No digging, rare earth mining will be environmentally friendly, says Perak MB
LENGGONG : The Perak government has given an assurance that all mining activities involving non-radioactive rare earth elements (NR-REE) will not harm the environment.
Menteri besar Saarani Mohamad said although rare earth mining presents a new opportunity for generating state revenue, the government will not compromise on protecting the people's interests.
He said the state government guarantees that NR-REE activities will utilise modern mining technologies to improve efficiency and safety while safeguarding the environment.
'When we initiated the NR-REE mining pilot project in Kenering, Hulu Perak, one of the key requirements was strict compliance with environmental impact assessment procedures, particularly those concerning environmental protection,' he said at a press conference after presenting the progress report of the Perak Sejahtera 2030 plan here today.
'The latest extraction method for this mineral no longer involves digging, but uses the in-situ leaching (ISL) method, which involves injecting ammonium sulfate solution into the ground to dissolve the rare earth elements, which are then pumped back to the surface for processing.'
Saarani said the state government would not allow NR-REE mining activities if it does not comply with standard operating procedures and the requirements set by the relevant technical agencies.
'NR-REE mining using the ISL method is the latest sustainable approach with controlled environmental impact, low operational costs, and good worker safety standards,' he said.
'Therefore, we do not have to worry about landslides, there will be no clearing of trees, and the forest reserve itself will be protected. If it causes environmental damage, we will not allow it.'
It was previously reported that the state government had identified new potential NR-REE mineral sites in three additional districts apart from Hulu Perak, with estimated reserves of 1.7 million metric tonnes.
Saarani said based on preliminary studies by the Perak minerals and geoscience department, the districts include Kuala Kangsar, Kinta, Larut Matang and Selama, with 70% to 80% of the potential NR-REE reserves located within forest reserve areas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
40 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
TNB should be considered utility company, apex court rules
In 2022, the Kuala Lumpur High Court allowed TNB's judicial review application to set aside LHDN's RM1.8 billion tax assessment for the year 2018, ruling that the amount was considered a reinvestment allowance. PETALING JAYA : The Federal Court today overturned a Court of Appeal ruling that found national utility company Tenaga Nasional Bhd to be in the business of manufacturing electricity, in a case considered the largest corporate tax dispute in the country's history. The court said TNB should actually have been considered a utility company under Schedule 7B of the Income Tax Act 1967 (ITA), The Edge reported. As a utility company, TNB's application for a reinvestment allowance in seeking tax relief under Schedule 7A of the ITA was wrong, a five-member bench, led by Court of Appeal president Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim said. The judges said TNB's application should have been done under Section 7B that specifically relates to utilities entities where it could apply for investment allowance. Justice Rhodzariah Bujang said even if TNB was manufacturing electricity, electricity was considered a form of utility. Rhodzariah said Schedule 7B of the ITA provides investment allowance incentives specifically for companies involved in the service sector, including transportation, communication, utilities, and other sub-sectors. The said schedule was introduced to encourage investments in infrastructure and services that were essential for public welfare and economic development, she said. However, she said TNB could not be blamed for filing its claim for reinvestment allowance under Schedule 7A on grounds that it manufactured electricity. 'It does not mean that the Inland Revenue Board (LHDN) has no option but to accede to it. 'That is the same for any other applicant of a statutory claim, for it is the approving authority which must decide whether an approval be granted for such a claim, and of course, if not, the aggrieved party has the legal right in an appropriate factual and legal circumstance to question that decision in court,' she said. In 2022, the High Court allowed TNB's judicial review application to set aside the LHDN's RM1.8 billion tax assessment for the year 2018. High Court judge Noorin Badaruddin agreed that the amount was considered a reinvestment allowance. The dispute arose when LHDN disallowed TNB's claim under Schedule 7A of the ITA on the basis that the generation, distribution and transmission of electricity was not manufacturing of electricity, and arguing that it was only a service provider. In 2024, the Court of Appeal upheld the High Court's ruling. TNB has already paid the said sum.
Free Malaysia Today
43 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
MACC probes tycoon allegedly linked to Albert Tei
On Monday, businessman Albert Tei claimed trial to two charges of giving a total of RM350,000 in bribes related to mineral prospecting licence applications in Sabah to two assemblymen. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission is investigating a tycoon allegedly linked to businessman Albert Tei, who is standing trial on charges of corruption. An MACC source said this followed claims that the tycoon, who manages a Singaporean company, had 'funded a corruption scandal' involving Tei and several Sabah Umno leaders. 'MACC has launched an investigation to confirm this information,' the source said. MACC chief commissioner Azam Baki confirmed the probe and said several witnesses would be summoned soon to assist in the investigation. On Monday, Tei claimed trial to two charges of giving a total of RM350,000 in bribes related to mineral prospecting licence applications in Sabah to two assemblymen. He is accused of giving RM150,000 and RM200,000 in bribes to assistant state industrial development and entrepreneurship minister Andi Suryady Bandy of Sabah Umno and Sindumin assemblyman Dr Yusof Yacob, respectively. The assemblymen also claimed trial to accepting the bribes. The Sabah mining scandal surfaced last year following the leak of several videos purportedly showing discussions involving bribery and misconduct related to mineral exploration projects in the state.
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Federal Court rules in favor of IRB, reinstates RM1.8b tax assessment against Tenaga Nasional Berhad
PUTRAJAYA, July 2 — The Federal Court today allowed the Inland Revenue Board's (IRB) appeal to reinstate an additional tax assessment of RM1.8 billion against Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) for the 2018 assessment year. A five-member panel chaired by Court of Appeal President Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim unanimously overturned the earlier decisions of both the High Court and the Court of Appeal, which had ruled in favour of TNB and quashed the IRB's tax assessment. The other members of the panel were Federal Court judges Tan Sri Nallini Pathmanathan, Datuk Zabariah Mohd Yusof, Datuk Rhodzariah Bujang and Datuk Abu Bakar Jais. No order as to costs was made, with the court noting that the matter involved issues of public interest. Delivering the court's judgment, Justice Rhodzariah held that TNB's claim for reinvestment allowance (RA) under Schedule 7A of the Income Tax Act 1967 (ITA) was misconceived and not in accordance with the provisions of the Act. She added that TNB ought to have applied for an investment allowance under Schedule 7B of the ITA, rather than seeking RA under Schedule 7A. She explained that the legislative intent behind Schedule 7A was to incentivise manufacturing companies to reinvest in their existing operations in Malaysia. In contrast, Schedule 7B provides for investment allowance incentives specifically tailored to companies in the services sector, as approved by the Minister of Finance. Justice Rhodzariah further noted that TNB is authorised to impose a service charge under the Service Tax Act 2018, which reinforces its status as a service provider. As such, the court found that TNB falls within the ambit of the services sector and is therefore subject to Schedule 7B, not Schedule 7A. The IRB argued that TNB, as a utility provider, does not qualify as a manufacturer and is thus not entitled to the RA granted to entities engaged in manufacturing activities. On July 21, 2020, TNB filed a judicial review application seeking, among others, to quash the IRB's decision dated July 13, 2020, which had disallowed its RA claim amounting to RM1,812,506,384.64. The company also sought a declaration that it was entitled to claim the RA under Schedule 7A of the ITA. TNB had included its RA claim for the year of assessment 2018 in its tax return. However, the IRB informed the company that the claim had been disallowed in a letter dated July 3, 2020. Subsequently, on July 13, 2020, the IRB issued a notice of additional assessment against TNB for RM1,812,506,384.64 in tax. TNB then initiated judicial review proceedings to challenge the assessment. In February 2022, the High Court allowed the application and set aside the IRB's additional assessment for the year 2018. The Court of Appeal, in a decision delivered in May 2023, affirmed the High Court's ruling. Despite the dispute, TNB has already paid the assessed sum. At today's hearing, the IRB was represented by Datuk Dr Cyrus Das and senior revenue counsel Ashrina Ramzan Ali, while counsels Datuk D. P. Naban and S. Saravana Kumar appeared for TNB. — Bernama
