logo
Slow-motion humiliation for Starmer as he loses control of Commons

Slow-motion humiliation for Starmer as he loses control of Commons

BBC News12 hours ago
The extraordinary thing about this is it felt, albeit perhaps just fleetingly, like the fraught and chaotic parliamentary rows about Brexit.Or even the bumpy moments for Boris Johnson and Liz Truss.It is extraordinary to say that because the parallel seems absurd: those moments in recent years happened to prime ministers without their own mandate or much of a majority or when engulfed in scandal.But the parallel is this: a government transparently not in control of events, shoved around humiliatingly by parliament.The astonishing thing about this row is Sir Keir Starmer has a mandate and a majority.But not only did swathes of his own MPs desert him, Downing Street was insufficiently nimble to first clock the breadth and depth of their anger and then realise quickly enough the scale of what would be necessary to deal with it.
Firstly, there was massive U-turn number one, completed the wrong side of midnight in the early hours of last Friday.The incidental details tell a story at moments like this and the timing of that opening climbdown pointed to the speed with which it had been cobbled together.But here is the thing – the government hoped they had done enough. It quickly became apparent there was a stubborn and sticky group of perhaps about 50 Labour MPs who still would not support the prime minister.Embarrassing, yes, and awkward too, but something they could have probably lived with. But would-be rebels kept telling us the numbers were nudging up.And when the government sought to reassure its MPs by presenting details to the Commons on Monday, it only served to make things worse for them - sowing uncertainty among wavering MPs about the specifics of the concessions.
Who are the welfare bill rebels? Find out how your MP votedWelfare cuts: What are the Pip and universal credit changes?'We're not scroungers, we want the right to live'
By Monday night, those familiar with the whipping spreadsheet were warning that the situation was "touch and go".It was clear from the furrowed brows of senior Labour figures by the middle of Tuesday that there was much more anxiety at the top of government than the public numbers would have suggested.And yet Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall returned to the Commons and repeated what the government was still intending to do – change the eligibility criteria for the Personal Independence Payment (Pip) in November of next year.By mid-afternoon, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner was frantically hitting the phones trying to persuade Labour MPs.Suddenly, and again, they were worried about losing.Word then reached Downing Street the numbers might be closer to 75 or 80 rebels – getting very close to the number that would defeat the bill.The prime minister had no option. Yet another U turn was sanctioned, leaving his plans appearing threadbare, shorn of their central pillars of just a week ago.And so up stepped the Work and Pensions Minister, Sir Stephen Timms, to announce another climbdown.But that decision to concede was met with fury by would-be rebels, many of those who saw the whole thing as a shambles and those Labour MPs who had loyally backed the various changes throughout and so had been asked to endorse three different positions in less than a week.One, referring to senior Labour MP Dame Meg Hillier who had campaigned for the first climbdown, told the BBC:"Meg better own any autumn tax rises and go out and sell them on the airwaves every day until the end of the parliament. She marched them all up to the top of the hill and couldn't bring them down again."Other MPs were more pithy."Jokers" said one, referring both to the government and the rebels."Nightmare" was another's assessment of the situation.Some government officials are more openly contemptuous of Labour MPs than ever.One, referring to the rebels who were first elected in 2024, said: "What did they think the job was? They all think they're JFK because they delivered some leaflets while Morgan [McSweeney] won them the election."The implications are head-spinning.Plenty now believe tax rises in this autumn's budget are inevitable.Whether Rachel Reeves will still be chancellor to deliver it is being questioned by Labour figures at all levels.Some suggest that Kendall ought to resign without delay. She has said she wants to carry on.One senior government source argued that though the government had been preparing to lift the two-child benefit cap in the autumn, this would no longer be possible.Meanwhile some at the heart of government are still reeling from a string of interviews given by the prime minister to mark his first anniversary in Downing Street on Friday, taken by some senior figures as a repudiation of the approach he has taken - and therefore of his advisers.One senior source said: "The atmosphere in there [No 10] is appallingly bad", accusing the prime minister of "dumping on people who are a staunch part of the team".They added: "A lot of it comes back to the question of what does Keir think - about policy and about personnel. It's the question everyone asks all the time because nobody knows."Sir Keir sought to address the personnel element at cabinet on Tuesday, saying he had full confidence in Mr McSweeney, his chief of staff, and that Labour would not have won the general election without him.All this leaves the prime minister and those around him humbled, bruised, reflective, pensive. Weakened.When the economy is flat, politics can often be angry, impatient.The international backdrop turbulent, the domestic bleak.The 2020s are no easy time to lead.But Sir Keir will know he has to demonstrably get a grip and quickly, after a deeply damaging episode for him.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer pledges to review minimum barrier heights in multi-storey car parks
Starmer pledges to review minimum barrier heights in multi-storey car parks

Western Telegraph

time14 minutes ago

  • Western Telegraph

Starmer pledges to review minimum barrier heights in multi-storey car parks

Gabriel Santer died after falling from the top of a multi-storey car park in the city centre in October 2020. The Prime Minister said he wanted to 'prevent future tragedies', and the Government will conduct a call for evidence on minimum barrier heights in car parks. This came after Labour MP Peter Dowd urged Sir Keir to back his calls to increase the minimum required height of guarding. Mr Dowd's Multi-Storey Car Parks (Safety) Bill also proposes 24-hour staffing of such car parks, to improve safety. During Prime Minister's Questions, Mr Dowd, MP for Bootle said: 'Gabe Santer, a 15-year-old, fell to his death from a multi-storey car park in Liverpool in 2020. He's one of the many dying in such tragic circumstances, including in my constituency. 'My Multi-Storey Car Parks (Safety) Bill seeks to prevent such deaths. 'Will the Government look carefully at its content as part of a national suicide prevention strategy?' Labour MP for Bootle Peter Dowd raised the case of Gabe Santer (Chris McAndrew/PA) The Prime Minister replied: 'The answer is yes, we will look at the content of it, and I'm grateful to him for raising it.' He added: 'Across the House, we have all got tragic experience of suicide, and our thoughts are with Gabe's family and with his friends. 'We will conduct a call for evidence on part K of the building regulations about minimum guarding heights, so that necessary protections are in place to prevent future tragedies. We will also look at the contents of the Bill.' Defence minister Maria Eagle previously presented 'Gabe's Law' to Parliament in 2023, in a bid to reform the safety of car parks.

Rayner dismisses suggestions she could take Starmer's place
Rayner dismisses suggestions she could take Starmer's place

The Independent

time14 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Rayner dismisses suggestions she could take Starmer's place

Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister, says she would never want to be prime minister, joking that it would age her by 10 years within six months. She dismissed suggestions of replacing Sir Keir Starmer, despite a recent rebellion over his welfare reforms and growing criticism of his leadership. Ms Rayner defended Sir Keir, asserting he is doing the job for Britain by repairing international relationships and securing trade deals. Her comments follow polling expert Professor Sir John Curtice 's assessment that Sir Keir's first year in office has been the worst start for any newly elected prime minister. Ms Rayner expressed passion for issues like workers' rights and council housing, emphasising her commitment to serving the country in her current role.

Politics latest: Rachel Reeves has Starmer's ‘full backing', No 10 says after chancellor cries in PMQs
Politics latest: Rachel Reeves has Starmer's ‘full backing', No 10 says after chancellor cries in PMQs

The Independent

time14 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Politics latest: Rachel Reeves has Starmer's ‘full backing', No 10 says after chancellor cries in PMQs

Downing Street has insisted Rachel Reeves has Sir Keir Starmer 's full backing after she was seen in tears during PMQs. Ms Reeves wiped away tears as Kemi Badenoch told the Commons she looked 'absolutely miserable'. Labour minister Ellie Reeves then appeared to be holding her sister's hand as she left the chamber on Wednesday. It has been claimed by ministerial sources that the tears were a result of an argument with Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle prior to PMQs for which they said he has since apologised. The Speaker's office has declined to comment. But her tears came as the prime minister came under attack in a fiery PMQs over his failure to deliver £5bn of welfare cuts which were a crucial part of the spending review. He had refused to guarantee Ms Reeves' future as chancellor when pressed by Ms Badenoch amid growing speculation over a reshuffle to regain his authority. In the grilling at PMQs, Sir Keir insisted his benefits bill will be 'better for the economy' despite a £5bn hole now left in the government 's spending plans. And he refused to rule out tax rises. No 10 says Starmer backs Reeves after Chancellor's tears in Commons Rachel Reeves is 'going nowhere' and will remain as Chancellor, Downing Street said, despite Sir Keir Starmer declining to give her a public show of support. The Chancellor was visibly tearful in the Commons, as her position came under intense scrutiny after the welfare U-turn which put an almost £5 billion black hole in her plans. But allies said she was dealing with a 'personal matter' and No 10 said she had Sir Keir's 'full backing'. Jabed Ahmed2 July 2025 13:54 Labour MP who led welfare revolt calls for wealth tax to meet £5bn cost of U-turn The leader of the rebel Labour MPs who forced Sir Keir Starmer to abandon his welfare reforms has called for a wealth tax to meet the £5bn cost of the U turn. On Tuesday, the prime minister suffered the biggest blow to his leadership since coming into power a year ago after he was forced to shelve a key plank of his controversial benefit cuts in order to get them through parliament. While his welfare reform bill passed its second reading by 335 votes to 260 – a majority of 75 – the prime minister still suffered the largest rebellion of his premiership so far, with 42 Labour MPs voting to reject the legislation. The Independent's political correspondents Millie Cooke and Archie Mitchell report: Labour MP who led welfare revolt calls for 'wealth tax' to meet £5bn cost of U-turn Rachael Maskell blamed the chancellor for the scale of rebellion, saying the Treasury had chosen to 'find savings on the backs of disabled people' Tara Cobham2 July 2025 13:45 Tories demand to 'know what's going on' with Reeves after tears in Commons The Tories have said 'we need to know what's going on' with Rachel Reeves after the Chancellor was seen visibly upset during Prime Minister's Questions, which a spokesman has since said related to a personal matter. Kemi Badenoch's spokesman said 'personal matter doesn't really clear it up' and 'you normally tell people what the personal matter is'. Asked whether politicians should disclose all personal matters in their lives regardless of what they are, he said: 'That's an absurd question.' He added: 'I'm not going to speculate… I think we should find out what's going on.' Tara Cobham2 July 2025 13:40 Welfare revolt will not be 'defining story of this government', Cabinet minister says Welfare revolt will not 'be the defining story of this government', a Cabinet minister has said. Pat McFadden compared Tuesday night's backbench revolt to one under Sir Tony Blair in the 1990s, and told Times Radio: 'I have been around for a long time, and I have to reflect that it's not the first time this has happened with Labour on welfare. 'When we first came into government in 1997 we had a very similar size of rebellion on a similar issue: we had 47 Labour MPs voting against a welfare reform measure, we had 100 abstentions. 'The headline was, Blair suffers in benefits revolt and that government went on not only to reform welfare more, but to reduce child poverty, to turn around the NHS and to do a lot of other good things. So I don't deny that this has been a difficult process over welfare reform, but it's not the first time it's happened, and it is not going to be the defining story of this government.' The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster also defended Sir Keir Starmer, telling the same station he is the person who has 'set the direction' for the Government. Asked whether there are issues of policy or leadership, the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster said: 'Keir Starmer is the leader who took the Labour Party for only the fourth time in its history from opposition to a majority Labour government.' Tara Cobham2 July 2025 13:30 Starmer will 'plough on' with 'busy agenda' following welfare vote, Downing St says Downing Street said Sir Keir Starmer would 'plough on' with his 'very busy agenda' when asked if the Prime Minister was planning for a course correction following the welfare vote. Asked whether Sir Keir would be changing anything about the way he operates after the fallout, a Number 10 spokesman said: 'The Prime Minister is fully focused on the job at hand. 'You've heard… the number of achievements this Government has secured in its first year in office. You can expect him to plough on with the very busy agenda.' 2 July 2025 13:28 Recap: The moment Starmer was challenged over Reeves' future as chancellor Kemi Badenoch accused Keir Starmer of forgetting that 'his welfare bill was there to plug a black hole created by the chancellor'. She accused them of instead 'creating new ones'. The Conservative leader went on to described Ms Reeves as looking 'absolutely miserable'. The chancellor was visibly tearful as the exchanges unfolded. Ms Badenoch continued: 'Labour MPs are going on the record saying that the chancellor is toast, and the reality is that she is a human shield for his incompetence. In January, he said that she would be in post until the next election. Will she really?' Sir Keir replied: '[Mrs Badenoch] certainly won't. I have to say, I'm always cheered up when she asks me questions or responds to a statement because she always makes a complete mess of it and shows just how unserious and irrelevant they are. She talks about the black hole, they left a £22 billion black hole in our economy and we're clearing it up, and I'm really proud that in the first year of a Labour Government, we got free school meals, breakfast clubs, childcare, got £15 billion invested in transport in the North and the Midlands. We're cutting regulation, planning and infrastructure is pounding forward, building 1.5 million homes, the biggest investment in social and affordable housing, and of course the three trade deals.' Mrs Badenoch replied: 'How awful for the Chancellor that he couldn't confirm that she would stay in place.' Tara Cobham2 July 2025 13:18 With a £5bn hole to fill, the true battle on Keir Starmer's hands is only just beginning Sir Keir Starmer forced the tattered remnants of his welfare reforms through the Commons on Tuesday night, staving off what would have been an embarrassing defeat. The unedifying spectacle of a leader with a huge majority after just a year in Downing Street chopping and changing one of his flagship bills to buy off backbench rebels has badly damaged his authority. The Independent's political correspondent Archie Mitchell reports: The true battle on Keir Starmer's hands may only be beginning Sir Keir Starmer's capitulation on welfare cuts has dented his authority and raised questions about his judgment Tara Cobham2 July 2025 13:15 Reeves crying in Commons over 'personal matter', spokesperson for chancellor says Rachel Reeves was crying in the Commons over a 'personal matter', a spokesperson for the chancellor has said. Asked about Ms Reeves' tears, the spokesperson said: 'It's a personal matter, which, as you would expect, we are not going to get into. 'The chancellor will be working out of Downing Street this afternoon.' Tara Cobham2 July 2025 13:11 Reeves 'is going nowhere' as chancellor and retains PM's 'full backing', Starmer's press secretary says Rachel Reeves "is going nowhere'' as chancellor and retains the prime minister's "full backing'', Sir Keir Starmer's press secretary has said. 2 July 2025 13:09 Starmer fails to say whether he has 'changed his mind' over Pip reform plans Sir Keir Starmer failed to say whether he has 'changed his mind' on the government's plans for reform of Personal Independence Payments (Pip) after a question from Liberal Democrat Sir Ed Davey. Sir Ed said in Prime Minister's Questions: 'Yesterday, the Government was asking this House to vote for a law that would mean someone with a condition like Parkinson's or multiple sclerosis would qualify for a personal independence payment (Pip) today, but someone diagnosed with the same condition with very same symptoms in a few months time would not. 'We all know that the cost of welfare needs to come down, but that was not a fair way to do it. Until he lost control yesterday, the Prime Minister was arguing for that approach. Has he changed his mind on this or not?' Responding, Sir Keir Starmer said: 'The Stephen Timms review will take place, a very important review to look into this issue. 'But what we did do last night was end mandatory reassessments for those with severe disabilities. I thought that he and his party cared about things like that. It's the right thing to do, and they voted against it. 'We rebalanced Universal Credit, long overdue. I think he believes that, but what did he do last night? He voted against it. We set out a pathway to reform, something he argues for every week, but what did he do when he had the chance? He voted against it.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store