Putin pushes digital sovereignty with state messaging app
The initiative is part of Moscow's broader strategy to reduce reliance on foreign apps like WhatsApp and Telegram, and to strengthen what it terms "digital sovereignty."
According to Reuters, Russia has been actively promoting local alternatives as part of a broader campaign to assert control over its digital ecosystem.
The urgency of this effort has grown since several Western tech companies left the Russian market following the onset of the Ukraine conflict in February 2022.
According to state-run outlet RIA Novosti, the upcoming government-supported app is expected to include functionalities beyond those offered by existing platforms.
While officials pitch it as a secure, integrated communication tool, digital rights advocates have raised red flags. Critics argue that increased state control over messaging services could severely undermine user privacy and limit civil freedoms.
Mikhail Klimarev, director of the Internet Protection Society, warned that authorities may intentionally slow down platforms like WhatsApp and Telegram to encourage citizens to adopt the new state-run app.
The development coincides with growing global scrutiny of private messaging platforms. Just one day prior, the U.S. House of Representatives imposed an official ban on WhatsApp across all government-issued devices, citing vulnerabilities in data storage and concerns over user privacy.
The app has been flagged as a high-risk platform due to its lack of end-to-end encryption for stored content, raising alarms over potential data leaks and foreign surveillance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Ammon
2 days ago
- Ammon
Terminology as a Weapon: The Use of Language in Media During Wars
In times of war and conflict, weapons are no longer limited to guns and missiles. Language itself has become a powerful tool, skillfully used for influence, provocation, direction—and even manipulation of facts. In this context, media terminology emerges as a highly precise weapon, reshaped and deployed in ways that serve the interests of warring parties and reshape both local and global public opinion. When media outlets refer to a fighting group as 'resistance,' it grants them a sense of moral and national legitimacy. However, using terms like 'militias' or 'rebels' drastically alters that image. A single event or group can be described in radically different terms, depending on the political alignment of the channel or publication. The difference between calling an event an 'invasion' or a 'limited military operation,' or labeling casualties as 'martyrs' versus 'victims,' can shift the narrative entirely. These terms are far from neutral; they are often deliberately crafted to reflect specific political or ideological stances. Thus, the role of the journalist or editor becomes pivotal—not just in reporting facts but in shaping collective understanding. Terminology also plays a central role in psychological warfare. Referring to a military action as a 'preemptive strike' suggests a legitimate act of defense, whereas 'indiscriminate bombing' implies a moral violation. Terms like 'special operation' instead of 'occupation' aim to soften the harsh reality and avoid describing actions as war crimes. In some cases, 'refugee' is replaced by 'displaced person' to downplay legal and political responsibilities. Likewise, 'crisis' is used instead of 'massacre,' and 'clashes' instead of 'crackdown.' Contemporary Examples •In the Russia-Ukraine war, Moscow refers to the invasion as a 'special military operation,' while Ukraine and Western media call it a 'war of aggression.' •In the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, descriptions vary between 'Palestinian resistance' and 'terrorist organizations,' depending on the broadcaster or country. •In conflicts like those in Syria or Yemen, media are saturated with biased terms reflecting the interests of global powers rather than the realities on the ground. Journalists often find themselves caught between professional ethics, which call for objectivity and accuracy, and editorial policies that push a particular agenda. In such cases, terminology can become a tool of disinformation rather than clarification. This raises deep ethical questions: Does the media have the right to weaponize language in service of ideologies or interests? Where does freedom of expression end, and the duty of truthful representation begin? In the age of fast-moving information, images, and narratives, wars are no longer fought solely on battlefields—they are also waged on screens and in headlines. Media terminology plays a decisive role in this hidden battle. It shapes awareness, directs opinion, and determines who is seen as the victim and who as the aggressor. Awareness of this reality is not a luxury—it is a necessity for every reader, viewer, and researcher. Because a single word—like a bullet—may be released in a moment, but its impact can linger in minds and societies for years to come.
Al Bawaba
3 days ago
- Al Bawaba
Russia becomes first nation to officially recognize Taliban government in Afghanistan
Published July 3rd, 2025 - 07:39 GMT The Afghan Foreign Ministry hailed the move as "brave," while Russia's ambassador in Kabul described it as a 'historic development' in bilateral relations. ALBAWABA- — In a landmark diplomatic move, Russia has become the first country to officially recognize the Taliban-led government of Afghanistan, marking a major shift in international engagement with the Islamic Emirate. Also Read American detainee freed in a Qatari-brokered deal with Taliban According to a statement by Afghanistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Russian government formally recognized the Taliban administration, with the Russian Ambassador in Kabul, Dmitry Zhirnov, delivering the message personally to Afghan Foreign Minister Mawlawi Amir Khan Muttaqi. The Ambassador of the Russian Federation, Mr. Dmitry Zhirnov, called on IEA-Foreign Minister Mawlawi Amir Khan Muttaqi. During the meeting, the Ambassador of Russian Federation officially conveyed his government's decision to recognize the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, — Ministry of Foreign Affairs - Afghanistan (@MoFA_Afg) July 3, 2025 During the meeting, Zhirnov conveyed President Vladimir Putin's decision to extend official recognition, reportedly made at the recommendation of Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. The Afghan Foreign Ministry hailed the move as "brave," while Russia's ambassador in Kabul described it as a 'historic development' in bilateral relations. In Moscow, the Russian Foreign Ministry confirmed that Deputy Foreign Minister accepted the credentials of Gul Hassan as Afghanistan's new ambassador, a formal step cementing diplomatic ties. Images shared online showed the flag of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan flying over the Afghan embassy in Moscow. The recognition is likely to have significant geopolitical ramifications, as global powers remain divided over how to engage with the Taliban regime since its return to power in 2021. © 2000 - 2025 Al Bawaba (
Al Bawaba
4 days ago
- Al Bawaba
North Korea to send about 30,000 troops to Russia
Published July 3rd, 2025 - 08:18 GMT ALBAWABA - An intelligence assessment from Ukrainian officials detailed that North Korea is planning to triple the number of its troops fighting alongside Russia against Ukraine. Also Read Extra 3,000 North Korean soldiers sent to Russia in 2025 The intelligence assessment reported that North Korea is set to send an extra 25,000 to 30,000 soldiers to help Russian President Vladimir Putin. The troops may arrive in Russia in the coming months, CNN reported after viewing the report. North Korea could send up to 30,000 additional troops to Russia over the coming months to aid Moscow in its war against Ukraine, media reports citing intelligence officials and security sources have said. | 📸: KCNA / via Reuters — The Japan Times (@japantimes) July 3, 2025 At least 11,000 were sent to Russia last November and helped repel Ukraine's incursion into Russia's Kursk region. About 4,000 of them were killed or injured in the deployment, according to Western officials. The Ukrainian assessment reads that the Russian Ministry of Defense is capable of providing "needed equipment, weapons and ammunition" with the aim of "further integration to Russian combat units." © 2000 - 2025 Al Bawaba (
