The Tánaiste has published the outline of the Occupied Territories Bill - here's what's in it
TÁNAISTE SIMON HARRIS yesterday published a broad outline of the updated Occupied Territories Bill as he endeavours to soon include services amongst prohibited trade activity.
Ireland is the only EU country seeking to pass legislation sanctioning trade with businesses located in Palestinian land that is under the military control of Israel since its declaration of independence in 1967 – otherwise known as the Occupied Territories.
These territories include the West Bank, East Jerusalem, the Gaza Strip and the Golan Heights in southwest Syria.
Israeli settlements in the territories are illegal under international law, as laid out in
Article 8 of the Rome Statute
of the International Criminal Court which stipulates that the transfer by a state of its own citizens into the land of another territory is illegal.
This has been happening in the Occupied Palestinian Territories – particularly in the West Bank – for decades.
A map of modern Israel showing the Occupied Territories of Palestine (marked by grey and white stripes)
United Nations
United Nations
The
Occupied Territories Bill
was first introduced by Independent Senator Francis Black in 2018 and proposed making it an offence 'for a person to import or sell goods or services originating in an occupied territory or to extract resources from an occupied territory in certain circumstances'.
The slightly amended bill proposed now by the Tánaiste, and formally known as the Israeli Settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Prohibition of Importation of Goods) Bill, would make it a crime under the Customs Act 2015 to import goods into Ireland that originate in Israeli settlements built over what is legally recognised as Palestinian land.
Advertisement
New homes being constructed in the West Bank After the Israeli government approved the expansion of Jewish settlements.
Alamy Stock Photo
Alamy Stock Photo
However, services such as tourism and IT are as of yet excluded in the latest draft of the legislation.
An estimated 700,000 Israeli settlers currently live in settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, which were seized by Israel in during the Six Day War in 1967.
At present, Ireland is Israel's second largest trading partner after the US, purchasing €2.9 billion of its total exports, according to data from the Central Statistics Office.
What will be included in the Bill?
In its current form, the Bill only applies to goods imported from the Occupied Territories.
The broad outline published by the Tánaiste yesterday breaks down the proposed terminology.
Goods
– materials and products, animate or inanimate.
Material
– indicates ingredients or component parts used to manufacture a good.
Product
– the good being manufactured, even if intended for use in a later manufacturing process.
Importation
- the act of bringing goods into the State from outside of the State (as per the Customs Act 2015).
Israeli settlement
- a city, village or industrial zone located in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem.
Parties found to be importing goods that are subject to prohibition under the Bill will be subject to punishment as outlined in Section 14(1) of the Customs Act.
Will services be included?
The Government has faced backlash for not including services in its recent outline of banned imports, with Labour accusing the Taoiseach of instead publishing a 'retreat'.
Micheál Martin has commented on the difficulty of incorporating services into the Bill, stating that it is 'genuinely more complex than goods transferring' due to issues over defining where the service originates.
However,
Simon Harris has vowed to seek their inclusion
in an enhanced version of the Bill due to go before an Oireachtas committee for examination.
'Let's not forget one thing before we get into the detail of the legislation, there isn't another country in the European Union that you can visit today and ask a government minister about their Bill to ban trade and the detail of it, because they don't have one,' Harris said.
He is also understood to be looking for a second opinion from the Attorney General on the legalities surrounding the inclusion of services before passing it through to the pre-legislative stage.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
26 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
UK police studying Glastonbury performances after anti-Israel chants
British police said they were considering whether to launch an investigation after performers at Glastonbury Festival made anti-Israel comments during their shows. "We are aware of the comments made by acts on the West Holts Stage at Glastonbury Festival this afternoon," Avon and Somerset Police, in western England, said on X late yesterday. Irish hip-hop group Kneecap and punk duo Bob Vylan made anti-Israeli chants in separate shows on the West Holts stage. One of the members of Bob Vylan chanted "Death, death, to the IDF" in a reference to the Israel Defense Forces. "Video evidence will be assessed by officers to determine whether any offences may have been committed that would require a criminal investigation," the police statement said. The Israeli Embassy in Britain said it was "deeply disturbed by the inflammatory and hateful rhetoric expressed on stage at the Glastonbury Festival". Prime Minister Keir Starmer said earlier this month it was "not appropriate" for Kneecap to appear at Glastonbury. The band's frontman Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh was charged with a terrorism offence last month for allegedly displaying a flag in support of Iran-backed militant group Hezbollah at a concert in November. He has denied the charge. A British government minister said it was appalling that the anti-Israel chants had been made at Glastonbury, and that the festival's organisers and the BBC broadcaster - which is showing the event - had questions to answer. Health Secretary Wes Streeting said he was also appalled by violence committed by Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank. "I'd also say to the Israeli Embassy, get your own house in order in terms of the conduct of your own citizens and the settlers in the West Bank," Mr Streeting told Sky News. "I wish they'd take the violence of their own citizens towards Palestinians more seriously," he said.
The Journal
40 minutes ago
- The Journal
Life in Palestine: 'I'd rather they break my arms and legs than take me into detention'
PEOPLE WHO LIVE under military occupation in the West Bank would rather be hospitalised than taken to an Israeli detention centre, Palestinian human rights activist Nasser Nawaj'ah has told The Journal . Nawaj'ah comes from the village of Susiya in the West Bank and has been working with the Israeli human rights NGO B'Tselem for over 16 years. He and his colleague Sarit Michaeli, B'Tselem's head of funding and international advocacy, sat down with The Journal during a visit to Dublin to discuss what happens to people in Israeli detention, and what it's like in the communities where arbitrary arrest is a constant threat. 'Today in the Palestinian community, you hear many people saying that if the army comes into my house in the middle of the night and knocks down the door, I would rather they break my arms and legs and beat me up than take me into detention, because I'd rather go into hospital for a few months rather than going into Israeli detention,' says Nawaj'ah. The conditions in Israeli prisons, Nawaj'ah explains, have been made harsher recently as a way of exacting revenge for the Hamas-led attack against Israel on 7 October 2023. But even before then, basic services in detention were already being deliberately degraded by Itamar Ben-Gvir, Israel's National Security Minister and the leader of the Jewish Power party. 'Prisoners should be shot in the head instead of being given more food,' Ben-Gvir said in response to complaints of overcrowding in Israeli jails in November 2024. A map of Israel and Palestine based on the 1967 borderssSource: Alamy Stock Photo 'Revenge arrests' and 'torture camps' The Hamas attack had reverberations beyond the besieged enclave of Gaza from which it was launched. That attack left almost 1,200 people dead and 251 people were taken hostage. Israel continues to wage war on the population of Gaza, where more than 55,000 Palestinians have been killed, but it has also ramped up assaults on West Bank communities through military raids and settler violence. 'After 7 October, Israeli forces started engaging in revenge arrests and this is ongoing,' Nawaj'ah says. Palestinians, including children, are routinely detained by Israeli occupation forces in the West Bank for minor infractions, such as throwing stones, and sometimes for doing nothing at all. 'If soldiers discover any sort of 'incriminating' photo on a Palestinian phone, like, for example, some sort of documentation of events in Gaza, then they'll immediately use it as an excuse, a pretext, to detain them and in some cases to attack and assault them. 'But I hear again and again from people who are glad that they were only beaten up and not arrested.' Nawaj'ah himself decided not to stay in his home for three months following the October 2023 attack, 'because I was worried about revenge arrests by the army'. One example of the systemic mistreatment of Palestinians in detention is the fact that people might only be fed 'three tablespoons of rice a day', just enough to keep them alive, 'but they would be suffering constantly', Nawaj'ah says. In April, a Palestinian teenager died in Israeli detention. An Israeli doctor who observed his autopsy said the likely cause of death was starvation. Palestinians released earlier this year also showed signs of torture and starvation , as well as suffering from scabies. In July last year, Said Maarouf, a 57-year-old pediatrician taken by Israeli forces in Gaza City in December 2023 told Amnesty International that guards kept him blindfolded and handcuffed for the entirety of his 45 days in detention. He described being starved, repeatedly beaten, and forced to sit on his knees for long periods. 'I think it's really important to remember that over half, or approximately half, of the Palestinians that are currently in Israeli detention have been detained without trial,' explains Sarit Michaeli. CNN / YouTube Palestinians taken from the West Bank without charge or trial are termed 'administrative detainees'. If they come from Gaza, they are detained under Israel's Unlawful Combatants law. In both cases, people are not informed of the charges against them and are held incommunicado, without access to a lawyer or the chance to speak to their families. 'It's mind bogglingly shocking,' she says, adding that it's not just about the lack of due process, 'it's the fact that they're subjected to a hellish torture system.' The Israeli prison system functions like a network of torture camps. The Israeli detention facilities have been shown in multiple investigations to be the scenes of abuse, torture and sexual assault. Prisoners or hostages? Since the October 2023 attack, media outlets and governments have come under scrutiny for the terms used to describe the people held captive in Gaza and the Palestinians held captive in Israel. Israeli forces have been rounding up people in Gaza and transferring them to detention centres since they invaded the territory. While those taken captive by Hamas during the October 2023 attack are clearly hostages under international law, the same designation can be given to many Palestinians in Israeli detention. Advertisement The International Convention against the Taking of Hostages defines the offence as the seizure or detention of a person, combined with a threat to kill, injure or to continue to detain that person, in order to compel a third party to do – or to abstain from doing – something as an explicit or implicit condition for the hostage's release. As of March 2025, Israel was holding captive 3,405 administrative and 1,555 Palestinians as 'unlawful combatants', all without trial, according to the Israeli human rights NGO Hamoked . Legal experts, including the UN Special Rapporteur for the Occupied Palestinian Territories Francesca Albanese, have previously told The Journal that Palestinians arrested and held without trial can be seen as hostages , especially those taken since October 2023. This is because they were abducted without cause and held without trial in the expectation that they might be exchanged for people in Hamas captivity. Michaeli tends to agree. 'We're talking about thousands of people who, over the last 20 months, have been detained either because they are political activists or because the Israeli authorities suspect them of doing something that they are not willing to put (forward) any evidence to prove. 'Or in some cases, and they're not a few cases, there's a very large number of them, by virtue of being in Gaza at a certain moment and basically being rounded up and taken.' Footage emerged early on in the conflict of Israeli soldiers corralling men stripped to their underwear, blindfolded and sitting cross-legged on the ground in Gaza. 'That is shocking,' she says. Micheali mentions a recent illustrative example, the final round of captive exchanges during the last ceasefire in Gaza in March this year, when Israel released a number of women and children. 'Essentially, there was a clear admission by the Israeli authorities that these people had been kept in detention as bargaining chips, in order to then be able to have this cadre of people to release for Israeli hostages.' In Arabic, Palestinians use the term prisoners for the people in Hamas captivity and those held in Israeli detention, according to Nawaj'ah and Michaeli. In Israel, the majority of people call Palestinian detainees 'terrorists', regardless of whether or not they have committed, or even been charged with, a crime, Michaeli says. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo At the same time, Michaeil stresses, Hamas has also mistreated hostages. She herself is involved in campaigning with some families to get their loved ones – or at least their bodies – released. Israelis who were taken hostage have described being tortured and sexually assaulted while in Hamas captivity. Others described being held in appalling conditions and suffering starvation , as well as being used in Hamas propaganda videos. Taking and holding hostages, she notes, is a war crime. 'It's immoral, it's shocking'. 'The conditions that Israeli hostages have had to deal with are absolutely horrific.' Still, she does believe that 'there is a real gap and a sort of double standard in the way the international community is treating the concept'. Hamas fighters escort Israeli hostage Or Levy on a stage before handing him over to a Red Cross team in Deir el-Balah Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo 'I'm not saying it's an identical situation,' she says while pointing to Hamas parading hostages as one example of a difference. Expressing frustration at her government's apparent lack of sincerity when it comes to prioritising the return of the hostages, Michaeli says the Israeli violation of the last ceasefire gave people reason to see the government's stated war aim as 'disingenuous'. 'All of this leads one to the unfortunate conclusion that the Israeli government is currently not interested in releasing the remaining hostages.' Obviously, she says, responsibility for capturing them lies with Hamas, but 'one has to admit that the current impediment to their release is the Israeli government. And that is a shocking admission'. 'It's recognised, and I think it's very blatant, that the 'price' of a full hostage deal is ending our war on Gaza, and this means if we (Israel) end our war on Gaza, we can't reoccupy it and resettle it.' Need more information on what is happening in Israel and Palestine? Check out our FactCheck Knowledge Bank for essential reads and guides to navigating the news online. Visit Knowledge Bank Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
The Journal
40 minutes ago
- The Journal
Ireland's €550m hospitality VAT cut seems based on little evidence
PICTURE THIS – YOU'RE a politician. 'Hey, hey!' says you. 'Don't threaten me with a good time!' But wait – it gets better. Because you're a senior politician. A cabinet minister. You have a say in how the government spends billions of euros every year. With that in mind, how should you make decisions? 1: Make evidence-based calls using the best data available 2: Make vibes-based calls using personal testimony / lobbying 3: A mix – evidence a fair bit of the time, but vibes when it suits If you chose Number 3 – congratulations, you have what it takes to be a minister! You see, the government recently made a 'solemn pledge' to cut the VAT rate for the hospitality sector. The move would cost the state at least €550 million in foregone tax revenue, if only applied to food businesses. As it means losing out on a lot of tax money, you would think the government would have a good reason for the move. But as we'll discover – the rationale seems murky at best. Billions at stake — but based on what evidence? Let's take a look. First of all, a quick reminder on what the hospitality VAT rate is. A VAT rate of 13.5% applies to businesses working in 'hospitality' – restaurants, cafes, hotels, etc. Restaurants say they're in crisis — but the numbers tell a different story. However, for much of the last decade or so, the rate was set at a lower 9%. This lower rate was introduced after the financial crisis, to help businesses lower prices. The state collects VAT on all products sold by hospitality firms. If the rate is lowered from 13.5% to 9%, in theory this means profitable companies can lower their prices without impacting their bottom line. So, this would make the services sold by hospitality businesses more affordable. Then, people would be more likely to, say, eat out in a restaurant. In turn, this would get people more confident about spending money, at a time when the economy desperately needed a boost. As explored previously, that original idea has now been lost . More recently, the lower VAT rate has essentially functioned as a support to the sector. For example, during Covid the rate was dropped as many restaurants could not operate. Instead of lowering prices, the idea was the lower rate would boost the profits of struggling businesses. The rate was increased from 9% back to the normal 13.5% in 2023 as the economy returned to normal. But last week, Tánaiste Simon Harris made a 'solemn promise' to once again reduce the VAT rate for the hospitality sector. He acknowledged the move would cost the state a 'significant amount of money'. However, he argued 'it's not about a tax cut for businesses'. 'It's about recognising that in every town and every village there are small businesses creating employment that want to be able to keep going and need to be supported,' he said. So the Tánaiste argued that hospitality firms are struggling and need financial support from the state. Where did he get that idea? Restaurants are closing — or are they? The most obvious source for the claim is lobbying from the likes of the Restaurants Association of Ireland (RAI). Advertisement Ever since the hospitality VAT rate was put back to 13.5% in 2022, the RAI has waged an exceptionally effective campaign to bring it back down to 9%. It has also made it clear the lower VAT rate won't be used to lower prices. Food businesses will take the extra money from paying less tax. At the core of the RAI's argument is its claim that a slew of restaurants across Ireland are closing due to high trading costs. It argues lowering VAT will reduce costs and help these firms survive. The key evidence it provides for this claim is closure statistics, which the RAI compiles itself. For the last year and a half or so, this survey has claimed about 600 restaurants are closing every year in Ireland . This statistics has been the basis for countless articles about the 'crisis' facing Irish hospitality. See examples here , here , here , here … you get the idea. What almost all of these share in common is citing the RAI figures. It's something I've done myself . But we should consider – do these figures reflect reality? As noted previously, the RAI only tracks restaurant closures – not openings. It's a shortcoming the group has previously acknowledged , saying: 'We don't have all the data'. But that caveat rarely appears in media reporting. In fact, the most recent data from the CSO (Central Statistics Office) found that openings were very strong in the sector . While the figures are from 2022 and possibly Covid-influenced, they certainly give no indication of a crisis. This leads onto the next point – you would expect huge numbers of food businesses closing to lead to a drop in the number of people employed in the sector. But that's not happening. But employment in this sector rose by 7% over the last year to 186,000 . By most metrics, the sector looks fine. More than that – it looks like it's doing well. What the numbers actually say The CSO tracks the number of people employed per industry. 'Accommodation and food services' is the one which is relevant for hospitality food businesses – the type the RAI claims are closing en masse. For instance, in November the CSO reported 'Accommodation & Food Services' recorded the largest increase in hours worked of any sector in the country . This simply doesn't match up with the claims of a supposed closure crisis. We even have a perfect, recent reference point for a closure crisis in the industry. In 2020, employment in 'Accommodation & Food Services' plunged to 139,000. There's no question that was a disaster, and the lower VAT rate was needed. But the same evidence is not there right now. The Department of Finance has also staunchly opposed reducing the hospitality VAT rate. It pointed out that 14 EU countries have a VAT rate of 12% or higher on food services – meaning Ireland's current 13.5% rate is fairly typical. The OECD, an intergovernmental group of wealthy countries, also recently pointed out that reducing hospitality VAT will likely 'disproportionately benefit' people on higher incomes . What cutting VAT really means Finally, it's worth considering the impact reducing the VAT rate will have more broadly. Reducing the rate and foregoing €550 million per year means the government has less money to spend in other areas. Cutting the VAT rate to 9% would make it much less likely for the government to adjust income tax bands for inflation – meaning workers will lose more money in tax. This is exactly what the Department of Finance has warned against, saying the lower VAT rate will mean an 'enormous fiscal transfer of taxpayer's money to the sector, which the evidence available at present does not support.' Given all of this – what is the evidence for reducing hospitality VAT? The Journal asked representatives for Simon Harris the studies or data he cited to decide on cutting the VAT rate. In response, a spokesperson said: 'The Programme for Government commits to bring forward measures to support SMEs. In particular, the retail and hospitality sectors, acknowledging the increased cost pressures on these sectors.' Asked again what evidence the Tánaiste's decision was based on, there was no response. Now, look – we all know most restaurants and cafes operate on fine margins. That's not in question. What is in doubt is whether this very specific measure – which will cost taxpayers a lot of money – is needed. To date, the government has not provided good evidence to indicate why it is choosing to forgo hundreds of millions of euros. When politicians are playing with so much taxpayer money, the least they can do is explain their decisions. So far, the government has completely failed to do that. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
