Robert Caro, Salman Rushdie and Sandra Cisneros honored by Authors Guild
NEW YORK (AP) — Robert Caro, Salman Rushdie and Sandra Cisneros were honored Monday night at an Authors Guild dinner gala that celebrated the written word and its vital role in the preservation of democracy.
'The world we live in is a house on fire and people we love are burning,' said Cisneros, the fiction writer, poet and pacifist who was presented the Baldacci Award for Literary Activism. Caro, the Pulitzer Prize-winning historian, is this year's winner of the Preston Award for Distinguished Service to the Literary Community and Rushdie, the novelist and determined critic of censorship, received the Champion of Writers Award for his 'steadfast commitment to free expression."
The Authors Guild represents more than 15,000 published authors and advocates for a variety of causes, whether opposing book bans or calling for restrictions on the use AI. The gala, held in Gotham Hall in midtown Manhattan, was hosted by 'Saturday Night Live' star Ego Nwodim.
Caro, who accepted his award through a pre-recorded video, served as Guild president from 1979-81. He noted that many of the issues that concerned writers decades ago still concern them, including, he joked, 'waiting for their editors to get back to them.' He otherwise called the Guild's work as 'urgent' as ever and warned that authors can't fight for their causes alone.
'To receive this award from the community that has give me so much moves me deeply,' he said.
Rushdie referred to the Trump administration's threats to cut off funding for universities and drastic reductions in support for the arts and humanities and said that 'the sphere of culture is under attack as never before" in his lifetime.
'All segments of the story of America are in the process of being suppressed and perhaps even erased,' he said. 'Authors are the keepers of that story.'
Rushdie said he had been reading the classic 18th century novel 'Candide,' and cited the title character's decision to step back from the tumultuous events of the world and 'cultivate his garden.' His retreat is a challenge to us now, said Rushdie, 77, who survived a horrifying on-stage stabbing in 2022.
'Is that how we are going to respond to the crisis of our time? Or are we going to engage with it and fight,' he said.
"Now I'm not as young as I used to be. And I've had my share of getting beaten up. So I'm tempted, like Candide, to find a private garden to cultivate. But I may still have a little fight left, and I hope you all do, too.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
44 minutes ago
- The Hill
Supreme Court takes up a Republican appeal to end limits on party spending in federal elections
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court will take up a Republican-led drive, backed by President Donald Trump's administration, to wipe away limits on how much political parties can spend in coordination with candidates for Congress and president. The justices said Monday they will review an appellate ruling that upheld a provision of federal election law that is more than 50 years old, ignoring pleas from Democrats to leave the law in place. The Supreme Court itself upheld it in 2001. But since Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court in 2005, a conservative majority has upended a variety of congressionally enacted limits on raising and spending money to influence elections. The court's 2010 Citizens United decision opened the door to unlimited independent spending in federal elections. Without the limits on party spending, large donors would be able to skirt caps on individual contributions to a candidate by directing unlimited sums to the party with the understanding that the money will be spent on behalf of the candidate, supporters of the law say. The case will be argued in the fall. Richard Hasen, an election law expert at the University of California at Los Angeles law school, has predicted the court will strike down the limits. 'That may even make sense now in light of the prevalence of super PAC spending that has undermined political parties and done nothing to limit (and in fact increased) corruption and inequality,' Hasen wrote on the Election Law blog. The Justice Department almost always defends federal laws when they are challenged in court. But the Trump administration notified the court that 'this is the rare case that warrants an exception to that general approach' because it believes the law violates free-speech protections in the First Amendment. The Republican committees for House and Senate candidates filed the lawsuit in Ohio in 2022, joined by two Ohio Republicans in Congress, then-Sen. J.D. Vance, who's now vice president, and then-Rep. Steve Chabot. In 2025, the coordinated party spending for Senate races ranges from $127,200 in several states with small populations to nearly $4 million in California. For House races, the limits are $127,200 in states with only one representative and $63,600 everywhere else. The court also agreed to referee a fight between internet service provider Cox Communications and record labels over illegal music downloads by Cox customers. The justices will review a lower-court ruling in a lawsuit led by Sony Music Entertainment that Cox has to cut off customers who downloaded music they didn't pay for or face liability for any future acts of digital piracy. A jury had initially found Cox liable for more than $1 billion, but the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals threw out the award. The high court rejected the record labels' appeal of that aspect of the ruling. ___ Follow the AP's coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Glastonbury mixed pop and politics long before the Bob Vylan controversy
LONDON (AP) — The Glastonbury Festival is making headlines for controversy rather than music. The likes of Olivia Rodrigo, Rod Stewart, Neil Young, Charli XCX, Busta Rhymes and Doechii played to tens of thousands onsite, and millions more on TV, during Britain's biggest and most famous music extravaganza. But it's little-known rap-punk duo Bob Vylan attracting politicians' ire — and a police probe — after leading a chant calling for 'death' to the Israeli military. This isn't the first time politics has collided with pop at the festival. For half a century, Britain's big political and cultural divides have found their way onstage at Glastonbury. Glastonbury grew from the counterculture The Glastonbury Festival of Contemporary Performing Arts, to give it its full name, was founded by Michael Eavis in 1970 on his Worthy Farm, 120 miles (some 200 kilometers) southwest of London. It's still run by the 90-year-old farmer and his daughter, Emily Eavis. Originally a hippie happening with a 1 pound ticket price (about 20 pounds or $27 today), Glastonbury has largely shed its counterculture cachet. These days, tickets for the three-day event cost close to 400 pounds. But it remains famous for its eclectic lineup, unique atmosphere and commitment to environmentalism and other progressive causes. This year's event drew about 200,000 people to see almost 4,000 performers on 120 stages, alongside film screenings and live debates on a variety of issues. The festival has always had a political side Glastonbury was founded in a spirit of hippie idealism that has never entirely faded. In the 1980s, the festival donated some of its profits to the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, which protested U.S. nuclear weapons on British soil. It continues to support charities including Oxfam and Greenpeace. By the late 1980s, attendees included New Age 'travelers' involved with the U.K.'s unofficial and anarchic rave scene. In 1990, some travelers clashed with security at the site, leading to significant damage and more than 200 arrests. Since then, the festival's security and organization have grown increasingly professional, sparking regret from some fans who feel it has lost its alternative spirit. The 2016 festival coincided with the U.K.'s referendum on European Union membership, and the decision to leave the bloc — which most young people opposed — overshadowed the event. Many performers mentioned Brexit and the dispirited mood, including headliner Adele, who urged people to 'look after each other.' Performers have often vented their opposition to politicians from the stage. In 2019, rapper Stormzy led the crowd in 'F___ Boris' chants aimed at then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson. This year, Irish rappers Kneecap directed the same expletive at Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza has provoked heightened emotions that spilled over onto Glastonbury's stages. Before the event, some politicians called for Glastonbury to cancel a performance by Irish-language hip-hop trio Kneecap, whose pro-Palestinian comments, critics say, have crossed a line into support for violence. Kneecap member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh has been charged under the Terrorism Act with supporting a proscribed organization for allegedly waving a Hezbollah flag at a concert in London in November. He denies the charge, and Kneecap has accused critics of trying to silence the band because of its support for the Palestinian cause. Kneecap's energetic set included plenty of pro-Palestinian comments and criticism of the government. But it was the act that preceded them, Bob Vylan, that caused a furor when a member of the duo led chants of 'death to the IDF,' the Israel Defense Forces. The Avon and Somerset Police force said officers would review video evidence 'to determine whether any offenses may have been committed that would require a criminal investigation. Michael and Emily Eavis said Bob Vylan had 'very much crossed a line.' They said 'there is no place at Glastonbury for antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence.' The BBC is facing criticism Britain's publicly funded national broadcaster is under fire for showing Bob Vylan's set, one of dozens of Glastonbury performances it streamed live online. The BBC said Monday that it should have cut off the broadcast after the 'antisemitic' and 'utterly unacceptable' comments, and has removed the performance from its website. But the government is demanding to know what 'due diligence' it did on Bob Vylan before the broadcast. Some media experts say the broadcaster is in a difficult position. Steven Barnett, professor of communications at the University of Westminster, said Britain's influential right-wing press,' including newspapers such as the Daily Mail and The Sun, frequently attack the BBC, 'for both commercial and ideological reasons.'
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Israel's ‘Operation Narnia' plan to kill Iran's top nuclear scientists was 15 years in the making: report
Israel's plan to kill more than a dozen of Iran's top nuclear scientists all at once was the culmination of a decade-and-a-half of stalking and targeting — and seemed so far-fetched it was dubbed 'Operation Narnia.' The June 13 stealth attack saw nine scientists wiped out when Israel dropped a barrage of missiles onto their Tehran homes in a near-simultaneous onslaught. At least five more were killed in subsequent strikes by the Jewish state The timing of the strikes, carried out at the outset of what President Trump has dubbed the '12-day war,' was chosen to ensure the scientists couldn't scatter or go into hiding, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing sources familiar with the plan. People mourn over the flag-draped coffins of Iranian army generals, nuclear scientists and their family members who were killed in Israeli strikes. AP The codename for the plot was a reference to the fantasy world created by author C.S. Lewis — and a nod to its complexity, as it required detailed intelligence about human targets, Israeli air superiority over Iran, and strategic deception by the governments in Jerusalem and Washington The planners had been closely tracking some of the top scientists since 2003, just a few years after Israeli intelligence first detected efforts by Iran to go nuclear, sources told the Journal. However, Israel appeared to step up its efforts in 2010, when two scientists were targeted in assassination attempts. One of those killed in this month's strikes — Fereydoon Abbasi, a former head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran — survived an attempt on his life in 2010. Israel has neither confirmed or denied its role in the deaths of five Iranian scientists between 2010 and 2020. Most of the scientists taken out in the 12-day war are believed to have been involved in the testing and assembling key parts of a nuclear warhead. Among those killed was Sayyed Seddighi Saber — a top scientist who had only just been sanctioned by the US due to his work on nuclear weapons, according to Israeli and Iranian media. The stealth attack on June 13 saw nine scientists wiped out when Israel dropped a barrage of missiles onto their homes in Tehran. UGC/AFP via Getty Images Saber was the head of Iran's Organization of Defensive Innovation and Research's Shahid Karimi Group, which specifically worked on explosives-related projects, the State Department said. 'It's one thing to lose that expertise slowly over time, especially if you are not trying to actually build a bomb. You have time to replace them,' Eric Brewer, a former US national security director for counterproliferation, told the outlet. 'But if you're in the middle of trying to build a bomb or if you see that as a potential near-term option, then it's going to have a bigger impact.' Meanwhile, a separate Israeli mission that wiped out scores of Iran's top military commanders was codenamed 'Red Wedding' — after a notorious scene from the TV show 'Game of Thrones.' In that attack, more than 200 Israeli Air Force aircraft hit roughly 100 targets, including nuclear facilities and ballistic missile factories. Dozens of high-ranking Iranian officials — including Gen. Hossein Salami, the head of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps; Mohammad Bagheri, chief of the country's military; and Gholam Ali Rashid, head of Iran's emergency command — were obliterated in the attack.
