Bengals' Mike Brown on Shemar Stewart contract clause dispute: 'If he's sitting in jail, I don't think I oughta be paying him'
Bengals team owner Mike Brown did not mince words about the situation when speaking to reporters on Monday. Brown confirmed that the contract talks with Stewart were not finished, though he said there's "really no reason why it shouldn't be."
"From our vantage point, it's a form of foolishness. It just ought to get done," Brown said, via WLWT Cincinnati.
Why is Shemar Stewart in a standoff with the Bengals?
Brown added that Stewart's primary grievance was about guaranteed money — a trend for rookies this offseason. Stewart's situation, though, is a little bit more complicated: The former Texas A&M DE is set to sign a four-year, $18.9 million contract as the No. 17 pick, based on the NFL's rookie wage scale. But The Cincinnati Enquirer reported in June that the Bengals are reportedly trying to make the deal in a way that lets the team void future guaranteed money, setting a new precedent for rookie contracts.
Brown confirmed that on Monday, and said that those clauses would kick in if Stewart — or any of the other Bengals rookies — engaged in "conduct detrimental to football."
"If we get a player who gets involved in something like that, or does something that is just unacceptable, guess what? I don't wanna pay 'em. I really don't. If he's sitting in jail, I don't think I oughta be paying him," Brown said Monday, via Fox 19's Joe Danneman.
Cincinnati is testing out the new contract term on its rookies this season. However, Stewart is just vocally pushing back against it.
"I'm 100 percent right," Stewart said in June, via Sports Illustrated's Jay Morrison. "I'm not asking for nothing y'all have never done before. But in y'all case, y'all just want to win arguments (more) than winning more games."
On Monday, Brown seemed frustrated with Stewart's stance.
"There is no dispute over the money. It's just a dispute in his mind that I guess if he did something that really deserved punishment, that he would want the whole contract guaranteed," Brown said.
Bengals GM Duke Tobin blames Shemar Stewart's agent
General manager Duke Tobin also expressed his frustrations, but pointed blame toward Stewart's representatives.
"I think Shemar needs to be here," Tobin said, via The Athletic's Paul Dehner Jr. "I'm not going to blame Shemar. He is listening to the advice he is paying for. I don't understand or believe or agree with the advice but I'm not the one paying for it.
"If I felt we were treating him unfairly as it relates to all the other draft picks in this year's draft then maybe it would be a different story. But we are not. I don't really understand where things are there."
What's next for Shemar Stewart?
The Bengals hold training camp on Tuesday, with every member of the team set to report. But since Stewart has yet to sign, he is not under any obligation with the team.
Even with the standoff, Stewart has continued working out on his own to prepare for the upcoming season, with Texas A&M coach Mike Elko confirming last week Stewart has been using the Aggies' facilities.
However, despite some speculation that Stewart might try to re-join the Aggies, Elko said that Stewart has been working out by himself. Stewart used only three years of college eligibility to play with Texas A&M, but any attempt to re-join the team would likely require a lawsuit given that he waived his eligibility to enter the draft.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Francisco Lindor's RBI groundout
Francisco Lindor drives in Francisco Alvarez after grounding out to Willy Adames, putting the Mets on the board first with a 1-0 lead in the 3rd inning
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ronny Mauricio's RBI double
Ronny Mauricio rips a double down the right-field line to bring home Francisco Alvarez and give the Mets a 2-1 lead in the 5th inning
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US, China to launch new talks on tariff truce extension, easing path for Trump-Xi meeting
By David Lawder STOCKHOLM (Reuters) -Top U.S. and Chinese economic officials will resume talks in Stockholm on Monday to try to tackle longstanding economic disputes at the centre of a trade war between the world's top two economies, aiming to extend a truce by three months and keeping sharply higher tariffs at bay. China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with President Donald Trump's administration, after Beijing and Washington reached preliminary deals in May and June to end weeks of escalating tit-for-tat tariffs and a cut-off of rare earth minerals. Without an agreement, global supply chains could face renewed turmoil from U.S. duties snapping back to triple-digit levels that would amount to a bilateral trade embargo. The Stockholm talks come hot on the heels of Trump's biggest trade deal yet with the European Union on Sunday for a 15% tariff on most EU goods exports to the U.S., including autos. The bloc will also buy $750 billion worth of American energy and make $600 billion worth of U.S. investments in coming years. No similar breakthrough is expected in the U.S.-China talks but trade analysts said that another 90-day extension of a tariff and export control truce struck in mid-May was likely. An extension of that length would prevent further escalation and facilitate planning for a potential meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in late October or early November. A U.S. Treasury spokesperson declined comment on a South China Morning Post report quoting unnamed sources as saying the two sides would refrain from introducing new tariffs or other steps that could escalate the trade war for another 90 days. Trump's administration is poised to impose new sectoral tariffs that will impact China within weeks, including on semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, ship-to-shore cranes and other products. "We're very close to a deal with China. We really sort of made a deal with China, but we'll see how that goes," Trump told reporters on Sunday before European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen struck their tariff deal. DEEPER ISSUES Previous U.S.-China trade talks in Geneva and London in May and June focused on bringing U.S. and Chinese retaliatory tariffs down from triple-digit levels and restoring the flow of rare earth minerals halted by China and Nvidia's H20 AI chips and other goods halted by the United States. So far, the talks have not delved into broader economic issues. They include U.S. complaints that China's state-led, export-driven model is flooding world markets with cheap goods, and Beijing's complaints that U.S. national security export controls on tech goods seek to stunt Chinese growth. "Geneva and London were really just about trying to get the relationship back on track so that they could, at some point, actually negotiate about the issues which animate the disagreement between the countries in the first place," said Scott Kennedy, a China economics expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. "I'd be surprised if there is an early harvest on some of these things but an extension of the ceasefire for another 90 days seems to be the most likely outcome," Kennedy said. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has already flagged a deadline extension and has said he wants China to rebalance its economy away from exports to more domestic consumption -- a decades-long goal for U.S. policymakers. Analysts say the U.S.-China negotiations are far more complex than those with other Asian countries and will require more time. China's grip on the global market for rare earth minerals and magnets, used in everything from military hardware to car windshield wiper motors, has proved to be an effective leverage point on U.S. industries. TRUMP-XI MEETING? In the background of the talks is speculation about a possible meeting between Trump and Xi in late October. Trump has said he will decide soon on a landmark trip to China, and a new flare-up of tariffs and export controls would likely derail planning. Sun Chenghao, a fellow at Tsinghua University's Center for International Security and Strategy in Beijing, said that a Trump-Xi summit would be an opportunity for the U.S. to lower the 20% tariffs on Chinese goods related to fentanyl. In exchange, he said the Chinese side could make good on its 2020 pledge to increase purchases of U.S. farm products and other goods. "The future prospect of the heads of state summit is very beneficial to the negotiations because everyone wants to reach an agreement or pave the way in advance," Sun said. Still, China will likely request a reduction of multi-layered U.S. tariffs totaling 55% on most goods and further easing of U.S. high-tech export controls, analysts said. Beijing has argued that such purchases would help reduce the U.S. trade deficit with China, which reached $295.5 billion in 2024.
