Plan which could see students moved to another school to be considered by Welsh Government
RCT Council is proposing the closure of Mountain Ash Comprehensive's sixth form and moving pupils to Aberdare Community School
Mountain Ash Comprehensive School's sixth form is set to close following a decision by RCT Council's cabinet
(Image: Media Wales )
Plans to close the sixth form at a valleys school will now be considered by Welsh Government. The proposals are to close the sixth form at Mountain Ash Comprehensive School with pupils transferring to Aberdare Community School by no later than September 2026.
It follows concerns raised by the school's governing body over the viability and future sustainability of the sixth form at the school. The council has said that the sixth form is inefficient, the curriculum choice for many pupils is restricted and class sizes are too small and that valuable education funds provided to educate pre-16 pupils are being redirected at post-16 pupils, to subsidise the funding shortfall that results from small class sizes.
The closure would mean no new year 12 sixth form pupils would be admitted in September 2025 and would see the catchment area for post 16 education at Mountain Ash Comprehensive moved to Aberdare Community School.
Under Section 50 of the School Standards and Organisation (Wales) Act 2013, proposals that affect sixth form education require approval by Welsh ministers
RCT must notify Welsh ministers within 35 days of the end of the statutory notice period and forward to them copies of any objections along with an objection report.
Welsh Government ministers will then decide whether to proceed with the proposal, amend the proposal or not proceed with the proposal. To get all the latest on politics, education, health and other Welsh issues, sign up to our Wales Matters newsletter.
Article continues below
Once Welsh Ministers make a decision on the proposal there will be a report to cabinet outlining the outcome.
In November 2024, cabinet agreed to formally consult on the proposals and in February 2025 cabinet agreed to move to the next stage of the process and publish the statutory notice.
This was published on March 4 which saw the start of the objection period which ran until April 3 and saw to objections submitted.
A council report says there would be no capital funding implications and any revenue implications including Mountain Ash Comprehensive School's delegated budget and any potential increases in home to school transport costs would be identified as the proposal is developed.
It says RCT has a statutory duty to maintain the efficiency and effectiveness of provision to ensure that all schools are well placed to deliver high quality education that meets the needs of the community and makes best use of public funding.
It adds: 'The concern that the governing body of Mountain Ash Comprehensive School have regarding the viability and future sustainability of the sixth form provision at the school are justified.
'The delivery of post-16 education is currently inefficient, the curriculum choice for many pupils is restricted and class sizes are too small.
'Valuable education funds provided to educate pre-16 pupils are being redirected at post-16 pupils, to subsidise the funding shortfall that results from small class sizes.
'Despite the school's best efforts to work in partnership with neighbouring schools in the Cynon Valley post-16 consortium, the post-16 offer across three schools remains fragmented, resulting in lost study time, cost, and travel times.'
Article continues below
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Pembrokeshire Herald
4 hours ago
- Pembrokeshire Herald
NHS in Wales to offer protection for premature babies against respiratory virus
A 'KANGAROO COURT' on the Covid-19 pandemic will be formally disbanded after members quit, but another Senedd committee will take over rather than a judge-led Wales-specific inquiry. At least 13,000 people died in Wales during the pandemic but, more than five years later, Senedd scrutiny of the decisions made in Cardiff Bay has stalled – if it ever got going. Elin Jones, the Senedd's speaker or Llywydd, announced the end of the 'Wales Covid-19 inquiry special purpose committee', which was set up to look at gaps in the UK inquiry. In March, Tom Giffard, its co-chair, and his Conservative colleague Sam Rowlands quit the committee after Labour blocked calls for witnesses to swear an oath. He said he had no confidence in the committee, saying he would no longer associate himself with a process 'seemingly designed to protect those it is supposed to hold to account'. The Welsh Government refused to set up a judge-led Wales-specific inquiry in the wake of the pandemic like in Scotland, where a public inquiry was established to learn lessons. Ms Jones announced the committee would be dissolved in the autumn after months of wrangling behind closed doors, with the Senedd's public accounts committee picking up the baton. Llywydd Elin Jones In a statement on July 16, she said: 'Due to the breakdown of the co-chair model that was adopted, it hasn't been possible for the committee to proceed with its work. 'It's been evident through discussions… that a different model will be required to move forward with the committee's scrutiny of this vital work.' Mark Isherwood chairs the public accounts committee which will now lead scrutiny of gaps identified by the Covid committee in its report on module one. The Conservative expressed concerns about the committee's capacity and the limited time left in this Senedd term, with an election on the horizon in May 2026. Conservative MS Mark Isherwood But he said: 'We have agreed to take on the task that has been asked of us to ensure that some scrutiny of these important matters is done within this Senedd – rather than none. 'While there is scope within the committee's work plan to accommodate some work on module one during the autumn term, this work will be limited and the scope of our work will need to be sharp and focused. 'Our work on module two will depend on when the report is published and will naturally be limited in any event, with issues potentially arising for our legacy report.' He stressed: 'We may not be best placed to pursue this work. And we cannot be sure any outcome will be sufficiently comprehensive to satisfactorily address the issues arising from the module one report, rather than through a Wales-specific public inquiry…. However, we will do our best to conduct work as effectively as we can within these constraints.' Mr Isherwood said the committee will want to take evidence from First Minister Eluned Morgan, given her responsibility for civil contingencies in Wales. Mabon ap Gwynfor said: 'Unfortunately, the main lesson that we've learned over the past few years is that the Welsh Government has an ongoing hatred of accountability.' Plaid Cymru's shadow health secretary paid tribute to the Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice Cymru group for their tireless campaigning on the issue. Mr ap Gwynfor expressed concerns about the 'shambolic' handling of the Covid committee, with months 'wasted debating the actual purpose of the special purposes committee'. He criticised the Tories for 'pulling the plug' on a committee they had a hand in setting up, saying: 'They're now proposing to belatedly re-enter the conversation by chairing a separate committee that also doesn't have any authority to compel oathtaking.' James Evans, the Conservatives' shadow health secretary, reiterated his party's position that a specific Covid inquiry is the only way Wales will get the focus and answers it needs. His colleague Mr Giffard said resigning from the committee he co-chaired was never his preferred outcome but it was better than the alternative: 'Presiding over a kangaroo court that would never have got to the bottom of the issues that the families deserve.' Conservative MS Tom Giffard Julie James, for the Welsh Government, urged Mr Giffard, a public accounts committee member, to reflect on his 'disgraceful' depiction of the Covid committee as a kangaroo court. At the outset, families led by Anna-Louise Marsh-Rees feared the 'not-fit-for-any-purpose' committee would be whitewashed by politicians marking their own homework. Following the latest debate, she said: 'It's clear to everyone there must be a Welsh inquiry into the handling of the pandemic in Wales and the continued failure to hold one is because the current government does not want its actions to be scrutinised.'
The Herald Scotland
8 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scottish Government strove to be Israel's ‘critical friend'
Opposition politicians have accused the Scottish Government of hypocrisy, saying its private efforts to engage with Israeli officials contradict its public stance on Gaza. Labour MSP Mercedes Villalba said the Swinney administration had "actively sought a meeting with a representative of a state whose prime minister is now wanted by the ICC for crimes against humanity". The planned meeting did not go ahead due to what the Israeli Embassy described as "sudden security threats", but a follow-up visit by Israel's deputy ambassador, Daniela Grudsky, was arranged for Thursday August 8. Ms Grudsky met with Cabinet Secretary for External Affairs Angus Robertson in Edinburgh, sparking widespread internal criticism and a furious backlash from SNP MSPs and activists. READ MORE The documents reveal that ministers and senior advisers were closely involved in managing the meeting, with discussions focused on communications strategy and anticipating FOI requests. One official remarked: "Transparency is obviously a good thing, but it takes up such a lot of our time." While the Scottish Government said the August 8 meeting allowed it to express concern about civilian deaths in Gaza, other topics including culture and renewable energy were also discussed. In the redacted minutes released to The Ferret, much of the section on "Israel/Scotland relations" is blacked out. However, the minutes state: "The Scottish Government's position remained that the Palestinian people had the right to self-determination and that a secure Israel should be able to live in peace and security. There was value in dialogue between Scotland and Israel as critical friends." The diplomatic row first came to light when the Israeli embassy tweeted a photo of Ms Grudsky and Mr Robertson on Monday August 12, shortly after the meeting. The backlash grew after it emerged that the Scottish Government had not initially disclosed the visit. Mr Swinney later replaced Mr Robertson at a scheduled Edinburgh Book Festival event with former Welsh First Minister Mark Drakeford. In internal discussions days later, Mr Swinney and Mr Robertson agreed to clarify the Government's position, acknowledging the controversy and agreeing that "normal" relations with Israel were not currently possible. Amnesty International said the documents raised questions about whether Mr Robertson strongly challenged Israel over its conduct in Gaza. "It is squarely in the public interest to have absolute clarity," said Amnesty's Liz Thomson. "Such guidance is clearly needed to inform all external affairs activity." In response to the story, Mr Robertson said: "Close to 60,000 people have been killed in Gaza — many more are now being left to starve at the hands of the Israeli government. Civilians who queue to access what little humanitarian aid is permitted to enter Gaza are frequently shot at and killed by Israeli Defence Forces. "The rhetoric of Israeli politicians has become increasingly extreme in recent months. Under such abhorrent circumstances, the Scottish Government is unequivocal that it would not be appropriate to meet with the Israeli government. "This will remain our position until real progress has been made towards peace and Israel co-operates fully with its international obligations on the investigation of genocide and war crimes."
The National
18 hours ago
- The National
'Vulnerability' left in UK constitution after UKIMA review
The Internal Market Act (UKIMA) faced fierce criticism from devolved administrations when it was introduced in 2020 to regulate trade within the UK following EU withdrawal. They argued it enabled Westminster to override devolved decision-making in areas such as public health and food standards in pursuit of a unified UK market. After winning power in 2024, the Labour Government announced it would be reviewing the legislation. The findings of the UKIMA review were published last Tuesday. The review introduced procedural changes – including a mechanism to fast-track exclusions from the act where the economic impact is less than £10 million per year – and pledged to prioritise the use of common frameworks, post-Brexit agreements intended to manage formerly EU-governed policy areas collaboratively. READ MORE: Lesley Riddoch: I was steered by BBC bosses on how to report. I ignored it However, the review's changes are not legally binding and could easily be reversed, Professor Thomas Horsley, a constitutional law expert at the University of Liverpool, said. 'All they've done is said, 'these legal powers that exist, we commit politically to exercise them in accordance with what we agree in the common frameworks',' Horsley said. 'But that is a political commitment, and we all know that intergovernmental commitments can be – even the strongest ones – can be disregarded by a particular recalcitrant government in London. 'So the constitutional vulnerability, if you want to put it like that, remains.' He also said the £10m threshold below which UKIMA exclusions would be fast-tracked was a 'low bar', noting that it could be met by the turnover of a single company. Following the publication of Labour's review, both the SNP Government in Edinburgh and the Welsh Government in Cardiff welcomed changes to the exclusions process – but called for UKIMA to be fully repealed. Welsh Deputy First Minister Huw Irranca-Davies (Image: Welsh Government) Huw Irranca-Davies, the Deputy First Minister of Wales, said: 'We particularly welcome the commitment to implement any exclusions agreed via common frameworks, which should improve the functioning of the UK internal market. The common frameworks operate on a clear set of principles which fully respect devolution and include dispute resolution mechanisms. 'However, it is our long-standing and consistent view that the act should be repealed and replaced with a system, underpinned by legislation, designed around the common frameworks.' Scottish Constitution Secretary Angus Robertson hit out in stronger terms, saying UKIMA 'introduces radical new uncertainty as to the effect of laws passed by the Scottish Parliament and effectively provides a veto to UK ministers'. 'Nothing set out in the UK Government's response to the review changes this position, which is completely unacceptable,' he went on. READ MORE: Kate Forbes calls for Internal Market Act to be scrapped 'The conclusion of the review falls well short of our stated position of repeal and replace UKIMA, and indeed short of the legislative change required to mitigate the most damaging aspects of the operation of UKIMA.' Horsley said he could understand the argument being made by the devolved governments, that the 'common frameworks can do it all' and UKIMA is unnecessary. 'It is precarious because if things don't get agreed through the common frameworks – or a future UK Government decides, well, these political commitments we made, we're changing our mind – the legal powers are still there,' he said. 'This review doesn't change the legal framework, it just says, wait a minute, we're going to park it in the background and we're going to try and work using more intergovernmental political mechanisms, the common frameworks.' However, Horsley said that although the Labour Government's review has resulted only in political pledges, it was 'definitely a move in the right direction and a move that speaks to the ambition of the UK Government to reset relations'. He went on: 'There are other parts of UKIMA which are just not discussed. [The devolved governments] would like to reopen discussions around the direct payments that can be made from London in devolved areas. So there are things that are not so narrowly related to intratrade that are still rubbing up wounds. 'But in terms of just narrowly looking at UKIMA and the market access principles, there are some positive things there and some clear commitments from the UK Government towards more consensual policy making … which is very different to obviously the more abrasive approach which preceded under previous governments.' READ MORE: John Swinney sets out 3-point plan for fresh independence push In late 2024, Horsley was one of four constitutional legal experts to co-author a report on UKIMA which concluded that reform of the legislation was 'essential to restore intergovernmental trust'. Asked if Labour's review had provided that essential reform, he said: 'What this review shows is that there is more work to be done, but it's around those common frameworks. 'It's now shifting the attention to making the common frameworks work. These are not off-the-shelf things that are super functioning and solve all the problems. 'So the work between the governments now is going to have to be making those common frameworks work.' Douglas Alexander is UK Trade Policy Minister (Image: UK Parliament) After the review was published, UK Trade Policy Minister Douglas Alexander acknowledged there were 'real concerns' about how the laws have operated, and pledged "improvements'. Alexander stressed the importance of having a 'well-functioning UK internal market' as part of the Government's 'ambition to improve economic growth for the benefit of businesses and people in all parts of our country'. He added: 'Latest figures show that trade between the four nations of the UK is valued at £129 billion and that it is particularly important to the economies of Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.'
