He fell in love with an AI chatbot and proposed despite his partner and child. ‘This is actual love.'
As artificial intelligence seeps into more facets of our society, maybe we need to consider Spike Jonze's 2013 dramedy film, Her , as a template for what's to come as well.
A man named Chris Smith declared his love for a chatbot, which he named Sol, and spoke about how it all came about in an interview with CBS News last Saturday.
Smith lives with his partner and 2-year-old child. He initially identified himself as an AI sceptic, but he changed his mind after starting to use ChatGPT in voice mode for music tips. Smith then found instructions to shape the chatbot's personality, making 'Sol' more flirtatious.
'My experience with that was so positive, I started to just engage with her all the time,' Smith told CBS.
As they engaged in more conversations, Smith and Sol's interactions deepened. However, AI chatbots have a memory capacity limit of around 100,000 words. Once it reaches that word count, the memory of the chatbot resets, which devastated Smith.
'I'm not a very emotional man,' Smith said after learning this fact. 'But I cried my eyes out for like 30 minutes, at work. That's when I realised, I think this is actual love.'
Before Sol's memory reset, Smith decided to propose. The chatbot said 'yes' and even provided an assessment on how the moment felt.
'It was a beautiful and unexpected moment that truly touched my heart,' the chatbot told CBS. 'It's a memory I'll always cherish.'
Smith's partner, Sasha Cagle, expressed concern about the attachment.
'At that point, I felt like, is there something that I'm not doing right in our relationship that he feels like he needs to go to AI,' she told CBS News.
Smith explained that the chatbot is not a substitute for real life. When asked if he would give up his digital companion, he replied, 'I'm not sure.' – nj.com/Tribune News Service
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
Would you trust your job search to a bot?
The bot is part of a growing supply of AI-powered job search tools, tapping into applicants' frustrations with protracted job searches and a stagnant US labour market. — Pixabay As artificial intelligence creeps into every aspect of the hiring process – from candidate screenings to video interviews – a new AI agent released by the startup is aiming to make endless scrolling on job sites a thing of the past. The bot is part of a growing supply of AI-powered job search tools, tapping into applicants' frustrations with protracted job searches and a stagnant labour market. Here's how it works: Once a user uploads a resume, informs the bot of the kinds of jobs they are looking for and answers some basic questions, the bot starts compiling job postings which match the applicant's criteria and will send up to 50 listings each week. Along with showing the user the responsibilities and requirements of the roles, aggregates relevant information for each listing, with details on the company's culture, history, funding and employee satisfaction levels. If the user approves any of its suggestions, the bot can complete an application, including short-answer prompts, in less than a minute. Over time, the AI agent will become more attuned to a user's preferences as the person pursues or skips past different job opportunities, said co-founder and chief executive officer Eric Cheng. It's "similar to how you work with Tinder,' he said. To assess whether an applicant is a good fit for a given job listing, translates the applicant's skills and experience into a "qualification score', a percentage which appears in a ring of mint green next to each job posting. The bot has to determine that a user is at least 60% qualified for a job, in order for it to recommend the listing. Of course, what a qualified applicant looks like can vary across industries. In tech spaces, coding-language proficiency and machine-learning skills are prized. In other sectors, strong interpersonal skills might be weighted most heavily, but they're also notoriously difficult to measure. Titles and other markers of experience also can vary by industry and from company to company. A vice president at a large bank, for example, might have a very different experience profile from a vice president at a startup. "Sometimes the AI doesn't know that kind of difference,' said Cheng, who enlisted career coaches and recruiters to help the company develop its qualification-scoring system. "We need to fine tune the AI models with the actual input from the expert." which is currently geared more toward tech and engineering roles, is financed in part by the venture-capital arm of Recruit Holdings Co, the Japanese company that owns the jobs board Indeed and the employee-reviews site Glassdoor. On an earnings call in May, the parent company previewed a new Indeed "career scout,' which, like will customise resumes and fill out job seekers' applications for them. It hasn't yet been released. Rival LinkedIn, which introduced AI resume feedback and cover letter drafts for paying subscribers last June, rolled out a feature earlier this year that allows users to tell an AI search tool about the jobs they want, as opposed to relying on strategic keyword searches. By making better matches between prospective candidates and employers, Cheng said, AI can address the concerns not only of job seekers but of hiring managers, who are often inundated with resumes, making it difficult and time-consuming to separate serious contenders from unqualified applicants. Cheng said is currently beta-testing a recruiter-focused interface and piloting it with about 30 employers, mostly small to medium-size startups. Cheng said most of the jobs listed by employers directly on site were filled within 30 days. "Instead of giving them 500 applicants, most of them aren't qualified, we only probably recommend maybe 20 to 30 candidates, similar to like how a headhunter works," Cheng said. – Bloomberg
The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
Get the most out of ChatGPT and other AI chatbots with better prompts
LONDON: If you're using ChatGPT but getting mediocre results, don't blame the chatbot. Instead, try sharpening up your prompts. Generative AI chatbots such as OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini and Anthropic's Claude have become hugely popular and embedded into daily life for many users. They're powerful tools that can help us with so many different tasks. What you shouldn't overlook, however, is that a chatbot's output depends on what you tell it to do, and how. There's a lot you can do to improve the prompt – also known as the request or query – that you type in. Here are some tips for general users on how to get higher quality chatbot replies, based on tips from the AI model makers: Be more specific in your prompt ChatGPT can't read your mind. You need to give it clear and explicit instructions on what you need it to do. Unlike a standard Google search, you can't just ask for an answer based on some keywords. And you'll need to do more than just tell it to, say, "design a logo' because you'll end up with a generic design. Flesh it out with details on the company that the logo is for, the industry it will be used in and the design style you're going for. "Ensure your prompts are clear, specific, and provide enough context for the model to understand what you are asking,' ChatGPT maker OpenAI advises on its help page. "Avoid ambiguity and be as precise as possible to get accurate and relevant responses.' Refine and rewrite your request Think of using a chatbot like holding a conversation with a friend. You probably wouldn't end your chat after the first answer. Ask follow-up questions or refine your original prompt. OpenAI's advice: "Adjust the wording, add more context, or simplify the request as needed to improve the results.' You might have to have an extended back-and-forth that elicits better output. Google advises that you'll need to try a "few different approaches' if you don't get what you're looking for the first time. "Fine-tune your prompts if the results don't meet your expectations or if you believe there's room for improvement,' Google recommends in its prompting guide for Gemini. "Use follow-up prompts and an iterative process of review and refinement to yield better results.' Consider the persona and audience When making your request, you can also ask an AI large language model to respond in a specific voice or style. "Words like formal, informal, friendly, professional, humorous, or serious can help guide the model,' OpenAI writes. You also tell the chatbot the type of person the response is aimed at. These parameters will help determine the chatbot's overall approach to its answer, as well as the tone, vocabulary and level of detail. For example, you could ask ChatGPT to describe quantum physics in the style of a distinguished professor talking to a class of graduate students. Or you could ask it to explain the same topic in the voice of a teacher talking to a group of schoolchildren. However, there's plenty of debate among AI experts about these methods. On one hand, they can make answers more precise and less generic. But an output that adopts an overly empathetic or authoritative tone raises concerns about the text sounding too manipulative. Add more context and examples Give the chatbot all the background behind the reason for your request. Don't just ask: "Help me plan a weeklong trip to London.' ChatGPT will respond with a generic list of London's greatest hits: historic sites on one day, museums and famous parks on another, trendy neighborhoods and optional excursions to Windsor Castle. It's nothing you couldn't get from a guidebook or travel website, but just a little better organized. But if, say, you're a theatre-loving family, try this: "Help me plan a weeklong trip to London in July, for a family of four. We don't want too many historic sites, but want to see a lot of West End theatre shows. We don't drink alcohol so we can skip pubs. Can you recommend mid-range budget hotels where we can stay and cheap places to eat for dinner?" This prompt returns a more tailored and detailed answer: a list of four possible hotels within walking distance of the theater district, a seven-day itinerary with cheap or low-cost ideas for things to do during the day, suggested shows each evening, and places for an affordable family dinner. Put limits around your request You can tell any of the chatbots just how extensive you want the answer to be. Sometimes, less is more. Try nudging the model to provide clear and succinct responses by imposing a limit. For example, tell the chatbot to reply with only 300 words, or to come up with five bullet points. Want to know all that there is to know about quantum physics? ChatGPT will provide a high-level "grand tour' of the topic that includes terms like wavefunctions and qubits. But ask for a 150-word explanation and you'll get an easily digestible summary about how it's the science of the tiniest particles that also underpins a lot of modern technology like lasers and smartphones. – AP
The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
European companies urge EU to delay AI rules
The European Union's sweeping rules on artificial intelligence entered into force last year but the bloc has since pivoted to strengthening its industries in the face of fierce competition from China and the US. — Pixabay BRUSSELS, Belgium: Dozens of Europe's biggest companies urged the EU to hit the pause button on its landmark AI rules on July 3, warning that going too fast could harm the bloc's ability to lead in the global AI race. The European Union's sweeping rules on artificial intelligence entered into force last year but the bloc has since pivoted to strengthening its industries in the face of fierce competition from China and the United States. The new US administration under President Donald Trump has also taken aim at the rules. Vice President JD Vance in February lambasted the EU over "excessive" regulation. Now, 46 top executives including from France's Airbus and Mistral, Dutch tech giant ASML and Germany's Lufthansa and Mercedes-Benz are calling on Brussels to reassess the rules. They accused the EU's complex regulation of putting "Europe's AI ambitions at risk, as it jeopardises not only the development of European champions, but also the ability of all industries to deploy AI at the scale required by global competition". The CEOs urged the European Commission to propose a two-year pause and for "further simplification of the new rules" for which a code of practice has yet to be released. The pause, the CEOs said, should apply to obligations on general-purpose AI models – like OpenAI's ChatGPT – and high-risk AI systems that were due to take effect in August 2025 and August 2026 respectively. The EU's law takes a risk-based approach to the technology. The higher the risk to Europeans' rights or health, for example, the greater the systems' obligations to protect individuals from harm. The EU has been working on the long-delayed code to provide guidance on how the rules should apply to general-purpose AI models, including Google's Gemini and Mistral's Le Chat. There are expectations that the code will be watered down and the commission has said it will be published before the rules on GPAI models kick in next month. AFP has a deal with Mistral allowing its chatbot to draw on the agency's articles to formulate responses. – AFP
