US army rescinds Biden cybersecurity director: Who is Laura Loomer and why did she question Jen Easterly's appointment?
Joe Biden
.
Driscoll made the decision public in a social media post, stepping in as Pentagon leaders increasingly influence staffing and academic decisions at military academies.
Easterly, who also worked under President George W. Bush's national security adviser Condoleezza Rice was briefly appointed to a top position in West Point's social sciences department — but the announcement was quietly removed, The New York Times reported.
Why did Laura Loomer question Jen Easterly's appointment?
Earlier on Tuesday, West Point's announcement of Jen Easterly's appointment drew backlash from far-right activist Laura Loomer.
Loomer, who earlier this year prompted the dismissal of numerous national security officials she claimed were disloyal, mentioned defense secretary Pete Hegseth in a post, claiming Easterly worked "to silence Trump supporters under Biden."
In a memorandum regarding hiring guidelines, Driscoll stated that the academy "terminates the gratuitous service agreement with Jen Easterly."
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Learn More - How Watching Videos Can Boost Your Income
TheDaddest
Undo
by Taboola
by Taboola
"She will no longer serve as the Robert F. McDermott Distinguished Chair in the department of social sciences at the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York," he added.
Additionally, Driscoll mandated West Point to undertake a "top-down review" of its recruitment procedures.
The withdrawal of Easterly's appointment exemplifies the Pentagon's ongoing conflict with perceived political opponents.
Earlier this month, Hegseth declined to promote a senior Army officer, Lt. Gen. Douglas A Sims II, despite his leadership of troops across five deployments in Afghanistan and Iraq, citing the officer's close association with Gen. Mark A. Milley, a former Joint Chiefs of Staff chair disliked by Trump.
Who is Laura Loomer?
Laura Loomer, known for her conspiracy theories, has gained growing influence over national security staffing decisions during President Donald Trump's second term.
Loomer was against extending the H-1B program standing firm on the America First policy. She calls herself a "proud Islamophobe" and a "pro-while nationalist".
Loomer has run for Congress twice as a Republican, losing in Florida's 21st district in 2020 to Democrat Lois Frankel and in the 2022 primary for Florida's 11th district to incumbent Daniel Webster.
Despite these losses, she has remained a vocal supporter of former President Donald Trump, who endorsed her 2020 campaign and has praised her as a "free spirit."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
23 minutes ago
- First Post
As McConnell exits, Kentucky Republicans trade barbs in race for Senate power
At the iconic Fancy Farm picnic, Republican Senate hopefuls Daniel Cameron, Andy Barr, and Nate Morris vied for attention as the race heats up to succeed retiring Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell read more Three Republicans competing to succeed longtime Sen. Mitch McConnell tried to define themselves before the political attacks that could come Saturday when they share the spotlight at the Fancy Farm picnic, a daunting rite of passage for candidates seeking statewide office in Kentucky. 'You're going to hear some barbs tomorrow, but what I want to focus on is my vision for serving in the United States Senate,' Daniel Cameron, one of the candidates, told a GOP crowd Friday evening. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Cameron's rivals in next year's Senate primary, US Rep. Andy Barr and businessman Nate Morris, used their speeches at the event to introduce themselves to Republican voters in western Kentucky. All three could shift into attack mode against each other Saturday afternoon at the Fancy Farm picnic, the Bluegrass State's premier political event. Politicians compete to land the sharpest, and sometimes most outlandish, barbs, and have to endure shouting and heckling from their rivals' supporters. The picnic could turn into a Republican skirmish since Democratic politicians are mostly skipping the event. McConnell, the longest-serving Senate party leader in US history, revealed in February, on his 83rd birthday, that he won't seek another term in Kentucky and will retire when his current term ends. His pending retirement has set up a fierce competition for his seat. Warming up for their appearance that will air on statewide TV at Fancy Farm, the three GOP rivals kept to one script they've all shared, lavishing praise on Republican President Donald Trump. Barr portrayed his congressional experience as an advantage that sets him apart. He represents a district stretching from central Kentucky's bluegrass region to the Appalachian foothills. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'I'm an 'America First' fighter in the United States Congress,' Barr said Friday night. 'Other people like to talk about being a Trump guy or being with Trump. I've been with President Trump from day one. I'm not just talking about supporting President Trump. I've done it. I'm continuing to do it.' Giving voters a glimpse into his political philosophy, Barr said: 'I'm a guy who was raised in the era of Ronald Reagan. I believe in limited government, free enterprise and a strong national defense.' Morris, a tech entrepreneur, portrayed himself as a populist and a political outsider while trying to attach himself to Trump's popularity in Kentucky. 'What we've seen with this president is that he has put emphasis back on the American worker,' Morris said Friday night. 'And the people that have been in Washington for all this time – the elites – they sold out the American worker.' Morris also touted his hardline stance on immigration. He said he supports a moratorium on immigration into the United States until every immigrant currently in the country illegally is deported. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Cameron, who is Black, used his speech to rail against diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. 'We don't need … an America built on DEI,' Cameron said. 'We need a country that's built on MEI – merit, excellence and intelligence.' Cameron entered the Senate campaign with one clear advantage — a higher statewide name recognition than his rivals. Cameron served one term as state attorney general and lost to Democrat Andy Beshear in the 2023 governor's race. 'You've been with us in the past,' Cameron told the GOP group Friday night. 'I hope that you'll be with us this time. We're going to get it done because we know that what happens in this seat will have reverberations across this country.'
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's tariff reset: From Canada to Laos, even dealmakers face higher costs as legal fight brews; US allies & rivals hit with steep import taxes
US President Donald Trump's sweeping new tariff regime, set to take effect August 7, has triggered a wave of economic disruption across the globe, from low-income nations like Laos and Algeria to wealthy trade partners such as Canada and Switzerland. Under the new policy, countries face steep new import duties unless they agree to revised trade terms with the US. Trump has framed the plan as a campaign for "fairness" under the slogan of "Liberation Day," invoking a 1977 law to declare the trade deficit a national emergency and bypass Congress. But legal and economic blowback is mounting, with US courts weighing challenges and allies questioning Washington's reliability, AP reported. 'Everybody's a loser': Experts flag fallout "In many respects, everybody's a loser here," said Barry Appleton, co-director of the Center for International Law at New York Law School. "The U.S. consumer's a big loser," added Alan Wolff, a former WTO deputy director-general and trade official. Even countries that struck deals to reduce their tariff exposure are still facing steeper import duties than before. The UK agreed to raise tariffs on its exports to the US from 1.3% to 10%, despite the US running a trade surplus with it for nearly two decades. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your Finger Shape Says a Lot About Your Personality, Read Now Tips and Tricks Undo The EU and Japan accepted 15% tariffs, lower than the threatened rates but still significantly higher than last year's levels. Steep tariffs for those resisting Trump's demands Nations that refused to negotiate fared far worse. Laos and Algeria, despite low per capita incomes, now face tariffs of 40% and 30% respectively. Brazil was slapped with a 50% levy, reportedly over its treatment of former president Jair Bolsonaro. Canada drew a 35% tariff, tied in part to its position on Palestinian statehood. Even Switzerland, which did not reach an agreement, was hit with a 39% import tax, exceeding the originally announced 31%. "The Swiss probably wish that they had camped in Washington to make a deal," said Wolff, now a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. Legal battle escalates as costs rise for US consumers Five US businesses and 12 states have filed lawsuits against the new tariffs, arguing that Trump overstepped his authority. In May, the US Court of International Trade sided with plaintiffs, blocking the tariffs, though collections continue during the appeal process. Economists at Goldman Sachs estimate that US businesses and consumers are absorbing most of the cost. Companies including Walmart, Nike, Best Buy and Procter & Gamble have all raised prices in response. "This is a consumption tax, so it disproportionately affects those with lower incomes," said Appleton. "Your appliances are going to go up. Your TV and electronics are going to go up. Your video game devices, consoles are going to go up." According to Yale University's Budget Lab, the average US tariff has jumped from 2.5% at the start of 2025 to 18.3%, the highest since 1934. The lab estimates this will cost the average US household $2,400 annually. Winners still end up paying more Even countries that reached deals to avoid Trump's harshest penalties are still absorbing high tariffs. Taiwan saw its rate lowered from 32% to 20%, and Angola's from 32% to 15% — but both were paying less than 2% before the new policy. Lesotho, one of the poorest nations affected, saw its tariff reduced from 50% to 15%, though economists say the damage may already be done. "He [Trump] wants to do it because he found an undervalued franchise -- not because the market says you need to do a deal," said Wolff, referring to Trump's transactional approach to global trade. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Palestine statehood: More countries back two-state solution - what's keeping the dream a dream?
Palestinians carry sacks of flour taken from a humanitarian aid convoy en route to Gaza City, in the outskirts of Beit Lahiya, northern Gaza Strip. (Pic credit: AP) First France, then the United Kingdom, and now Canada: three of America's closest Western allies have recently voiced support for the idea of a Palestinian state, adding significant political heft to a movement already endorsed by more than 140 countries. On paper, it sounds like a diplomatic shift. In reality, the goal of Palestinian statehood may be further away than ever. Why now? The recent declarations by France, Britain, and Canada stem from several motives: Frustration with Israel's actions, especially in Gaza, where images of starving Palestinians have outraged many in the West. Domestic political pressure, as citizens and lawmakers demand their governments take a stand. A desire to reinvigorate peace efforts long stalled in the region. Meanwhile, Palestinians have welcomed these moves as a major boost for their cause, but Israel has rejected them outright, calling recognition of a Palestinian state tantamount to "rewarding terrorism." Where does the US stand? These announcements have left the US looking increasingly isolated in its steadfast support for Israel. US President Trump, who has aspirations for a Middle East peace legacy, has grown frustrated with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — especially over starvation in Gaza, which Netanyahu denies. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pirates Climb Aboard Cargo Ship - Watch What The Captain Did Next Tips and Tricks Undo Trump wants Saudi Arabia to normalise ties with Israel as part of expanding the Abraham Accords, but Riyadh has made it clear: there will be no normalisation without an irreversible path to Palestinian statehood. What's stopping it? A lot. Here's why the dream of a Palestinian state remains just that — a dream: 1. No partner in power Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu flat-out rejects a two-state solution. He has described the idea of a Palestinian state as a "launch pad to annihilate Israel." Even if Netanyahu were to waver, hardline ministers in his coalition have threatened to collapse the government over any hint of compromise. 2. Palestinian leadership vacuum On the Palestinian side, things aren't any more stable. The Palestinian Authority, which governs parts of the West Bank, is seen as weak and out of touch. Meanwhile, Hamas, which controls Gaza, is internationally designated as a terrorist group. So even if a state were created, who would run it? Who could actually deliver peace? 3. The geography just doesn't work anymore The borders discussed in the 1990s Oslo Accords, based on 1967 lines with minor land swaps, are now more fantasy than framework. Massive Israeli settlement expansion in the West Bank has carved up Palestinian territory into disconnected fragments. A contiguous, functioning Palestinian state under these conditions is nearly impossible. Can Israel accept a Palestinian state? The short answer: Not under Netanyahu's government. Netanyahu has declared that a Palestinian state would serve as a 'launch pad to annihilate Israel.' Even more extreme members of his coalition openly oppose any Palestinian sovereignty and have threatened to collapse the government if Netanyahu shows signs of compromise. Some cabinet members have even suggested starving Palestinians in Gaza rather than negotiating. What does it all mean? Recognition by France, the UK, and Canada is largely symbolic without Israel's agreement. In fact, it could even entrench Netanyahu further, allowing him to rally his base against what he will frame as unfair outside pressure. But at the same time, Israel's growing international isolation — especially among its traditional Western allies — could build pressure on leaders like Trump to reconsider their unwavering support, potentially reshaping the diplomatic landscape. The harsh reality Despite global calls, a Palestinian state faces more roadblocks now than in past decades. If anything, the conflict and entrenched positions have made it harder to imagine such a state ever existing — let alone thriving. The dream of Palestinian statehood continues to inspire hope — and trigger fierce debates. But right now, it's a dream suspended in diplomatic limbo, with no clear path, no consensus, and no timeline. The louder the world speaks, the more distant the solution seems.
