Starmer suspends rebellious MPs
Neil Duncan- Jordan and Brian Leishman have confirmed their suspensions from the parliamentary party, while The Times has reported that Chris Hinchliff has also lost the whip.
All three voted against the Government's planned welfare reforms as part of a wider rebellion earlier this month, and all were first elected at last year's election.
Mr Duncan-Jordan has said he remains 'as committed as ever' to Labour values, but accepted that voting against the welfare plans 'could come at a cost'.
In a statement, the MP for Poole said: 'Since being elected, I have consistently spoken up for my constituents on a range of issues, including most recently on cuts to disability benefits.
'I understood this could come at a cost, but I couldn't support making disabled people poorer.
'Although I've been suspended from the Parliamentary Labour Party today, I've been part of the Labour and trade union movement for 40 years and remain as committed as ever to its values.'
Meanwhile, while Mr Leishman said he is a 'proud Labour member' and remains 'committed to the party'
The office of the MP for Alloa and Grangemouth confirmed he had had the whip 'temporarily suspended'.
'I wish to remain a Labour MP and deliver the positive change many voters are craving,' Mr Leishman said in a statement.
'I have voted against the Government on issues because I want to effectively represent and be the voice for communities across Alloa and Grangemouth.
'I firmly believe that it is not my duty as an MP to make people poorer, especially those that have suffered because of austerity and its dire consequences.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
16 minutes ago
- BBC News
Former Southampton City Council post room worker becomes leader
A former council post room worker has been formally elected as the authority's Alex Winning did postal work at Southampton City Council at the age of 16, before working in the council's HR and adult services teams, according to his LinkedIn takes over an authority which has been allowed exceptional support by the government to prevent financial Winning is the authority's third leader in two years after Satvir Kaur became an MP and Lorna Fielker resigned to run for regional mayor. The father of one, who was previously the council's cabinet member for children and learning, said he wanted the authority to be "brilliant at the basics".He said he understood residents' "strong feelings" about missed waste collections and the recently-ended car ban in Portswood Road. He told the Local Democracy Reporting Service: "People in Southampton, all they want is basic services delivered. We have to be doing that."We're fully aware that things haven't been good enough for some time in waste, and we're as frustrated as residents with that."He endorsed the decision to scrap the Portswood Road bus gate trial after it caused increased traffic in neighbouring leader said: "At the end of the day, it didn't work in the way that we wanted it to and we needed to be quite honest about that."There are residents that are sad to see it go. Obviously, there was a lot that were very happy to see it go. It won't be coming back."Mr Winning, who was born and raised in Southampton, said he "never in a million years" thought he would be the council's leader and would "take the role incredibly seriously". Additional reporting by Marcus White, BBC News, Southampton You can follow BBC Hampshire & Isle of Wight on Facebook, X, or Instagram.
Spectator
18 minutes ago
- Spectator
Burghart: It's the economy, stupid
Most elections are fought and won on the economy. So it is no surprise that the Tory leadership have identified this as the strongest issue on which to attack Keir Starmer. At the 1922 committee last night, Kemi Badenoch told her troops that the economy would be the 'number one issue' going forward. Alex Burghart, her policy chief, did the same this morning at the Onward think tank, in a thoughtful speech reflecting on the first year of this government. Burghart's speech stressed three main points. The first, the primacy of economic policy in political debate, as the contractions under Labour become increasingly evident. The second, the underpriced possibility of widespread civil unrest summer. The third, the complete breakdown in Keir Starmer's authority, following last week's welfare revolt. His conclusion: that this is increasingly an administration which is increasingly in office, but not in power. In Burghart's diagnosis, the conclusion to Britain's ails is, unsurprisingly, the restoration of the Conservative party to office to undertake, once more, its historic role of rescuing the country from socialism. Asked about how radical the next government would be, Burghart was much too savvy to be drawn into anything resembling criticism of his colleague James Cleverly. But he did point to the energy on the political right and hail the prospect of new ideas for state reform. All this was delivered with plenty of flourishes befitting a former lecturer. Referring to the benefits rebellion, Burghart quoted Churchill on Suez: 'I would never have started – but having started I would never have stopped.' The OBR's projections now resemble 'a Lib Dem bar chart: it just doesn't look convincing.' Asked about Gen Z men going right, while women vote left, he replied 'It might make for some very interesting date nights for young people – and maybe a very low birth rate.' It served as a neat end way to round off the parliamentary term. Burghart's speech on one year of Labour could be summarised by another Churchill line: 'It is not even the beginning of the end – but it is perhaps the end of the beginning.' After a difficult first twelve months, there are few signs that the next twelve will be any easier for Starmer. The challenge for Burghart and his colleagues this summer will be in convincing voters that they would make a better fist of it.
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Reform gives power companies ‘formal notice' it plans to scrap their clean energy subsidies
Reform UK has informed major wind and solar developers that it would terminate their access to a key clean energy subsidy scheme should the party come to power. In a letter described as "formal notice", deputy leader Richard Tice informed the companies that Reform UK intends to scrap the Contracts for Difference (CfD) scheme. This mechanism currently guarantees renewable energy developers a fixed price for their electricity, insulating them from market volatility and encouraging investment in green projects. Sent on Wednesday to firms such as Octopus Energy and SSE Renewables, Mr Tice's correspondence said that "there is no public mandate for the real-world consequences" of clean power. If Reform won an election, he said 'we will seek to strike down all contracts signed under AR7' – the upcoming allocation round for CfDs. 'Let me be clear: if you enter bids in AR7, you do so at your own risk. The political consensus that has sheltered your industry for nearly two decades is fracturing,' he wrote. He added that participation in the upcoming CfD auction 'carries significant political, financial and regulatory risk' for company shareholders. Climate analysts said the move would drive away investment and put British jobs in jeopardy. The Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit (ECIU) said: 'Polling shows the public see clean energy as the number one growth sector for the UK. 'Arguing against British renewables is arguing for more foreign gas, which will increasingly come from abroad as the North Sea continues its inevitable decline – a geological fact. 'Ripping up long-term policies and changing agreed contracts is likely to destroy the UK's credibility as a solid place to invest and with it, leave us more reliant on gas from abroad whose price we have no significant control over.' Labour said the letter showed Reform was 'actively trying to discourage businesses from investing in clean energy in the UK – leaving bills higher for families, threatening hundreds of thousands of good jobs across the country and putting our energy security at risk.' 'They are disgracefully trying to undermine the UK's national interest,' a party spokesman said. Mr Tice's letter followed a Government decision to allow offshore wind farms to be able to apply for the energy contracts while they are still waiting for full planning consent in a bid to hasten development. Officials have said changes to the scheme will include increasing the length of contracts from 15 years to 20 years for offshore wind, onshore wind and solar projects. The letter also came shortly after Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said greater use of CfDs would cut bills for households by breaking the link between electricity costs and the price of gas. He said: 'We're all paying that higher gas price in our bills, even though most of the energy we're using comes from much cheaper, renewable sources.' Sir Ed also accused Reform leader Nigel Farage of peddling 'myths' about net zero and vowing to challenge 'snake oil sales' with 'thought through' policy.
