swinney, Trump spoke with the media before cutting the ribbon to mark the grand opening. Trump noted that after playing the course, he would head back to the United States to "put out fires all over the world." "We did one yesterday, as you know, we stopped the war," he said Tuesday in reference to a cease-fire that had been arranged between Thailand and Cambodia, despite Thailand announcing Tuesday that Cambodia violated that cease-fire only hours later. "That's much more important than playing golf," Trump added. "As much as I like it, it's much more important." It was Trump's second day of golf on this trip, as he played Monday at his resort in Turnberry, Scotland, where he had met with U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Swinney was reportedly seeking to speak with Trump about the 10% tariff levied by Trump on U.K. exports to the United States, specifically in regard to the alcoholic beverage Scotch. Scotch makes up 25% of all the U.K.'s food and drink exports, according to the Scotch Whisky Association. The BBC reported Tuesday that Trump and Swinney discussed whisky "at length," and that a Scottish government source said there was a "window of opportunity" between this visit Trump's next scheduled visit to the U.K. in September to make progress on shrinking the tariff.

USA Today
a day ago
- USA Today
Trump's EU trade deal ushers in a golden age for blue-collar workers
Critics can hate Donald Trump's personality all they want, but the president's ability to forge trade deals that favor American workers shouldn't be discounted. Between golf rounds in Scotland, President Donald Trump secured a deal with the European Union this weekend that promises an extraordinary boon for American workers. After months of negotiations, the EU succumbed to Trump's pressure on trade, agreeing on July 27 to 15% tariffs on many U.S. imports from Europe. The EU also agreed to buy $750 billion worth of oil, gas and nuclear fuel from U.S. energy producers over the next three years. And Europe's governing body agreed to invest $600 billion in U.S. operations. Details on the energy and investment stipulations are vague for now. But if they happen at anywhere close to the levels promised, they will be a huge boost for the U.S. economy and drive job growth in agriculture, energy and other vital sectors. Trump's EU trade deal is fuel for US economy The EU deal is a big deal on multiple fronts. When Trump threatened high tariffs in April, stock markets plummeted. Critics claimed Trump was wrecking the economy, and analysts raised fears of a recession this year. Three months later, the Nasdaq and S&P 500 have set multiple record highs, job growth is strong and forecasters expect a healthy growth in gross domestic product when the second quarter number is released this week. I've heard few critics, save perhaps comedian Bill Maher, acknowledge that tariffs functioned as excellent leverage to persuade countries to agree to more favorable trade terms with the U.S. Many of those critics underestimated the president's negotiation skills. The Financial Times reported that one European ambassador remarked, 'Trump worked out exactly where our pain threshold is." Opinion: Nvidia CEO says Trump gives America an advantage. Hear that, progressives? Trump's EU deal will help blue-collar workers The decades-long push for young people to attend college rather than gain the skills needed to work in a trade has created a labor gap. A McKinsey study released in 2024 found that manufacturers and construction companies face a hiring crunch for carpenters, electricians, welders and plumbers. This EU deal might help change that as hundreds of billions of dollars are poured into the energy industry and other sectors. The financial incentives to work in the skilled trades could well be better than ever. Opinion: In-N-Out owner places order to go − out of California Mike Rowe, former host of the television show "Dirty Jobs," has become an ambassador for blue-collar employment via his foundation, which offers scholarships to help young people complete a trade program. On July 22, Rowe told Brian Kilmeade on his Fox News show that "paralegal, and anything creative, writing in general, coding … AI is going to come for those" jobs. But Rowe said there's never been a better time to become a skilled laborer: "We are entering the golden age of plumbing, steamfitting, pipefitting, welding, HVAC. Those jobs are not going to be impacted by' artificial intelligence. Critics can hate Trump's personality all they want, but the president's ability to forge trade deals that favor American workers shouldn't be discounted. I voted for this and would do so again. After months of economic wins, I'd like to know why you didn't? Nicole Russell is a columnist at USA TODAY and a mother of four who lives in Texas. Contact her at nrussell@ and follow her on X, formerly Twitter: @russell_nm. Sign up for her weekly newsletter, The Right Track, here.


New York Post
a day ago
- New York Post
Trump's trade wins shock the experts — who are blind to business reality
If America is in the midst of a trade war, the question we have to ask is: Are we tired of winning yet? President 'Donald Trump reaps $50bn tariff haul as world 'chickens out,'' reads the Financial Times headline. 'Only China and Canada have retaliated against US president's tariff war,' its subhead adds. 'In the Trump-dominated global economy, the US gets plenty but gives nothing in return,' reads a rueful post on X from Axios — another publication with an upmarket readership — promoting an article titled, 'Trump trade deals prove access to the US still matters above all else.' Populist publications have a different take on Trump's spate of trade victories. 'Trump's trade deal bloc — let's call it The Free World — now encompasses 57% of global GDP . . . 40% of total global trade in goods,' and '18% of the world's population,' according to Breitbart's John Carney. The president has only been in office six months, and his tariffs haven't even been in place that long, but already the results are undeniable. At a time when there otherwise seems to be no end to federal deficits, Trump's trade policy put the federal government in the black for the month of June, with a $27 billion surplus — and, as it happens, about $27 billion in tariff revenue. It's one thing that Trump so often surprises political opponents who underestimate him at election time and can't understand the root of his appeal. What's more remarkable is Trump seems to defy the very laws of economics — or rather, the law as laid down by economists. Other social sciences have lately lost credibility thanks to a 'republication crisis' that shows how the results reported in leading journals of psychology and other fields all too often fail to be repeated when experiments are conducted anew and data are re-examined. Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! Will the economics profession — whose mainstream is fervently in favor of free trade and is convinced tariffs are madness — face a similar reckoning for getting this test wrong? Trump can do things the economists say can't be done because he approaches trade the way he conducts his real-estate business: It's a negotiation, and leverage is what counts. Precisely because the United States has such an enormous trade deficit with the rest of the world — amounting to more than $918 billion in 2024 — other nations depend on access to our market as an outlet for their goods. The size and wealth of the American consumer base is unmatchable, and countries that get cut off from it can't easily make up the difference by selling more goods and services somewhere else. Whole industries in Europe and Asia would collapse without access to the American consumer. Trump is willing to give them access — for a price. Instead of using punitive tariffs to exclude foreign goods altogether, Trump is willing to strike a deal with anyone to allow goods to be sold in America at a price that makes the trade worthwhile for Americans and foreign companies alike. The hitch: The deal must be on terms favorable for American workers and industry. The president's arrangement with the European Union levies a 15% tariff on most EU goods — but that's peanuts compared to the 30% Trump was threatening if Europe didn't cooperate. The deal calls for new European investments of $600 billion in America, as well as for EU members to buy more energy and military equipment from us. The 15% tariff is higher than what European producers were paying before Trump returned to the White House — high enough that American producers will get some protective advantage, but not so high that foreign companies won't be able to compete. Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters That's crucial because competition is what keeps prices down for American consumers. Foreign firms can't easily 'pass on' a tax on their goods — which is what a tariff is — to the Americans who buy their products when those same Americans can choose from domestic producers instead. The modest protection a 15% tariff affords gives more investors at home a reason to put their capital into American companies — which is good for our workforce and consumers alike. It means more jobs and more goods; more money in Americans' pockets and more stock on the shelves, which keeps prices down. There's risk in all this, but the upside opportunity is much greater, as entrepreneurs here and abroad recognize. For the Europeans, it's a no-brainer: The American market is so rife with profit possibilities that a 15% access fee is a very modest cost of doing business. American businesses should recognize their opportunity as well — they're native to a market the entire world is desperate to be in, and they should use that advantage to the fullest, investing at home and making the sales that foreign firms are so eager to make here. In this trade war, all Americans are winning — except, perhaps, the overeducated prisoners of the Ivory Tower. Daniel McCarthy is the editor of Modern Age: A Conservative Review and editor-at-large of The American Conservative.